Adverse drug reactions after intravenous rituximab infusion are more common in hematologic malignancies than in autoimmune disorders and can be predicted by the combination of few clinical and laboratory parameters: results from a retrospective, multicenter study of 374 patients

Characteristics and predictors of infusion-related reactions to rituximab in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

This retrospective study aimed to assess the characteristics and predictors of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) to rituximab in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). The medical records of adult patients with B-NHL who received their first cycle of rituximab from August 2020 to August 2022 were reviewed. IRRs were defined as any signs experienced by patients during rituximab infusion and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. During the study period, 334 patients were included; among them, 100 patients (30%) developed IRRs (mean age 54.7 (SD 13.2) years). Of the reported IRRs, 90% were grade II reactions, and 10% were grade III reactions. The multivariate analysis identified indolent lymphoma [OR 1.90, p = 0.025], no hydrocortisone as premedication [OR 3.03, p = 0.029], thrombocytopenia [OR 2.55, p = 0.009], and absolute lymphocyte count ≥ 2000 lymphocytes/microL [OR 1.74, p = 0.045] as independent predictors for IRRs.

A novel prednisone premedication protocol significantly decreases infusion‑related reactions of rituximab in newly diagnosed diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma

Rituximab is a widely used anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with a high incidence of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during administration. Reducing the incidence of IRRs remains problematic in hematological practices. In the present study, a novel strategy of a prednisone pretreatment regimen was designed similar to the combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) with the aim of exploring the effect on the incidence of IRRs to rituximab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A prospective, randomized (1:1) and controlled study was conducted in three regional hospitals in two groups (n=44 for each group): i) A control group treated with standard R-CHOP-like regimen; and ii) a group receiving a prednisone-pretreatment, modified R-CHOP-like protocol for newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL. The primary endpoint was to assess the incidence of IRRs to rituximab, as well as the association of IRRs with the efficacy of treatment. The second endpoint involved clinical outcomes. The total incidence of IRRs to rituximab in the treatment group was significantly lower compared with that in the control group (15.9 vs. 43.2%; P=0.0051). The different grade incidence of IRRs was lower in the treatment group compared with that in the control group (P=0.0053). In total, 29.5% of patients (26/88) experienced >1 IRR episode. The incidence of IRRs in the pre-treatment group was decreased compared with that in the control group in the 1st cycle (15.9 vs. 43.2%; P=0.0051) and 2nd cycle (6.8 vs. 27.3%; P=0.0107). The overall response rate was similar between the two groups (P>0.05). Median progression-free survival and median overall survival time were not statistically distinct between the two groups (P=0.5244 and P=0.5778, respectively). Grade ≥III toxicities mainly included vomiting and nausea (<20%), leukopenia and granulocytopenia (<20%), and alopecia (<25%). No death events were reported. Apart from IRRs to rituximab, the incidence of other adverse events was similar in both groups. The novel prednisone-pretreatment R-CHOP-like protocol in the present study significantly decreased the total and different grade incidences of IRRs to rituximab among newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL. This clinical trial was retrospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number, ChiCTR2300070327; date of registration, 10 April 2023).

Safety and tolerability of a 90-minute rapid infusion of Sandoz biosimilar rituximab in B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders in a real-world setting

Although rituximab is generally well-tolerated, infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are common with the initial dose when administered intravenously according to standard recommendations. To prevent IRRs, premedication and low-speed infusion rates have been recommended. Consequently, intravenous (i.v.) infusion of rituximab can become a labor-intensive process. Rapid i.v. rituximab infusion over 90 min has demonstrated a favorable safety profile for the second and subsequent infusions during the course of therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and tolerability of 90-min rapid infusion of Sandoz rituximab biosimilar (SDZ-RTX) for patients with CD20+ lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We retrospectively reviewed all patients with CD20+ lymphoma or CLL who received SDZ-RTX infusions in 90 min from July 2019 to July 2021 at seven Spanish hospitals. The primary end point was the incidence of IRRs. We identified 124 patients and 576 rapid administrations of SDZ-RTX, with an average of five rapid infusions per patient. Most rapid infusions of SDZ-RTX were in combination with CHOP/CHOP-like therapy (48.4%), followed by SDZ-RTX alone (15.1%), in combination with bendamustine (14.5%), or with other regimens (22%). The 90-min SDZ-RTX infusion schedule was well-tolerated with no grade 3/4 IRRs. The incidence of any grade IRR during the first rapid infusion was 1% (5 grade 1 IRRs and 1 grade 2 IRR). In conclusion, rapid 90-min i.v. administration of SDZ-RTX for the second and subsequent infusions during the course of therapy is well-tolerated in patients with CD20+ lymphoma or CLL.

