Older patients with early-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: the role of consolidation radiotherapy after chemoimmunotherapy

Survival Outcomes of Limited-Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With Radiation Therapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with favorable risk limited-stage (LS) diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have shown excellent outcomes without radiotherapy (RT). However, the role of RT for the remainder of LS-DLBCL patients is less well defined. We aimed to investigate whether the addition of RT provided an overall survival (OS) benefit in a real-world cohort of LS-DLBCL patients based on primary site at presentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective data from 39,745 patients with stage I and II DLBCL treated with front-line combination chemotherapy alone or followed by RT were identified using the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015.

RESULTS

The addition of RT was associated with improved 5-year OS for all LS patients as compared to those treated with chemotherapy alone (85% vs. 80%, P < .001). RT was associated with improved 5-year OS in both the nodal and extranodal disease patients (nodal: 85% vs. 80%, P < .001; extranodal: 83% vs. 79%; P < .001). Extranodal sites with prolonged OS from the addition of RT include skin and soft tissue, head and neck, testicular, and thyroid sites (all P < .02). Breast, bone, lung and gastrointestinal extranodal primary sites had no OS benefit from the inclusion of RT. In multivariate analysis, the addition of RT was an independent factor for improved survival for all LS patients ([HR] 0.84, 95% [CI] 0.81-0.88; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Though there is no consensus on optimal treatment indications for RT in LS-DLBCL, these data suggest certain subgroups may have benefit when RT is added to front-line chemotherapy.

Definition of bulky disease in early stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in computed tomography on coronal and transverse planes

Background

In early stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (ESDLBL), tumor bulkiness is an important determinant of treatment and prognosis. Tumor bulk is usually measured on transverse computed tomography (CT) plane and variably defined from 5 to 10 cm.

Objectives

Our study aims to investigate the prognostic significance of bulky disease measured on CT coronal and transverse planes and to evaluate the outcome of patients with bulky disease.

Methods

Patients with ESDLBL and treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisolone (RCHOP) with or without radiotherapy were included. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to identify the optimal tumor dimension that correlated with progression, relapse, or death. Correlation between different variables and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test and Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

A total of 127 patients with a median age of 47 (range: 18-90) years were included. Eighty-two (64.6%) patients treated with combined modality treatment (CMT) [RCHOP + radiotherapy]. After a median follow-up of 40 (range: 2-114) months, 3-year PFS and OS were 83.9% (95% CI: 76.759%-89.981%), and 80.6% (95% CI: 72.499%-87.531%), respectively. Tumor dimension of >7.5 cm measured on either CT plane was the optimal cutoff point to define bulky disease. Three-year PFS and OS were inferior in the group of patients with no bulky disease on transvers plane (n = 84) but had bulky disease on coronal plane (n = 9,10.7%); (94.2% vs. 75%, p = 0.017 and 90.5% vs. 56.3%, p = 0.002), as well as in patients with no bulky disease on coronal plane (n = 89), but had bulky disease on transverse plane (n = 14, 15.7%); (94.1% vs. 62.3%, p < 0.001, and 90.4% vs. 63.5%, p = 0.002). Compared to RCHOP alone, 3-year PFS and OS were better in patients with bulky disease treated with CMT (78% vs. 52.5%, p = 0.018 and 81.8% vs. 38.7%, p = 0.003) but not in patients with non-bulky disease (96.2% vs. 93%, p = 0.691 and 87.6% vs. 91.5%, p = 0.477).

Conclusion

In ESDLBL, measurement of tumor mass on transverse and coronal CT planes may help in better identification of patients with bulky disease. The use of CMT was associated with better survival outcomes in patients with bulky disease.

Clinical outcomes after incomplete cycles of R-CHOP for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: 10 years' real-world experience in a single institute

Although the current standard of care for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is six cycles of rituximab/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisolone combination chemotherapy (R-CHOP), a larger than expected number of patients cannot complete planned six cycles for various reasons in the real world. We aimed to evaluate the prognosis of patients with DLBCL after incomplete treatment by analyzing the chemotherapy response and survival according to the cause of discontinuation and the number of cycles. We analyzed a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with DLBCL who underwent incomplete cycles of R-CHOP at Seoul National University Hospital and Boramae Medical Center from January 2010 to April 2019. A total of 1183 patients were diagnosed with DLBCL, of which 260 (22%) did not complete six cycles of R-CHOP. The most common cause of discontinuation of chemotherapy was life-threatening infection, and the most common pathogen was Pneumocystis jirovecii. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly better in patients who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) at the first response evaluation. Patients underwent three or more cycles of chemotherapy had a longer OS than those who did not. In patients with limited-stage disease, consolidative radiotherapy showed a significant improvement in OS and PFS. Advanced stage, high comorbidity score, and poor primary response to chemotherapy were poor prognostic factors in patients with unplanned treatment shortening. This study provides real-world outcomes for patients who could not complete the planned six cycles of R-CHOP.

