1
|
Harvey Bluemel A, Gillespie H, Asif A, Samuriwo R. How to … navigate entry into the field of clinical education research and scholarship. CLINICAL TEACHER 2024; 21:e13686. [PMID: 37877546 DOI: 10.1111/tct.13686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
Clinical education research (ClinEdR) is a growing field that aims to ensure the way healthcare professionals are taught and learn is evidence-based. There is growing interest in how this evidence is generated in a robust, timely and cost-effective fashion. In this 'How to …' paper, we draw on relevant literature and our own experiences to offer suggestions on how novice researchers can navigate entry into the field of ClinEdR. We summarise key resources for those at the earliest stages of their interest in ClinEdR and scholarship and provide personal experiences of networking, collaborating and balancing research with a clinical or teaching role. This paper will be of interest to those at any stage in their clinical career with little to no experience of ClinEdR, but the enthusiasm to get started.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Aqua Asif
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ray Samuriwo
- School of Nursing and Healthcare Leadership, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luong V, Ajjawi R, Burm S, Olson R, MacLeod A. Unravelling epistemic injustice in medical education: The case of the underperforming learner. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024. [PMID: 38676450 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT Epistemic injustice refers to a wrong done to someone in their capacity as a knower. While philosophers have detailed the pervasiveness of this issue within healthcare, it is only beginning to be discussed by medical educators. The purpose of this article is to expand the field's understanding of this concept and to demonstrate how it can be used to reframe complex problems in medical education. METHODS After outlining the basic features of epistemic injustice, we clarify its intended (and unintended) meaning and detail what is required for a perceived harm to be named an epistemic injustice. Using an example from our own work on introversion in undergraduate medical education, we illustrate what epistemic injustice might look like from the perspectives of both educators and students and show how the concept can reorient our perspective on academic underperformance. RESULTS Epistemic injustice results from two things: (1) social power dynamics that give some individuals control over others, and (2) identity prejudice that is associated with discriminatory stereotypes. This can lead to one, or both, forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial and hermeneutical. Our worked example demonstrates how medical educators can be unaware of when and how epistemic injustice is happening, yet the effects on students' well-being and sense of selves can be profound. Thinking about academic underperformance with epistemic injustice in mind can reveal an emphasis within current educational practices on diagnosing learning deficiencies, to the detriment of holistically representing its socially constructed and structural nature. CONCLUSIONS This article builds upon recent calls to recognise epistemic injustice in medical education by clarifying its terminology and intended use and providing in-depth application and analysis to a particular case: underperformance and the introverted medical student. Equipped with a more sophisticated understanding of the term, medical educators may be able to re-conceptualise long-standing issues including, but also beyond, underperformance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Luong
- Department of Continuing Professional Development and Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Rola Ajjawi
- Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning (CRADLE), Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah Burm
- Department of Continuing Professional Development and Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Rebecca Olson
- School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anna MacLeod
- Department of Continuing Professional Development and Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tavares W, Pearce J. Attending to Variable Interpretations of Assessment Science and Practice. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE 2024; 36:244-252. [PMID: 37431929 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2023.2231923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
Issue: The way educators think about the nature of competence, the approaches one selects for the assessment of competence, what generated data implies, and what counts as good assessment now involve broader and more diverse interpretive processes. Broadening philosophical positions in assessment has educators applying different interpretations to similar assessment concepts. As a result, what is claimed through assessment, including what counts as quality, can be different for each of us despite using similar activities and language. This is leading to some uncertainty on how to proceed or worse, provides opportunities for questioning the legitimacy of any assessment activity or outcome. While some debate in assessment is inevitable, most have been within philosophical positions (e.g., how best to minimize error), whereas newer debates are happening across philosophical positions (e.g., whether error is a useful concept). As new ways of approaching assessment have emerged, the interpretive nature of underlying philosophical positions has not been sufficiently attended to. Evidence: We illustrate interpretive processes of assessment in action by: (a) summarizing the current health professions assessment context from a philosophical perspective as a way of describing its evolution; (b) demonstrating implications in practice using two examples (i.e., analysis of assessment work and validity claims); and (c) examining pragmatism to demonstrate how even within specific philosophical positions opportunities for variable interpretations still exist. Implications: Our concern is not that assessment designers and users have different assumptions, but that practically, educators may unknowingly (or insidiously) apply different assumptions, and methodological and interpretive norms, and subsequently settle on different views on what serves as quality assessment even for the same assessment program or event. With the state of assessment in health professions in flux, we conclude by calling for a philosophically explicit approach to assessment, and underscore assessment as, fundamentally, an interpretive process - one which demands the careful elucidation of philosophical assumptions to promote understanding and ultimately defensibility of assessment processes and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter Tavares
