The effect of R-CHOP dose reduction on overall survival of elderly patients with DLBCL - comparative study

Geriatric risk model for older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (GERIAD): a prospective multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Optimal risk stratification based on simplified geriatric assessment to predict treatment-related toxicity and survival needs to be clarified in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

METHODS

This multicenter prospective cohort study enrolled newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL (≥ 65 yr) between September 2015 and April 2018. A simplified geriatric assessment was performed at baseline using Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental ADL (IADL), and Charlson's Comorbidity Index (CCI). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS).

RESULTS

The study included 249 patients, the median age was 74 years (range, 65-88), and 125 (50.2%) were female. In multivariable Cox analysis, ADL, IADL, CCI, and age were independent factors for EFS; an integrated geriatric score was derived and the patients stratified into three geriatric categories: fit (n = 162, 65.1%), intermediate-fit (n = 25, 10.0%), and frail (n = 62, 24.9%). The established geriatric model was significantly associated with EFS (fit vs. intermediate-fit, HR 2.61, p < 0.001; fit vs. frail, HR 4.61, p < 0.001) and outperformed each covariate alone or in combination. In 87 intermediate-fit or frail patients, the relative doxorubicin dose intensity (RDDI) ≥ 62.4% was significantly associated with worse EFS (HR, 2.15, 95% CI 1.30-3.53, p = 0.002). It was related with a higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 symptomatic non-hematologic toxicities (63.2% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.001) and earlier treatment discontinuation (34.5% vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001) in patients with RDDI ≥ 62.4% than in those with RDDI < 62.4%.

CONCLUSION

This model integrating simplified geriatric assessment can risk-stratify older patients with DLBCL and identify those who are highly vulnerable to standard dose-intensity chemoimmunotherapy.

Use of benzodiazepines is the risk factor for infection in patients aged 80 years or older with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A single-institution retrospective study

Background

The number of patients aged 80 years or older with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is increasing, and the incidence rate of the disease in this population group reaches up to 20%. The risk of infection is higher in older patients than in other patients. Although hypnotic drugs are frequently detected as potentially inappropriate medications, it is unclear whether hypnotic drugs affect the occurrence of infection during chemotherapy. Here, we investigated whether the use of hypnotic drugs is associated with infection during first-line chemotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) aged 80 years or older.

Methods

Japanese patients aged 80 years or older with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who had received first-line chemotherapy at Fujita Health University Hospital from January 2005 to March 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. The primary study outcome was the identification of the risk factor for infection during first-line chemotherapy.

Results

This study included 65 patients received first-line chemotherapy. The proportion of patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network-international prognostic index ≥ 6 was higher in the infection group than in the non-infection group. The relative dose intensity of each anticancer drug (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and vincristine) and dose of prednisolone did not significantly differ between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that the use of benzodiazepines was a risk factor for infection (odds ratio, 4.131 [95% confidence interval: 1.225–13.94], P = 0.022).

Conclusion

DLBCL patients using benzodiazepines should be monitored for infection symptoms during chemotherapy.

Multimodality Imaging Guided Diagnosis and Treatment Response Evaluation in a Patient with Lymphoma with Right Atrioventricular Involvement

A 42-year-old female was transferred to our center from a regional hospital with 5-day history of flushing, fatigue, and chest pressure. On initial presentation to the regional hospital, computed tomography (CT) of chest revealed a large mediastinal mass with cardiac involvement. Supraclavicular lymph node biopsy demonstrated non-germinal center diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with Ki67 index near 100%. A transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) revealed a solid mass infiltrating the right atrium (RA) and right ventricle (RV), moderate tricuspid regurgitation, and a moderate pericardial effusion. Further assessment with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging demonstrated a contrast avid mass with necrotic center invading into the RA and RV consistent with metastatic lymphoma. Prior to induction chemotherapy, her clinical course was complicated by supraventricular tachycardia that resolved after initiation of targeted chemotherapy against the lymphoma. Follow-up cardiac imaging 3 months later demonstrated decrease in size of the cardiac mass and the amount of pericardial effusion. This case demonstrates utility of multi-modality cardiac imaging in the diagnosis and assessing therapeutic response of diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma with cardiac involvement.

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients older than 65 years: analysis of 3 year Real World data of practice patterns and outcomes in England

BACKGROUND

We wished to examine treatment and outcome patterns in older diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients, with a focus on the effect of route-to-diagnosis to outcome.

METHODS

Data were extracted from Public Health England's National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service between 2013 and 2015 included route-to-diagnosis, disease characteristics and survival for 9186 patients ≥65 years. Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy data identified front-line regimens, cycles and doses.

RESULTS

Route-to-diagnosis were emergency (34%), NHS urgent cancer pathway (rapid haemato-oncologist review <2 weeks), (29%) and standard GP referral (25%). The most common regimen was R-CHOP (n = 4392). 313 patients received R-miniCHOP (7% of R-CHOP). For all patients, 3-year overall survival (OS) for 65-79 years was 57% and for ≥80 years was 32%. Three-year OS for R-CHOP-treated patients diagnosed via emergency presentation was 54% (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.63, p < 0.01) and 75% (adjusted HR 0.81, p < 0.01) on the NHS urgent cancer pathway (reference HR:1.00: GP referrals). 3-year OS was 54% for both R-miniCHOP and R-CHOP in ≥80 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our comprehensive population analysis is the first to show that the NHS urgent cancer pathway is associated with a superior survival after adjusting for multiple confounders. Equivalent survival for R-CHOP and R-mini-CHOP was demonstrated in those ≥80 years.

