Predictive and prognostic biomarkers in the era of new targeted therapies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Realizing precision medicine in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Remaining challenges and potential opportunities

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) exhibit diverse clinical outcomes. An expanding array of genetic tests is now employed to facilitate the identification of patients with high-risk disease and inform treatment decisions. These tests encompass molecular cytogenetic analysis, focusing on recurrent chromosomal alterations, particularly del(17p). Additionally, sequencing is utilized to identify TP53 mutations and to determine the somatic hypermutation status of the immunoglobulin heavy variable gene. Concurrently, a swift advancement of targeted treatment has led to the implementation of novel strategies for patients with CLL, including kinase and BCL2 inhibitors. This review explores both current and emerging diagnostic tests aimed at identifying high-risk patients who should benefit from targeted therapies. We outline existing treatment paradigms, emphasizing the importance of matching the right treatment to the right patient beyond genetic stratification, considering the crucial balance between safety and efficacy. We also take into consideration the practical and logistical issues when choosing a management strategy for each individual patient. Furthermore, we delve into the mechanisms underlying therapy resistance and stress the relevance of monitoring measurable residual disease to guide treatment decisions. Finally, we underscore the necessity of aggregating real-world data, adopting a global perspective, and ensuring patient engagement. Taken together, we argue that precision medicine is not the mere application of precision diagnostics and accessibility of precision therapies in CLL but encompasses various aspects of the patient journey (e.g., lifestyle exposures and comorbidities) and their preferences toward achieving true personalized medicine for patients with CLL.

Prognostication in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of leukemia in Western countries. CLL is a highly heterogeneous disease: some patients may never require therapy and others relapse several times after different therapeutic strategies. Therefore, in CLL, prognostic markers are essential to capture high-risk patients for different clinical endpoints including early treatment requirement, early progression after BTK or BCL2 inhibitors and Richter transformation. In early stage CLL, different biological and clinical biomarkers have been identified to predict time to treatment requirement that could be used to identify the most appropriate population for early intervention clinical trial. However, at the moment, the standard of care for early stage CLL remains watch & wait since no survival benefit has been identified in clinical trials with chemoimmunotherapy and with BTK inhibitors. In patients requiring treatment TP53 disruptions identify high-risk patients who benefit the most from long-term continuous therapy with BTKi. On the opposite side of the spectrum, IGHV mutated patients devoid of TP53 disruption benefit the most from fixed-duration therapy with venetoclax-obinutuzumab. In between, the highly heterogenous subgroup of patients with IGHV unmutated genes represents the group in which further efforts are needed to identify additional prognostic biomarkers aimed at selecting patients who can benefit from fixed-duration and patients who can benefit from long term BTKi therapy. In the context of the aggressive transformation of CLL, namely Richter syndrome, the clonal relationship to the CLL counterpart represents the strongest prognostic biomarker. Clonally related Richter syndrome still represents an unmet clinical need which requires further efforts to identify new therapeutic strategies.

Biological relevance of ZNF224 expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and its implication IN NF-kB pathway regulation

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a heterogeneous disease, whose presentation and clinical course are highly variable. Identification of novel prognostic factors may contribute to improving the CLL classification and providing indications for treatment options. The zinc finger protein ZNF224 plays a key role in cell transformation, through the control of apoptotic and survival pathways. In this study, we evaluated the potential application of ZNF224 as a novel marker of CLL progression and therapy responsiveness. To this aim, we analyzed ZNF224 expression levels in B lymphocytes from CLL patients at different stages of the disease and in patients showing different treatment outcomes. The expression of ZNF224 was significantly increased in disease progression and dramatically decreased in patients in complete remission after chemotherapy. Gene expression correlation analysis performed on datasets of CLL patients revealed that ZNF224 expression was well correlated with that of some prognostic and predictive markers. Moreover, bioinformatic analysis coupled ZNF224 to NF-κB pathway, and experimental data demonstrated that RNA interference of ZNF224 reduced the activity of the NF-κB survival pathway in CLL cells. Consistently with a pro-survival role, ZNF224 knockdown raised spontaneous and drug-induced apoptosis and inhibited the proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from CLL patients. Our findings provide evidence for the involvement of ZNF224 in the survival of CLL cells via NF-κB pathway modulation, and also suggest ZNF224 as a prognostic and predictive molecular marker of CLL disease.

