Length of attending-student and resident-student interactions in the inpatient medicine clerkship

Association between inpatient team continuity and clerkship student academic performance

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between inpatient team continuity, defined as the maximum number of days the same student, resident, and attending worked together on the inpatient wards, and the academic performance of students in a pediatric block clerkship.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified students who rotated in the pediatric clerkship at a single institution from 2020 to 2022. We used multiple linear regression models to adjust for multiple confounders and used a one-way analysis of variance to compare adjusted outcomes across quartiles of inpatient team continuity.

RESULTS

A total of 227 students were included in the analysis. Students' preceptor ratings increased by 0.04 on a scale of 0-4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.06; p = .001), and their final pediatric grade increased by 0.02 on a scale of 0-4 (95% CI 0.01-0.02; p < .001) with each 1-day increase in inpatient team continuity. There was no statistically significant association between team continuity and shelf exam scores or observed structured clinical examination scores. Preceptor ratings and final clerkship grades increased across quartiles of team continuity, with the greatest increase being between the second, 6-7 days of continuity, and third, 8-10 days of continuity, quartiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased inpatient team continuity is associated with students receiving higher preceptor ratings and achieving a higher final pediatric clerkship grade. While the mechanisms driving these associations remain unknown, the results add to the literature base supporting the importance of preceptor continuity in undergraduate medical education.

Time Does Matter: Reduced Internal Medicine Clerkship Clinical Experiences Due to COVID-19

Introduction The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected medical education in many ways. The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) temporarily suspended clinical student rotations, calling for a transition to remote learning. Unfortunately, due to the heavy impact of COVID-19 in our South Florida community, medical students were not able to return to in-person activities for a significant time. During this period, students had remote clerkship learning activities, didactic sessions, narrative projects, and small-group learning sessions, which were front-loaded using Zoom technology (Zoom Video Communications, Inc., San Jose, California, United States) and web-based learning tools. Once in-person clinical experiences resumed, the duration of all third-year clerkships for the remainder of the year was reduced to five weeks to allow for timely graduation. The Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine (HWCOM) Internal Medicine (IM) clerkship has traditionally been an eight-week-long rotation. Other clerkships that varied from six to eight weeks were similarly reduced to five weeks. We hypothesized that the shortened duration of the IM clerkship would have negative impacts on National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) exam performance and clerkship clinical experiences would likely be affected. Methods We compared the NBME subject exam results and end of clerkship evaluations from the Class of 2021 (CO2021) which had the traditional eight weeks of patient care, with the CO2022, which had only five weeks of in-person patient care. A T-test analysis was performed comparing performance on the NBME medicine clinical subject exam between students who completed the usual eight-week rotation versus those who completed a five-week rotation. We also evaluated the IM clerkship course evaluation and analyzed student responses and ratings to assess any areas that were statistically significant when comparing the traditional eight-week IM clerkship to the shortened five-week clerkship. Results There was no statistically significant difference (t=0.68, p<0.4951) in mean NBME subject exam performance between cohorts. Students who completed the shortened five-week IM clerkship indicated there was limited volume and diversity of patients, which consequently affected their ability to complete all the required clinical experiences for the IM clerkship. These results indicated a statistically significant difference between the two cohorts (t =3.33, p<.001). Conclusion Students with shortened IM clerkship clinical care time (five weeks) were found to have no significant statistical differences in NBME subject exam performance compared to the traditional eight-week cohorts. However, students felt there was a decreased volume and diversity of patients, and they reported greater difficulties in completing the required clinical experiences, with diminished clinical confidence. Time does matter, and clinical time is very valuable for a student's undergraduate medical education. If another pandemic were to arise, the duration of different clerkships should be carefully assessed and individualized, and methods to assess and reclaim lost clinical time during the advanced clinical and postgraduate years should be considered.

Exploring the impact of postponing core clerkships on future performance

Despite the many clerkship models of medical education, all can be considered a form of experiential learning. Experiential learning is a complex pedagogical approach involving the development of cognitive skills in an environment with a unique culture with multiple stakeholders, which may impact learner motivation, confidence, and other noncognitive drivers of success. Students may delay the transition to the clerkship year for myriad reasons, and the intricate nature of experiential learning suggested this may impact student performance. This retrospective, observational study investigated the impact of clerkship postponement by measuring subsequent clerkship performance. Pre-clerkship and third-year clerkship performance were analyzed for three cohorts of students (classes of 2018, 2019, and 2020, N = 274) where students had the option to delay the start of their clerkship year. A mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-tests were conducted to compare academic performance over time among students who did and did not delay. Across three cohorts of students, 12% delayed the start of the clerkship year (N = 33). Regardless of prior academic performance, these students experienced a significant reduction in clerkship grades compared to their non-delaying peers. Delaying the start of the clerkship year may have negative durable effects on future academic performance. This information should be kept in mind for student advisement.

