Autografting followed by rituximab for chemosensitive mantle cell lymphoma: A pilot study and literature review

Mantle cell lymphoma

MCL is a well-characterized generally aggressive lymphoma with a poor prognosis. However, patients with a more indolent disease have been reported in whom the initiation of therapy can be delayed without any consequence for the survival. In 2017 the World Health Organization updated the classification of MCL describing two main subtypes with specific molecular characteristics and clinical features, classical and indolent leukaemic nonnodal MCL. Recent research results suggested an improving outcome of this neoplasm. The addition of rituximab to conventional chemotherapy has increased overall response rates, but it did not improve overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone. The use of intensive frontline therapies including rituximab and consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation ameliorated response rate and prolonged progression-free survival in young fit patients, but any impact on survival remains to be proven. Furthermore, the optimal timing, cytoreductive regimen and conditioning regimen, and the clinical implications of achieving a disease remission even at molecular level remain to be elucidated. The development of targeted therapies as the consequence of better understanding of pathogenetic pathways in MCL might improve the outcome of conventional chemotherapy and spare the toxicity of intense therapy in most patients. Cases not eligible for intensive regimens, may be considered for less demanding therapies, such as the combination of rituximab either with CHOP or with purine analogues, or bendamustine. Allogeneic SCT can be an effective option for relapsed disease in patients who are fit enough and have a compatible donor. Maintenance rituximab may be considered after response to immunochemotherapy as the first-line strategy in a wide range of patients. Finally, since the optimal approach to the management of MCL is still evolving, it is critical that these patients are enrolled in clinical trials to identify the better treatment options.

Mantle cell lymphoma

MCL is a well-characterized clinically aggressive lymphoma with a poor prognosis. Recent research findings have slightly improved the outcome of this neoplasm. The addition of rituximab to conventional chemotherapy has increased overall response rates, but it does not improve overall survival with respect to chemotherapy alone. The use of intensive frontline therapies including rituximab and consolidated by ASCT ameliorates response rate and prolongs progression-free survival, but any impact on survival remains to be proven. Furthermore, the optimal timing, cytoreductive regimen and conditioning regimen, and the clinical implications of achieving a disease remission even at molecular level remain to be elucidated. The development of targeted therapies as the consequence of better dissection of pathogenetic pathways in MCL might improve the outcome of conventional chemotherapy in most patients and spare the toxicity of intense therapy in a minority of MCL patients characterized by a relatively indolent disease. Patients not eligible for intensive regimens, such as hyperC-VAD, may be considered for less demanding therapies, such as the combination of rituximab either with CHOP or with purine analogues, or bendamustine. Allogeneic SCT can be an effective option for relapsed disease in patients who are fit enough and have a compatible donor. Maintenance rituximab may be considered after response to immunochemotherapy for relapsed disease, although there are currently no data to recommend this approach as the first-line strategy. As the optimal approach to the management of MCL is still evolving, it is critical that these patients be enrolled in clinical trials to identify better treatment options.

Immunotherapy in mantle cell lymphoma: anti-CD20-based therapy and beyond

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), an aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma characterized by t(11; 14)(q13; q32) chromosomal translocation and overexpression of cyclin D1, has the worst prognosis among all lymphomas. Recent advances in biology, genetics, and immunology have supported the development of immunotherapy in MCL. Rituximab monotherapy in MCL has limited activity. It is more effective when used in combination with chemotherapy such as R-CHOP, R-hyperCVAD/MTX-Ara-C, or R-FCM as front-line or salvage therapy for mantle cell lymphoma. Maintenance with Rituximab was shown to prolong response duration. Although most results have suggested that combining autologous stem cell transplantation with Rituximab may lead to durable remission, the sample size was not sufficient to declare survival benefit. Anti-CD20 radioimmunoconjugates (RICs) (90)Yttrium-ibritumomab tiuxetan and (131)Iodine-tositumomab have been used in mantle cell lymphoma even when patients are relatively resistant to Rituximab-based therapy. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a treatment modality in advanced or relapsed MCL, particularly using reduced-intensity conditioning. MCL may have high response rates and sustained remissions after donor lymphocyte infusion. Dendritic cells (DCs) fused with MCL cells for immunostimulation have preliminarily shown anti-lymphoma effects as well. Idiotype vaccination in MCL patients following Rituximab-containing chemotherapy induced tumor-specific T-cell immunity in the absence of B cells. Other immunotherapy, such as the combination of thalidomide with Rituximab, has shown substantial antitumor activity. A Phase I/II study is ongoing to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the efficacy of lenalidomide in combination with Rituximab for relapsed/refractory MCL. This review summarizes the latest and exciting advances in MCL.