Real-World Characteristics and Outcome of Patients Treated With Single-Agent Ibrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Spain (IBRORS-LLC Study)

BACKGROUND

Ibrutinib demonstrated remarkable efficacy and favorable tolerability in patients with untreated or relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including those with high-risk genetic alterations. The IBRORS-CLL study assessed the characteristics, clinical management and outcome of CLL patients receiving ibrutinib in routine clinical practice in Spain.

PATIENTS

Observational, retrospective, multicenter study in CLL patients who started single-agent ibrutinib as first-line treatment or at first or second relapse between January 2016 and January 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 269 patients were included (median age: 70.9 years; cardiovascular comorbidity: 55.4%, including hypertension [47.6%] and atrial fibrillation [AF] [7.1%]). Overall, 96.7% and 69% of patients underwent molecular testing for del(17p)/TP53 mutation and IGHV mutation status. High-risk genetic features included unmutated IGHV (79%) and del(17p)/TP53 mutation (first-line: 66.3%; second-line: 23.1%). Overall, 84 (31.2%) patients received ibrutinib as first-line treatment, and it was used as second- and third-line therapy in 121 (45.0%) and 64 (23.8%) patients. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached irrespective of del(17p)/TP53, or unmutated IGHV. Common grade ≥3 adverse events were infections (12.2%) and bleeding (3%). Grade ≥3 AF occurred in 1.5% of patients.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study shows that single-agent ibrutinib is an effective therapy for CLL, regardless of age and high-risk molecular features, consistent with clinical trials. Additionally, single-agent ibrutinib was well tolerated, with a low rate of cardiovascular events. This study also emphasized a high molecular testing rate of del(17p)/TP53 mutation and IGHV mutation status in clinical practice according to guideline recommendations.

Lymphocyte doubling time in chronic lymphocytic leukemia modern era: a real-life study in 848 unselected patients

The prognostic significance of lymphocyte doubling time (LDT) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was identified when the biology of the disease was poorly understood and therapy was not effective. We assessed the clinical and biological significance of LDT in 848 CLL patients in a real-life setting and the context of new biomarkers and effective therapy. A short LDT (≤12 months) was enriched for adverse biomarkers. Patients with a rapid LDT did need therapy shortly after diagnosis (median 23 months vs. not reached; p < 0.001) and had a poorer overall survival (median 95 months vs. not reached p < 0.001). LDT, IGHV mutational status, Beta-2 microglobulin, and Rai clinical stage were independent predictors for time to first treatment in the whole series and in Binet stage A patients. No correlation was observed between LDT and response to chemoimmunotherapy. However, a short LDT along with age ≥65 years, high-risk FISH (del(17p), del(11q)), unmutated IGHV, increased Beta-2 microglobulin, and TP53 mutations predicted short survival. Moreover, the prognostic significance of LDT was independent of the CLL-IPI and the Barcelona/Brno prognostic model. LDT remains an important outcome marker in the modern CLL era and should be incorporated into the clinical assessment and stratification of CLL patients.

The Biology of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications

ABSTRACT

The high degree of clinical heterogeneity of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is influenced by the disease molecular complexity. Genetic studies have allowed to better understand CLL biology and to identify molecular biomarkers of clinical relevance. TP53 disruption represents the strongest prognosticator of chemorefractoriness and indicates the use of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) and BCL2 inhibitors. Unmutated IGHV (immunoglobulin heavy variable) genes also predict refractoriness to chemoimmunotherapy; importantly, when treated with B-cell receptor inhibitors or BCL2 inhibitors, IGHV unmutated patients display an outcome similar to that of IGHV mutated CLL. Before choosing treatment, a comprehensive assessment of TP53 and IGHV status is recommended by all guidelines for CLL clinical management. In case of fixed-duration therapeutic strategies, monitoring of minimal residual disease may provide a tool to decide treatment duration. The current precision medicine management of CLL patients might be further improved by the adoption of novel biomarkers that are emerging as clinically meaningful for this disease.

