From bacteria to humans, chromatin to elongation, and activation to repression: The expanding roles of noncoding RNAs in regulating transcription

C-value paradox: Genesis in misconception that natural selection follows anthropocentric parameters of 'economy' and 'optimum'

C-value paradox refers to the lack of correlation between biological complexity and the intuitively expected protein-coding genomic information or DNA content. Here I discuss five questions about this paradox: i) Do biologically complex organisms carry more protein-coding genes? ii) Does variable accumulation of selfish/ junk/ parasitic DNA underlie the c-value paradox? iii) Can nucleoskeletal or nucleotypic function of DNA explain the enigma of orders of magnitude high levels of DNA in some 'lower' taxa or in taxonomically related species? iv) Can the newly understood noncoding but functional DNA explain the c-value paradox? and, v) Does natural selection uniformly apply the anthropocentric parameters for 'optimum' and 'economy'? Answers to Q.1-5 are largely negative. Biology presents numerous 'anomalous' examples where the same end function/ phenotype is attained in different organisms through astoundingly diverse ways that appear 'illogical' in our perceptions. Such evolutionary oddities exist because natural selection, unlike a designer, exploits random and stochastic events to modulate the existing system. Consequently, persistence of the new-found 'solution/s' often appear bizarre, uneconomic, and therefore, paradoxical to human logic. The unexpectedly high c-values in diverse organisms are irreversible evolutionary accidents that persisted, and the additional DNA often got repurposed over the evolutionary time scale. Therefore, the c-value paradox is a redundant issue. Future integrative biological studies should address evolutionary mechanisms and processes underlying sporadic DNA expansions/ contractions, and how the newly acquired DNA content has been repurposed in diverse groups.

RNA-Seq employing a novel rRNA depletion strategy reveals a rich repertoire of snoRNAs in Euglena gracilis including box C/D and Ψ-guide RNAs targeting the modification of rRNA extremities

Previous mRNA transcriptome studies of Euglena gracilis have shown that this organism possesses a large and diverse complement of protein coding genes; however, the study of non-coding RNA classes has been limited. The natural extensive fragmentation of the E. gracilis large subunit ribosomal RNA presents additional barriers to the identification of non-coding RNAs as size-selected small RNA libraries will be dominated by rRNA sequences. In this study we have developed a strategy to significantly reduce rRNA amplification prior to RNA-Seq analysis thereby producing a ncRNA library allowing for the identification of many new E. gracilis small RNAs. Library analysis reveals 113 unique new small nucleolar (sno) RNAs and a large collection of snoRNA isoforms, as well as the first significant collection of nuclear tRNAs in this organism. A 3' end AGAUGN consensus motif and conserved structural features can now be defined for E. gracilis pseudouridine guide RNAs. snoRNAs of both classes were identified that target modification of the 3' extremities of rRNAs utilizing predicted base-pairing interactions with internally transcribed spacers (ITS), providing insight into the timing of steps in rRNA maturation. Cumulatively, this represents the most comprehensive analysis of small ncRNAs in Euglena gracilis to date.

Long Noncoding RNAs as Targets and Regulators of Nuclear Receptors

Intensive research has been directed at the discovery, biogenesis, and expression patterns of long noncoding RNAs , yet their biochemical functions have remained elusive for the most part. Nuclear receptors that interpret signaling mediated by small molecule hormones play a role in regulating the expression of some long noncoding RNAs. More importantly, these RNAs have also been shown to effect hormone-affected gene transcription regulated by the nuclear receptors. In this chapter, we summarize the current knowledge that has been acquired on hormonal signaling inducing expression of long noncoding RNAs and how they then may act in trans or in cis to modulate gene transcription. We highlight a few of these noncoding RNA molecules in terms of how they may impact hormone-driven cancers. Future directions critical for moving this field forward are presented, with a clear emphasis on the need for better biochemical approaches to address the mechanism of action of these exciting RNAs.

