Love, faith and hope - a secondary analysis of prostate cancer survivors and their partners

The psychological impact of prostate cancer after treatment: a critical review of the literature

Aim:

This critical review of the literature seeks to understand the psychological impact that treatment interventions may have on prostate cancer (PC) survivors.

Materials and Methods:

A literature search was conducted using databases of peer-reviewed literature. The search terms used were devised using the building-blocks technique to divide the query into facets. The articles were manually assessed for relevance and appraised using the relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Government guidelines and regulations were also used following a manual search on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) website. This process resulted in a total of 12 sources being included in the critical review.

Results:

The key themes that arose from the review were masculinity, depression, anxiety and psychological implications related to sexual functioning. Psychological impact varies on an individual basis and is influenced by the quality of a patient’s experience during and after treatment in relation to sufficient information giving and support.

Findings:

Open communication should be encouraged by healthcare professionals to assess patient mental wellbeing. The extent of psychological impact varies on an individual basis; however, there are predictive factors that can make an individual more at risk of being affected psychologically post-PC treatment.

Adoption, Acceptability, and Effectiveness of a Mobile Health App for Personalized Prostate Cancer Survivorship Care: Protocol for a Realist Case Study of the Ned App

Background

By 2030, prostate cancer will be the most commonly diagnosed cancer in North America. To mitigate this impending challenge, comprehensive support mechanisms for disease- and treatment-specific changes in health and well-being must be proactively designed and thoughtfully implemented for streamlined survivorship care. mHealth apps have been lauded as a promising complement to current outpatient treatment and monitoring strategies, but have not yet been widely used to support prostate cancer survivorship needs. A realist evaluation is needed to examine the impact of such apps on the prostate cancer survivorship experience.

Objective

We seek to gain an understanding of how an mHealth app for prostate cancer survivorship care called Ned (No Evident Disease) is adopted and accepted by patients, caregivers, and clinicians. We also aim to determine the effect of Ned on health-related quality of life, satisfaction with cancer care, unmet needs, self-efficacy, and prostate cancer-related levels of anxiety.

Methods

The Ned case study is a 12-month mixed-methods embedded single-case study with a nested within-group pre-post comparison of health outcomes. We will give 400 patients, 200 caregivers, and 10 clinicians access to Ned. Participants will be asked to complete study assessments at baseline, 2 months, 6 months, and 12 months. We will conduct 30 semistructured qualitative interviews with patients (n=20) and their caregivers (n=10) poststudy to gain insight into their experience with the app.

Results

We recruited our first survivor in October 2017 and anticipate completing this study by May 2019.

Conclusions

This will, to our knowledge, be the first realist case study to evaluate an app for prostate cancer survivorship care. Prostate cancer survivors are set to increase in number and longevity, heightening the need for integrated survivorship solutions to provide them with optimal and durable outcomes. The knowledge gained from this study will comprehensively inform how and why Ned works, for whom, and in what circumstances. Understanding the impact of digital health interventions such as Ned on how survivors care for themselves is critical to realizing patient-centered care.

Men's experiences after prostatectomy: A meta-synthesis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review was to critically analyze, interpret, and synthesize the literature on men's experiences after prostatectomy.

DESIGN

A meta-synthesis was conducted.

DATA SOURCES

Six databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AgeLine, and Sociological Abstract) were searched from the earliest year to 2016. From initial searches with main keywords (prostatectomy and qualitative study), 642 abstracts were retrieved. Based on inclusion criteria (English-language published qualitative study focusing on the experience of men after prostatectomy), this meta-synthesis included 15 studies.

REVIEW METHODS

Components of meta-study (meta-data-analysis, meta-method, and meta-theory) were employed to analyze, interpret, and synthesize the results of included studies. Three authors independently appraised the methodological quality of the included studies using a combined appraisal tool (The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Research Checklist and Paterson et al.'s Primary Research Appraisal Tool). The Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research Statement was used to strengthen the completeness of reporting.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria and quality appraisal guidelines, however, most did not identify or relate their findings to theory. Through meta-synthesis, five themes emerged: facing a life-changing situation, experiencing changes and their impact, striving to manage and adjust to changes, coping with masculinity, and anticipating the future.

CONCLUSIONS

After prostatectomy, men experienced physical, psychological, and social changes. Many men are physically and psychologically ill-prepared and suffer from lack of information and support. Health care providers need to be sensitive to men's needs including perceptions of masculinity, realize the importance of support as an essential component of men's adaptation post-prostatectomy, and provide comprehensive and individualized patient-centered interventions. Future studies need to use rigorous research methods, clearly identify methodological approaches, and consider employing or developing theory.