Influence of renal artery stenosis morphology on hemodynamics

A new computational fluid dynamics based noninvasive assessment of portacaval pressure gradient

Accurate assessment of portacaval pressure gradient (PCG) in patients with portal hypertension (PH) is of great significance both for diagnosis and treatment. This study aims to develop a noninvasive method for assessing PCG in PH patients and evaluate its accuracy and effectiveness. This study recruited 37 PH patients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). computed tomography angiography was used to create three dimension (3D) models of each patient before and after TIPS. Doppler ultrasound examinations were conducted to obtain the patient's portal vein flow (or splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein). Using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation, the patient's pre-TIPS and post-TIPS PCG was determined by the 3D models and ultrasound measurements. The accuracy of these noninvasive results was then compared to clinical invasive measurements. The results showed a strong linear correlation between the PCG simulated by CFD and the clinical invasive measurements both before and after TIPS (R2 = 0.998, P < 0.001 and R2 = 0.959, P < 0.001). The evaluation accuracy of this noninvasive method reached 94 %, and the influence of ultrasound result errors on the numerical accuracy was found to be marginal if the error was less than 20 %. Furthermore, the information about the hemodynamic environment in the portal system was obtained by this numerical method. Spiral flow patterns were observed in the portal vein of some patients. In a conclusion, this study proposes a noninvasive numerical method for assessing PCG in PH patients before and after TIPS. This method can assist doctors in accurately diagnosing patients and selecting appropriate treatment plans. Additionally, it can be used to further investigate potential biomechanical causes of complications related to TIPS in the future.

Hemodynamic analysis of unilateral and bilateral renal artery stenosis based on fluid-structure interaction

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) hypertension is a common type of secondary hypertension. This paper aimed to explore how unilateral renal artery stenosis (Uni-RAS) and bilateral renal artery stenosis (Bi-RAS) caused renovascular hypertension with the fluid-structure interaction (FSI) method. Based on a real RAS model, 20 ideal models with different stenosis degrees were established by modifying the stenosis segment. The hemodynamic parameters at different degrees of stenosis, mass flow rate (MFR), pressure drop (PD), fractional flow reserve (FFR), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and relative residence time (RRT), were numerically calculated by the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method. The numerical results showed that RAS caused the decrease of MFR, and the increase of PD and the proportion of high OSI and high RRT. In the case of RAS, it could not be regarded as a reference indicator for causing renovascular hypertension that the value of FFR was greater than 0.9. In addition, the results of the statistical analysis indicated that Uni-RAS and Bi-RAS were statistically different for MFR, PD and the proportion of high RRT.

Evaluating Short-Term and Long-Term Risks Associated with Renal Artery Stenosis Position and Severity: A Hemodynamic Study

Background: Moderate renal artery stenosis (50-70%) may lead to uncontrolled hypertension and eventually cause irreversible damage to renal function. However, the clinical criteria for interventional treatment are still ambiguous in this condition. This study investigated the impact of the position and degree of renal artery stenosis on hemodynamics near the renal artery to assess the short-term and long-term risks associated with this disease. Methods: Calculation models with different degrees of stenosis (50%, 60%, and 70%) located at different positions in the right renal artery were established based on the computed tomography angiography (CTA) of a personalized case. And computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to analyze hemodynamic surroundings near the renal artery. Results: As the degree of stenosis increases and the stenosis position is far away from the aorta, there is a decrease in renal perfusion. An analysis of the wall shear stress (WSS)-related parameters indicated areas near the renal artery (downstream of the stenosis and the entrance of the right renal artery) with potential long-term risks of thrombosis and inflammation. Conclusion: The position and degree of stenosis play a significant role in judging short-term risks associated with renal perfusion. Moreover, clinicians should consider not only short-term risks but also independent long-term risk factors, such as certain regions of 50% stenosis with adequate renal perfusion may necessitate prompt intervention.

A Comparative Study on the Hemodynamic Performance Within Cross and Non-cross Stent-Grafts for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms With an Angulated Neck

Objectives: Cross-limb stent grafts for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are often employed for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with significant aortic neck angulation. Neck angulation may be coronal or sagittal; however, previous hemodynamic studies of cross-limb EVAR stent grafts (SGs) primarily utilized simplified planar neck geometries. This study examined the differences in flow patterns and hemodynamic parameters between crossed and non-crossed limb SGs at different spatial neck angulations.

Methods: Ideal models consisting of 13 cross and 13 non-cross limbs were established, with coronal and sagittal angles ranging from 0 to 90°. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to capture the hemodynamic information, and the differences were compared.

Results: With regards to the pressure drop index, the maximum difference caused by the configuration and angular direction was 4.6 and 8.0%, respectively, but the difference resulting from the change in aneurysm neck angle can reach 27.1%. With regards to the SAR-TAWSS index, the maximum difference caused by the configuration and angular direction was 7.8 and 9.8%, respectively, but the difference resulting from the change in aneurysm neck angle can reach 26.7%. In addition, when the aneurysm neck angle is lower than 45°, the configuration and angular direction significantly influence the OSI and helical flow intensity index. However, when the aneurysm neck angle is greater than 45°, the hemodynamic differences of each model at the same aneurysm neck angle are reduced.

Conclusion: The main factor affecting the hemodynamic index was the angle of the aneurysm neck, while the configuration and angular direction had little effect on the hemodynamics. Furthermore, when the aneurysm neck was greatly angulated, the cross-limb technique did not increase the risk of thrombosis.

Hemodynamic Characteristics of Patients With Suspected Coronary Heart Disease at Their Initial Visit

Purpose

It is difficult for doctors to decide whether patients with suspected coronary heart disease classified as Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) < 3 should be administered preventive treatment, or whether non-atherosclerotic chest pain should be considered. The aim of the current study was to investigate coronary hemodynamic characteristics in such patients, which may provide more information on their stenosis and be helpful for initial diagnoses.

Methods

Two patient-specific models were reconstructed based on the coronary computed tomographic angiography underwent in 2012. Patient 1 was classified as CAD-RADS 0, and was readmitted to hospital due to coronary artery disease within 5 years. Patient 2 was classified as CAD-RADS 2, and has experienced no adverse events to date. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was used to obtain hemodynamic parameters including flow rate waveform, flow streamlines, time-average wall shear stress (TAWSS), and oscillatory shear index (OSI).

Results

Patient 1 exhibited no physiological characteristics of right coronary artery flow waveform, large areas of low TAWSS, and slow blood flow in the proximal and middle segments of the left anterior descending branch. Patient 2 exhibited reduced coronary supply, small and separate areas of abnormal TAWSS, and a higher left anterior descending branch OSI than patient 1.

Conclusion

Hemodynamic abnormalities may play an important role in the prognosis of patients with coronary stenosis, and patient-specific hemodynamic characteristics may facilitate more accurate initial diagnosis, and better management. Overall hemodynamics (along the whole vessel) warranted attention at the time of the initial visit in patients classified as CAD-RADS < 3.