Transcription of ncDNA: Many roads lead to local gene regulation

Transcription of ncDNA occurs throughout eukaryotic genomes, generating a wide array of ncRNAs. One large class of ncRNAs includes those transcribed over the promoter regions of nearby protein coding genes. Recent studies, primarily focusing on individual genes have uncovered multiple mechanisms by which promoter-associated transcriptional activity locally alters gene expression.

The cytoplasmic and nuclear populations of the eukaryote tRNA-isopentenyl transferase have distinct functions with implications in human cancer

Mod5 is the yeast tRNA isopentenyl transferase, an enzyme that is conserved from bacteria to humans. Mod5 is primarily cytoplasmic where it modifies the A37 position of a few tRNAs, and the yeast enzyme has been shown capable of forming heritable, amyloid-like aggregates that confer a selective advantage in the presence of specific antifungal agents. A subpopulation of Mod5 is also found associated with nuclear tRNA genes, where it contributes tRNA-gene mediated (tgm) silencing of local transcription by RNA polymerase II. The tgm-silencing function of Mod5 has been observed in yeast and a Mod5-deletion in yeast can be complemented by the plant and human tRNA isopentenyl transferases, but not the bacterial enzymes, possibly due to the lack of an extended C-terminal domain found in eukaryotes. In light of this additional nuclear role for Mod5 we discuss the proposed role of the human homologue of Mod5, TRIT1, as a tumor suppressor protein.

Deep profiling of the novel intermediate-size noncoding RNAs in intraerythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum

Intermediate-size noncoding RNAs (is-ncRNAs) have been shown to play important regulatory roles in the development of several eukaryotic organisms. However, they have not been thoroughly explored in Plasmodium falciparum, which is the most virulent malaria parasite infecting human being. By using Illumina/Solexa paired-end sequencing of an is-ncRNA-specific library, we performed a systematic identification of novel is-ncRNAs in intraerythrocytic P. falciparum, strain 3D7. A total of 1,198 novel is-ncRNA candidates, including antisense, intergenic, and intronic is-ncRNAs, were identified. Bioinformatics analyses showed that the intergenic is-ncRNAs were the least conserved among different Plasmodium species, and antisense is-ncRNAs were more conserved than their sense counterparts. Twenty-two novel snoRNAs were identified, and eight potential novel classes of P. falciparum is-ncRNAs were revealed by clustering analysis. The expression of randomly selected novel is-ncRNAs was confirmed by RT-PCR and northern blotting assays. An obvious different expressional profile of the novel is-ncRNA between the early and late intraerythrocytic developmental stages of the parasite was observed. The expression levels of the antisense RNAs correlated with those of their cis-encoded sense RNA counterparts, suggesting that these is-ncRNAs are involved in the regulation of gene expression of the parasite. In conclusion, we accomplished a deep profiling analysis of novel is-ncRNAs in P. falciparum, analysed the conservation and structural features of these novel is-ncRNAs, and revealed their differential expression patterns during the development of the parasite. These findings provide important information for further functional characterisation of novel is-ncRNAs during the development of P. falciparum.

Stress granule formation in Entamoeba histolytica: cross-talk between EhMLBP, EhRLE3 reverse transcriptase and polyubiquitinated proteins

The Entamoeba histolytica-methylated LINE-binding protein (EhMLBP) binds to methylated repetitive DNA and is a positive regulator of a reverse transcriptase of a long interspersed nucleotide element (LINE). This protein protects trophozoites against heat shock by reducing protein aggregation. The presence of EhMLBP and polyubiquitinated proteins in heat shock-induced protein aggregates raised the question whether these proteins interact. This assumption was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation experiments: ubiquitinated proteins were detected in the perinuclear region of non-stressed E. histolytica trophozoites, whereas ubiquitinated proteins were detected in the perinuclear region and colocalized with EhMLBP in cytoplasmic granules in heat-shocked trophozoites. We also observed that overexpression of the reverse transcriptase of EhRLE3 induced the upregulation of EhMLBP expression and the formation of these EhMLBP-containing granules. Since (i) these EhMLBP-containing granules in the cytoplasm of heat-shocked E. histolytica trophozoites also contain polyubiquitinated proteins and poly(A)(+) mRNA and (ii) their formation is promoted by sodium arsenate, puromycin, and pateamine A and is inhibited by cycloheximide, we propose that these cytoplasmic EhMLBP-containing granules are stress granules. Our data also suggest that the formation of these granules is dependent upon EhMLBP and LINE.