Sinonasal lymphoma: A primer for otolaryngologists

Objective

Sinonasal lymphomas are a rare entity that commonly present with nonspecific sinonasal symptoms and are often recognized immediately. Through this review, we aim to summarize important principles in diagnosis and treatment of sinonasal lymphomas, with the goal of disseminating the current knowledge of this under-recognized malignancy to otolaryngologists.

Methods

Systemic review using PRISMA guidelines of foundational scholarly articles, guidelines, and trials were reviewed focusing on clinical characteristics of key sinonasal lymphoma subtypes, along with available treatments in the otolaryngology, medical oncology, and radiation oncology literature.

Results

Sinonasal lymphoma are derived from clonal proliferation of lymphocytes at various stages of differentiation, of which diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) are the most common. Diagnosis and staging require biopsy with immunohistochemistry in conjunction with imaging and laboratory studies. Treatment is ever evolving and currently includes multi-agent chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy.

Conclusion

Otolaryngologists may be the first to recognize sinonasal lymphoma, which requires a comprehensive workup and a multidisciplinary team for treatment. Symptoms are nonspecific and similar to many sinonasal pathologies, and it is crucial for otolaryngologists to keep a broad differential.

Level of Evidence

5.

Radiotherapy update: current role of radiotherapy in the treatment of lymphomas

Radiotherapy (RT) remains an important modality in the modern treatment of lymphomas. In Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), its role is stage-dependent. In early stage favorable HL, RT is an essential component of combined treatment. In early unfavorable and advanced stage HL, RT can be omitted if patients are positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) negative after chemotherapy. In non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), RT can be used as definitive treatment of indolent lymphoma. In aggressive NHL, the role of RT is limited to consolidation therapy of bulky disease, extranodal involvement and in elderly patients. Overall, technology evolved from extended fields to involved-node (INRT) and involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT), with concurrent reduction in doses. This short review summarizes current evidence and provides a future outlook with regard to the role of RT in the treatment of lymphomas.

Radiotherapy for Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Radiotherapy (RT) plays a diverse and essential role in the contemporary management of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and remains the single most powerful monotherapeutic intervention for both aggressive and indolent subtypes. Over the past decade, there have been significant advancements in radiation oncology practice, which have made modern treatments safer and more conformal. Despite this sophistication and evidence supporting a continued role for RT, numerous data suggest that utilization is on the decline. In this review, we discuss the rationale for RT in 4 commonly encountered scenarios: combined modality therapy for limited-stage aggressive NHL, consolidation therapy for advanced-stage aggressive NHL, and the changing roles of salvage RT for relapsed/refractory NHL in an era of new frontiers such as cellular therapies. We also evaluate current strategies to treat indolent histologies. We conclude with perspectives on how RT for the hematological malignancies may continue to evolve.

Treatment Modalities and Survival Outcomes for Sinonasal Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

This study utilizes a large population national database to comprehensively analyze prognosticators and overall survival (OS) outcomes of varying treatment modalities in a large cohort of sinonasal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (SN-DLBCL) patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database study.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for all SN-DLBCL cases diagnosed from 2004 to 2015. Kaplan-Meier log-rank test determined differences in OS based on clinical covariates. Cox proportional-hazards analysis was used to determine clinical and sociodemographic covariates predictive of mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 2,073 SN-DLBCL patients were included, consisting of 48% female with a mean age of 66.0 ± 16.2 years. Overall, 82% of patients were Caucasian, 74% had early-stage disease, and 49% had primary tumors in the paranasal sinuses. Early-stage patients were more likely to receive multi-agent chemoradiotherapy compared to multi-agent chemotherapy alone (P < .001). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards analysis revealed chemoradiotherapy to confer significantly greater OS improvements than chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; P < .001). However, subset analysis of late-stage patients demonstrated no significant differences in OS between these treatment modalities (P = .245). On multivariable analysis of chemotherapy patients treated post-2012, immunotherapy (HR = 0.51; P = .024) demonstrated significant OS benefits. However, subset analysis showed no significant advantage in OS with administering immunotherapy for late-stage patients (P = .326). Lastly, for all patients treated post-2012, those receiving immunotherapy had significantly improved OS compared to those not receiving immunotherapy (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment protocol selection differs between early- and late-stage SN-DLBCL patients. Early-stage patients receiving chemotherapy may benefit from immunotherapy as part of their treatment paradigm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Laryngoscope, 2021.

Phase 2 Study of Dose-Reduced Consolidation Radiation Therapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of reducing the dose of consolidation radiation therapy (RT) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This phase 2 study enrolled patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified and primary mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma in complete response on positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging after ≥4 cycles of a rituximab/anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy regimen. Consolidation RT used a dose of 19.5 to 20 Gy. The primary endpoint was 5-year freedom from local recurrence.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were enrolled between 2010 and 2016. Stage distribution was as follows: I to II (n = 49, 79%) and III to IV (n = 13, 21%). Bulky disease (defined as ≥7.5 cm or ≥10 cm) was present in 23 (40%) and 16 (28%) patients, respectively. Chemotherapy was R-CHOP (then list the drugs) in 58 (94%) and R-EPOCH (then list the drugs) in 4 (6%) with a median of 6 cycles. With a median follow-up of 51 months, 7 patients developed disease progression (6 outside the RT field, 1 within the RT field). Freedom from local recurrence at 5 years was 98% (90% lower confidence bound, 88%). Progression-free and overall survival at 5 years were 83% and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

With more effective systemic therapy (e.g., addition of rituximab) and more refined chemotherapy response assessment (e.g., positron emission tomography-computed tomography), the dose of RT in combined modality treatment programs may potentially be reduced to 20 Gy. This achieves excellent local control with the potential to decrease acute and long-term side effects.

The Changing Paradigm of Radiotherapy in the Elderly Population

There is increasing awareness of the special needs for care of the elderly cancer patient. Newer precise conformal radiotherapy techniques allow the safe delivery of higher doses of radiotherapy to the target tumor while reducing the dose to surrounding critical organs. This has led to a shortening of radiotherapy protocols for both curative and palliative indications. We review these novel techniques and protocols and the published clinical studies that include elderly patients treated with these techniques. Despite the fact that the elderly are a growing significant proportion of cancer patients, and the need for radiotherapy in the elderly is expected to rise with increasing life expectancy, they are underrepresented in most clinical studies of radiotherapy, and there are few studies specifically investigating radiotherapy in the elderly. The treatment of early-stage primary lung cancer with stereotactic body radiotherapy is a prime example how new highly conformal techniques and shortened treatment protocols are changing the approach to radiotherapy in the elderly. With improved imaging and radiotherapy treatment precision, it is expected that such techniques will become increasingly used in other cancer sites. It is important for radiation oncologists to be aware of the special needs of the elderly cancer patient and in particular to assess these patients based on functional status and not only chronological age. In addition, geriatric oncologists should be aware of modern radiotherapy techniques that can be particularly appropriate for the elderly patient.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in very elderly patients over 80 years old: Incorporating consolidative radiation therapy into management decisions

Purpose

The population of patients aged 80 years or older who are diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) continues to increase, but an optimal treatment strategy has not been established. We sought to examine the influence of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) on outcome and toxicity among the very elderly diagnosed with stage I-IV DLBCL.

Methods and materials

We evaluated 131 patients treated at a single institution between 2002 and 2014 who were eligible for RT after successful treatment with chemotherapy.

Results

The median age was 83 years (range, 80-96). Advanced-stage disease was present in 61.8% of patients. Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone was administered to 80% of patients (n = 108), and 23.7% of patients received consolidative RT. Among early-stage (ES) patients treated with 3 to 4 cycles of chemotherapy and RT (n = 12) versus 6 to 8 cycles of chemotherapy alone (n = 17), there were no statistically significant differences in 3-year disease-free, progression-free, or overall survival rates. The 3 year disease-free survival was 91.7% versus 88.2% among patients treated with combined modality therapy versus chemotherapy alone (P = .78). The 3-year overall survival was 82.5% versus 87.5% among patients treated with combined modality therapy compared with chemotherapy alone (P = .852). Anemia and neuropathy occurred more frequently among ES patients who received 6 to 8 cycles of chemotherapy alone. Among advanced-stage patients with bulky disease (n = 35), consolidative RT to sites of bulky disease may have improved local control (3-year local control, 100% vs 60.3%, P = .160).

Conclusions

Among patients aged 80 years or older who have with ES DLBCL, 3 to 4 cycles of chemotherapy followed by RT is at least equivalent in efficacy to chemotherapy alone and is associated with lower levels of toxicity, which suggests that it may be a better choice for therapy when trying to balance treatment efficacy and tolerability.