1
|
Oyesanya TO, Loflin C, You H, Myers J, Kandel M, Johnson K, Strauman T, Hawes J, Byom L, Gonzalez-Guarda R, Houtven CV, Agarwal S, Bettger JP. The BETTER Traumatic Brain Injury Transitional Care Intervention: A Feasibility Study. West J Nurs Res 2023; 45:902-912. [PMID: 37542381 PMCID: PMC10947151 DOI: 10.1177/01939459231189786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and clinical outcome measures of BETTER (Brain Injury Education, Training, and Therapy to Enhance Recovery), a culturally tailored traumatic brain injury (TBI) transitional care intervention, among diverse younger adult patients with TBI (age 18-64) and their caregivers. Trained clinical interventionists addressed patient/family needs; established goals; coordinated post-hospital care and resources; and provided patient/family training on self- and family-management coping skills. Fifteen dyads enrolled (N = 31, 15 patients, 16 caregivers). All completed baseline data; 74.2% (n = 23; 10 patients, 13 caregivers) completed 8-week data; 83.8% (n = 26; 13 each) completed 16-week data. Approximately 38% (n = 12, 3 patients, 9 caregivers) completed acceptability data, showing positive experiences (mean = 9.25, range 0-10; SD = 2.01). Overall and mental quality of life (QOL) scores did not differ over time but physical QOL scores did improve over time (baseline: 30.3, 8 weeks: 46.5, 16 weeks: 61.6; p = 0.0056), which was considered to be a suitable outcome measure for a future trial. BETTER is a promising intervention with implications to improve TBI care standards. Research is needed to determine efficacy in a randomized trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Callan Loflin
- Duke University School of Nursing
- Duke University School of Medicine
| | | | | | - Melissa Kandel
- Duke University Health System, Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy
| | - Karen Johnson
- Duke University Health System, Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy
| | | | | | - Lindsey Byom
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Allied Health Sciences
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pilli K, Worne B, Simpson G. Clinician experiences with using assistive technology in brain injury rehabilitation: a survey of clinician capability, attitudes, and barriers. BRAIN IMPAIR 2023; 24:185-203. [PMID: 38167181 DOI: 10.1017/brimp.2023.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rise in assistive technology (AT) solutions to support people with an acquired brain injury (ABI) has warranted clinicians to build capability in assisting clients to select goal-centred AT. The study explored, amongst ABI clinicians, (a) capability, attitudes, and barriers with AT implementation, (b) age-related differences in technology self-efficacy and capability (c) strategies to support AT use in rehabilitation and (d) thematic analysis of AT-related experiences. METHOD Mixed methods design. Online survey circulated to ABI clinicians across New South Wales, Australia, comprising purpose-designed items as well as the Modified Computer Self-Efficacy Scale (MCSES; range 0-100). RESULTS Clinicians (n = 123) were evenly distributed across decadal age groups. The majority were female (90%, n = 111) and one-third were occupational therapists.Clinicians scored strongly on the MCSES (Mdn = 76, IQR = 19), with younger age groups significantly associated with higher scores (H[3] = 9.667, p = .022). Most clinicians (92%) were knowledgeable of mainstream technology for personal use, but over half (65%) reported insufficient knowledge of suitable AT for clients. Clinicians reported positive attitudes towards AT, however, time to research and develop proficiency with a range of AT was the primary barrier (81%).Thematic analysis suggested that whilst the ideal AT experience is client-motivated requiring multidisciplinary guidance, the clinician role and experience with AT is evolving, influenced by rapid technological advancement and extrinsic opportunities to access AT. CONCLUSIONS Whilst clinicians have positive attitudes towards AT, there is a gap in clinician implementation. There is need to support further resources to build clinician capability and access to AT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavya Pilli
- Liverpool Brain Injury Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brendan Worne
- Brain Injury Rehabilitation Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Grahame Simpson
- Brain Injury Rehabilitation Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- John Walsh Centre of Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oyesanya TO, Ibemere SO, Loflin C, McReynolds V, Anaya B, Huang M, Gonzalez-Guarda R, Strauman TJ, Prvu Bettger J. "If you respect me, you are respecting my culture": methods and recommendations for personalizing a TBI transitional care intervention. Brain Inj 2023; 37:746-757. [PMID: 37144496 PMCID: PMC10330302 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2023.2208881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite research, national legislation, and clinical guidelines supporting transitional care, there is minimal benefit from existing transitional care interventions for racial/ethnic minorities with traumatic brain injury (TBI) discharged home from acute hospital care. Existing TBI transitional care interventions are not tailored to address the needs/preferences of patients from various racial/ethnic minority groups. The purpose of this study was to describe use of personalization to tailor a TBI transitional care intervention for various racial/ethnic groups. DESIGN Following preliminary intervention manual development, a