- The Wilson Centre for Health Professions Education Research, and Post-Graduate Medical Education, Toronto, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Health and Society, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- York Region Paramedic Services, Community Health Services, Regional Municipality of York, Newmarket, Canada
| | - Jacob Pearce
- Tertiary Education, Australian Council for Educational Research, Camberwell, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rietmeijer CBT, van Esch SCM, Blankenstein AH, van der Horst HE, Veen M, Scheele F, Teunissen PW. A phenomenology of direct observation in residency: Is Miller's 'does' level observable? MEDICAL EDUCATION 2023; 57:272-279. [PMID: 36515981 PMCID: PMC10107098 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Guidelines on direct observation (DO) present DO as an assessment of Miller's 'does' level, that is, the learner's ability to function independently in clinical situations. The literature, however, indicates that residents may behave 'inauthentically' when observed. To minimise this 'observer effect', learners are encouraged to 'do what they would normally do' so that they can receive feedback on their actual work behaviour. Recent phenomenological research on patients' experiences with DO challenges this approach; patients needed-and caused-some participation of the observing supervisor. Although guidelines advise supervisors to minimise their presence, we are poorly informed on how some deliberate supervisor participation affects residents' experience in DO situations. Therefore, we investigated what residents essentially experienced in DO situations. METHODS We performed an interpretive phenomenological interview study, including six general practice (GP) residents. We collected and analysed our data, using the four phenomenological lenses of lived body, lived space, lived time and lived relationship. We grouped our open codes by interpreting what they revealed about common structures of residents' pre-reflective experiences. RESULTS Residents experienced the observing supervisor not just as an observer or assessor. They also experienced them as both a senior colleague and as the patient's familiar GP, which led to many additional interactions. When residents tried to act as if the supervisor was not there, they could feel insecure and handicapped because the supervisor was there, changing the situation. DISCUSSION Our results indicate that the 'observer effect' is much more material than was previously understood. Consequently, observing residents' 'authentic' behaviour at Miller's 'does' level, as if the supervisor was not there, seems impossible and a misleading concept: misleading, because it may frustrate residents and cause supervisors to neglect patients' and residents' needs in DO situations. We suggest that one-way DO is better replaced by bi-directional DO in working-and-learning-together sessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris B. T. Rietmeijer
- Department of General PracticeAmsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Suzanne C. M. van Esch
- Department of General PracticeAmsterdam UMC, location University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Annette H. Blankenstein
- Department of General PracticeAmsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Henriëtte E. van der Horst
- Department of General PracticeAmsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Mario Veen
- Department of General PracticeErasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Fedde Scheele
- School of Medical Sciences, Athena Institute for Transdisciplinary ResearchAmsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Pim W. Teunissen
- School of Health Professions EducationMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
MacLeod A, Luong V, Cameron P, Burm S, Field S, Kits O, Miller S, Stewart WA. Case-Informed Learning in Medical Education: A Call for Ontological Fidelity. PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION 2023; 2:120-128. [PMID: 37063601 PMCID: PMC10103732 DOI: 10.5334/pme.47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Case-informed learning is an umbrella term we use to classify pedagogical approaches that use text-based cases for learning. Examples include Problem-Based, Case-Based, and Team-Based approaches, amongst others. We contend that the cases at the heart of case-informed learning are philosophical artefacts that reveal traditional positivist orientations of medical education and medicine, more broadly, through their centering scientific knowledge and objective fact. This positivist orientation, however, leads to an absence of the human experience of medicine in most cases. One of the rationales for using cases is that they allow for learning in context, representing aspects of real-life medical practice in controlled environments. Cases are, therefore, a form of simulation. Yet issues of fidelity, widely discussed in the broader simulation literature, have yet to enter discussions of case-informed learning. We propose the concept of ontological fidelity as a way to approach ontological questions (i.e., questions regarding what we assume to be real), so that they might centre narrative and experiential elements of medicine. Ontological fidelity can help medical educators grapple with what information should be included in a case by encouraging an exploration of the philosophical questions: What is real? Which (and whose) reality do we want to simulate through cases? What are the essential elements of a case that make it feel real? What is the clinical story we want to reproduce in case format? In this Eye-Opener, we explore what it would mean to create cases from a position of ontological fidelity and provide suggestions for how to do this in everyday medical education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna MacLeod
