Coordinated roles of SLX4 and MutSβ in DNA repair and the maintenance of genome stability

Harmonin homology domain-mediated interaction of RTEL1 helicase with RPA and DNA provides insights into its recruitment to DNA repair sites

The regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1 (RTEL1) plays roles in telomere DNA maintenance, DNA repair, and genome stability by dismantling D-loops and unwinding G-quadruplex structures. RTEL1 comprises a helicase domain, two tandem harmonin homology domains 1&2 (HHD1 and HHD2), and a Zn2+-binding RING domain. In vitro D-loop disassembly by RTEL1 is enhanced in the presence of replication protein A (RPA). However, the mechanism of RTEL1 recruitment at non-telomeric D-loops remains unknown. In this study, we have unravelled a direct physical interaction between RTEL1 and RPA. Under DNA damage conditions, we showed that RTEL1 and RPA colocalise in the cell. Coimmunoprecipitation showed that RTEL1 and RPA interact, and the deletion of HHDs of RTEL1 significantly reduced this interaction. NMR chemical shift perturbations (CSPs) showed that RPA uses its 32C domain to interact with the HHD2 of RTEL1. Interestingly, HHD2 also interacted with DNA in the in vitro experiments. HHD2 structure was determined using X-ray crystallography, and NMR CSPs mapping revealed that both RPA 32C and DNA competitively bind to HHD2 on an overlapping surface. These results establish novel roles of accessory HHDs in RTEL1's functions and provide mechanistic insights into the RPA-mediated recruitment of RTEL1 to DNA repair sites.

Cellular Responses to Widespread DNA Replication Stress

Replicative DNA polymerases are blocked by nearly all types of DNA damage. The resulting DNA replication stress threatens genome stability. DNA replication stress is also caused by depletion of nucleotide pools, DNA polymerase inhibitors, and DNA sequences or structures that are difficult to replicate. Replication stress triggers complex cellular responses that include cell cycle arrest, replication fork collapse to one-ended DNA double-strand breaks, induction of DNA repair, and programmed cell death after excessive damage. Replication stress caused by specific structures (e.g., G-rich sequences that form G-quadruplexes) is localized but occurs during the S phase of every cell division. This review focuses on cellular responses to widespread stress such as that caused by random DNA damage, DNA polymerase inhibition/nucleotide pool depletion, and R-loops. Another form of global replication stress is seen in cancer cells and is termed oncogenic stress, reflecting dysregulated replication origin firing and/or replication fork progression. Replication stress responses are often dysregulated in cancer cells, and this too contributes to ongoing genome instability that can drive cancer progression. Nucleases play critical roles in replication stress responses, including MUS81, EEPD1, Metnase, CtIP, MRE11, EXO1, DNA2-BLM, SLX1-SLX4, XPF-ERCC1-SLX4, Artemis, XPG, FEN1, and TATDN2. Several of these nucleases cleave branched DNA structures at stressed replication forks to promote repair and restart of these forks. We recently defined roles for EEPD1 in restarting stressed replication forks after oxidative DNA damage, and for TATDN2 in mitigating replication stress caused by R-loop accumulation in BRCA1-defective cells. We also discuss how insights into biological responses to genome-wide replication stress can inform novel cancer treatment strategies that exploit synthetic lethal relationships among replication stress response factors.

Partial Response to Crizotinib in a Lung Adenocarcinoma Patient with a Novel FBXO11 (Intergenic)-ALK (Exon 20-29) Fusion

Intergenic-gene fusion detected by DNA-seq is particularly confusing for drug selection since the function of the intergenic region located upstream is unknown. We reported a case of a 49-year-old male with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, who was detected FBXO11 (intergenic)-ALK (exon 20-29) by DNA-seq, and FISH analysis revealed a positive result. The patient was treated with crizotinib and achieved a PR. The canonical EML4 (exon 1-13)-ALK (exon 20-29) fusion verified by RNA-seq suggested a complex EML4 (exon 1-13)-FBXO11 (intergenic)-ALK (exon 20-29) tripartite rearrangement at the DNA level. Our case emphasized the necessity of RNA-seq for verifying intergenic-gene fusion. Simultaneously, the pathogenic germline SLX4 variant and extensive CNVs of DNA segment were detected by DNA-seq deserves our attention.

