1
|
Mahdi Seyedzadeh Sani S, Sahranavard M, Jannati Yazdanabad M, Seddigh Shamsi M, Elyasi S, Hooshang Mohammadpour A, Sathyapalan T, Arasteh O, Ghavami V, Sahebkar A. The effect of concomitant use of Colony-Stimulating factors on bleomycin pulmonary toxicity - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Immunopharmacol 2022; 112:109227. [PMID: 36099787 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changes in the incidence of bleomycin pulmonary toxicity (BPT) as a result of adding colony-stimulating factors (CSF) to bleomycin regimens has been investigated in numerous studies. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the outcomes of these studies. METHODS A systematic search was performed using Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase on April 2021. Studies evaluating the incidence of BPT in patients receiving bleomycin with and without CSF were included. In addition, meta-analysis was performed by pooling odds ratios using R. RESULTS Out of 340 obtained records, our qualitative and quantitative analysis included 3234 and 1956 patients from 22 and 14 studies, respectively. The quantitative synthesis showed that addition of CSF significantly increased the risk of BPT incidence (OR = 1.82, 95 % CI: 1.37-2.40, p < 0.0001; I2 = 10.7 %). Subgroup analysis did not show any association between continent, bleomycin dose, cancer type, type of study, and pulmonary function test with BPT incidence. CONCLUSION This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that co-administration of CSF with bleomycin increases the incidence of BPT. The physicians need to consider this finding while deciding the best strategy for this cohort of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mehrdad Sahranavard
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Mahdi Jannati Yazdanabad
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Mohsen Seddigh Shamsi
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Sepideh Elyasi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Amir Hooshang Mohammadpour
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Thozhukat Sathyapalan
- Academic Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, UK
| | - Omid Arasteh
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran.
| | - Vahid Ghavami
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran.
| | - Amirhossein Sahebkar
- Biotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Applied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cheung MC, Prica A, Graczyk J, Buckstein R, Chan KKW. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in secondary prophylaxis for advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated with ABVD chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Leuk Lymphoma 2016; 57:1865-75. [PMID: 26758765 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2015.1117609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly administered to patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) with neutropenia. We constructed a decision-analytic model to compare the cost-effectiveness of secondary prophylaxis with G-CSF to a strategy of 'no G-CSF' in response to severe neutropenia for adults with advanced-stage HL treated with ABVD. A Canadian public health payer's perspective was considered and costs were presented in 2013 Canadian dollars. The quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) attained with the G-CSF and 'no G-CSF' strategies were 1.403 and 1.416, respectively. Costs for the strategies with and without G-CSF were $38,971 and $33,982, respectively. In the base case analysis, the 'no G-CSF' strategy was associated with cost savings and improved QALYs; therefore, 'no G-CSF' was the dominant approach. For patients with severe neutropenia during ABVD chemotherapy for advanced-stage HL, a strategy without G-CSF support is associated with improved quality-adjusted outcomes, cost savings, and is the preferred approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C Cheung
- a Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada
| | - A Prica
- b Princess Margaret Hospital and Mt. Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada
| | - J Graczyk
- c Grand River Regional Cancer Centre , Kitchener , Canada
| | - R Buckstein
- a Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada
| | - K K W Chan
- a Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada ;,d Division of Biostatistics , Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Graczyk J, Cheung MC, Buckstein R, Chan K. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as secondary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in the management of advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated with adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine chemotherapy: a decision analysis. Leuk Lymphoma 2013; 55:56-62. [PMID: 23597142 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2013.796046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Current practice guidelines are unclear regarding the role of secondary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma despite several small retrospective studies that demonstrate the omission of growth factors to be a safe and economic practice. We used a decision-analytic model to compare secondary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to no G-CSF with the onset of severe neutropenia for a hypothetical cohort of patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated with adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD). There was a net benefit of 0.017 years and 0.037 quality-adjusted life years for no G-CSF use in severe neutropenia. On microsimulation (10 000 trials), 96% of the simulations showed that the no G-CSF strategy is preferred to the use of G-CSF. This finding was robust across a wide range of sensitivity analyses. Our analysis suggests that G-CSF not be used as secondary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Graczyk