Differences in the Development of Adverse Infusion Reactions to Rituximab in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Rheumatoid Arthritis and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma-Enigma Variations

It has become clear that rituximab treatment is useful for both B-cell malignancies and autoimmune rheumatic diseases. However this treatment is associated with an increased risk of an allergic reaction. We have reviewed the frequency with which these reactions occur in these different conditions. They appear to be less frequent when rituximab is used to treat rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus perhaps because concomitant steroids are invariably given to these patients with the rituximab which is not necessarily the case with the treatment of B-cell malignancies.

Prevalence of adverse reactions to intravenously administered originator biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A 5-year retrospective study

Background

Few Saudi studies have examined adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving intravenous (IV) originator biologics. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, types, and predictors of ADRs following long-term IV originator biologic use in patients with RA.

Patients and methods

This retrospective, single-center study included adult patients with RA who received IV originator biologics between 2015 and 2020. Medical records were reviewed and data regarding ADRs were collected and evaluated for causality using the Naranjo scale. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the odds for and factors associated with developing ADRs for each biologic.

Results

A total of 129 patients (87.6% women) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 54 (13) years were included in this study. A total of 1963 doses of tocilizumab (38.76%), rituximab (38.76%), abatacept (13.95%), and infliximab (8.53%), were administered during the study period. ADRs with a Naranjo score ≥ 1 were experienced by 103 (78%) patients, with an average of 2.2 events per patient. Infection (26.6%) and skin and mucous membrane disorders (14.18%) were the most commonly reported ADRs. Abatacept was associated with a significantly higher risk of multiple ADRs than the other biologics (adjusted odds ratio: 3.145, 95% confidence interval 1.004–9.854, p = 0.049).

Conclusion

There was a high prevalence of ADRs among patients with RA receiving biologics. Abatacept was associated with a greater risk of multiple ADRs than other biologics. Infection was the most common ADR. Future multicenter longitudinal studies are warranted.

Intensive Safety Monitoring of Rituximab (Biosimilar Novex® and the Innovator) in Pediatric Patients With Complex Diseases

Although rituximab is widely used off-label for complex pediatric diseases, safety reports are limited. We aimed to report evidence of its use in clinical practice, to describe the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADR) to rituximab biosimilar Novex^® and innovator, and to identify risk factors for the development of ADR in a real-life follow-up cohort of pediatric patients with complex diseases. We conducted a prospective, longitudinal, observational, single-centre study in patients that received rituximab for any complex disease, and as part of an intensive pharmacovigilance program. Demographic, pharmacological, clinical, and drug-related data were collected for all patients. ADR-free survival, including infusion-related reactions (IRR) and delayed ADR (dADR), was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Risk factors were evaluated by multivariable Cox regression models. In total, 77 patients (<19 y.o.) received 187 infusions of rituximab Novex^® (n = 155) or innovator rituximab (n = 32) for neurologic (Neu), immune-hematologic-rheumatic (IHR), oncologic (O) diseases, and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) or solid-organ transplantation (SOT). We recorded 29 IRR and 58 dADR that occurred in 27 (35.1%) and 29 (37.7%) patients, respectively. The respiratory tract was the most affected during IRR (29.6%) and hypogammaglobulinemia (37.9 %) was the most frequent dADR. First versus subsequent infusions (HR 5.4, CI95% 2.4-12.1, p<0.05), sex (boys vs. girls, HR 0.3, CI95% 0.1-0.8, and p<0.05), and diagnosis (Neu-IHR diseases vs. O-HSCT-SOT, HR 2.3, CI95% 1.02-5.4, and p < 0.05) were significantly associated with the development of IRR. For dADR, risk factors were diagnosis (Neu-IHR diseases vs. O-HSCT-SOT, HR 0.4, CI95% 0.2-0.9, and p < 0.05) and cumulative body surface area-normalized dosage (HR 1.0003, CI95% 1.0001-1.0006, and p < 0.05). The present is the largest real-world safety assessment of rituximab in Latin-American children with complex diseases supporting its use based on the overall acceptable safety. Identification of risk factors may contribute to optimization of off-label rituximab treatment in pediatrics.

