1
|
Assessing copy number aberrations and copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity across the genome as best practice: An evidence-based review from the Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC) working group for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Genet 2018; 228-229:236-250. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2018.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Revised: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
2
|
Krem MM, Press OW, Horwitz MS, Tidwell T. Mechanisms and clinical applications of chromosomal instability in lymphoid malignancy. Br J Haematol 2015; 171:13-28. [PMID: 26018193 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Lymphocytes are unique among cells in that they undergo programmed DNA breaks and translocations, but that special property predisposes them to chromosomal instability (CIN), a cardinal feature of neoplastic lymphoid cells that manifests as whole chromosome- or translocation-based aneuploidy. In several lymphoid malignancies translocations may be the defining or diagnostic markers of the diseases. CIN is a cornerstone of the mutational architecture supporting lymphoid neoplasia, though it is perhaps one of the least understood components of malignant transformation in terms of its molecular mechanisms. CIN is associated with prognosis and response to treatment, making it a key area for impacting treatment outcomes and predicting prognoses. Here we will review the types and mechanisms of CIN found in Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma and the lymphoid leukaemias, with emphasis placed on pathogenic mutations affecting DNA recombination, replication and repair; telomere function; and mitotic regulation of spindle attachment, centrosome function, and chromosomal segregation. We will discuss the means by which chromosome-level genetic aberrations may give rise to multiple pathogenic mutations required for carcinogenesis and conclude with a discussion of the clinical applications of CIN and aneuploidy to diagnosis, prognosis and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxwell M Krem
- Department of Medicine and Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.,Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Oliver W Press
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Marshall S Horwitz
- Department of Pathology and Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Timothy Tidwell
- Department of Pathology and Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Genetic abnormalities in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: where we are and where we go. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2014; 2014:435983. [PMID: 24967369 PMCID: PMC4054680 DOI: 10.1155/2014/435983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2014] [Accepted: 04/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Chromosomal abnormalities in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are detected in up to 80% of patients. Among them, deletions of 11q, 13q, 17p, and trisomy 12 have a known prognostic value and play an important role in CLL pathogenesis and evolution, determining patients outcome and therapeutic strategies. Standard methods used to identify these genomic aberrations include both conventional G-banding cytogenetics (CGC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Although FISH analyses have been implemented as the gold standard, CGC allows the identification of chromosomal translocations and complex karyotypes, the latest associated with poor outcome. Genomic arrays have a higher resolution that allows the detection of cryptic abnormalities, although these have not been fully implemented in routine laboratories. In the last years, next generation sequencing (NGS) methods have identified a wide range of gene mutations (e.g., TP53, NOTCH1, SF3B1, and BIRC3) which have improved our knowledge about CLL development, allowing us to refine both the prognostic subgroups and better therapeutic strategies. Clonal evolution has also recently arisen as a key point in CLL, integrating cytogenetic alterations and mutations in a dynamic model that improve our understanding about its clinical course and relapse.
Collapse
|
4
|
Houldsworth J, Guttapalli A, Thodima V, Yan XJ, Mendiratta G, Zielonka T, Nanjangud G, Chen W, Patil S, Mato A, Brown JR, Rai K, Chiorazzi N, Chaganti RSK. Genomic imbalance defines three prognostic groups for risk stratification of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2013; 55:920-8. [PMID: 24047479 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2013.845882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) has yet to be fully leveraged in a prognostic setting in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Genomic imbalance was assessed in 288 CLL specimens using a targeted array. Based on 20 aberrations in a hierarchical manner, all 228 treatment-naive specimens were classified into a group with poor outcome (20.6%) exhibiting at least one aberration that was univariately associated with adverse outcome (gain: 2p, 3q, 8q, 17q, loss: 7q, 8p, 11q, 17p, 18p), good outcome (32.5%) showing 13q14 loss without any of the other 10 aberrations (gain: 1p, 7p, 12, 18p, 18q, 19, loss: 4p, 5p, 6q, 7p) or intermediate outcome (remainder). The three groups were significantly separated with respect to time to first treatment and overall survival (p < 0.001), and validation of the stratification scheme was performed in two independent datasets. Gain of 3q and 8q, and 17p loss were determined to be independent unfavorable prognostic biomarkers. TP53, NOTCH1 and SF3B1 mutations correlated with the presence of one poor outcome aCGH marker, at a considerably higher frequency than when only considering poor risk aberrations routinely detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). These data support genomic imbalance evaluation in CLL by aCGH to assist in risk stratification.
Collapse
|
5
|
Fabris S, Mosca L, Cutrona G, Lionetti M, Agnelli L, Ciceri G, Barbieri M, Maura F, Matis S, Colombo M, Gentile M, Recchia AG, Anna Pesce E, Di Raimondo F, Musolino C, Gobbi M, Di Renzo N, Mauro FR, Brugiatelli M, Ilariucci F, Lipari MG, Angrilli F, Consoli U, Fragasso A, Molica S, Festini G, Vincelli I, Cortelezzi A, Federico M, Morabito F, Ferrarini M, Neri A. Chromosome 2p gain in monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis and in early stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Am J Hematol 2013; 88:24-31. [PMID: 23044996 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2012] [Revised: 08/03/2012] [Accepted: 09/05/2012] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Recent studies have described chromosome 2p gain as a recurrent lesion in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We investigated the 2p gain and its relationship with common prognostic biomarkers in a prospective series of 69 clinical monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (cMBL) and 218 early stage (Binet A) CLL patients. The 2p gain was detected by FISH in 17 patients (6%, 16 CLL, and 1 cMBL) and further characterized by single nucleotide polymorphism-array. Overall, unfavorable cytogenetic deletions, i.e., del(11)(q23) and del(17)(p13) (P = 0.002), were significantly more frequent in 2p gain cases, as well as unmutated status of IGHV (P < 1 × 10(-4) ) and CD38 (P < 1 × 10(-4) ) and ZAP-70 positive expression (P = 0.003). Furthermore, 2p gain patients had significantly higher utilization of stereotyped B-cell receptors compared with 2p negative patients (P = 0.009), and the incidence of stereotyped subset #1 in 2p gain patients was significantly higher than that found in the remaining CLLs (P = 0.031). Transcriptional profiling analysis identified several genes significantly upregulated in 2p gain CLLs, most of which mapped to 2p. Among these, NCOA1 and ROCK2 are known for their involvement in tumor progression in several human cancers, whereas among those located in different chromosomes, CAV1 at 7q31.1 has been recently identified to play a critical role in CLL progression. Thus, 2p gain can be present since the early stages of the disease, particularly in those cases characterized by other poor prognosis markers. The finding of genes upregulated in the cells with 2p gain provides new insights to define the pathogenic role of this lesion.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Biomarkers, Tumor/biosynthesis
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2/genetics
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2/metabolism
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7/genetics
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7/metabolism
- Female
- Gene Expression Regulation, Leukemic
- Humans
- In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
- Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/diagnosis
- Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/genetics
- Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/metabolism
- Lymphocytosis/diagnosis
- Lymphocytosis/genetics
- Lymphocytosis/metabolism
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Proteins/biosynthesis
- Neoplasm Proteins/genetics
- Neoplasm Staging
- Prognosis
- Prospective Studies
- Up-Regulation/genetics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Fabris
- Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e di Comunità, Università degli Studi di Milano e Ematologia 1 CTMO, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Setlur SR, Ihm C, Tchinda J, Shams S, Werner L, Cho EK, Thompson C, Phillips K, Rassenti LZ, Kipps TJ, Neuberg D, Freedman AS, Lee C, Brown JR. Comparison of familial and sporadic chronic lymphocytic leukaemia using high resolution array comparative genomic hybridization. Br J Haematol 2010; 151:336-45. [PMID: 20812997 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08341.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 10% of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) have a family history of the disease or a related lymphoproliferative disorder, yet the relationship of familial CLL to genomic abnormalities has not been characterized in detail. We therefore studied 75 CLL patients, half familial and half sporadic, using high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), in order to better define the relationship of genomic abnormalities to familial disease and other biological prognostic factors. Our results showed that the most common high-risk deletion in CLL, deletion 11q, was significantly associated with sporadic disease. Comparison of familial to sporadic disease additionally identified a copy number variant region near the centromere on 14q, proximal to IGH@, in which gains were associated both with familial CLL, and with mutated IGHV and homozygous deletion of 13q. Homozygous deletion of 13q was also found to be associated with mutated IGHV and low expression of ZAP-70, and a significantly longer time to first treatment compared to heterozygous deletion or lack of alteration. This study is the first high resolution effort to investigate and report somatic genetic differences between familial and sporadic CLL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunita R Setlur
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kiefer Y, Drieschner N, Förster H, Tiemann M, Schulte C, Rommel B, Bullerdiek J. An unbalanced t(15;18)(q21-q22;p11) as the sole cytogenetic aberration in a patient with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 200:65-9. [PMID: 20513537 DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2009] [Revised: 03/17/2010] [Accepted: 03/19/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
8
|
Cheung KJJ, Horsman DE, Gascoyne RD. The significance ofTP53in lymphoid malignancies: mutation prevalence, regulation, prognostic impact and potential as a therapeutic target. Br J Haematol 2009; 146:257-69. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07739.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
9
|
|