Hybrid triad provides fracture plane stability in a computational model of a Pauwels Type III hip fracture

Should a low starting point be abandoned for cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures?

A validated femoral neck fracture model stabilized with three inverted cannulated screws was used to consider different intraoperative scenarios when the inferior screw hole is inadvertently started too inferiorly. These scenarios were to: (1) abandon the misplaced inferior screw hole and restart this hole more proximally, or (2) accept the mispositioned placement of the inferior screw and insert the remaining superior screws parallel or convergent to the inferior screw. Utilizing the second option and accepting the errant hole was associated with the greatest interfragmentary motion and stresses in the bone and hardware. In contrast, the first option created an improved mechanical environment for healing.

Novel screw fixation placement configuration for the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis

Verticality of transcervical hip fractures in young patients is usually connected with typically high-energy fractures which are known as Pauwels type III. Artificial femoral head replacement surgery is mostly not considered for treating femoral neck fractures in such patients. The commonly used devices for the fixation of vertical femoral neck fractures are multiple screws or a sliding hip screw with or without an antirotation screw. Size, location and length of the screws are the most effective parameters in terms of the structural performance of internal fixation implants, but the optimal configuration of the screws is necessary to be investigated to direct the clinical practice. The aim of this study is to compare the biomechanical stability of the standard inverted triangle configuration with the various newly proposed x-crossed screw configurations. FEA simulations carried out in this study demonstrated that using an x-crossed-right assembly in treating Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures satisfies the biomechanical stability in terms of maximum von Mises stresses and maximum femoral head displacement. However, in terms of maximum relative neck fracture displacement, the x-crossed-right assembly would not entirely suffice the desired biomechanical stability. Therefore, using an x-crossed screw assembly in treating femoral neck fractures would provide the needed biomechanical stability.

Finite element comparative analysis of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND

Comparison of 4 cannulated lag screws (3 inverted triangular cannulated screws + anti-rotating screws;4 CLS), dynamic hip screws + derotational screws (DHS + DS), and femoral neck fixation system (FNS) in the treatment of Biomechanical properties of middle-aged Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

The femur CT data of a healthy young volunteer was selected and imported into Mimics software to construct a three-dimensional model of a normal femur. Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures were simulated according to the 70° fracture line. Use Geomagic and SolidWorks software to optimize and build CLS, DHS + DS, and FNS fracture internal fixation models. Finally, Ansys software was used to analyze the stress distribution, peak value, and maximum displacement of the proximal fracture fragment and internal fixation; the displacement distribution, and peak value of the fracture surface at the fracture end.

RESULTS

① The stress peaks of the proximal fracture fragments in the three groups were concentrated near the femoral calcar. The peak stress of the FNS group was the largest, and the DHS + DS group was the smallest. ②The displacement of the fracture fragments was all located at the top of the femur. The peak displacement of the FNS group was the largest, and the DHS + DS group was the smallest. ③ The internal fixation stress of the three groups is concentrated in the middle part of the device. The stress distribution of the first two groups of models is more uniform than that of FNS. The peak stress of FNS is the largest and the CLS is the smallest. ④ The internal fixed displacements are all located at the top of the model. The peak displacement of the CLS is the largest, and the DHS + DS is the smallest. ⑤ The displacement of the fracture surface is in the upper part of the fractured end. The peak displacement of the FNS group was the largest, and the DHS + DS group was the smallest.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the other two internal fixation methods, dynamic hip screw + derotational screw (DHS + DS) showed good biomechanical stability. When Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture occurs in young adults, DHS + DS can be given priority as the preferred treatment for this type of fracture.

Comparison of oblique triangular configuration and inverted equilateral triangular configuration of three cannulated screws in treating unstable femoral neck fracture: A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

The cross-sectional area of three parallel screws might affect the stability of the internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. The screws fixed in the oblique-triangle configuration (OTC) were assumed to have a larger cross-sectional area, but the biomechanical stability has not yet been validated. In this study, finite element analyses were performed to compare the biomechanical properties of the internal fixation fixed by the OTC and the traditional Inverted Equilateral Triangle Configuration (IETC).

METHOD

Pauwels type III fracture was established on the three-dimensional femoral model and three cannulated screws with the OTC and traditional IETC methods were applied. The oblique-triangle configuration with the largest area inscribed the femoral neck isthmus by the three screws was determined, the area and circumference of the cross-section formed by the OTC and IETC model were compared. Stress, strain, and displacement peaks of the two configuration models under different loads were compared. Twelve pairs of nodes on the fracture ends were selected and the displacement of the fracture ends was evaluated through the displacement between these nodes.