- Department of Continuing Professional Development and Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Victoria Luong
- Department of Continuing Professional Development and Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Paula Cameron
- Department of Continuing Professional Development and Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Sarah Burm
- Department of Continuing Professional Development and Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Simon Field
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Olga Kits
- Department of Continuing Professional Development and Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Stephen Miller
- Department of Continuing Professional Development and Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Wendy A. Stewart
- Department of Continuing Professional Development and Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schaepkens SPC, Lijster T. Mind The Gap: A Philosophical Analysis of Reflection's Many Benefits. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE 2022:1-10. [PMID: 36475951 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2142794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Issue: Expectations of reflection run high in medical practice and medical education; it is claimed as a means to many ends. In this article, the authors do not reject the value of reflection for medical education and medical practitioners, but they still ask why reflection can (potentially) yield so many different benefits, and what that implies for the status of reflection in medical education practice. Evidence: Based on a conceptual analysis of debates about reflection in the philosophical tradition, the authors argue that there are two quintessential gaps that play a role in the proliferation of (potential) benefits. First, reflection deals with bridging the gap between theory and practice; second, it deals with bridging the gap between the individual sense and communal sense. These gaps prevent the systematization of reflection, and they are fundamental to human thinking and experience in any situated environment, which led contemporary research on reflection to list a wide variety of benefits. Implications: The authors argue that if reflection resists systematization, it cannot be learned by following rules or protocols, but only practiced. Then, reflection should no longer be taught and researched as an individual skill one learns, nor as a means to some particular, beneficial end. Rather, one should practice reflection, and experience what it means to be part of a community wherein professionals jump the theory-practice gap constantly in a myriad of situations. Based on their analysis, the authors provide three concrete recommendations for reflection in medical education. First, to give precedence to reflective activities that encompass both gaps wherein situated examples can flourish; second, to use reflective guidelines as sources of inspiration; third, to show reserve about assessing reflection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thijs Lijster
- Faculty of Arts, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Monrouxe LV, Bloomfield JG. Editorial: Insights in healthcare professions education: 2021. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1054572. [DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1054572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
8
|
MacLeod A, Luong V, Cameron P, Kovacs G, Fredeen M, Patrick L, Kits O, Tummons J. The Lifecycle of a Clinical Cadaver: A Practice-Based Ethnography. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE 2022; 34:556-572. [PMID: 35770381 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2092111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
PhenomenonCadavers have long played an important and complex role in medical education. While research on cadaver-based simulation has largely focused on exploring student attitudes and reactions or measuring improvements in procedural performance, the ethical, philosophical, and experiential aspects of teaching and learning with cadavers are rarely discussed. In this paper, we shed new light on the fascinating philosophical moves in which people engage each and every time they find themselves face to face with a cadaver. ApproachOver a two-year period (2018/19-2019/20), we applied ethnographic methods (137 hours of observation, 24 interviews, and the analysis of 22 documents) to shadow the educational cadaver through the practical stages involved in cadaver-based simulation: 1. cadaver preparation, 2. cadaver-based skill practice with physicians and residents, and 3. interment and memorial services. We used Deleuze and Guattari's concepts of becoming and acts of creation to trace the ontological "lifecycle" of an educational cadaver as embedded within everyday work practices. FindingsWe delineated six sub-phases of the lifecycle, through which the cadaver transformed ontologically from person to donor, body, cadaver, educational cadaver, teacher, and loved one/legacy. These shifts involved a network of bureaucratic, technical, educational, and humanistic practices that shaped the way the cadaver was perceived and acted upon at different moments