Is lymphoma occurring in the elderly the same disease?

Reduced Dose Intensities of Doxorubicin in Elderly Patients with DLBCL in Rituximab Era

Purpose

The dose intensity of doxorubicin (DID) is important to the survival of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. However, due to expected toxicities, most elderly patients cannot receive full doses of anthracyclines. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of DID on the survival of elderly DLBCL patients (age ≥ 70 years) in the rituximab era.

Materials and Methods

We analyzed 433 DLBCL patients who were treated with R-CHOP between December 2003 and October 2011 at the Seoul National University Hospital. Of these patients, 19.2% were aged ≥ 70 years. We analyzed the survival outcomes according to DID.

Results

Significantly poorer overall survival (OS) was observed for patients aged ≥ 70 years (2-year OS rate: 59.9% vs. 84.2%; p < 0.001). DID ≤ 10 mg/m²/wk had a significant effect on the OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in elderly patients (2-year OS rate: 40.0% in DID ≤ 10 mg/m²/wk vs. 62.6% in DID > 10 mg/m²/wk; p=0.031; 2-year PFS: 35.0% vs. 65.7%; p=0.036). The OS on each 1.7 mg/m²/wk doxorubicin increment above 10 mg/m²/wk in elderly patients was not significant among the groups (2-year OS rate: 75.0% in DID 10.0-11.7 mg/m²/wk vs. 66.7% in DID 15.0-16.7 mg/m²/wk; p=0.859). Treatment related mortality was not related to DID.

Conclusion

DID can be reduced up to 10 mg/m²/wk in elderly DLBCL patients in the rituximab era. Maintenance of DID > 10 mg/m²/wk and judicious selection of elderly patients who are tolerant to DID is necessary.

A retrospective study on 73 elderly patients (≥75years) with aggressive B-cell non Hodgkin lymphoma: clinical significance of treatment intensity and comprehensive geriatric assessment

OBJECTIVE

The clinical outcome of elderly (≥75years) patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) is not firmly established because few studies have specifically addressed this issue. In addition, the usefulness of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in B-NHL still needs to be deeply explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated the prognostic factors of 73 patients aged ≥75years (median age: 78) with B-NHL treated by clinical judgment with curative anthracycline-based approaches (n=36) or with conservative treatments without anthracyclines (n=37). Analysis of clinical outcomes also included baseline CGA stratification.

RESULTS

The curative approaches resulted in a better clinical outcome than conservative approaches [overall response rate: 91.2% vs. 69.7%, P=0.003; 2-year progression-free survival: 47.2% vs. 21.6%, P=0.006; and 2-year overall survival (OS): 58.3% vs 24.3%, P=0.003] with similar safety profiles. Independent of treatment type, patients classified as "fit" and "intermediate" by CGA presented with better OS compared to patients classified as "frail" (P<0.001). Patients classified as "fit" and "intermediate" who were receiving curative treatments presented with a significantly better OS when compared with those treated conservatively on the basis of clinical judgment. A curative anthracycline-based therapy (P=0.048), the response to treatment (P=0.017) and a "frail" condition (P=0.031) were the only factors affecting OS in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Present data indicates that even in elderly patients with B-NHL curative anthracycline-based therapies are more effective than conservative approaches. However, choice of treatment should rely more on objective than on subjective parameters. Therefore, further prospective trials are warranted to better define the CGA role in hematopoietic malignancies.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the older

The incidence of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCL) in the older is growing to the point of becoming a health priority in the next decades. Prognostic factors and the biology of the tumor are not very different between younger and older populations. Furthermore, it seems that the response rate is basically similar in both populations, provided an appropriate dose of chemotherapy is administered. However, there seem to be differences with regard to a lower tolerance to treatment and a higher relapse rate in responsive older patients. To analyze these problems we review the most important differences between young and older DLCL patients in terms of immunologic status, treatment toxicity and the presence of other concomitant diseases or organ dysfunctions. We also consider the most relevant clinical studies that may allow us to make the appropriate decisions regarding DLCL therapy in this older population.