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Division of Hematology/Oncology , Toronto , Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ho P, Sherman P, Grigg A. Intermittent granulocyte colony-stimulating factor maintains dose intensity after ABVD therapy complicated by neutropenia. Eur J Haematol 2012; 88:416-21. [PMID: 22296221 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2012.01763.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) is commonly used to maintain dose intensity in patients receiving ABVD chemotherapy (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) for Hodgkin lymphoma. However, the need for growth factor support is unclear, with studies suggesting that dose intensity can be maintained without G-CSF. Moreover, G-CSF is expensive (pegfilgrastim: EUR 1540/cycle; 300 μg filgrastim for 7 days: EUR 700/cycle) and is associated with side effects including bone pain and increased risk of bleomycin lung toxicity. Intermittent G-CSF may be an effective compromise, given that the effect of G-CSF on granulocyte precursors in vitro persists for 4-5 days after administration. After promising results of a pilot study, this schedule has been used subsequently in the majority of our patients receiving G-CSF as secondary prophylaxis for ABVD complicated by neutropenia. METHODS Retrospective analysis of the incidence of febrile neutropenia and treatment delay in a variety of different G-CSF schedules used as secondary prophylaxis in patients receiving ABVD. RESULTS 848 cycles in 85 consecutive patients were evaluated. Most patients (86%) received G-CSF, generally commenced prophylactically for neutropenia when cycle 1B was due. Intermittent G-CSF (typically given on days 4, 8 and 12) was used in 413 cycles compared with daily or pegylated G-CSF in 99 cycles. In patients receiving intermittent G-CSF, the median neutrophil count, across all cycles, was 7.3 × 10(9) /L (range: 1.4-47.1) when the next scheduled chemotherapy was due. There were two cases of febrile neutropenia (0.45%) and no treatment delays. One patient developed possible bleomycin toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Intermittent G-CSF is effective in maintaining dose intensity in patients receiving ABVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prahlad Ho
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) alone and more recently in combination with chemotherapy (combined modality therapy; CMT) has been the cornerstone of curative treatment for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) for over 40 years. Because of increasing awareness of the late morbidity and mortality associated with RT, recent treatment regimens have attempted to limit its use. Chemotherapy only has been demonstrated to be a treatment option for most patients with localized HL. Current clinical trials have targeted subgroups of such patients who may be at an increased risk of recurrence for the addition of limited RT to chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J Straus
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Minuk LA, Monkman K, Chin-Yee IH, Lazo-Langner A, Bhagirath V, Chin-Yee BH, Mangel JE. Treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma with adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine without routine granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support does not increase the risk of febrile neutropenia: a prospective cohort study. Leuk Lymphoma 2011; 53:57-63. [DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2011.602771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
8
|
Neutropenia and Neutropenic Complications in ABVD Chemotherapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma. Adv Hematol 2011; 2011:656013. [PMID: 21687649 PMCID: PMC3112508 DOI: 10.1155/2011/656013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2010] [Accepted: 02/27/2011] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
A combination of Adriamycin (a.k.a. Doxorubicin), Bleomycin, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine (ABVD) is the most commonly used chemotherapy regime for Hodgkin lymphoma. This highly effective treatment is associated with a significant risk of neutropenia. Various strategies are adopted to counter this commonly encountered problem, including dose modification, use of colony stimulating factors, and prophylactic or therapeutic use of antibiotics. Data to support these approaches is somewhat controversial, and in keeping with the paucity of definitive evidence, there is a wide disparity in the management of neutropenia in patients receiving ABVD chemotherapy. This paper summarizes the evidence for managing ABVD-related neutropenia during the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma.
Collapse
|