in the lifecycle. By highlighting, at each phase, 1) the ontological transitions of the cadaver, itself, and 2) the practices, events, settings, and people involved in each of these transitions, we explored questions of "being" as it related to the ontological ambiguity of the cadaver: its conceptualization as both person and tool, simultaneously representing life and death. InsightsEngaging deeply with the philosophical questions of cadaver-based simulation (CBS) helped us conceptualize the lifecycle as a series of meaningful and purposeful acts of becoming. Following the cadaver from program entry to interment allowed us to contemplate how its ontological ambiguity shapes every aspect of cadaver-based simulation. We found that in discussions of fidelity in medical simulation, beyond both the physical and functional, it is possible to conceive of a third type: ontological. The humanness of the cadaver makes CBS a unique, irreplaceable, and inherently philosophical, practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna MacLeod
- Department of Continuing Professional Development and Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Victoria Luong
- Department of Continuing Professional Development and Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Paula Cameron
- Department of Continuing Professional Development and Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - George Kovacs
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Molly Fredeen
- Department of Continuing Professional Development and Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Lucy Patrick
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Olga Kits
- Research Methods Unit, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fawns T, Schaepkens S. A Matter of Trust: Online Proctored Exams and the Integration of Technologies of Assessment in Medical Education. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE 2022; 34:444-453. [PMID: 35466830 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2048832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
ISSUE Technology is pervasive in medicine, but we too rarely examine how it shapes assessment, learning, knowledge, and performance. Cultures of assessment also shape identities, social relations, and the knowledge and behavior recognized as legitimate by a profession. Therefore, the combination of technology and assessment within medical education is worthy of review. Online proctoring services have become more prevalent during the Covid-19 pandemic, as a means of continuing high-stakes invigilated examinations online. With criticisms about increased surveillance, discrimination, and the outsourcing of control to commercial vendors, is this simply "moving exams online", or are there more serious implications? What can this extreme example tell us about how our technologies of assessment influence relationships between trainees and medical education institutions? EVIDENCE We combine postdigital and postphenomenology approaches to analyze the written component of the 2020 online proctored United Kingdom Royal College of Physicians (MRCP) membership exam. We examine the scripts, norms, and trust relations produced through this example of online proctoring, and then locate them in historical and economic contexts. We find that the proctoring service projects a false objectivity that is undermined by the tight script with which examinees must comply in an intensified norm of surveillance, and by the interpretation of digital data by unseen human proctors. Nonetheless, such proctoring services are promoted by an image of data-driven innovation, a rhetoric of necessity in response to a growing problem of online cheating, and an aversion, within medical education institutions, to changing assessment formats (and thus the need to accept different forms of knowledge as legitimate). IMPLICATIONS The use of online proctoring technology by medical education institutions intensifies established norms, already present within examinations, of surveillance and distrust. Moreover, it exacerbates tensions between conflicting agendas of commercialization, accountability, and the education of trustworthy professionals. Our analysis provides an example of why it is important to stop and consider the holistic implications of introducing technological "solutions", and to interrogate the intersection of technology and assessment practices in relation to the wider goals of medical education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Fawns
- Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Sven Schaepkens
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schaepkens SPC, Veen M, de la Croix A. Is reflection like soap? a critical narrative umbrella review of approaches to reflection in medical education research. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION : THEORY AND PRACTICE 2022; 27:537-551. [PMID: 34767115 PMCID: PMC9117338 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-021-10082-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Reflection is a complex concept in medical education research. No consensus exists on what reflection exactly entails; thus far, cross-comparing empirical findings has not resulted in definite evidence on how to foster reflection. The concept is as slippery as soap. This leaves the research field with the question, 'how can research approach the conceptual indeterminacy of reflection to produce knowledge?'. The authors conducted a critical narrative umbrella review of research on reflection in medical education. Forty-seven review studies on reflection research from 2000 onwards were reviewed. The authors used the foundational literature on reflection from Dewey and Schön as an analytical lens to identify and critically juxtapose common approaches in reflection research that tackle the conceptual complexity. Research on reflection must deal with the paradox that every conceptualization of reflection is either too sharp or too broad because it is entrenched in practice. The key to conceptualizing reflection lies in its use and purpose, which can be provided by in situ research of reflective practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven P C Schaepkens