Optimal Management of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Economic Constraints

ABSTRACT

In this article, we carry out an overview on the management options available for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients and discuss possible treatment decisions, taking into account the issue of sustainability and availability. Targeted agents have shown to be superior compared with chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) in terms of progression-free survival in high-risk CLL. In the majority of studies, however, continuous treatment was compared with fixed-duration CIT and no overall survival or progression-free survival-2 (time from randomization to second progression or death) advantage could be documented. Meanwhile, a substantial financial burden on both patients and payers has raised issues about affordability and adherence to treatment. Therefore, value-based pricing of new drugs has been used to set up price negotiation policies in several countries, and fixed-duration therapy has shown to be less costly than continuous treatment. Thus, CIT continues to have a role in the treatment of CLL patients with a favorable genetic profile, that is, with a mutated IGHV gene profile and a wild-type TP53. Targeted treatment represents the preferred choice in patients with an unmutated IGHV gene configuration and/or a TP53 disruption, provided that adherence to treatment is guaranteed and bearing in mind that should costly drugs not be available for frontline treatment, new agents can be very effective as first salvage treatment.

Extracellular vesicles and their associated miRNAs as potential prognostic biomarkers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Many prognostic and predictive biomarkers have been proposed for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Here, we aim to discuss the evidence showing a prognostic potential for extracellular vesicles (EV) and their associated microRNAs (miRNAs).

RECENT FINDINGS

EV are produced by several cells in the body as a physiological event; however, there is evidence suggesting that an elevated EV concentration is present in the circulation of CLL patients. Moreover, some studies have associated EV concentration with advanced Rai stage and unmutated CLL while others have demonstrated its potential as an independent prognostic factor for TTFT and OS. Finally, some studies have shown that CLL EV shared some dysregulated microRNAs with CLL cells and plasma. On the other hand, it was found that CLL EV has a distinctive microRNA expression profile. Until now, EV-associated miR-155 is the most studied miRNA. Despite methodological diversity and limitations in study design, unanimity in CLL EV concentration behaviour and miRNA content has been found.

From Biomarkers to Models in the Changing Landscape of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Evolve or Become Extinct

Simple Summary

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by a highly variable clinical course. Thus, predicting the outcome of patients with this disease is a topic of special interest. The rapidly changing treatment landscape of CLL has questioned the value of classical biomarkers and prognostic models. Herein we examine the current state-of-the-art of prognostic and predictive biomarkers in the setting of new oral targeted agents with special focus on the most controversial findings over the last years. We also discuss the available information on the role of “old” and “new” prognostic models in the era of oral small molecules.

Abstract

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is an extremely heterogeneous disease. With the advent of oral targeted agents (Tas) the treatment of CLL has undergone a revolution, which has been accompanied by an improvement in patient’s survival and quality of life. This paradigm shift also affects the value of prognostic and predictive biomarkers and prognostic models, most of them inherited from the chemoimmunotherapy era but with a different behavior with Tas. This review discusses: (i) the role of the most relevant prognostic and predictive biomarkers in the setting of Tas; and (ii) the validity of classic and new scoring systems in the context of Tas. In addition, a critical point of view about predictive biomarkers with special emphasis on 11q deletion, novel resistance mutations, TP53 abnormalities, IGHV mutational status, complex karyotype and NOTCH1 mutations is stated. We also go over prognostic models in early stage CLL such as IPS-E. Finally, we provide an overview of the applicability of the CLL-IPI for patients treated with Tas, as well as the emergence of new models, generated with data from patients treated with Tas.

The prognostic value of serum levels of a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) in treatment-naïve patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Background/aim

A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) has been investigated as a prognostic marker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. However, there is no cut-off level for serum APRIL (sAPRIL) levels that predict time to treatment in CLL patients.

