1
|
Möhlhenrich SC, Kniha K, Peters F, Heitzer M, Szalma J, Prescher A, Danesh G, Hölzle F, Modabber A. Evaluation of bone contact area and intercondylar distance changes in orthognathic surgery - a comparison between BSSO and HSSO technique depending on mandibular displacement extent. Clin Oral Investig 2024; 28:182. [PMID: 38424318 PMCID: PMC10904418 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05584-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The present study aims to assess the impact of bilateral and high oblique sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO/HSSO), as well as displacement distances and directions on the expected and achievable bone contact area (BCA) and changes in the intercondylar distance (ICD). The primary question addressed is whether mandibular splitting through BSSO results in a greater BCA and/or ICD when compared to splitting through HSSO. MATERIALS AND METHODS Totally 80 mandibular displacements were performed on 20 fresh cadavers, for each subject, four splints were produces to facilitate mandibular advancement as well as setbacks of 4 and 8 mm. Pre- and postoperative CBCT scans were performed to plan the surgical procedures and to analyze the expected and achieved BCA and ICD. RESULTS Regarding the maximum mandibular displacement, the expected BCA for HSSO/BSSO were 352.58 ± 96.55mm2 and 1164.00 ± 295.50mm2, respectively, after advancement and 349.11 ± 98.42mm2 and 1344.70 ± 287.23mm2, respectively, after setback. The achieved BCA for HSSO/BSSO were 229.37 ± 75.90mm2 and 391.38 ± 189.01mm2, respectively, after advancement and 278.03 ± 97.65mm2 and 413.52 ± 169.52 mm2, respectively after setback. The expected ICD for HSSO/BSSO were 4.51 ± 0.73 mm and 3.25 ± 1.17 mm after advancement and - 5.76 ± 1.07 mm and - 4.28 ± 1.58 mm after setback. The achieved ICD for HSSO/BSSO were 2.07 ± 2.9 mm and 1.7 ± 0.60 mm after advancement and - 2.57 ± 2.78 mm and - 1.28 ± 0.84 mm after setback. Significant differences between the BCA after HSSO and BSSO were at each displacement (p < 0.001), except for the achieved BCA after 8-mm setback and advancement (p ≥ 0.266). No significant differences were observed regarding ICD, except for the expected ICD after 8-mm setback and advancement (p ≤ 0.037). CONCLUSIONS Compared to the virtual planning, the predictability regarding BCA and ICD was limited. ICD showed smaller clinical changes, BCA decreased significantly in the BSSO group. CLINICAL RELEVANCE BCA and ICD might have been less important in choosing the suitable split technique. in orthognathic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich
- Department of Orthodontics, University of Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen Str. 45, 58455, Witten, Germany.
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Kristian Kniha
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Florian Peters
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marius Heitzer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Josef Szalma
- Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical School, University of Pécs, 1. Tüzér St., Pécs, 7623, Hungary
| | - Andreas Prescher
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, Medical Faculty of RWTH-Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Gholamreza Danesh
- Department of Orthodontics, University of Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen Str. 45, 58455, Witten, Germany
| | - Frank Hölzle
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ali Modabber
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Graillon N, Foletti JM, Godio-Raboutet Y, Guyot L, Varazzani A, Thollon L. Mandibular Titanium Miniplates Change the Biomechanical Behaviour of the Mandible in the Case of Facial Trauma: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:994. [PMID: 37760096 PMCID: PMC10525150 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10090994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Our study aimed to compare the biomechanical behaviour of mandibles with or without titanium miniplates when subjected to an impact after bone healing using a finite element model (FEM) of the human mandible. We simulated mandibular trauma on an FEM of a human mandible carrying or not two parasymphyseal miniplates and applying a concentrated force of 2000 N to four different areas, including the insertion area, the area straddling the edge of the miniplates and the adjacent bone, at a distance from the miniplates on the symphysis, and on the basilar border of the mandible below the miniplates. Then, we compared the Von Mises stress distributions between the two models. In the case of an impact on the miniplates, the maximum Von Mises stress occurred in two specific areas, on the cortical bone at the posterior border of the two miniplates at a distance from the impact, while in the model without miniplates, the Von Mises stresses were homogenously distributed in the impact area. The presence of titanium miniplates in the case of trauma affects the biomechanical behaviour of the mandible and could cause more complex fractures. We recommend informing patients of this potential risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Graillon
- Laboratoire de Bioméchanique Appliquée (LBA), Gustave Eiffel University/Aix-Marseille University, 13015 Marseille, France; (J.-M.F.); (Y.G.-R.); (L.G.); (L.T.)
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Marseille (APHM), Conception University Hospital, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Marc Foletti
- Laboratoire de Bioméchanique Appliquée (LBA), Gustave Eiffel University/Aix-Marseille University, 13015 Marseille, France; (J.-M.F.); (Y.G.-R.); (L.G.); (L.T.)
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Marseille (APHM), Conception University Hospital, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Yves Godio-Raboutet
- Laboratoire de Bioméchanique Appliquée (LBA), Gustave Eiffel University/Aix-Marseille University, 13015 Marseille, France; (J.-M.F.); (Y.G.-R.); (L.G.); (L.T.)
| | - Laurent Guyot
- Laboratoire de Bioméchanique Appliquée (LBA), Gustave Eiffel University/Aix-Marseille University, 13015 Marseille, France; (J.-M.F.); (Y.G.-R.); (L.G.); (L.T.)