Di-valent siRNA-mediated silencing of MSH3 blocks somatic repeat expansion in mouse models of Huntington's disease

Huntington's disease (HD) is a severe neurodegenerative disorder caused by the expansion of the CAG trinucleotide repeat tract in the huntingtin gene. Inheritance of expanded CAG repeats is needed for HD manifestation, but further somatic expansion of the repeat tract in non-dividing cells, particularly striatal neurons, hastens disease onset. Called somatic repeat expansion, this process is mediated by the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway. Among MMR components identified as modifiers of HD onset, MutS homolog 3 (MSH3) has emerged as a potentially safe and effective target for therapeutic intervention. Here, we identify a fully chemically modified short interfering RNA (siRNA) that robustly silences Msh3 in vitro and in vivo. When synthesized in a di-valent scaffold, siRNA-mediated silencing of Msh3 effectively blocked CAG-repeat expansion in the striatum of two HD mouse models without affecting tumor-associated microsatellite instability or mRNA expression of other MMR genes. Our findings establish a promising treatment approach for patients with HD and other repeat expansion diseases.

Structure-forming CAG/CTG repeats interfere with gap repair to cause repeat expansions and chromosome breaks

Expanded CAG/CTG repeats are sites of DNA damage, leading to repeat length changes. Homologous recombination (HR) is one cause of repeat instability and we hypothesized that gap filling was a driver of repeat instability during HR. To test this, we developed an assay such that resection and ssDNA gap fill-in would occur across a (CAG)₇₀ or (CTG)₇₀ repeat tract. When the ssDNA template was a CTG sequence, there were increased repeat contractions and a fragile site was created leading to large-scale deletions. When the CTG sequence was on the resected strand, resection was inhibited, resulting in repeat expansions. Increased nucleolytic processing by deletion of Rad9, the ortholog of 53BP1, rescued repeat instability and chromosome breakage. Loss of Rad51 increased contractions implicating a protective role for Rad51 on ssDNA. Together, our work implicates structure-forming repeats as an impediment to resection and gap-filling which can lead to mutations and large-scale deletions.

PARP Inhibitors and Proteins Interacting with SLX4

PARP inhibitors are small molecules currently used with success in the treatment of certain cancer patients. Their action was first shown to be specific to cells with DNA repair deficiencies, such as BRCA-mutant cancers. However, recent work has suggested clinical interest of these drugs beyond this group of patients. Preclinical data on relationships between the activity of PARP inhibitors and other proteins involved in DNA repair exist, and this review will only highlight findings on the SLX4 protein and its interacting protein partners. As suggested from these available data and depending on further validations, new treatment strategies could be developed in order to broaden the use for PARP inhibitors in cancer patients.

Increased HRD score in cisplatin resistant penile cancer cells

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION

Penile cancer is a rare disease in demand for new therapeutic options. Frequently used combination chemotherapy with 5 fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with metastatic penile cancer mostly results in the development of acquired drug resistance. Availability of cell culture models with acquired resistance against standard therapy could help to understand molecular mechanisms underlying chemotherapy resistance and to identify candidate treatments for an efficient second line therapy.