H19 inhibits RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription by disrupting the hnRNP U-actin complex

BACKGROUND

H19 was one of the earliest identified, and is the most studied, long noncoding RNAs. It is presumed that H19 is essential for regulating development and disease conditions, and it is associated with carcinogenesis for many types. However the biological function and regulatory mechanism of this conserved RNA, particularly with respect to its effect on transcription, remain largely unknown.

METHODS

We performed RNA pulldown, RNA immunoprecipitation and deletion mapping to identify the proteins that are associated with H19. In addition, we employed EU (5-ethynyl uridine) incorporation, immunoprecipitation and Western blotting to investigate the functional aspects of H19.

RESULTS

Our research further verifies that H19 is bound to hnRNP U, and this interaction is located within the 5' 882 nt region of H19. Moreover, H19 disrupts the interaction between hnRNP U and actin, which inhibits phosphorylation at Ser5 of the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) C-terminal domain (CTD), consequently preventing RNA Pol II-mediated transcription. We also showed that hnRNP U is essential for H19-mediated transcription repression.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we demonstrate that H19 inhibits RNA Pol II-mediated transcription by disrupting the hnRNP U-actin complex.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

These data suggest that H19 regulates general transcription and exerts wide-ranging effects in organisms.

The non-coding B2 RNA binds to the DNA cleft and active-site region of RNA polymerase II

The B2 family of short interspersed elements is transcribed into non-coding RNA by RNA polymerase III. The ~180-nt B2 RNA has been shown to potently repress mRNA transcription by binding tightly to RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and assembling with it into complexes on promoter DNA, where it keeps the polymerase from properly engaging the promoter DNA. Mammalian Pol II is an ~500-kDa complex that contains 12 different protein subunits, providing many possible surfaces for interaction with B2 RNA. We found that the carboxy-terminal domain of the largest Pol II subunit was not required for B2 RNA to bind Pol II and repress transcription in vitro. To identify the surface on Pol II to which the minimal functional region of B2 RNA binds, we coupled multi-step affinity purification, reversible formaldehyde cross-linking, peptide sequencing by mass spectrometry, and analysis of peptide enrichment. The Pol II peptides most highly recovered after cross-linking to B2 RNA mapped to the DNA binding cleft and active-site region of Pol II. These studies determine the location of a defined nucleic acid binding site on a large, native, multi-subunit complex and provide insight into the mechanism of transcriptional repression by B2 RNA.

Long non-coding RNAs coordinate cellular responses to stress

Following the initial discovery of the heat shock RNA omega (hsrω) gene of Drosophila melanogaster to be non-coding (nc) and also inducible by cell stress, other stress-inducible long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) have been described in diverse organisms. In view of the rapid sequence divergence of lncRNAs, present knowledge of stress trasncriptome is limited and fragmented. Several known stress-related lncRNAs, associated with specific nuclear speckled domains or nucleolus, provide structural base for sequestering diverse RNA-processing/regulatory proteins. Others have roles in transcriptional or translational inhibition during stress or in signaling pathways; functions of several other lncRNAs are not yet known. Most stress-related lncRNAs act primarily by modulating activity of the proteins to which they bind or by sequestering specific sets of proteins away from the active pool. A common emerging theme is that a given lncRNA targets one or more protein/s with key role/s in the cascade of events triggered by the stress and therefore has a widespread integrative effect. Since proteins associate with RNA through short sequence motifs, the overall base sequence of functionally similar ncRNAs is often not conserved except for specific motifs. The rapid evolvability of ncRNA sequences provides elegant modules for adaptability to changing environment as binding of one or the other protein to ncRNA can alter its structure and functions in distinct ways. Thus the stress-related lncRNAs act as hubs in the cellular networks to coordinate activities of the members within and between different networks to maintain cellular homeostasis for survival or to trigger cell death.