RESULTS

The area and circumference of the cross-section formed by the OTC were larger than those in the IETC model. The degree of stress dispersion around the screw holes in the OTC model was better than that of the IETC, but the stress distribution order of the three screws in the two models was consistent. The maximum stress, strain, displacement, and displacement of the fracture end in the OTC model were smaller than those in the IETC model. The stress, strain, displacement, and fracture end displacement peaks of the two fixed models gradually increase with the increase of loads.

CONCLUSION

The oblique-triangle configuration showed superior mechanical properties than the IETC in finite element analyses. This study suggests that when three screws are fixed in parallel method, the larger the cross-sectional area of the screw configuration, the better stability of the internal fixation might be obtained. Furthermore, the biomechanical properties of various spatial configurations and screw holes of the three parallel screws need to be considered before clinical practice.

Clinical Outcome and Biomechanical Analysis of Dynamic Hip Screw Combined with Derotation Screw in Treating Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures Based on Different Reduction Qualities in Young Patients (≤65 Years of Age)

Objective

To examine the clinical results and biomechanical mechanism of the dynamic hip screw (DHS) and derotation screw (DS) in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) based on different reduction qualities in young patients (≤65 years of age).

Methods

All patients with FNF who received closed reduction and internal fixation with DHS+DS from January 2014 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Data on demographics, surgery, clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications were collected. According to the reduction quality immediately after surgery, all patients were categorized into the positive buttress reduction group (PBRG) and the anatomical reduction group (ARG). The complications and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Meanwhile, the biomechanical mechanism of different reduction qualities was further analyzed with finite element analysis (FEA). The distribution of von Mises stress, the peak stress of internal fixation, and the displacement of the proximal fragment were compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 68 patients were included in our study. Among them, 31 were divided into the PBRG while 37 were in the ARG. The surgical time and fluoroscopy time were significantly shorter in the PBRG than in the ARG (p < 0.05). The degree of femoral neck shortening and the varus change of the femoral-neck shaft angle were lower in the PBRG compared to the ARG (p < 0.05). The excellent-good rate of the Harris hip score was higher in the PBRG compared to the ARG (83.9% vs. 64.8%). The FEA results demonstrated that the stress of DHS+CS and the downward displacement of the proximal femoral neck fragment were greater in the ARG than in the PBRG.

Conclusion

For displaced FNF with difficulty to achieve reduction, DHS+CS combined with positive buttress reduction was an effective treatment in young patients due to better mechanical support, shorter surgical time, less radiation exposure, and higher excellent-good rate of Harris hip score.

Salvaging Pull-Out Strength in a Previously Stripped Screw Site: A Comparison of Three Rescue Techniques

Screw stripping during bone fixation is a common occurrence during operations that results in decreased holding capacity and bone healing. We aimed to evaluate the rescue of the stripped screw site using screws of different dimensions. Five screw configurations were tested on cadaveric specimens for pull-out strength (POS). The configurations included a control screw tightened without stripping, a configuration voluntarily stripped and left in place, and three more configurations in which the stripped screws were replaced by a different screw with either increased overall length, diameter, or thread length. Each configuration was tested five times, with each screw tested once. The POS of the control screw, measured to be 153.6 ± 27 N, was higher than the POS measured after stripping and leaving the screw in place (57.1 ± 18 N, p = 0.001). The replacement of the stripped screw resulted in a POS of 158.4 ± 64 N for the screw of larger diameter, while the screws of the same diameter but increased length or those with extended thread length yielded POS values of 138.4 ± 42 and 185.7 ± 48 N, respectively. Screw stripping is a frequent intraoperative complication that, according to our findings, cannot be addressed by leaving the screw in place. The holding capacity of a stripped screw implanted in cancellous bone can successfully be restored with a different screw of either larger diameter, longer length, or extended thread length.

Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Fixation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Fracture fixation aims to provide stability and promote healing, but remains challenging in unstable and osteoporotic fractures with increased risk of construct failure and nonunion. The first part of this article reviews the clinical motivation behind finite element analysis of fracture fixation, its strengths and weaknesses, how models are developed and validated, and how outputs are typically interpreted. The second part reviews recent modeling studies of the femur and proximal humerus, areas with particular relevance to fragility fractures.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is some consensus in the literature around how certain modeling aspects are pragmatically formulated, including bone and implant geometries, meshing, material properties, interactions, and loads and boundary conditions. Studies most often focus on predicted implant stress, bone strain surrounding screws, or interfragmentary displacements. However, most models are not rigorously validated. With refined modeling methods, improved validation efforts, and large-scale systematic analyses, finite element analysis is poised to advance the understanding of fracture fixation failure, enable optimization of implant designs, and improve surgical guidance.