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - M Veen
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A de la Croix
- Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Postbus 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Olding MN, Rhodes F, Humm J, Ross P, McGarry C. Black, White and Gray: Student Perspectives on Medical Humanities and Medical Education. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE 2022; 34:223-233. [PMID: 34749550 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1982717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
ISSUE In recent years, the value and relevance of humanities-based teaching in medical education have become more widely acknowledged. In many medical schools this has prompted additions to curricula that allow students to explore the gray-as opposed to the black and white-areas of medicine through arts, humanities, and social sciences. As curricula have expanded and diversified in this way, both medical educators and students have begun to ask: what is the best way to teach medical humanities? EVIDENCE In this article, five current medical students reflect on their experiences of medical humanities teaching through intercalated BSc programmes in the UK. What follows is a broad exploration of how the incorporation of medical humanities into students' time at university can improve clinical practice where the more rigid, objective-driven, model of medicine falls short. IMPLICATIONS This article reinforces the merit of moving beyond a purely biomedical model of medical education. Using the student voice as a vector for critique and discussion, we provide a starting point for uncovering the path toward true integration of humanities-style teaching into medical school curricula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Freya Rhodes
- Academic Unit of Medical Education, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England
| | - John Humm
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, England
| | - Phoebe Ross
- Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, England
| | - Catherine McGarry
- Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Samuriwo R. Interprofessional Collaboration—Time for a New Theory of Action? Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:876715. [PMID: 35372376 PMCID: PMC8971839 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.876715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
13
|
Wyatt TR, Zaidi Z. Bricolage: A tool for race-related, historically situated complex research. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 56:170-175. [PMID: 34514622 DOI: 10.1111/medu.14629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As medical education grapples with larger issues of race and racism, researchers will need new tools to capture society's complex issues. One promising approach is bricolage, a methodological and theoretical approach that allows researchers to bend analytical tools to meet their needs. Bricolage is both a metaphor and an activity to describe the cognitively creative process researchers engage in while conducting interdisciplinary and multidimensional research. PROCESS At the heart of bricolage is the researchers' engagement in critical hermeneutics, which at its basic level recognises that all objects under study are subject to larger social, political, and historical forces that constrain individuals. Researching with bricolage treats objects of inquiry as part of a historically situated complex system. As such, data are interpreted in ways that build conceptual bridges between individuals' concrete experiences and concepts acknowledging larger social, historical, economic, and political forces. PEARLS To engage in bricolage, researchers should begin by reading and comparing ideas across disciplines to expose disciplinary-specific assumptions, as well as learn about new theories, approaches and methods that might be utilised for a bricolage project. Researchers should also ask themselves philosophical questions to identify new readings or their data. And finally, researchers should experiment with analytical metaphors because they help to frame new relationships between seemingly unrelated theories, methods and concepts. As researchers engage in bricolage, they need to sidestep their training and over-reliance on research protocols and checklists and engage in a creative tinkering to interpret the world in new ways. In doing so, scholars will be able to push traditional research boundaries and generate critical dialogue to move the field forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tasha R Wyatt
- Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Zareen Zaidi
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rietmeijer CBT, Veen M. Phenomenological Research in Health Professions Education: Tunneling from Both Ends. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE 2022; 34:113-121. [PMID: 34586929 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1971989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Issue: The term "phenomenology" is increasingly being used in Health Professions Education research. Phenomenology refers to a philosophical tradition or discipline. For researchers in Health Professions Education without a philosophical or humanities background, there are two practical problems. The first is that it is not always clear how studies that call themselves "phenomenological" are distinct from studies that use other methods; phenomenology as a label seems to be used for any study that is interested in the experiences of participants. The second problem is that a more in-depth study of phenomenology in the literature yields either abstract definitions such as "examining the underlying structures of consciousness," or