A novel rituximab administration protocol to minimize infusion-related adverse reactions in patients with B-cell lymphoma

Background Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during rituximab administration are occasionally severe and remain problematic in oncology practice. Aim To establish a safer, risk-stratified rituximab protocol for patients with B-cell lymphoma. Method We stratified patients into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups according to the number of risk factors for IRRs, specifically, low-grade histology and bulky tumors (> 10 cm): Then, the administrating schedule of rituximab (375 mg/m², diluted in 1 mg/mL concentration) was individualized. For the first rituximab cycle, the low- and moderate-risk groups underwent conventional infusion #1 (25-200 mg/h, ~4.3 h), and the high-risk group underwent long infusion (25-100 mg/h, 6.8 h). Patients in the low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups without IRRs in the first cycle underwent short infusion (100-400 mg/h, 2.3 h), conventional infusion #2 (100-200 mg/h, 3.5 h), and conventional infusion #1, respectively. Patients with IRRs in the first cycle received a second rituximab cycle with the same schedule as the first cycle. The procedure for the third cycle was at the attending physician's discretion. Results Among 81 patients, the overall incidence of IRRs was 28%. IRR incidences in the low- (n = 39), moderate- (n = 35), and high-risk groups (n = 7) were 31%, 20%, and 57%, respectively. All IRRs were grade ≤ 2. The overall conversion rate to short infusion in the third cycle was 54%, without any IRRs. Conclusions Our step-by-step rituximab protocol demonstrated a fewer incidence of severe IRRs among B-cell lymphoma patients receiving rituximab.

Cardiovascular disease-specific mortality in 270,618 patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the trend of cardiovascular disease (CVD)-specific mortality in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and identify prognostic factors for CVD-specific death in stage NSCLC patients.

METHODS

In this study, 270,618 NSCLC patients were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. CVD- and NSCLC-specific cumulative mortality and proportion of death were calculated and graphically displayed to describe the probability of specific endpoints. Prognostic factors for CVD-specific mortality were evaluated by cause-specific hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the competing risk model with non-cardiovascular death as competing risks.

RESULTS

Among all competing causes of death, lung cancer resulted in the highest cumulative mortality, followed by CVDs and other causes. In the proportion of cause-specific death, heart diseases accounted for approximately 5.3% of the total death, only secondary to primary cancer. In all three stages, higher age, squamous cell carcinoma, and no-or-unknown chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy were associated with a higher risk of CVD-specific death, while surgery treatment seemed to be a protective factor. Female gender was statistically related to CVD-specific death in stage I and III patients with HRs of 0.84 (0.78-0.91) and 0.84 (0.77-0.93), respectively. Interestingly, right-sided laterality was correlated with lower CVD-specific mortality with HR of 0.82 (0.74-0.90) in stage III.

CONCLUSIONS

This study illustrated the historical trend of CVD-specific death in NSCLC patients and assesses potential prognostic risk factors, highlighting the involvement of cardio-oncology teams in cancer treatment to provide optimal comprehensive care and long-term surveillance for cancer patients.