METHODS

We generated a cell line from a humanpapilloma virus (HPV) negative penile squamous cell carcinoma (UKF-PEC-1). This cell line was subject to chronic exposure to chemotherapy with CDDP and / or 5-FU to induce acquired resistance in the newly established chemo-resistant sublines (PEC-1^rCDDP²⁵⁰⁰, adapted to 2500 ng/ml CDDP; UKF-PEC-1^r5-FU⁵⁰⁰, adapted to 500 ng/ml 5- FU; UKF-PEC1^rCDDP²⁵⁰⁰/^r5-FU⁵⁰⁰, adapted to 2500 ng/ml CDDP and 500 ng/ml 5 -FU). Afterwards cell line pellets were formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded and subject to sequencing as well as testing for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Additionally, exemplary immunohistochemical stainings for p53 and gammaH2AX were applied for verification purposes. Finally, UKF-PEC-1^rCDDP²⁵⁰⁰, UKF-PEC-1^r5-FU⁵⁰⁰, UKF-PEC1^rCDDP²⁵⁰⁰/^r5-FU⁵⁰⁰, and UKF-PEC-3 (an alternative penis cancer cell line) were tested for sensitivity to paclitaxel, docetaxel, olaparib, and rucaparib.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The chemo-resistant sublines differed in their mutational landscapes. UKF-PEC-1^rCDDP²⁵⁰⁰ was characterized by an increased HRD score, which is supposed to be associated with increased PARP inhibitor and immune checkpoint inhibitor sensitivity in cancer. However, UKF-PEC-1^rCDDP²⁵⁰⁰ did not display sensitivity to PARP inhibitors.

The structure-specific endonuclease complex SLX4-XPF regulates Tus-Ter-induced homologous recombination

Vertebrate replication forks arrested at interstrand DNA cross-links (ICLs) engage the Fanconi anemia pathway to incise arrested forks, 'unhooking' the ICL and forming a double strand break (DSB) that is repaired by homologous recombination (HR). The FANCP product, SLX4, in complex with the XPF (also known as FANCQ or ERCC4)-ERCC1 endonuclease, mediates ICL unhooking. Whether this mechanism operates at replication fork barriers other than ICLs is unknown. Here, we study the role of mouse SLX4 in HR triggered by a site-specific chromosomal DNA-protein replication fork barrier formed by the Escherichia coli-derived Tus-Ter complex. We show that SLX4-XPF is required for Tus-Ter-induced HR but not for error-free HR induced by a replication-independent DSB. We additionally uncover a role for SLX4-XPF in DSB-induced long-tract gene conversion, an error-prone HR pathway related to break-induced replication. Notably, Slx4 and Xpf mutants that are defective for Tus-Ter-induced HR are hypersensitive to ICLs and also to the DNA-protein cross-linking agents 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine and zebularine. Collectively, these findings show that SLX4-XPF can process DNA-protein fork barriers for HR and that the Tus-Ter system recapitulates this process.

Inflammatory leiomyosarcoma/rhabdomyoblastic tumor: a report of two cases with novel genetic findings

Inflammatory leiomyosarcoma (ILMS) is a malignant neoplasm showing smooth muscle differentiation, a prominent inflammatory infiltrate, and near‐haploidization. These tumors have significant pathologic and genetic overlap with the recently described “inflammatory rhabdomyoblastic tumor (IRT),” suggesting that ILMS and IRT may belong to one entity. Herein, we describe two cases of ILMS/IRT with attention to new cytogenetic and sequencing findings. The tumors were composed of sheets and fascicles of variably pleomorphic tumor cells showing spindled and epithelioid to rhabdoid morphology and a prominent histiocyte‐rich inflammatory infiltrate typical of ILMS/IRT. In case 1, chromosomal microarray analysis showed a near‐haploid pattern with loss of heterozygosity resulting from loss of one copy of all autosomes except for chromosomes 5, 20, 21, and 22. Case 2 showed areas with high‐grade rhabdomyosarcomatous transformation. In this case, the low‐grade tumor component revealed a hyper‐diploid pattern with loss of heterozygosity for most of autosomes but with a normal diploid copy number state except for chromosomes 5, 20, and 22, which showed a relative gain. The high‐grade tumor component showed a similar pattern of copy‐neutral loss of heterozygosity with additional abnormalities, including mosaic segmental gains at 1p, 5p, 8q, 9p, 20q, and segmental loss at 8p. Next‐generation sequencing identified sequence variants in NF1, TP53, SMARCA4, KRAS, and MSH6. MSH6 variant was confirmed as germline, consistent with the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome in one of our study patients and suggestive that ILMS/IRT might be part of the HNPCC cancer spectrum.