qualitative descriptive study was conducted using eight focus groups with 40 English-and Spanish-speaking participants (12 patients, 12 caregivers, and 16 providers). RESULTS Three personalization-related themes emerged: 1) what is important to me, 2) finding someone to deliver the intervention who can adapt to my needs, and 3) respect over culture. Findings informed personalization strategies within our final manual. CONCLUSIONS We recommend researchers who wish to use personalization to tailor interventions to consider: 1) allowing stakeholders to dictate what is most important and 2) implementing an iterative intervention development process with input from diverse stakeholders. Findings have implications for informing the development of transitional care interventions to increase the likelihood that interventions are inclusive of needs and preferences of various races/ethnicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tolu O Oyesanya
- Department of School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stephanie O Ibemere
- Department of School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Callan Loflin
- Department of School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department is Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Victoria McReynolds
- Department of School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brian Anaya
- Department of School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michelle Huang
- Department of School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Timothy J Strauman
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Janet Prvu Bettger
- Department of School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department is Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Keyvanloo Shahrestanaki S, Rafii F, Ashghali Farahani M, Najafi Ghezeljeh T, Amrollah Majdabadi Kohne Z. Contributing factors involved in the safety of elderly people with chronic illness in home healthcare: a qualitative study. BMJ Open Qual 2023; 12:e002335. [PMID: 37451802 PMCID: PMC10351293 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients receiving home care are often elderly people with chronic illnesses that increasingly experience patient safety barriers due to special care needs. OBJECTIVE The present study was conducted to determine the factors involved in the safety of elderly patients with chronic illnesses receiving home care. METHODS A qualitative study with a conventional content analysis method was conducted in home care agencies of Tehran, Iran from August 2020 to July 2022. For data generation, semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 nurses, 2 nurse assistants, 1 home care inspector (an expert working at the deputy of treatment) and 3 family caregivers. Moreover, four observational sessions were also held. Data analysis was done using the five-step Graneheim and Lundman method. RESULTS According to the results, the facilitators of the safety of the elderly patients with chronic illnesses included the family's participation, nurse's competence, efficiency of the home care agency management and patient's participation in patient safety. The barriers to patient safety included problems created by the family, nurse's incompetence, inefficiency of the home care agency, patient's prevention of patient safety, home care setting limitations and health system limitations. CONCLUSION The majority of the factors involved in the safety of elderly patients with chronic diseases receiving home care had dual roles and could serve as a double-edged sword to guarantee or hinder patient safety. Identification of the facilitators and barriers can assist nurses and the healthcare system in planning and implementing patient safety improvement programmes for elderly patients with chronic illnesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Forough Rafii
- Professor, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mansoureh Ashghali Farahani
- Professor, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Tahereh Najafi Ghezeljeh
- Professor, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
- Professor, Cardiovascular Nursing Research Center, Rajai Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Velez M, Lugo-Agudelo LH, Patiño Lugo DF, Glenton C, Posada AM, Mesa Franco LF, Negrini S, Kiekens C, Spir Brunal MA, Roberg ASB, Cruz Sarmiento KM. Factors that influence the provision of home-based rehabilitation services for people needing rehabilitation: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 2:CD014823. [PMID: 36780267 PMCID: PMC9918343 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To increase people's access to rehabilitation services, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, we need to explore how the delivery of these services can be adapted. This includes the use of home-based rehabilitation and telerehabilitation. Home-based rehabilitation services may become frequently used options in the recovery process of patients, not only as a solution to accessibility barriers, but as a complement to the usual in-person inpatient rehabilitation provision. Telerehabilitation is also becoming more viable as the usability and availability of communication technologies improve. OBJECTIVES To identify factors that influence the organisation and delivery of in-person home-based rehabilitation and home-based telerehabilitation for people needing rehabilitation. SEARCH METHODS We searched PubMed, Global Health, the VHL Regional Portal, Epistemonikos, Health Systems Evidence, and EBM Reviews as well as preprints, regional repositories, and rehabilitation organisations websites for