Vasculitis in a patient with mixed cryoglobulinemia treated with rituximab biosimilar CT-P10: a case report

Rituximab represents a milestone in the treatment of mixed cryoglobulinemic vasculitis. Despite usually well-tolerated, rituximab may induce different types of adverse drug reactions, including exacerbation of vasculitis. Rituximab biosimilar have been recently approved in Europe in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, but no data are available about effectiveness and safety of rituximab biosimilar in the treatment of mixed cryoglobulinemic vasculitis. We describe a severe skin vasculitis reactivation in a patient affected by rheumatoid arthritis and mixed cryoglobulinemic vasculitis treated with rituximab biosimilar. After 7 days from the first infusion, a severe purpuric rash at lower limbs appeared, that resolved in about 2 weeks with high dose-corticosteroid. Rituximab-induced vasculitis has also been described since 2001, but its pathophysiology is still controversial due to the anecdotical descriptions in literature and the variability of the time between the rituximab infusion and the onset of skin lesions. Up to date, this is the first report describing a vasculitic flare in a patient affected by mixed cryoglobulinemic vasculitis treated with rituximab biosimilar.

Paraneoplastic autoimmune multiorgan syndrome

Originally described by Anhalt as paraneoplastic pemphigus in 1990, paraneoplastic autoimmune multiorgan syndrome (PAMS) is a potentially lethal blistering disease, characterized by polymorphous clinical features, including mucocutaneous erosions, blisters, lichenoid papules, and erythemas. Several autoantibodies have been detected in serum of PAMS patients, including antiplakins, anti-alpha-2-macroglobulin like 1, and antidesmogleins autoantibodies. The mortality rate of PAMS is up to 90%. This is due on the one hand to the poor response to treatments and on the other hand to the delay in the diagnosis and to the prognosis of the underlying neoplasia.

Adverse infusion reactions to rituximab in systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective analysis

Background

To undertake a retrospective review of patients with SLE who had received Rituximab in order to determine the rates and associated patient characteristics of clinically significant adverse infusion reactions.

Methods

A descriptive analysis was undertaken of each infusion reaction, which was then assessed using the clinical information available to hypothesise on the possible underlying mechanism(s).

Results

Records of 136 SLE patients previously treated with 481 individual infusions of Rituximab were reviewed. A total of 22 patients (17.6%) had 28 (5.8% of total infusions) documented clinically significant adverse infusion reactions. Average age at first Rituximab infusion in patients without a reaction was 37 years (range 16–73) compared with 30 years (range 18–56) in those with a reaction. A high proportion of men (18.2%) experienced an infusion reaction. Severity and type of reaction varied. 6.4% of those who had a reaction were not retreated.

Conclusions

While Rituximab remains an important tool in the treatment of SLE it is important to be aware that rates of infusion reactions may be more significant in SLE than in other diseases. A prospective study is required to better characterise the reactions.

Infusion-related reactions to rituximab: frequency, mechanisms and predictors

INTRODUCTION

Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb), is indicated in the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, chronic lymphoid leukemia, and rheumatoid arthritis. The occurrence of infusion-related reactions (IRR), especially during the first infusion, is one of the main concerns of rituximab, otherwise well tolerated. Although IRR are usually mild to moderate, fatal evolutions have been reported. These reactions are not specific to rituximab and also observed with other compounds, including those recruiting effectors cells. Further studies are required to predict the frequency and severity of such reactions, to avoid life-threatening complications, especially in the first-in-human studies. Areas covered: This review reports data available to date on the occurrence of IRR induced by rituximab. Then, factors associated with IRR are described, with proposed pathogenic mechanisms of IRR. Finally, different methods to prevent and manage IRR are reported. Expert opinion: Various factors have been associated with the occurrence and severity of IRR. A predictive model of IRR is of importance to prevent life-threatening IRR or detrimental interruption of rituximab therapy. This model would combine parameters, such as the number of CD20 positive cells and NK cells (CD16 positive), together with the level of CD20 and CD16 expressions, and FCGR3Apolymorphism.