Interprofessional bedside rounding improves quality of feedback to resident physicians

PURPOSE

Obtaining high quality feedback in residency education is challenging, in part due to limited opportunities for faculty observation of authentic clinical work. This study reviewed the impact of interprofessional bedside rounds ('iPACE™') on the length and quality of faculty narrative evaluations of residents as compared to usual inpatient teaching rounds.

METHODS

Narrative comments from faculty evaluations of Internal Medicine (IM) residents both on usual teaching service as well as the iPACE™ service (spanning 2017-2020) were reviewed and coded using a deductive content analysis approach.

RESULTS

Six hundred ninety-two narrative evaluations by 63 attendings of 103 residents were included. Evaluations of iPACE™ residents were significantly longer than those of residents on usual teams (109 vs. 69 words, p < 0.001). iPACE™ evaluations contained a higher average occurrence of direct observations of patient/family interactions (0.72 vs. 0.32, p < 0.001), references to interprofessionalism (0.17 vs. 0.05, p < 0.001), as well as specific (3.21 vs. 2.26, p < 0.001), actionable (1.01 vs. 0.69, p < 0.001), and corrective feedback (1.2 vs. 0.88, p = 0.001) per evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the iPACE™ model, which prioritizes interprofessional bedside rounds, had a positive impact on the quantity and quality of feedback, as measured via narrative comments on weekly evaluations.

Twelve tips for medical students to enhance clinical skills learning during disrupted placements

Disruption to healthcare settings can present a significant challenge to traditional, face-to-face models of learning in medical education. Reductions in undergraduate medical students' clinical exposure, whether due to periods of increased healthcare demand, localised service changes or infectious disease outbreaks, are likely to result in fewer opportunities to develop key clinical and practical skills. Proficiency in these skills is often essential to progression and future practice, creating a broad incentive for students to develop techniques to maintain and refine their clinical skills during disrupted placements. These tips, based on our experiences as senior medical students, are intended to help students on disrupted placements to engage in reflective practice, discover ways to facilitate further opportunities for clinical skills learning, and to make the most of clinical skills learning opportunities that they do receive.

Fostering a Feedback Mindset: A Qualitative Exploration of Medical Students' Feedback Experiences With Longitudinal Coaches

PURPOSE

Feedback is important for medical students' development. Recent conceptualizations of feedback as a dialogue between feedback provider and recipient point to longitudinal relationships as a facilitator of effective feedback discussions. This study illuminates how medical students experience feedback within a longitudinal relationship with a physician coach.

METHOD

In this qualitative study, second-year medical students from the University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine participated in semistructured interviews that explored their experiences discussing feedback within longitudinal, nonevaluative coaching relationships. Interviews occurred between May and October 2018. Interview questions addressed students' experiences receiving feedback from their coach, how and when they used this feedback, and how their relationship with their coach influenced engagement in feedback discussions. Interviews were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory.

RESULTS

Seventeen students participated. The authors identified 3 major themes. First, students' development of a feedback mindset: Over time, students came to view feedback as an invaluable component of their training. Second, setting the stage for feedback: Establishing feedback routines and a low-stakes environment for developing clinical skills were important facilitators of effective feedback discussions. Third, interpreting and acting upon feedback: Students described identifying, receiving, and implementing tailored and individualized feedback in an iterative fashion. As students gained comfort and trust in their coaches' feedback, they reported increasingly engaging in feedback conversations for learning.

CONCLUSIONS

Through recurring feedback opportunities and iterative feedback discussions with coaches, students came to view feedback as essential for growth and learning. Longitudinal coaching relationships can positively influence how students conceptualize and engage in feedback discussions.

A Developmental Approach to Internal Medicine Residency Education: Lessons Learned from the Design and Implementation of a Novel Longitudinal Coaching Program

BACKGROUND

Resident physicians' achievement of professional competencies requires reflective practice skills and faculty coaching. Graduate medical education programs, however, struggle to operationalize these activities.

OBJECTIVE

To (1) describe the process and strategies for implementing an Internal Medicine (IM) resident coaching program that evolved in response to challenges, (2) characterize residents' professional learning plans (PLPs) and their alignment with EPAs, and, (3) examine key lessons learned.

DESIGN

The program began in 2013 and involved all postgraduate years (PGY) residents (n = 60, 100%), and 20 faculty coaches who were all IM trained and practicing in an IM-related specialty. One coach was linked with 3-4 residents for three years. Through 1:1 meetings, resident-coach pairs identified professional challenges ('disorienting dilemmas' or 'worst days'), reviewed successes ('best days'), and co-created professional learning plans. Typed summaries were requested following meetings. Coaches met monthly for professional development and to discuss program challenges/successes, which informed programmatic improvements; additionally, a survey was distributed after three program years. Data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methodologies.

RESULTS

Disorienting dilemmas and professional learning plans mapped to all 16 EPAs and four additional themes: work-life balance, career planning, teaching skills, and research/scholarship. The most-frequently mapped topics included: PGY1 - leading and working within interprofessional care teams (EPA 10), research and scholarship, and work-life balance; PGY2 - improving quality of care (EPA 13), demonstrating personal habits of lifelong learning (EPA15), and research and scholarship; PGY3 - lifelong learning (EPA15); career planning was common across all years.