eligible studies, from database inception to search date in June 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies that used qualitative methods for data collection and analysis; and that explored patients, caregivers, healthcare providers and other stakeholders' experiences, perceptions and behaviours about the provision of in-person home-based rehabilitation and home-based telerehabilitation services responding to patients' needs in different phases of their health conditions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used a purposive sampling approach and applied maximum variation sampling in a four-step sampling frame. We conducted a framework thematic analysis using the CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) framework as our starting point. We assessed our confidence in the findings using the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included 223 studies in the review and sampled 53 of these for our analysis. Forty-five studies were conducted in high-income countries, and eight in low-and middle-income countries. Twenty studies addressed in-person home-based rehabilitation, 28 studies addressed home-based telerehabilitation services, and five studies addressed both modes of delivery. The studies mainly explored the perspectives of healthcare providers, patients with a range of different health conditions, and their informal caregivers and family members. Based on our GRADE-CERQual assessments, we had high confidence in eight of the findings, and moderate confidence in five, indicating that it is highly likely or likely respectively that these findings are a reasonable representation of the phenomenon of interest. There were two findings with low confidence. High and moderate confidence findings Home-based rehabilitation services delivered in-person or through telerehabilitation Patients experience home-based services as convenient and less disruptive of their everyday activities. Patients and providers also suggest that these services can encourage patients' self-management and can make them feel empowered about the rehabilitation process. But patients, family members, and providers describe privacy and confidentiality issues when services are provided at home. These include the increased privacy of being able to exercise at home but also the loss of privacy when one's home life is visible to others. Patients and providers also describe other factors that can affect the success of home-based rehabilitation services. These include support from providers and family members, good communication with providers, the requirements made of patients and their surroundings, and the transition from hospital to home-based services. Telerehabilitation specifically Patients, family members and providers see telerehabilitation as an opportunity to make services more available. But providers point to practical problems when assessing whether patients are performing their exercises correctly. Providers and patients also describe interruptions from family members. In addition, providers complain of a lack of equipment, infrastructure and maintenance and patients refer to usability issues and frustration with digital technology. Providers have different opinions about whether telerehabilitation is cost-efficient for them. But many patients see telerehabilitation as affordable and cost-saving if the equipment and infrastructure have been provided. Patients and providers suggest that telerehabilitation can change the nature of their relationship. For instance, some patients describe how telerehabilitation leads to easier and more relaxed communication. Other patients describe feeling abandoned when receiving telerehabilitation services. Patients, family members and providers call for easy-to-use technologies and more training and support. They also suggest that at least some in-person sessions with the provider are necessary. They feel that telerehabilitation services alone can make it difficult to make meaningful connections. They also explain that some services need the provider's hands. Providers highlight the importance of personalising the services to each person's needs and circumstances. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This synthesis identified several factors that can influence the successful implementation of in-person home-based rehabilitation and telerehabilitation services. These included factors that facilitate implementation, but also factors that can challenge this process. Healthcare providers, program planners and policymakers might benefit from considering these factors when designing and implementing programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcela Velez
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | | | - Claire Glenton
- Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ana M Posada
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | | | - Stefano Negrini
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University La Statale , Milano, Italy