Impact of R-CHOP dose intensity on survival outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review

The dilemma of whether to treat elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with a full or reduced dose intensity (DI) of R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone+rituximab) is often faced by clinicians. We conducted a systematic review assessing the impact of R-CHOP DI on DLBCL survival outcomes, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies with ≥100 patients treated with R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like therapies published from January 2002 through November 2020. Studies were included if they reported the impact of R-CHOP DI on survival outcomes. We screened records, extracted data, and reviewed all the studies for quality and statistical appraisal. Of 380 screened records, 13 studies including 5188 patients were reviewed. DI was often calculated as the ratio of the cumulative delivered dose of prespecified drug(s) to the cumulative planned dose multiplied by a time-correction factor. Lower DI (intended or relative) was associated with inferior survival in 7 of 9 studies reporting crude survival analyses. Multivariable analysis using DI as a covariate was performed in 10 studies. Six showed an association (P < .05) with adjustment for other covariates, and 4 did not. Most studies and those larger studies of higher quality showed poorer outcomes associated with reduced DI. In subgroups aged ≥80 years, survival was not consistently affected by reduced DI. DI-specific randomized trials are warranted, but these data support full-dose R-CHOP in elderly and fit patients aged <80 years with DLBCL, but not in those aged ≥80 years, where dose-reduced R-CHOP does not appear to compromise survival.

Approaches to aggressive B-cell lymphomas in less fit patients

Treating unfit patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma poses the dilemma of balancing potential cure while minimizing toxicity because of frailty and comorbidities. Age greater than 80 years and common comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease and poorly controlled diabetes mellitus often preclude the use of full-dose anthracyclines and steroids, the backbones of standard regimens for aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Assessing patient fitness remains subjective, with no consensus on best practice or how to integrate assessment tools into decision making. Incorporation of prephase steroids for all unfit patients may markedly improve performance status with consideration of standard dose therapy, especially in patients less than age 80. Although randomized studies are lacking, current data suggest patients age ≥ 80 years are considered unfit a priori and should receive dose-reduced anthracycline regimens or anthracycline-free regimens. Severe toxicity is highest after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Dose reductions for cycle 1 in unfit patients with plans to escalate as tolerated is often an effective strategy. Unfit patients often benefit from comanagement with gerontologists, cardio-oncologists, and endocrinologists depending on age and the nature of comorbidities. Palliative therapy for patients with newly diagnosed aggressive B-cell lymphoma results in median survivals of less than 3 months, and in general, should only be considered in patients with untreatable comorbidities such as advanced dementia or refractory metastatic solid tumors. Incorporating new, potentially less toxic agents such as novel antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and bispecific antibodies into first-line therapy is an exciting future direction with potential for substantial benefit in less fit patients.

Prognostic significance of infectious episodes occurring during first-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma - A nationwide cohort study

Infections during first-line therapy for DLBCL are often associated with chemotherapy dose reductions and increased mortality. Systemic infections have also been suggested as beneficial promotors of immunological responses. However, whether there is an association between the timing of an infectious episode and outcome during treatment has not yet been clarified. We investigated how the occurrence and timing of infectious episodes during the first line of treatment for "de novo" DLBCL influenced patient outcome. We used data on DLBCL patients from the Danish Lymphoma Registry, the Danish National Patient Registry, and the Danish National Pathology Registry. Infections were categorized according to type (ICD-10) and time of occurrence after treatment start. "Early" infections were defined as occurring between days 7 and 42 and "late" infections between days 100 and 150 from treatment start. Patients experiencing both "early and late" infections were categorized separately. We used multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier estimates to assess the association between infections and survival adjusting for NCCN-IPI, sex, comorbidity, and rituximab treatment. We identified 3546 patients, median age 65 years (IQR 56,73). Infectious episodes occurred in 1171 (33%) patients, of which 666 had "early," 303 "late," and 202 both "early and late" events. Patients without registered infections had a 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 74%. Those with "early," "late," or "early+late" had 5-year OS of 65%, 62%, and 53%, respectively. Compared with patients without any registered infections, hazard rate ratios (HR) were 1.24 (95% CI 1.05-1.47), 1.32 (95% CI 1.06-1.63), and 1.59 (95% CI 1.27-2.00), respectively, in the multivariable model. We observed that infectious episodes during first-line treatment for "de novo" DLBCL occurred in 44% of the patients. Irrespective of timing, patients with infectious episodes had an inferior outcome compared to those without. Outcome patterns were similar for patients registered with sepsis.

Front-Line Treatment of High Grade B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy has resulted in a marked improvement in the survival of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We reflect upon the history front-line (1L) therapy and highlight advances in management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the introduction of R-CHOP, the majority of randomized studies in the front-line treatment of DLBCL have failed to show a benefit. Such studies have involved treatment intensification, adding novel agents to the R-CHOP backbone and targeting such novel agents to biologically defined subgroups. R-CHOP therefore remains standard-of-care for most but new insights into the molecular biology of these diseases, and the development of active targeted molecules offers promise for the future. Accumulating evidence in the very elderly suggests dose attenuation does not compromise survival. Intensification in primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma may avoid the need for radiotherapy, but must be balanced against the risks. PET-CT- and ctDNA-based response assessment may now enable response adapted therapy and early prognostication, improving patient selection and potentially outcomes. Novel technologies and therapies in combination with novel molecular diagnostics will likely become the standard-of-care approach for the personalized therapy of DLBCL but need to be proven in well-designed and conducted randomized trials.