Evaluation of biomechanics using different traction devices in distalization of maxillary molar with clear aligners: a finite element study

Evaluating the efficacy and predictability of distalization protocols for maxillary molars in Class II treatment with clear Aligners: A narrative review

Introduction

Clear aligner therapy (CAT) has become a popular orthodontic treatment option for adolescent and adult patients for its aesthetic, patient's comfort, and convenient features. It involves a programmed and simulated virtual planning, tracking, and quantifying of tooth movement to target positions. Over the years, the therapeutic scope of CAT has increased dramatically to include a wider range of malocclusions with the aid of orthodontic auxiliaries as adjunctive biomechanics. This narrative review aims at summarizing and evaluating current practices, efficacy and predictability of sequential distalization protocol for maxillary molars in class II treatment using CAT.

Methods

A systematic search for this review included electronic literature databases of MEDLINE via Pubmed, Web of Science, ProQuest and Embase to include all available published articles including systematic reviews, books, cases reports, and narrative literature reviews.

Results

Most published studies are retrospective examining small sample size. Current literature should be interpreted carefully as studies differ in their outcome measurement process and timing. Although reports show 2-3 mm of molar distalization is possible, a distinguish between bodily movement and molar tip back should be made. There is a discrepancy between computer-assisted predicted outcome and actual clinical outcome reported in literature.

Conclusion

Molar distalization using CAT is possible. However, randomised trials with large sample size are necessary to draw more definitive conclusion about its efficacy and predictability. Due to the discrepancy between computer-assisted predicted outcome and actual clinical outcome, case refinement and possible altered treatment duration should be discussed with the patient in the planning stage. Since the process of molar distalization using CAT involves undesirable reaction force, it is essential to reinforce anchorage with suitable auxiliaries like composite attachments, class II/III elastics, and TADs.

Comparative assessment of orthodontic clear aligner versus fixed appliance for anterior retraction: a finite element study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to conduct a comparative evaluation of different designs of clear aligners and examine the disparities between clear aligners and fixed appliances.

METHODS

3D digital models were created, consisting of a maxillary dentition without first premolars, maxilla, periodontal ligaments, attachments, micro-implant, 3D printed lingual retractor, brackets, archwire and clear aligner. The study involved the creation of five design models for clear aligner maxillary anterior internal retraction and one design model for fixed appliance maxillary anterior internal retraction, which were subsequently subjected to finite element analysis. These design models included: (1) Model C0 Control, (2) Model C1 Posterior Micro-implant, (3) Model C2 Anterior Micro-implant, (4) Model C3 Palatal Plate, (5) Model C4 Lingual Retractor, and (6) Model F0 Fixed Appliance.

RESULTS

In the clear aligner models, a consistent pattern of tooth movement was observed. Notably, among all tested models, the modified clear aligner Model C3 exhibited the smallest differences in sagittal displacement of the crown-root of the central incisor, vertical displacement of the central incisor, sagittal displacement of the second premolar and second molar, as well as vertical displacement of posterior teeth. However, distinct variations in tooth movement trends were observed between the clear aligner models and the fixed appliance model. Furthermore, compared to the fixed appliance model, significant increases in tooth displacement were achieved with the use of clear aligner models.

CONCLUSIONS

In the clear aligner models, the movement trend of the teeth remained consistent, but there were variations in the amount of tooth displacement. Overall, the Model C3 exhibited better torque control and provided greater protection for posterior anchorage teeth compared to the other four clear aligner models. On the other hand, the fixed appliance model provides superior anterior torque control and better protection of the posterior anchorage teeth compared to clear aligner models. The clear aligner approach and the fixed appliance approach still exhibit a disparity; nevertheless, this study offers a developmental direction and establishes a theoretical foundation for future non-invasive, aesthetically pleasing, comfortable, and efficient modalities of clear aligner treatment.

Improvements of tooth movement efficiency and torque control in expanding the arch with clear aligners: a finite element analysis

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of different movement strategies, embossment structures, and torque compensation of the aligner on tooth movement during arch expansion using clear aligners by finite element analysis. Methods: Models comprising the maxilla, dentition, periodontal ligament, and aligners were created and imported into a finite element analysis software. The tests were performed using the following: three orders of tooth movement (including alternating movement with the first premolar and first molar, whole movement with second premolar and first molar or premolars and first molar), four different shapes of embossment structures (ball, double ball, cuboid, cylinder, with 0.05, 0.1, 0.15-mm interference) and torque compensation (0°, 1°, 2°, 3°, 4°, and 5°). Results: The expansion of clear aligners caused the target tooth to move obliquely. Alternating movement resulted in higher movement efficiency with lower anchorage loss as compared with whole movement. Embossment increased the efficiency of crown movement but did not contribute positively to torque control. As the angle of compensation increased, the tendency of oblique tooth movement was gradually controlled; however, the movement efficiency decreased concurrently, and stress distribution on the periodontal ligament became more even. For each 1° increase in compensation, the torque per millimeter of the first premolar would decrease by 0.26°/mm, and the crown movement efficiency eliminate decreased by 4.32%. Conclusion: Alternating movement increases the efficiency of the arch expansion by the aligner and reduces anchorage loss. Torque compensation should be designed to enhance torque control in arch expansion using an aligner.