- Laboratory of Evidence Based Rehabilitation, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Howard J, Fisher Z, Kemp AH, Lindsay S, Tasker LH, Tree JJ. Exploring the barriers to using assistive technology for individuals with chronic conditions: a meta-synthesis review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2022; 17:390-408. [PMID: 32663110 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1788181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Assistive technology can provide a key tool to enabling independence, greater inclusion and participation in society for individuals with chronic conditions. This potential is currently not always realized due to barriers to accessing and using assistive technology. This review aims to identify the common barriers to acquiring and using assistive technology for users with chronic conditions through a systematic meta-synthesis. This differs from other systematic reviews by applying a transdiagnostic approach to identify if barriers are common across chronic conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search of five scientific databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Medline) was conducted to identify relevant qualitative studies. The search was conducted in November 2019. For the identified articles, thematic content analysis was conducted and the methodological quality was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for qualitative research. RESULTS Forty papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Fifty-one descriptive themes grouped into six overarching analytical themes were identified from the studies. The analytical themes identified were: the design and function of the assistive technology, service provision, information and awareness, psychological barriers, support network and societal barriers. CONCLUSIONS The barriers are interconnected and common across different health conditions. More involvement in personalized care for developing strategies, adaptation of home technologies and provision of assistive technology could overcome the service provision and design barriers to assistive technology. Accessible information and providing greater awareness will be important to overcoming information, psychological and societal barriers to assistive technology.Implications for rehabilitationIndividuals with chronic conditions face complex barriers to acquiring and using assistive technology as a result of the devices themselves, their individual context, the healthcare context where assistive technology is provided and wider societal barriers.The provision of assistive technology needs to change away from the traditional medical model of the "expert" clinician and instead focus on more user involvement to deliver personalised care that utilises the users lived knowledge and experiences.Assistive technology provision should be considered alongside how to adapt everyday mainstream technology to meet user needs; the provision of devices should encourage creative problem solving rather then relying on pre-defined prescription lists of assistive technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Howard
- Department of Psychology, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
- Rehabilitation Engineering Unit, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - Zoe Fisher
- Health and Wellbeing Academy, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
- Traumatic Brain Injury Service, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - Andrew H Kemp
- Department of Psychology, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Stephen Lindsay
- Department of Computer Science, College of Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Lorna H Tasker
- Rehabilitation Engineering Unit, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - Jeremy J Tree
- Department of Psychology, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Oyesanya TO, Loflin C, You H, Kandel M, Johnson K, Strauman T, Yang Q, Hawes J, Byom L, Gonzalez-Guarda R, Van Houtven C, Agarwal S, Bettger JP. Design, methods, and baseline characteristics of the Brain Injury Education, Training, and Therapy to Enhance Recovery (BETTER) feasibility study: a transitional care intervention for younger adult patients with traumatic brain injury and caregivers. Curr Med Res Opin 2022; 38:697-710. [PMID: 35174756 PMCID: PMC9131748 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2043657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We developed a patient- and family-centered traumatic brain injury (TBI) transitional care intervention, called BETTER (Brain Injury Education, Training, and Therapy to Enhance Recovery), to improve quality of life (via SF-36) of younger TBI patients of different racial groups discharged home from acute hospital care and caregivers. We describe our design, methods, and baseline characteristics for our feasibility study. METHODS We co-developed BETTER with input from key stakeholders (TBI patients and caregivers, healthcare providers, and interdisciplinary research team members). BETTER is guided by the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory, our team's prior research, as well as literature used to support, educate, and train patients and families recovering from TBI and other conditions. The intervention is delivered by trained clinical interventionists (transitional care managers), beginning 24-72 h pre-discharge to 16 weeks post-discharge. BETTER offers tailored transitional care support to patient/family dyads, including assessing needs; establishing goals; coordinating post-hospital care, services, and resources; and providing patient/family education and training on brain injury coping skills. The majority of the intervention is delivered remotely via phone and remote video conferencing platform (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04584554). RESULTS We enrolled 15 dyads (N = 31, 15 patients, 16 caregivers) in this single arm, single center feasibility study. Most patients were men (n = 11, 73.33%), had a mean age of 39.07 (SD: 15.15), and were Black (n = 9, 60%), White (n = 5, 33.3%), or American Indian (n = 1, 0.66%). Injury severities were mild (n = 6, 40%), moderate (n = 4, 26.6%) or severe (n = 5, 33.33%). Most patients were insured (n = 10; 66.7%), had a high school education (n = 6; 40%); and earned $30,000 or less per year (n = 11; 73.3%). Most caregivers were married (n = 9, 56.25%) women (n = 14, 87.5%) with a mean age of 43.38 (SD: 10.45) and were Black (n = 8, 50%), White (n = 7, 43.75%), or American Indian (n = 1, 0.62%). Most caregivers identified as the spouse (n = 7; 43.75%) or parent (n = 6; 37.5%) of the patient. CONCLUSIONS BETTER is among the first TBI transitional care intervention to address needs/preferences for younger TBI patients of different racial groups after discharge home from acute hospital care and families. Findings can be used to inform future work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Callan Loflin
- Duke University School of Nursing
- Duke University School of Medicine
| | | | - Melissa Kandel
- Duke University Health System, Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy
| | - Karen Johnson
- Duke University Health System, Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy
| | | | | | | | - Lindsey Byom
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Allied Health Sciences
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zarshenas S, Couture M, Bier N, Giroux S, Pigot H, Dawson D, Nalder E, Gagnon-Roy M, Le Dorze G, Poncet F, McKenna S, Zabjek K, Bottari C. Potential advantages, barriers, and facilitators of implementing a cognitive orthosis for cooking for individuals with traumatic brain injury: the healthcare providers' perspective. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2020; 17:938-947. [PMID: 33151098 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1833093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Considering the key role of health care providers in integrating assistive technologies into clinical settings (e.g., in/outpatient rehabilitation) and home, this study explored the care providers' perspectives on benefits, barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Cognitive Orthosis for coOking (COOK) for adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) within clinical contexts and homes. METHODS Using a qualitative descriptive approach, semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups were carried out with experienced care providers of adults with TBI (n = 30) in Ontario-Canada. Qualitative analysis based on the Miles et al approach was used. RESULTS According to the participants, COOK could potentially be used with individuals with cognitive impairments (TBI and non-TBI) to increase safety and independence in meal preparation and support healthcare providers. However, limited access to funding, clients' lack of motivation/knowledge, and the severity of their cognitive and motor impairments were perceived as potential barriers. Facilitators to the use of COOK include training sessions, availability of private/provincial financing, and comprehensive assessments by a clinical team prior to use. CONCLUSIONS Health care providers' perspectives will help develop implementation strategies to facilitate the adoption of COOK within homes and clinical contexts for individuals with TBI and improve the next version of this technology.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONCOOK shows a high potential for increasing independence and safety during meal preparation with its sensor-based monitoring of the environment and cognitive-based assistance, for adults with TBI.Comprehensive clinical assessments to identify individuals' therapeutic goals, clinical characteristics, and living environments are necessary to facilitate the deployment of COOK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sareh Zarshenas
- Occupational Therapy Program, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Institut universitaire sur la réadaptation en déficience physique de Montréal du CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Melanie Couture
- Centre for Research and Expertise in Social Gerontology, Côte Saint-Luc, Canada
| | - Nathalie Bier
- Occupational Therapy Program, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Sylvain Giroux
- DOMUS Laboratory, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Montreal, Canada
| | - Hélène Pigot
- DOMUS Laboratory, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Montreal, Canada
| | - Deirdre Dawson
- Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy Department, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Emily Nalder
- Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy Department, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,March of Dimes Canada, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mireille Gagnon-Roy
- Occupational Therapy Program, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Institut universitaire sur la réadaptation en déficience physique de Montréal du CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Guylaine Le Dorze
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Institut universitaire sur la réadaptation en déficience physique de Montréal du CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,School of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Frédérique Poncet
- Lethbridge-Layton-Mackay Rehab Center, Montreal, Canada.,Optometry Department, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,Champlain Local Health Integration Network (LHIN), Ottawa, Canada
| | - Suzanne McKenna
- Champlain Local Health Integration Network (LHIN), Ottawa, Canada
| | - Karl Zabjek
- Physical Therapy Department, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Carolina Bottari
