1
|
Mohammadi M, Zhang T, Cheung JPY. Modelling of Intervertebral Disc (IVD) with Structured Mesh and Crosswise Collagen Fibers. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2023; 2023:1-4. [PMID: 38557306 DOI: 10.1109/embc40787.2023.10485564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
The highly organized collagen network of human lumbar annulus fibrosus (AF) is fundamental to preserve the mechanical integrity of the intervertebral discs. In the healthy AF, fibers are embedded in a hydrated matrix and arranged in a crosswise fashion, giving an anisotropic structure capable to undergo large strains. For finite element analysis (FEA) of spine, modelling a realistic intervertebral disc geometry has always been a challenge. This paper proposes a simple yet efficient workflow details for generating structured mesh of the ground substance of the AF and the method for generating collagen fibers with controllable angles that are embedded in AF.Clinical Relevance- The biomechanical response of spine is usually studied by finite element analysis (FEA) of the assembly of vertebra and IVD and other components. The FEA results are always dependent on the correct generation of the geometry and the material of the components. For IVD, creating structured mesh with crosswise collagen fibers with adjustable angles will provide a better control over the anisotropic property definitions of the IVD and approaching a more realistic simulation.
Collapse
|
2
|
Oyekan AA, LeVasseur CM, Shaw JD, Donaldson WF, Lee JY, Anderst WJ. Changes in intervertebral sagittal alignment of the cervical spine from supine to upright. J Orthop Res 2023; 41:1538-1545. [PMID: 36484123 PMCID: PMC10250559 DOI: 10.1002/jor.25500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Cervical sagittal alignment is a critical component of successful surgical outcomes. Unrecognized differences in intervertebral alignment between supine and upright positions may affect clinical outcomes; however, these differences have not been quantified. Sixty-four patients scheduled to undergo one or two-level cervical arthrodesis for symptomatic pathology from C4-C5 to C6-C7, and forty-seven controls were recruited. Upright sagittal alignment was obtained through biplane radiographic imaging and measured using a validated process with accuracy better than 1° in rotation. Supine alignment was obtained from computed tomography scans. Coordinate systems used to measure supine and upright alignment were identical. Distances between adjacent bony endplates were measured to calculate disc height in each position. For both patients and controls, the C1-C2, C2-C3, and C3-C4 motion segments were in more lordosis when upright as compared with supine (all p < 0.001). However, the C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7 motion segments were in less lordosis when upright as compared with supine (all p ≤ 0.004). There was an interaction between group and position at the C1-C2 (p = 0.002) and C2-C3 (p = 0.001) motion segments, with the controls demonstrating a greater increase in lordosis at both motion segments when moving from supine to upright. The results indicate that cervical motion segment alignment changes between supine and upright positioning, those changes differ among motion segments, and cervical pathology affects the magnitude of these changes. Clinical Significance: Surgeons should be mindful of the differences in alignment between supine and upright imaging and the implications they may have on clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony A Oyekan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Pittsburgh Ortho Spine Research (POSR) Group, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Biodynamics Laboratory, Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Clarissa M LeVasseur
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Pittsburgh Ortho Spine Research (POSR) Group, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Biodynamics Laboratory, Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jeremy D Shaw
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Pittsburgh Ortho Spine Research (POSR) Group, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Biodynamics Laboratory, Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - William F Donaldson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Pittsburgh Ortho Spine Research (POSR) Group, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Biodynamics Laboratory, Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joon Y Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Pittsburgh Ortho Spine Research (POSR) Group, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Biodynamics Laboratory, Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - William J Anderst
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Pittsburgh Ortho Spine Research (POSR) Group, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Biodynamics Laboratory, Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Finite Element Method for the Evaluation of the Human Spine: A Literature Overview. J Funct Biomater 2021; 12:jfb12030043. [PMID: 34449646 PMCID: PMC8395922 DOI: 10.3390/jfb12030043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The finite element method (FEM) represents a computer simulation method, originally used in civil engineering, which dates back to the early 1940s. Applications of FEM have also been used in numerous medical areas and in orthopedic surgery. Computing technology has improved over the years and as a result, more complex problems, such as those involving the spine, can be analyzed. The spine is a complex anatomical structure that maintains the erect posture and supports considerable loads. Applications of FEM in the spine have contributed to the understanding of bone biomechanics, both in healthy and abnormal conditions, such as scoliosis, fractures (trauma), degenerative disc disease and osteoporosis. However, since FEM is only a digital simulation of the real condition, it will never exactly simulate in vivo results. In particular, when it concerns biomechanics, there are many features that are difficult to represent in a FEM. More FEM studies and spine research are required in order to examine interpersonal spine stiffness, young spine biomechanics and model accuracy. In the future, patient-specific models will be used for better patient evaluations as well as for better pre- and inter-operative planning.
Collapse
|
4
|
Büchler P, Räber J, Voumard B, Berger S, Bell B, Sutter N, Funariu S, Hasler C, Studer D. The Spinebot—A Robotic Device to Intraoperatively Quantify Spinal Stiffness. J Med Device 2021. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4049915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Degenerative spine problems and spinal deformities have high socio-economic impacts. Current surgical treatment is based on bony fusion that can reduce mobility and function. Precise descriptions of the biomechanics of normal, deformed, and degenerated spinal segments under in vivo conditions are needed to develop new approaches that preserve spine function. This study developed a system that intraoperatively measures the three-dimensional segmental stiffness of patient's spine. SpineBot, a parallel kinematic robot, was developed to transmit loads to adjacent vertebrae. A force/torque load cell mounted on the SpineBot measured the moment applied to the spinal segment and calculated segmental stiffnesses. The accuracy of SpineBot was characterized ex vivo by comparing its stiffness measurement of five ovine specimens to measurements obtained with a reference spinal testing system. The SpineBot can apply torques up to 10 N·m along all anatomical axes with a total range of motion of about 11.5 deg ± 0.5 deg in lateral bending, 4.5 deg ± 0.3 deg in flexion/extension, and 2.6 deg ± 0.5 deg in axial rotation. SpineBot's measurements are noisier than the reference system, but the correlation between SpineBot and reference measurements was high (R2 > 0.8). In conclusion, SpineBot's accuracy is comparable to that of current reference systems but can take intraoperative measurements. SpineBot can improve our understanding of spinal biomechanics in patients who have the pathology of interest, and take these measurements in the natural physiological environment, giving us information essential to developing new “nonfusion” products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Büchler
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland
| | - Jonas Räber
- Institute of Mechanical Engineering and Energy Technology, Lucerne School of Engineering and Architecture, Luzern 6002, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin Voumard
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland
| | - Steve Berger
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland
| | - Brett Bell
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland
| | - Nino Sutter
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Funariu
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland
| | - Carol Hasler
- Orthopaedic Department, Children's Hospital, University of Basel, Basel 4056, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Studer
- Orthopaedic Department, Children's Hospital, University of Basel, Basel 4056, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|