Prolonged hospitalization, primary refractory disease, performance status and age are prognostic factors for survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and transformed indolent lymphoma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

Understanding common key indicators of successful and unsuccessful cancer drug trials using a contrast mining framework on ClinicalTrials.gov

Clinical trials are essential to the process of new drug development. As clinical trials involve significant investments of time and money, it is crucial for trial designers to carefully investigate trial settings prior to designing a trial. Utilizing trial documents from ClinicalTrials.gov, we aim to understand the common characteristics of successful and unsuccessful cancer drug trials to provide insights about what to learn and what to avoid. In this research, we first computationally classified cancer drug trials into successful and unsuccessful cases and then utilized natural language processing to extract eligibility criteria information from the trial documents. To provide explainable and potentially modifiable recommendations for new trial design, contrast mining was applied to discoverhighly contrasted patterns with a significant difference in prevalence between successful (completion with advancement to the next phase) and unsuccessful (suspended, withdrawn, or terminated) groups. Our method identified contrast patterns consisting of combinations of drug categories, eligibility criteria, study organization, and study design for nine major cancers. In addition to a literature review for the qualitative validation of mined contrast patterns, we found that contrast-pattern-based classifiers using the top 200 contrast patterns as feature representations can achieve approximately 80% F₁ score for eight out of ten cancer types in our experiments. In summary, aligning with the modernization efforts of ClinicalTrials.gov, our study demonstrates that understanding the contrast characteristics of successful and unsuccessful cancer trials may provide insights into the decision-making process for trial investigators and therefore facilitate improved cancer drug trial design.

Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Performance Status Work Group

PURPOSE

Performance status (PS) is one of the most common eligibility criteria. Many trials are limited to patients with high-functioning PS, resulting in important differences between trial participants and patient populations with the disease. In addition, existing PS measures are subjective and susceptible to investigator bias.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A multidisciplinary working group of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends of Cancer Research evaluated how PS eligibility criteria could be more inclusive. The working group recommendations are based on a literature search, review of trials, simulation study, and multistakeholder consensus. The working group prioritized inclusiveness and access to investigational therapies, while balancing patient safety and study integrity.

RESULTS

Broadening PS eligibility criteria may increase the number of potentially eligible patients for a given clinical trial, thus shortening accrual time. It may also result in greater participant diversity, potentially reduce trial participant and patient disparities, and enable clinicians to more readily translate trial results to patients with low-functioning PS. Potential impact on outcomes was explored through a simulation trial demonstrating that when the number of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS2 participants was relatively small, the effect on the estimated HR and power was modest, even when PS2 patients did not derive a treatment benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Expanding PS eligibility criteria to be more inclusive may be justified in many cases and could result in faster accrual rates and more representative trial populations.See related commentary by Giantonio, p. 2369.

High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a nationwide survey

To investigate the use of high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for relapsed or high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) between 1990 and 2007, we conducted a nationwide survey using the registry database of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Of the 1222 patients in the database, 576 (47%) received ASCT in first complete remission (CR1), 140 (12%) in first partial remission, 281 (23%) in sensitive relapse, 150 (12%) in resistant or sensitivity-unknown relapse, and 75 (6%) in primary refractory status. With a median follow-up of 22 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival rates were 71% and 68%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of 2-year non-relapse mortality and relapse/progression were 6% and 26%, respectively. