Do polymorphisms inMDR1andCYP3A5genes influence the risk of cytogenetic relapse in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia on imatinib therapy?

Pharmacogenomics to Predict Tumor Therapy Response: A Focus on ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters and Cytochromes P450

Pharmacogenomics is an evolving tool of precision medicine. Recently, due to the introduction of next-generation sequencing and projects generating "Big Data", a plethora of new genetic variants in pharmacogenes have been discovered. Cancer resistance is a major complication often preventing successful anticancer treatments. Pharmacogenomics of both somatic mutations in tumor cells and germline variants may help optimize targeted treatments and improve the response to conventional oncological therapy. In addition, integrative approaches combining copy number variations and long noncoding RNA profiling with germline and somatic variations seem to be a promising approach as well. In pharmacology, expression and enzyme activity are traditionally the more studied aspects of ATP-binding cassette transporters and cytochromes P450. In this review, we briefly introduce the field of pharmacogenomics and the advancements driven by next-generation sequencing and outline the possible roles of genetic variation in the two large pharmacogene superfamilies. Although the evidence needs further substantiation, somatic and copy number variants as well as rare variants and common polymorphisms in these genes could all affect response to cancer therapy. Regulation by long noncoding RNAs has also been shown to play a role. However, in all these areas, more comprehensive studies on larger sets of patients are needed.

Imatinib trough levels: a potential biomarker to predict cytogenetic and molecular response in newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

Therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is an ongoing debate. We studied the influence of imatinib trough levels on therapeutic response in 206 newly diagnosed patients with CML. We also compared the drug levels in patients taking branded and generic imatinib. Imatinib levels were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Marked inter-individual variability was seen in imatinib levels (coefficient of variation = 69%). Trough levels were significantly higher in patients who attained complete cytogenetic response than those who did not (2213.9 ± 1101 vs. 1648.6 ± 1403.4ng/mL; p < .001). Patients with major molecular response (MMR) had higher trough levels than those without MMR (2333.4 ± 1112 vs. 1643.4 ± 1383.9ng/mL; p = .001). Patients with trough levels ≤1000ng/mL were at high risk for failure of imatinib therapy [RR =1.926; 95%CI (1.562, 2.374); p < .001]. Trough levels emerged as an independent predictor of imatinib response in multivariate analysis. To conclude, imatinib trough levels significantly influence cytogenetic and molecular response and might emerge as a potential biomarker for therapeutic response in CML.