B2 RNA represses TFIIH phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II

Mouse B2 RNA represses RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription during the cellular heat shock response. B2 RNA binds Pol II, enters complexes at promoters, and keeps the polymerase from engaging the DNA. Here we show that phosphorylation of Ser5 residues in the Pol II carboxy terminal domain (CTD) decreases after heat shock at the promoter of the repressed actin gene in mouse cells, despite the continued presence of Cdk7 and cyclin H. Biochemical assays revealed that B2 RNA, when present with Pol II in promoter-bound complexes, specifically represses CTD phosphorylation by TFIIH.

Sensitive and label-free biosensing of RNA with predicted secondary structures by a triplex affinity capture method

A novel biosensing approach for the label-free detection of nucleic acid sequences of short and large lengths has been implemented, with special emphasis on targeting RNA sequences with secondary structures. The approach is based on selecting 8-aminoadenine-modified parallel-stranded DNA tail-clamps as affinity bioreceptors. These receptors have the ability of creating a stable triplex-stranded helix at neutral pH upon hybridization with the nucleic acid target. A surface plasmon resonance biosensor has been used for the detection. With this strategy, we have detected short DNA sequences (32-mer) and purified RNA (103-mer) at the femtomol level in a few minutes in an easy and level-free way. This approach is particularly suitable for the detection of RNA molecules with predicted secondary structures, reaching a limit of detection of 50 fmol without any label or amplification steps. Our methodology has shown a marked enhancement for the detection (18% for short DNA and 54% for RNA), when compared with the conventional duplex approach, highlighting the large difficulty of the duplex approach to detect nucleic acid sequences, especially those exhibiting stable secondary structures. We believe that our strategy could be of great interest to the RNA field.

EFFECT OF NON-CODING RNA ON BISTABILITY AND OSCILLATIONS IN THE mRNA-PROTEIN INTERPLAY

The feedbacks between the mRNA and protein synthesis may result in kinetic bistability and oscillations. Two generic models predicting bistability include, respectively, a gene with positive regulation of the mRNA production by protein and two genes with mutual suppression of the mRNA production due to negative regulation of the gene transcription by protein. The simplest model predicting oscillations describes a gene with negative regulation of the mRNA production by protein formed via mRNA translation and a few steps of conversion. We complement these models by the steps of non-coding RNA (ncRNA) formation and ncRNA-mRNA association and degradation. With this extension, the bistability can often be observed as well. Without and with ncRNA, the biochemistry behind the steady states may be different. In the latter case, for example, ncRNA may control the mRNA population in the situations when this population is relatively small, and one can observe a switch in the mRNA, protein and ncRNA populations. Our analysis of oscillatory kinetics of the mRNA-protein interplay shows that with ncRNA the oscillations may be observed in a wider range of parameters and the amplitude of oscillations may be larger.

RNA templating of molecular assembly and covalent modification patterning in early molecular evolution and modern biosystems

The Direct RNA Template (DRT) hypothesis proposes that an early stage of genetic code evolution involved RNA molecules acting as stereochemical recognition templates for assembly of specific amino acids in sequence-ordered arrays, providing a framework for directed covalent peptide bond formation. It is hypothesized here that modern biological precedents may exist for RNA-based structural templating with functional analogies to hypothetical DRT systems. Beyond covalent molecular assembly, an extension of the DRT concept can include RNA molecules acting as dynamic structural template guides for the specific non-covalent assembly of multi-subunit complexes, equivalent to structural assembly chaperones. However, despite numerous precedents for RNA molecules acting as scaffolds for protein complexes, true RNA-mediated assembly chaperoning appears to be absent in modern biosystems. Another level of function with parallels to a DRT system is possible if RNA structural motifs dynamically guided specific patterns of catalytic modifications within multiple target sites in a pre-formed polymer or macromolecular complex. It is suggested that this type of structural RNA templating could logically play a functional role in certain areas of biology, one of which is the glycome of complex organisms. If any such RNA templating processes are shown to exist, they would share no necessary evolutionary relationships with events during early molecular evolution, but may promote understanding of the practical limits of biological RNA functions now and in the ancient RNA World. Awareness of these formal possibilities may also assist in the current search for functions of extensive non-coding RNAs in complex organisms, or for efforts towards artificial rendering of DRT systems.