Materials and methods

Between May and December 2012, 94 consecutive CLL patients and 25 healthy controls were assessed. sAPRIL levels were measured by ELISA. Demographic data and prognostic markers were obtained from the patients’ files. Treatment-naïve patients were followed up for 6.5 years for any treatment need.

Results

Patients were divided into 3 groups: Treatment-naïve (n = 47), chemotherapy receiving (n = 25), and those who had received chemotherapy previously (n = 22). There was no difference in median sAPRIL levels of patients who were receiving chemotherapy at the sampling time and the healthy controls, which indicates that sAPRIL levels might be influenced by treatment. For treatment-naïve patients, the best cut-off in predicting time to treatment was found at the sAPRIL level of 2.04 ng/mL, with 78% sensitivity and 63% specificity. Time to treatment was significantly earlier in the APRIL high group (n = 27) than in the APRIL low group (n = 20) (P = 0.010, log-rank test).

Conclusion

sAPRIL, a simple, promising blood test which can be measured by ELISA, will likely obtain a place in the wide range of prognostic markers in CLL. Prospective large-scale studies are required to validate and confirm the feasibility of the proposed cut-off level of 2.04 ng/mL as a predictor of time to treatment in treatment-naïve CLL patients.

Novel Therapies in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Rapidly Changing Landscape

OPINION STATEMENT

Treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has changed since 2014 after the introduction of inhibitors of B-cell receptor signaling pathway (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, idelalisib and duvelisib) and the inhibitor of the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2 (venetoclax). In 2019, novel agents were upgraded from being a "great treatment option" to the "preferred choice" for all lines of treatment after number of randomized clinical trials proved their superiority compared to conventional chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) regimens. A growing number of next-generation molecules are in clinical trials with a promise of improved efficacy and less toxicity. This includes agents with expected better safety profile (zanubrutinib, umbralisib, etc.) or more importantly with a potential to overcome the resistance mechanism to early generation agents (ARQ-531, LOXO-305, or vecabrutinib). Early intervention has once again become an active topic of research and, if proven to provide an overall survival benefit, will eliminate the "watch and wait" strategy for asymptomatic CLL patients. Until then, treatment should only be offered to patients who meet the standard treatment indication in standard practice. With our upgraded therapeutic toolbox, there are and will be many unanswered questions. CLL field will need to define the optimal treatment sequence and most effective combinations with a goal of having a time-limited and chemotherapy-free regimen that provides longest remissions and potentially cure. Cellular immunotherapy with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) may become available for high-risk CLL along with allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT). Financial toxicity of novel agents especially when used in combination will need to be an important aspect of research in coming years to avoid unnecessary overtreatment of patients. As current prognostic models (CLL-IPI, etc.) were developed and validated in the CIT era, there is ongoing effort to develop new models using clinical and molecular characteristics to accurately define high-risk CLL in the era of novel agents. We all need to keep in mind that access to the novel agents is currently limited to certain developed countries and every effort should be made to make sure patients around the world also benefit from these outstanding drugs.