- Occupational Therapy Program, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Institut universitaire sur la réadaptation en déficience physique de Montréal du CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leslie M, Gray RP, Khayatzadeh-Mahani A. What is 'care quality' and can it be improved by information and communication technology? A typology of family caregivers' perspectives. Scand J Caring Sci 2020; 35:220-232. [PMID: 32168399 DOI: 10.1111/scs.12837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With governments worldwide reducing their involvement in the provision of institutional long-term elder care, community-based family caregivers (FCs) have become a key element in policies aimed at improving the quality of healthcare systems and maintaining their financial sustainability. This paper uses data from focus groups with FCs providing care to older adults to describe their approaches to and priorities for achieving care quality and sustainability as they work with formal health and social care systems. It describes FCs' views on information and communications technology (ICT) as potential supports for achieving these care quality and sustainability goals. METHODS We held 10 focus groups from May 2017 to August 2018 and recruited 25 FCs through a mix of convenience and snowball sampling strategies. We employed an inductive approach and used qualitative thematic content analysis methods to examine and interpret the resulting data. We used NVIVO 12 software for data analysis. RESULTS Quality of care - as delivered by both FCs themselves, and formal health and social care systems - was a major preoccupation for our participants. They saw communications quality as a key aspect of the broader concept of care quality. Our data analysis produced a typology of communications quality from the FC perspective. Analysis of our data also revealed ICT development opportunities and available products in key areas. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the formal care system providers could be more caregiver-oriented in their communications by engaging FCs in the decision-making process and allowing them to express their own concerns and goals. The implication of our findings for those seeking to develop policies and ICT products in support of FCs is that these should focus on human relationships and seek to expand facilitative communications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myles Leslie
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Akram Khayatzadeh-Mahani
- School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leslie M, Gray RP, Eales J, Fast J, Magnaye A, Khayatzadeh-Mahani A. The care capacity goals of family carers and the role of technology in achieving them. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:52. [PMID: 32102654 PMCID: PMC7045442 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-1455-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As global populations age, governments have come to rely heavily on family carers (FCs) to care for older adults and reduce the demands made of formal health and social care systems. Under increasing pressure, sustainability of FC's unpaid care work has become a pressing issue. Using qualitative data, this paper explores FCs' care-related work goals, and describes how those goals do, or do not, link to technology. METHODS We employed a sequential mixed-method approach using focus groups followed by an online survey about FCs' goals. We held 10 focus groups and recruited 25 FCs through a mix of convenience and snowball sampling strategies. Carer organizations helped us recruit 599 FCs from across Canada to complete an online survey. Participants' responses to an open-ended question in the survey were included in our qualitative analysis. An inductive approach was employed using qualitative thematic content analysis methods to examine and interpret the resulting data. We used NVIVO 12 software for data analysis. RESULTS We identified two care quality improvement goals of FCs providing care to older adults: enhancing and safeguarding their caregiving capacity. To enhance their capacity to care, FCs sought: 1) foreknowledge about their care recipients' changing condition, and 2) improved navigation of existing support systems. To safeguard their own wellbeing, and so to preserve their capacity to care, FCs sought to develop coping strategies as well as opportunities for mentorship and socialization. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that a paradigm shift is needed to reframe caregiving from a current deficit frame focused on failures and limitations (burden of care) towards a more empowering frame (sustainability and resiliency). The fact that FCs are seeking strategies to enhance and safeguard their capacities to provide care means they are approaching their unpaid care work from the perspective of resilience. Their goals and technology suggestions imply a shift from understanding care as a source of 'burden' towards a more 'resilient' and 'sustainable' model of caregiving. Our case study findings show that technology can assist in fostering this resiliency but that it may well be limited to the role of an intermediary that connects FCs to information, supports and peers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myles Leslie
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Jacquie Eales
- Department of Human Ecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Janet Fast
- Department of Human Ecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Andrew Magnaye
- Department of Human Ecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Akram Khayatzadeh-Mahani
- School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
- Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|