Small RNA and transcriptional upregulation

Small RNA molecules, such as microRNA and small interfering RNA, have emerged as master regulators of gene expression through their ability to suppress target genes in a phenomenon collectively called RNA interference (RNAi). There is growing evidence that small RNAs can also serve as activators of gene expression by targeting gene regulatory sequences. This novel mechanism, known as RNA activation (RNAa), appears to be conserved in at least mammalian cells and triggered by both endogenous and artificially designed small RNAs. RNAa depends on Argonaute proteins, but possesses kinetics distinct from that of RNAi. Epigenetic changes are associated with RNAa and may contribute to transcriptional activation of target genes, but the underlying mechanism remains elusive. Given the potential of RNAa as a molecular tool for studying gene function and as a therapeutic for disease, further research is needed to completely elucidate its molecular mechanism in order to refine the rules for target selection and improve strategies for exploiting it therapeutically. WIREs RNA 2011 2 748-760 DOI: 10.1002/wrna.90 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Defining features and exploring chemical modifications to manipulate RNAa activity

RNA interference (RNAi) is an evolutionary conserved mechanism by which small double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)--termed small interfering RNA (siRNA)--inhibit translation or degrade complementary mRNA sequences. Identifying features and enzymatic components of the RNAi pathway have led to the design of highly-effective siRNA molecules for laboratory and therapeutic application. RNA activation (RNAa) is a newly discovered mechanism of gene induction also triggered by dsRNAs termed small activating RNA (saRNA). It offers similar benefits as RNA interference (RNAi), while representing a new method of gene overexpression. In the present study, we identify features of RNAa and explore chemical modifications to saRNAs that improve the applicability of RNAa. We evaluate the rate of RNAa activity in order to define an optimal window of gene induction, while comparing the kinetic differences between RNAa and RNAi. We identify Ago2 as a conserved enzymatic component of both RNAa and RNAi implicating that saRNA may tolerate modification based on Ago2 function. As such, we define chemical modifications to saRNAs that manipulate RNAa activity, as well as exploit their effects to design saRNAs with enhanced medicinal properties. These findings reveal functional features of RNAa that may be utilized to augment saRNA function for mechanistic studies or the development of RNAa-based drugs.

Intergenic transcription causes repression by directing nucleosome assembly

Transcription of non-protein-coding DNA (ncDNA) and its noncoding RNA (ncRNA) products are beginning to emerge as key regulators of gene expression. We previously identified a regulatory system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae whereby transcription of intergenic ncDNA (SRG1) represses transcription of an adjacent protein-coding gene (SER3) through transcription interference. We now provide evidence that SRG1 transcription causes repression of SER3 by directing a high level of nucleosomes over SRG1, which overlaps the SER3 promoter. Repression by SRG1 transcription is dependent on the Spt6 and Spt16 transcription elongation factors. Significantly, spt6 and spt16 mutations reduce nucleosome levels over the SER3 promoter without reducing intergenic SRG1 transcription, strongly suggesting that nucleosome levels, not transcription levels, cause SER3 repression. Finally, we show that spt6 and spt16 mutations allow transcription factor access to the SER3 promoter. Our results raise the possibility that transcription of ncDNA may contribute to nucleosome positioning on a genome-wide scale where, in some cases, it negatively impacts protein-DNA interactions.

Wisely chosen paths--regulation of rRNA synthesis: delivered on 30 June 2010 at the 35th FEBS Congress in Gothenburg, Sweden

All cells, from prokaryotes to vertebrates, synthesize enormous amounts of rRNA to produce 1-2 million ribosomes per cell cycle, which are required to maintain the protein synthesis capacity of the daughter cells. In recent years, considerable progress has been made in the elucidation of the basic principles of transcriptional regulation and the pathways that adapt cellular rRNA synthesis to metabolic activity, a process that is essential for understanding the link between nucleolar activity, cell growth, proliferation, and apoptosis. I will survey our present knowledge of the highly coordinated networks that regulate transcription by RNA polymerase I, coordinating rRNA gene transcription and ribosome production with environmental cues. Moreover, I will discuss the epigenetic mechanisms that control the chromatin structure and transcriptional activity of rRNA genes, in particular the role of noncoding RNA in DNA methylation and transcriptional silencing.