Precision Medicine Management of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of leukemia in western countries, with an incidence of approximately 5.1/100,000 new cases per year. Some patients may never require treatment, whereas others relapse early after front line therapeutic approaches. Recent whole genome and whole exome sequencing studies have allowed a better understanding of CLL pathogenesis and the identification of genetic lesions with potential clinical relevance. Consistently, precision medicine plays a pivotal role in the treatment algorithm of CLL, since the integration of molecular biomarkers with the clinical features of the disease may guide treatment choices. Most CLL patients present at the time of diagnosis with an early stage disease and are managed with a watch and wait strategy. For CLL patients requiring therapy, the CLL treatment armamentarium includes both chemoimmunotherapy strategies and biological drugs. The efficacy of these treatment strategies relies upon specific molecular features of the disease. TP53 disruption (including both TP53 mutation and 17p deletion) is the strongest predictor of chemo-refractoriness, and the assessment of TP53 status is the first and most important decisional node in the first line treatment algorithm. The presence of TP53 disruption mandates treatment with biological drugs that inhibit the B cell receptor or, alternatively, the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) pathway and can, at least in part, circumvent the chemorefractoriness of TP53-disrupted patients. Beside TP53 disruption, the mutational status of immunoglobulin heavy variable (IGHV) genes also helps clinicians to improve treatment tailoring. In fact, patients carrying mutated IGHV genes in the absence of TP53 disruption experience a long-lasting and durable response to chemoimmunotherapy after fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) treatment with a survival superimposable to that of a matched general population. In contrast, patients with unmutated IGHV genes respond poorly to chemoimmunotherapy and deserve treatment with B cell receptor inhibitors. Minimal residual disease is also emerging as a relevant biomarker with potential clinical implications. Overall, precision medicine is now a mainstay in the management and treatment stratification of CLL. The identification of novel predictive biomarkers will allow further improvements in the treatment tailoring of this leukemia.

How to Choose the Best Treatment and Testing for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in the Tsunami of New Treatment Options

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has undergone a major shift since introduction of multiple targeted agents. B cell receptor inhibitors that target either bruton tyrosine kinase (ibrutinib) or phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (idelalisib and duvelisib) and BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax have become the mainstay of treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newer generations of monoclonal antibodies targeting CD20 (obinutuzumab and ofatumumab) are commonly used with novel drugs or chemotherapy agents and result in improved efficacy. At the same time, chemoimmunotherapy remains a reasonable option for selected patients. Therefore, with variety of reasonable options, choice of treatment in first-line or relapsed setting has become more challenging. Better understanding of the molecular and cytogenetics data for each patient is critical to improve management of patients with CLL. Herein, we review our approach to diagnosis and treatment of CLL in the era of novel therapeutic agents.

Elevated FANCA expression determines a worse prognosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and interferes with p53 function

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by a failure in the mechanisms of apoptosis that leads to an accumulation of mature B cells in peripheral blood, bone marrow, and lymphoid organs. The molecular basis of CLL remains unknown. Certain cytogenetic and molecular markers determine a bad prognosis in CLL. Fanconi anemia complementation (FANC) proteins have been related to chromosomal instability and alterations in the mechanisms of p53 activation, control of cell cycle, and apoptosis. We investigated the role of certain FANC proteins in CLL. Our data identified a group of patients with CLL with high expression of FANCA in peripheral B-CLL cells and we established its relationship with the deletion of 11q23 and a worse prognosis. When we investigated the molecular mechanisms of this bad prognosis, we observed a reduction in the expression of 2 p53 target genes, p21 and ∆Np73, in CLL primary cells transfected with FANCA. Functional studies demonstrated an impairment of p53 by FANCA. Moreover, we obtained evidence of a cooperation between FANCA and the NEDD8-interacting protein NUB1L in the destabilization of p53. For the first time, FANCA is reported as a bad prognosis marker by a mechanism other than its role in the Fanconi anemia-breast cancer DNA repair pathway.-Bravo-Navas, S., Yáñez, L., Romón, Í., Pipaón, C. Elevated FANCA expression determines a worse prognosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and interferes with p53 function.

Improving risk-stratification of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia using multivariate patient similarity networks

BACKGROUND

Better risk-stratification of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and identification of subsets of ultra-high-risk (HR)-CLL patients are crucial in the contemporary era of an expanded therapeutic armamentarium for CLL.

METHODS

A multivariate patient similarity network and clustering was applied to assess the prognostic values of routine genetic, laboratory, and clinical factors and to identify subsets of ultra-HR-CLL patients. The study cohort consisted of 116 HR-CLL patients (F/M 36/80, median age 63 yrs) carrying del(11q), del(17p)/TP53 mutations and/or complex karyotype (CK) at the time of diagnosis.