CONCLUSIONS

Lessons learned included challenges in coordination of observations, identifying disorienting dilemmas, and creating a shared mental model between residents, faculty, and program leadership. The coaching program resulted in professional learning plans aligned with IM EPAs, in addition to other professional development topics. Operationalization of aspects of these results can inform the development of similar programs in residency education.

Explicit Dialogue About the Purpose of Hospital Admission Is Essential: How Different Perspectives Affect Teamwork, Trust, and Patient Care

PURPOSE

The authors previously found that attending physicians conceptualize hospital admission purpose according to 3 perspectives: one focused dominantly on discharge, one on monitoring and managing chronic conditions, and one on optimizing overall patient health. Given implications of varying perspectives for patient care and team collaboration, this study explored how purpose of admission is negotiated and enacted within clinical teaching teams.

METHOD

Direct observations and field interviews took place in 2 internal medicine teaching units at 2 teaching hospitals in Ontario, Canada, in summer 2017. A constructivist grounded theory approach was used to inform data collection and analysis.

RESULTS

The 54 participants included attendings, residents, and medical students. Management decisions were identified across 185 patients. Attendings and senior medical residents (second- and third-year residents) were each observed to enact one dominant perspective, while junior trainees (first-year residents and students) appeared less fixed in their perspectives. Teams were not observed discussing purpose of admission explicitly; however, differing perspectives were present and enacted. These differences became most noticeable when at the extremes (discharge focused vs optimization focused) or between senior medical residents and attendings. Attendings implicitly signaled and enforced their perspectives, using authority to shut down and redirect discussion. Trainees' maneuvers for enacting their perspectives ranged from direct advocacy to covert manipulation (passive avoidance/forgetting and delaying until attending changeover).

CONCLUSIONS

Failing to negotiate and explicitly label perspectives on purpose of admission may lead to attendings and senior medical residents working at cross-purposes and to trainees participating in covert maneuvers, potentially affecting trust and professional identify development.

Core Clerkship Grading: The Illusion of Objectivity

Core clerkship grading creates multiple challenges that produce high stress for medical students, interfere with learning, and create inequitable learning environments. Students and faculty alike succumb to the illusion of objectivity-that quantitative ratings converted to grades convey accurate measures of the complexity of clinical performance.Clerkship grading is the first high-stakes assessment within medical school and occurs just as students are newly immersed full-time in an environment in which patient care supersedes their needs as learners. Students earning high marks situate themselves to earn entry into competitive residency programs and selective specialties. However, there is no commonly accepted standard for how to assign clerkship grades, and the process is vulnerable to imprecision and bias. Rewarding learners for the speed with which they adapt inherently favors students who bring advantages acquired before medical school and discounts the goal of all learners achieving competence.The authors propose that, rather than focusing on assigning core clerkship grades, assessment of student performance should incorporate expert judgment of learning progress. Competency-based medical education is predicated on the articulation of stepwise expectations for learners, with the support and time allocated for each learner to meet those expectations. Concurrently, students should ideally review their own performance data with coaches to self-assess areas of relative strength and areas for further growth. Eliminating grades in favor of competency-based assessment for learning holds promise to engage learners in developing essential patient care and teamwork skills and to foster their development of lifelong learning habits.

The Fourth Year of Medical School: Time for Reassessment: AOA Critical Issues

Most U.S. medical schools follow the 4-year model, consisting of 2 preclinical years, core clinical experience, and a fourth year intended to permit students to increase clinical competency, to explore specialty areas, and to transition to residency. Although the design and delivery of Years 1 through 3 have evolved to meet new challenges and expectations, the structure of Year 4 remains largely unchanged. For most students considering a career in orthopaedics, Year 4 is a series of elective rotations in which educational objectives become secondary to interviewing for residency programs. Most accreditation bodies recognize the importance of attainment of competency over the duration of medical school as the goal of educating physicians, and thus, there is a growing interest in reexamining the traditional medical school curriculum with the goal of integrating the final phases of undergraduate education and the first phases of postgraduate education.A literature search was undertaken to identify publications on the duration of medical education. Pilot approaches to competency-based integration of undergraduate medical school and postgraduate training in orthopaedic surgery were reviewed.There have been few data suggesting that 4 years of medical education is superior to shorter-duration programs. Three approaches to competency-based integration of undergraduate medical school and postgraduate training are presented. Their goal is to use student and faculty time more effectively. Each approach offers the opportunity to lower the cost and to decrease the time required for Board Certification in Orthopaedic Surgery. Two approaches shorten the entire duration of medical school and graduate training by using various proportions of the fourth year to begin residency, and one approach expands the duration of orthopaedic training by starting in the fourth year of medical school and including training equivalent to a fellowship program into the residency experience.The effectiveness of such programs will form the basis for revisions to the current orthopaedic training paradigm, resulting in a more effective, efficient, and integrated orthopaedic training curriculum.