Nucleases and Co-Factors in DNA Replication Stress Responses

DNA replication stress is a constant threat that cells must manage to proliferate and maintain genome integrity. DNA replication stress responses, a subset of the broader DNA damage response (DDR), operate when the DNA replication machinery (replisome) is blocked or replication forks collapse during S phase. There are many sources of replication stress, such as DNA lesions caused by endogenous and exogenous agents including commonly used cancer therapeutics, and difficult-to-replicate DNA sequences comprising fragile sites, G-quadraplex DNA, hairpins at trinucleotide repeats, and telomeres. Replication stress is also a consequence of conflicts between opposing transcription and replication, and oncogenic stress which dysregulates replication origin firing and fork progression. Cells initially respond to replication stress by protecting blocked replisomes, but if the offending problem (e.g., DNA damage) is not bypassed or resolved in a timely manner, forks may be cleaved by nucleases, inducing a DNA double-strand break (DSB) and providing a means to accurately restart stalled forks via homologous recombination. However, DSBs pose their own risks to genome stability if left unrepaired or misrepaired. Here we focus on replication stress response systems, comprising DDR signaling, fork protection, and fork processing by nucleases that promote fork repair and restart. Replication stress nucleases include MUS81, EEPD1, Metnase, CtIP, MRE11, EXO1, DNA2-BLM, SLX1-SLX4, XPF-ERCC1-SLX4, Artemis, XPG, and FEN1. Replication stress factors are important in cancer etiology as suppressors of genome instability associated with oncogenic mutations, and as potential cancer therapy targets to enhance the efficacy of chemo- and radiotherapeutics.

Exploring the Structures and Functions of Macromolecular SLX4-Nuclease Complexes in Genome Stability

All organisms depend on the ability of cells to accurately duplicate and segregate DNA into progeny. However, DNA is frequently damaged by factors in the environment and from within cells. One of the most dangerous lesions is a DNA double-strand break. Unrepaired breaks are a major driving force for genome instability. Cells contain sophisticated DNA repair networks to counteract the harmful effects of genotoxic agents, thus safeguarding genome integrity. Homologous recombination is a high-fidelity, template-dependent DNA repair pathway essential for the accurate repair of DNA nicks, gaps and double-strand breaks. Accurate homologous recombination depends on the ability of cells to remove branched DNA structures that form during repair, which is achieved through the opposing actions of helicases and structure-selective endonucleases. This review focuses on a structure-selective endonuclease called SLX1-SLX4 and the macromolecular endonuclease complexes that assemble on the SLX4 scaffold. First, we discuss recent developments that illuminate the structure and biochemical properties of this somewhat atypical structure-selective endonuclease. We then summarize the multifaceted roles that are fulfilled by human SLX1-SLX4 and its associated endonucleases in homologous recombination and genome stability. Finally, we discuss recent work on SLX4-binding proteins that may represent integral components of these macromolecular nuclease complexes, emphasizing the structure and function of a protein called SLX4IP.

Control of structure-specific endonucleases during homologous recombination in eukaryotes

Structure-Specific Endonucleases (SSE) are specialized DNA endonucleases that recognize and process DNA secondary structures without any strict dependency on the nucleotide sequence context. This enables them to act virtually anywhere in the genome and to make key contributions to the maintenance of genome stability by removing DNA structures that may stall essential cellular processes such as DNA replication, transcription, repair and chromosome segregation. During repair of double strand breaks by homologous recombination mechanisms, DNA secondary structures are formed and processed in a timely manner. Their homeostasis relies on the combined action of helicases, SSE and topoisomerases. In this review, we focus on how SSE contribute to DNA end resection, single-strand annealing and double-strand break repair, with an emphasis on how their action is fine-tuned in those processes.