Interaction of noncoding RNA with the rDNA promoter mediates recruitment of DNMT3b and silencing of rRNA genes

Noncoding RNAs are important components of regulatory networks controlling the epigenetic state of chromatin. We analyzed the role of pRNA (promoter-associated RNA), a noncoding RNA that is complementary to the rDNA promoter, in mediating de novo CpG methylation of rRNA genes (rDNA). We show that pRNA interacts with the target site of the transcription factor TTF-I, forming a DNA:RNA triplex that is specifically recognized by the DNA methyltransferase DNMT3b. The results reveal a compelling new mechanism of RNA-dependent DNA methylation, suggesting that recruitment of DNMT3b by DNA:RNA triplexes may be a common and generally used pathway in epigenetic regulation.

MacroRNA underdogs in a microRNA world: evolutionary, regulatory, and biomedical significance of mammalian long non-protein-coding RNA

The central dogma of molecular biology relegates RNAs to the role of "messengers" of genetic information, with proteins as the end products that perform key roles as regulators and effectors of biological processes. Notable exceptions include non-protein-coding RNAs, which function as adaptors (tRNAs) and ribosomal components (rRNAs) during translation, as well as in splicing (snRNAs) and RNA maturation including editing (snoRNAs). Genome and transcriptome projects have revealed, however, a significant number, rivaling the protein-coding transcripts, of non-protein-coding RNAs not related to these previously characterized transcript classes. Non-protein-coding RNA research has primarily focused on microRNAs, a small subclass of non-protein-coding RNAs, and their regulatory roles in gene expression, and these findings have been reviewed extensively. Here, we turn our attention to the larger, in number and size, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and review their evolutionary complexity and the growing evidence for their diverse mechanisms of action and functional roles in basic molecular and cellular biology and in human disease. In contrast to the focus on in-silico and expression studies in existing lncRNA literature, we emphasize direct evidence for lncRNA function, presenting experimental approaches and strategies for systematic characterization of lncRNA activities, with applications to known gene regulatory networks and diseases.

Involvement of argonaute proteins in gene silencing and activation by RNAs complementary to a non-coding transcript at the progesterone receptor promoter

Double-stranded RNAs that are complementary to non-coding transcripts at gene promoters can activate or inhibit gene expression in mammalian cells. Understanding the mechanism for modulating gene expression by promoter-targeted antigene RNAs (agRNAs) will require identification of the proteins involved in recognition. Previous reports have implicated argonaute (AGO) proteins, but identifications have differed with involvement of AGO1, AGO2, or both AGO1 and AGO2 being reported by different studies. The roles of AGO3 and AGO4 have not been investigated. Here, we examine the role of AGO 1–4 in gene silencing and activation of the progesterone receptor (PR) gene. Expression of AGO2 is necessary for efficient gene silencing or activation and AGO2 is recruited to the non-coding transcript that overlaps the promoter during both gene silencing and activation. Expression of AGO1, AGO3 and AGO4 are not necessary for gene silencing or activation nor are AGO1, AGO3, or AGO4 recruited to the target non-coding transcript during gene activation. These data indicate that AGO2 is the primary AGO variant involved in modulating expression of PR by agRNAs.

Transcriptional regulation by small RNAs at sequences downstream from 3' gene termini

Transcriptome studies reveal many noncoding transcripts overlapping 3' gene termini. The function of these transcripts is unknown. Here we have characterized transcription at the progesterone receptor (PR) locus and identified noncoding transcripts that overlap the 3' end of the gene. Small RNAs complementary to sequences beyond the 3' terminus of PR mRNA modulated expression of PR, recruited argonaute 2 to a 3' noncoding transcript, altered occupancy of RNA polymerase II, induced chromatin changes at the PR promoter and affected responses to physiological stimuli. We found that the promoter and 3' terminal regions of the PR locus are in close proximity, providing a potential mechanism for RNA-mediated control of transcription over long genomic distances. These results extend the potential for small RNAs to regulate transcription to target sequences beyond the 3' termini of mRNA.

