Technology-Enhanced Learning of Human Trauma Biomechanics in an Interprofessional Student Context

Sociomaterial perspective as applied in interprofessional education and collaborative practice: a scoping review

Learning and working together towards better health outcomes today have become more complex requiring an investigation on how interprofessional education (IPE) and interprofessional collaboration (IPC) practices could be sustained and further developed. Through a sociomaterial perspective, we can better understand IPE and IPC practices by foregrounding the material aspect of learning and working together and examining its relationship with humans and their interactions. This article aimed to examine existing literature that discusses the application of sociomaterial perspectives in IPE and IPC. A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's framework to explore the extent within the current body of knowledge that discuss how sociomaterial perspective is applied in IPE and IPC practices. A systematic database search was performed in September 2021 to retrieve literature published from 2007 onwards, with forty-three papers meeting the inclusion criteria. These papers included research articles, book chapters, conference papers and commentaries, with the majority originating from Europe. The thematic analysis revealed the following themes: (1) power as a sociomaterial entity shaping IPE and IPC; (2) inclusion of non-health professionals in reimagining IPE and IPC practices, and (3) the critical understanding of sociomateriality. The findings suggest that a sociomaterial perspective can allow for the reimagination of the contemporary and future practices of interprofessionalism.

Behavioral sciences applied to acute care teams: a research agenda for the years ahead by a European research network

BACKGROUND

Multi-disciplinary behavioral research on acute care teams has focused on understanding how teams work and on identifying behaviors characteristic of efficient and effective team performance. We aimed to define important knowledge gaps and establish a research agenda for the years ahead of prioritized research questions in this field of applied health research.

METHODS

In the first step, high-priority research questions were generated by a small highly specialized group of 29 experts in the field, recruited from the multinational and multidisciplinary "Behavioral Sciences applied to Acute care teams and Surgery (BSAS)" research network - a cross-European, interdisciplinary network of researchers from social sciences as well as from the medical field committed to understanding the role of behavioral sciences in the context of acute care teams. A consolidated list of 59 research questions was established. In the second step, 19 experts attending the 2020 BSAS annual conference quantitatively rated the importance of each research question based on four criteria - usefulness, answerability, effectiveness, and translation into practice. In the third step, during half a day of the BSAS conference, the same group of 19 experts discussed the prioritization of the research questions in three online focus group meetings and established recommendations.

RESULTS

Research priorities identified were categorized into six topics: (1) interventions to improve team process; (2) dealing with and implementing new technologies; (3) understanding and measuring team processes; (4) organizational aspects impacting teamwork; (5) training and health professions education; and (6) organizational and patient safety culture in the healthcare domain. Experts rated the first three topics as particularly relevant in terms of research priorities; the focus groups identified specific research needs within each topic.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on research priorities within the BSAS community and the broader field of applied health sciences identified through this work, we advocate for the prioritization for funding in these areas.

Being-Opposite-Illness: Phenomenological Ontology in Medical Education and Clinical Practice

Issue: Phenomenology has proven to be a very useful tool for medicine. Descriptive, first-person accounts of patient experiences can reveal new and unique insights. These insights can inform renewed approaches to medical education and practice. However, comparatively little research has been done on the other side of the clinical encounter. This leaves the lived experiences of doctors diagnosing and treating illness unaddressed and the ontological transformation of medical students through medical education unexplored. Evidence: This paper provides a phenomenological description of the clinical encounter and ontological transformation of the medical student into the doctor. I argue doctors have a unique ontology, rooted in the objectification of the patient, for which I use the term being-opposite-illness This is achieved, through phenomenological examination of my experiences as a medical student and through descriptions of three distinct types of face-to-face encounters: the basic encounter with the Other, the encounter with illness, and the clinical encounter, which I argue are all metaphysically distinct. Finally, textual analysis of popular first-person accounts from two doctors, Henry Marsh and Paul Kalanithi, provide an illustration of being-opposite-illness in clinical practice and how this ontological transformation occurs through medical education. Implications: Together, the phenomenology of the clinical encounter and textual analysis of Marsh and Kalanithi reveal clinical practice and medical education be an ontological transformative process. This paper attempts a new understanding of this experience of doctors by accounting for their unique ontology. In sum, I suggest being-opposite-illness can represent a new lens for analyzing the experience of doctors. Through this, I hope to promote new medical education and practice approaches.