RESULTS

Three major subsets based on the presence of key prognostic variables as genetic aberrations, bulky lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, and gender: profile (P)-I (n = 34, men/women with CK + no del(17p)/TP53 mutations), P-II (n = 47, predominantly men with del(11q) + no CK + no del(17p)/TP53 mutations), and P-III (n = 35, men/women with del(17p)/TP53 mutations, with/without del(11q) and CK) were revealed. Subanalysis of major subsets identified three ultra-HR-CLL groups: men with TP53 disruption with/without CK, women with TP53 disruption with CK and men/women with CK + del(11q) with poor short-term outcomes (25% deaths/12 mo). Besides confirming the combinations of known risk-factors, the used patient similarity network added further refinement of subsets of HR-CLL patients who may profit from different targeted drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed for the first time in hemato-oncology the usefulness of the multivariate patient similarity networks for stratification of HR-CLL patients. This approach shows the potential for clinical implementation of precision medicine, which is especially important in view of an armamentarium of novel targeted drugs.

Descriptive analysis of genetic aberrations and cell of origin in Richter transformation

Richter transformation (RT) is a progression from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) to a more aggressive lymphoma, most often diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Due to the rarity of the disease, data regarding the molecular profile and cell of origin (COO) of RT is limited. We performed immunohistochemistry analysis for COO determination and next-generation sequencing for gene mutation analysis in 11 RT patients. Seventy-nine percent of our patients were classified as non-GCB phenotype. Of the 57 unique mutations identified, the three most commonly mutated genes were TP53, TET2, and CREBBP. Neither TET2 nor CREBBP has been previously described in RT. Our analysis provides additional information to help guide further investigation of both the diagnosis and treatment of this complex and heterogeneous disease.

Cytogenetic complexity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: definitions, associations, and clinical impact

Recent evidence suggests that complex karyotype (CK) defined by the presence of ≥3 chromosomal aberrations (structural and/or numerical) identified by using chromosome-banding analysis (CBA) may be relevant for treatment decision-making in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, many challenges toward the routine clinical application of CBA remain. In a retrospective study of 5290 patients with available CBA data, we explored both clinicobiological associations and the clinical impact of CK in CLL. We found that patients with ≥5 abnormalities, defined as high-CK, exhibit uniformly dismal clinical outcomes, independently of clinical stage, TP53 aberrations (deletion of chromosome 17p and/or TP53 mutations [TP53abs]), and the expression of somatically hypermutated (M-CLL) or unmutated immunoglobulin heavy variable genes. Thus, they contrasted with CK cases with 3 or 4 aberrations (low-CK and intermediate-CK, respectively) who followed aggressive disease courses only in the presence of TP53abs. At the other end of the spectrum, patients with CK and +12,+19 displayed an exceptionally indolent profile. Building upon CK, TP53abs, and immunoglobulin heavy variable gene somatic hypermutation status, we propose a novel hierarchical model in which patients with high-CK exhibit the worst prognosis, whereas those with mutated CLL lacking CK or TP53abs, as well as CK with +12,+19, show the longest overall survival. Thus, CK should not be axiomatically considered unfavorable in CLL, representing a heterogeneous group with variable clinical behavior. High-CK with ≥5 chromosomal aberrations emerges as prognostically adverse, independent of other biomarkers. Prospective clinical validation is warranted before ultimately incorporating high-CK in risk stratification of CLL.

Management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia at high risk of relapse on ibrutinib therapy

The past two decades have witnessed a paradigm shift in the management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), particularly with the introduction of targeted therapies to clinical practice. Ibrutinib is an irreversible inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) and has shown significant efficacy and tolerability, even in heavily treated patients. Despite improvement in outcomes, patients do ultimately relapse. Those who develop disease progression on ibrutinib are a particularly high-risk population with poor outcomes. Identifying patients at higher risk of relapse while on therapy is needed for individualized clinical monitoring and timely subsequent management upon relapse. In this article, we discuss characteristics of CLL progression, risk factors for relapse on ibrutinib including clinical and molecular biomarkers, and a risk-adapted approach to identifying, monitoring, and managing CLL patients during ibrutinib therapy.