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Marseille (APHM), Conception University Hospital, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Andrea Varazzani
- Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Stomatology and Oral Surgery, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon-Sud Hospital—Claude-Bernard Lyon 1 University, 69310 Pierre-Benite, France;
| | - Lionel Thollon
- Laboratoire de Bioméchanique Appliquée (LBA), Gustave Eiffel University/Aix-Marseille University, 13015 Marseille, France; (J.-M.F.); (Y.G.-R.); (L.G.); (L.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Comparison of two surgical techniques (HOO vs. BSSO) for mandibular osteotomies in orthognathic surgery-a 10-year retrospective study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022:10.1007/s10006-022-01073-y. [PMID: 35595944 DOI: 10.1007/s10006-022-01073-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To retrospectively compare the high-angled sagittal split osteotomy (HOO) and the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) for the correction of skeletal dysgnathias regarding intra- and postoperative complications. METHODS The electronic medical records of all patients treated with an orthognathic surgery at the Department for Oral, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany, between the years 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS Two hundred ninety-one patients were included. The overall complication rates were 19.78% (BSSO) compared to 12.5% (HOO) (p = 0.14). Significant differences were found regarding the operation time (HOO < BSSO, p = 0.02), material failure (HOO > BSSO, p = 0.04), and early recurrence requiring revision surgery (HOO < BSSO, p = 0.002). The use of a ramus plate significantly reduced the risk of plate failure (2.8% < 13.6%, p = 0.05). More bad splits (p = 0.08) and early sensory disorders (p = 0.07) occurred in the BSSO group. CONCLUSION The HOO presents a possible alternative to the BSSO since newly developed osteosynthesis material significantly reduces the risk of material failure. The BSSO is accompanied by higher risks of developing complications like a bad split and sensory disorders but, however, remains the standard for large anterior-posterior transpositions of the mandible.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kämmerer PW, Müller D, Linz F, Peron PF, Pabst A. Patient-specific 3D-printed cutting guides for high oblique sagittal osteotomy-an innovative surgical technique for nerve preservation in orthognathic surgery. J Surg Case Rep 2021; 2021:rjab345. [PMID: 34457236 PMCID: PMC8390334 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjab345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) of the mandible according to Obwegeser/Dal Pont is considered to be gold standard in orthognathic surgery. Frequently reported complications of BSSO are injuries of the mandibular nerve resulting in paresthesia/anesthesia as well as inadequate mandibular bone fracturing ('bad split'). High oblique sagittal osteotomy (HOSO) was introduced to overcome these complications. We present an innovative HOSO modification using patient-specific 3D-printed cutting guides positioned on the outside of the ascending mandibular ramus and fixed in the incisura semilunaris, precisely marking the optimal height and angle of the osteotomy. Advantages are a decreased operation time due to the simplicity of this less invasive procedure, a potentially reduced frequency of mandibular nerve damage and bad splits as well as a lower bleeding risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peer W Kämmerer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Plastic Operations, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Daniel Müller
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Plastic Operations, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Friedemann Linz
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Plastic Operations, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Pabst
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Plastic Operations, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Herrera-Vizcaino C, Seifert L, Berdan M, Ghanaati S, Klos M, Landes C, Sader R. Revision of 116 orthognathic surgery patients operated on with the high-oblique sagittal osteotomy (HOSO): a retrospective case series (PROCESS-compliant article). Clin Oral Investig 2020; 25:3229-3236. [PMID: 33106901 PMCID: PMC8060227 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03653-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The high-oblique sagittal osteotomy (HOSO) is an alternative to a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). Due to its novelty, there are no long-term studies which have focused on describing the incidence and type of complications encountered in the post-operative follow-up. The aim of this retrospective study is to analyze patients operated on with this surgical technique and the post-operative complications encountered. PATIENT AND METHODS The electronic medical records of all patients treated with orthognathic surgery at the Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany, between the years 2009 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS A total of 116 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The cases operated on with the standard osteosynthesis (X, Y, and straight) showed a complication rate of 36.37% (n = 4/11). The cases operated on with the HOSO-dedicated plates (HOSO-DP) showed, in total, a complication rate of 6.67% (n = 7/105). The most common post-operative complication resulting from both fixation methods was a reduction in mouth opening and TMJ pain for 4.3%. During the first years of performing the surgery (2009-211), a variety of standard plates had material failure causing non-union or pseudarthrosis. No cases of material failure were observed in the cases operated on with the HOSO-DP. The statistical results showed a highly significant dependence of a reduction in OP-time over the years, when the HOSO was performed without additional procedures (R2 > 0.83, P < 0.0015). CONCLUSION The rate of complications in the HOSO were shown to be comparable to the rate of complications from the BSSO reported in the literature. Moreover, the use of the ramus dedicated plate appears to provide enough stability to the bone segments, making the surgery safer. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The HOSO needs to be considered by surgeons as an alternative to BSSO. Once the use of the HOSO-DP was established, the rate of complications and the operation time reduced considerably.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Herrera-Vizcaino
- Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - L Seifert
- Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - M Berdan
- Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - S Ghanaati
- Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - M Klos
- Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - C Landes
- Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Sana Klinikum, Offenbach am Main, Germany
| | - Robert Sader
- Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|