How eukaryotic genes are transcribed

Regulation of eukaryotic gene expression is far more complex than one might have imagined 30 years ago. However, progress towards understanding gene regulatory mechanisms has been rapid and comprehensive, which has made the integration of detailed observations into broadly connected concepts a challenge. This review attempts to integrate the following concepts: (1) a well-defined organization of nucleosomes and modification states at most genes; (2) regulatory networks of sequence-specific transcription factors; (3) chromatin remodeling coupled to promoter assembly of the general transcription factors and RNA polymerase II; and (4) phosphorylation states of RNA polymerase II coupled to chromatin modification states during transcription. The wealth of new insights arising from the tools of biochemistry, genomics, cell biology, and genetics is providing a remarkable view into the mechanics of gene regulation.

Dampening DNA binding: a common mechanism of transcriptional repression for both ncRNAs and protein domains

With eukaryotic non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) now established as critical regulators of cellular transcription, the true diversity with which they can elicit biological effects is beginning to be appreciated. Two ncRNAs, mouse B2 RNA and human Alu RNA, have been found to repress mRNA transcription in response to heat shock. They do so by binding directly to RNA polymerase II, assembling into complexes on promoter DNA, and disrupting contacts between the polymerase and the DNA. Such a mechanism of repression had not previously been observed for a eukaryotic ncRNA; however, there are examples of eukaryotic protein domains that repress transcription by blocking essential protein-DNA interactions. Comparing the mechanism of transcriptional repression utilized by these protein domains to that used by B2 and Alu RNAs raises intriguing questions regarding transcriptional control, and how B2 and Alu RNAs might themselves be regulated.

Research resource: expression profiling reveals unexpected targets and functions of the human steroid receptor RNA activator (SRA) gene

The human steroid receptor RNA activator (SRA) gene encodes both noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) and protein-generating isoforms. In reporter assays, SRA ncRNA enhances nuclear receptor and myogenic differentiation 1 (MyoD)-mediated transcription but also participates in specific corepressor complexes, serving as a distinct scaffold. That SRA RNA levels might affect some biological functions, such as proliferation, apoptosis, steroidogenesis, and myogenesis, has been reported. However, the breadth of endogenous target genes that might be regulated by SRA RNAs remains largely unknown. To address this, we depleted SRA RNA in two human cancer cell lines with small interfering RNAs and then assayed for changes in gene expression by microarray analyses. The majority of significantly changed genes were reduced upon SRA knockdown, implicating SRA RNAs as endogenous coactivators. Unexpectedly, only a small subset of direct estrogen receptor-alpha target genes was affected in estradiol-treated MCF-7 cells. Eight bona fide SRA downstream target genes were identified (SLC2A3, SLC2A12, CCL20, TGFB2, DIO2, TMEM65, TBL1X, and TMPRSS2), representing entirely novel SRA targets, except for TMPRSS2. These data suggest unanticipated roles for SRA in glucose uptake, cellular signaling, T(3) hormone generation, and invasion/metastasis. SRA depletion in MDA-MB-231 cells reduced invasiveness and expression of some genes critical for this process. Consistent with the knockdown data, overexpressed SRA ncRNA coactivates certain target promoters and may enhance the activity of some coregulatory proteins. This study is a valuable resource because it represents the first genome-wide analysis of a mammalian RNA coregulator.