contrasting translations of phenomenology to concrete research tools. What would phenomenology in medical education research look like that is both true to its philosophical roots and yields research findings that contribute to the quality of medical education? Evidence: Two medical education researchers, one with a medical background and the other with a philosophy background, engaged in a dialogue with the purpose of formulating an approach for phenomenology in medical education research. The first departed from the practical demands of his research project in which phenomenology was suggested as a methodology, but guidance was lacking. The other departed from the philosophical tradition of phenomenology with the purpose of exploring how phenomenological insights can be valuable for medical education research. The paper presents these journeys and the results of this dialogue where they formulate starting points for an approach to conducting HPE research that has scientific phenomenological integrity and yields practical results. Implications: Phenomenology has been one of the defining developments in philosophy and the humanities in the 20th century. A basic grasp of its insights is useful for medical education researchers since any research today takes place in the light of these insights. Within medical education, there are certain types of phenomena, research questions, and research goals that call for an explicitly phenomenological approach. Rather than prescribing specific methods or methodologies, phenomenology offers signposts for how to think about the relationship between our research object, methods, and data, and our own role as researchers. We suggest that researchers in HPE, when reporting a phenomenological study, instead of claiming to have followed a certain phenomenological method, explain how their research question, methods, and results fit the purposes and standards of phenomenology. We illustrate this with an example of how to use phenomenology in an interview study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris B T Rietmeijer
- Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mario Veen
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brown MEL, Kelly M, Finn GM. Thoughts that breathe, and words that burn: poetic inquiry within health professions education. PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 10:257-264. [PMID: 34472010 PMCID: PMC8505582 DOI: 10.1007/s40037-021-00682-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Qualitative inquiry is increasingly popular in health professions education, and there has been a move to solidify processes of analysis to demystify the practice and increase rigour. Whilst important, being bound too heavily by methodological processes potentially represses the imaginative creativity of qualitative expression and interpretation-traditional cornerstones of the approach. Rigid adherence to analytic steps risks leaving no time or space for moments of 'wonder' or emotional responses which facilitate rich engagement. Poetic inquiry, defined as research which uses poetry 'as, in, [or] for inquiry', offers ways to encourage creativity and deep engagement with qualitative data within health professions education. Poetic inquiry attends carefully to participant language, can deepen researcher reflexivity, may increase the emotive impact of research, and promotes an efficiency of qualitative expression through the use of 'razor sharp' language. This A Qualitative Space paper introduces the approach by outlining how it may be applied to inquiry within health professions education. Approaches to engaging with poetic inquiry are discussed and illustrated using examples from the field's scholarship. Finally, recommendations for interested researchers on how to engage with poetic inquiry are made, including suggestions as to how to poetize existing qualitative research practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan E L Brown
- Health Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.
- Medical Education Innovation and Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Martina Kelly
- Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gabrielle M Finn
- Health Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Samuriwo R. Values, culture, narrative and medical education: The case for a renewed focus. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 55:888-889. [PMID: 34003497 DOI: 10.1111/medu.14569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ray Samuriwo
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Wales Centre for Evidence Based Care, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Veen M. Creative leaps in theory: the might of abduction. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION : THEORY AND PRACTICE 2021; 26:1173-1183. [PMID: 34142300 PMCID: PMC8338823 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-021-10057-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
This paper argues that abductive reasoning has a central place in theorizing Health Professions Education. At the root of abduction lies a fundamental debate: How do we connect practice, which is always singular and unique, with theory, which describes the world in terms of rules, generalizations, and universals? While abduction was initially seen as the 'poor cousin' of deduction and induction, ultimately it has something important to tell us about the role of imagination and humility in theorizing Health Professions Education. It is that which makes theory possible, because it allows us to ask what might be the case and calls attention to the role of creative leaps in theory. Becoming aware of the abductive reasoning we already perform in our research allows us to take the role of imagination-something rarely associated with theory-seriously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Veen
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Postbus 2040, 3000, Rotterdam, CA, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|