The evaluation of the biological behavior and grade among cases with mantle cell lymphoma

Translocations targeting CCND2, CCND3, and MYCN do occur in t(11;14)-negative mantle cell lymphomas

The genetics of t(11;14)(q13;q32)/cyclin D1-negative mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is poorly understood. We report here 8 MCL cases lacking t(11;14) or variant CCND1 rearrangement that showed expression of cyclin D1 (2 cases), D2 (2 cases), and D3 (3 cases). One case was cyclin D negative. Cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization detected t(2;12)(p11;p13)/IGK-CCND2 in one of the cyclin D2-positive cases and t(6;14)(p21;q32)/IGH-CCND3 in one of the cyclin D3-positive cases. Moreover, we identified a novel cryptic t(2;14)(p24;q32) targeting MYCN in 2 blastoid MCLs: one negative for cyclin D and one expressing cyclin D3. Interestingly, both cases showed expression of cyclin E. Notably, all 3 blastoid MCLs showed a monoallelic deletion of RB1 associated with a lack of expression of RB1 protein and monoallelic loss of p16. In sum-mary, this study confirms frequent aberrant expression of cyclin D2 and D3 in t(11;14)-negative MCLs and shows a t(11;14)-independent expression of cy-clin D1 in 25% of present cases. Novel findings include cyclin E expression in 2 t(11;14)-negative MCLs characterized by a cryptic t(2;14)(p24;q32) and identification of MYCN as a new lymphoma oncogene associated with a blastoid MCL. Clinically important is a predisposition of t(11;14)-negative MCLs to the central nervous system involvement.

Cyclin D1-negative mantle cell lymphoma: a clinicopathologic study based on gene expression profiling

Cyclin D1 overexpression is believed to be essential in the pathogenesis of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Hence, the existence of cyclin D1-negative MCL has been controversial and difficult to substantiate. Our previous gene expression profiling study identified several cases that lacked cyclin D1 expression, but had a gene expression signature typical of MCL. Herein, we report the clinical, pathologic, and genetic features of 6 cases of cyclin D1-negative MCL. All 6 cases exhibited the characteristic morphologic features and the unique gene expression signature of MCL but lacked the t(11;14)(q13; q32) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. The tumor cells also failed to express cyclin D1 protein, but instead expressed either cyclin D2 (2 cases) or cyclin D3 (4 cases). There was good correlation between cyclin D protein expression and the corresponding mRNA expression levels by gene expression analysis. Using interphase FISH, we did not detect chromosomal translocations or amplifications involving CCND2 and CCND3 loci in these cases. Patients with cyclin D1-negative MCL were similar clinically to those with cyclin D1-positive MCL. In conclusion, cases of cyclin D1-negative MCL do exist and are part of the spectrum of MCL. Up-regulation of cyclin D2 or D3 may substitute for cyclin D1 in the pathogenesis of MCL.