TFIIF facilitates dissociation of RNA polymerase II from noncoding RNAs that lack a repression domain

Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have recently been found to regulate multiple steps in mammalian mRNA transcription. Mouse B2 RNA and human Alu RNA bind RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and repress mRNA transcription, using regions of the ncRNAs referred to as repression domains. Two other ncRNAs, mouse B1 RNA and human small cytoplasmic Alu (scAlu) RNA, bind Pol II with high affinity but lack repression domains and hence do not inhibit transcription. To better understand the interplay between ncRNAs that bind Pol II and their functions in transcription, we studied how Pol II binding and transcriptional repression are controlled by general transcription factors. We found that TFIIF associates with B1 RNA/Pol II and scAlu RNA/Pol II complexes and decreases their kinetic stability. Both subunits of TFIIF are required for this activity. Importantly, fusing a repression domain to B1 RNA stabilizes its interaction with Pol II in the presence of TFIIF. These results suggest a new role for TFIIF in regulating the interaction of ncRNAs with Pol II; specifically, it destabilizes interactions with ncRNAs that are not transcriptional repressors. These studies also identify a new function for ncRNA repression domains: they stabilize interactions of ncRNAs with Pol II in the presence of TFIIF.

InvAluable junk: the cellular impact and function of Alu and B2 RNAs

The short interspersed elements (SINEs) Alu and B2 are retrotransposons that litter the human and mouse genomes, respectively. Given their abundance, the manner in which these elements impact the host genome and what their biological functions might be is of significant interest. Finding that Alu and B2 SINEs are transcribed, both as distinct RNA polymerase III transcripts and as part of RNA polymerase II transcripts, and that these SINE encoded RNAs indeed have biological functions has refuted the historical notion that SINEs are merely "junk DNA." This article reviews currently known cellular functions of both RNA polymerase II and RNA polymerase III transcribed Alu and B2 RNAs. These RNAs, in different forms, control gene expression by participating in processes as diverse as mRNA transcriptional control, A-to-I editing, nuclear retention, and alternative splicing. Future studies will likely reveal additional contributions of Alu and B2 RNAs as regulators of gene expression.

6S RNA binding to Esigma(70) requires a positively charged surface of sigma(70) region 4.2

6S RNA is a small, non-coding RNA that interacts with sigma(70)-RNA polymerase and downregulates transcription at many promoters during stationary phase. When bound to sigma(70)-RNA polymerase, 6S RNA is engaged in the active site of sigma(70)-RNA polymerase in a manner similar enough to promoter DNA that the RNA can serve as a template for RNA synthesis. It has been proposed that 6S RNA mimics the conformation of DNA during transcription initiation, suggesting contacts between RNA polymerase and 6S RNA or DNA may be similar. Here we demonstrate that region 4.2 of sigma(70) is critical for the interaction between 6S RNA and RNA polymerase. We define an expanded binding surface that encompasses positively charged residues throughout the recognition helix of the helix-turn-helix motif in region 4.2, in contrast to DNA binding that is largely focused on the N-terminal region of this helix. Furthermore, negatively charged residues in region 4.2 weaken binding to 6S RNA but do not similarly affect DNA binding. We propose that the binding sites for promoter DNA and 6S RNA on region 4.2 of sigma(70) are overlapping but distinct, raising interesting possibilities for how core promoter elements contribute to defining promoters that are sensitive to 6S RNA regulation.

B2 RNA and Alu RNA repress transcription by disrupting contacts between RNA polymerase II and promoter DNA within assembled complexes

Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) are now recognized as transregulators of eukaryotic transcription, a role once attributed exclusively to protein factors. Two ncRNAs in mammalian cells have been shown to repress general mRNA transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) in response to heat shock: mouse B2 RNA and human Alu RNA. B2 and Alu RNAs bind directly and tightly to Pol II and co-occupy the promoters of repressed genes along with the polymerase. Here, we identified the molecular mechanism by which mouse B2 RNA and human Alu RNA repress Pol II transcription. Biochemical assays to probe the network of protein-DNA interactions at the promoter revealed that B2 and Alu RNAs prevent Pol II from establishing contacts with the promoter both upstream and downstream of the TATA box during closed complex formation. Disruption of these contacts correlates with transcriptional repression. We conclude that B2 and Alu RNA prevent Pol II from properly engaging the DNA during closed complex formation, resulting in complexes with an altered conformation that are transcriptionally inert. In the absence of its normal contacts with the promoter, Pol II is likely held in these inactive complexes on DNA through interactions with promoter-bound TATA box-binding protein and transcription factor IIB.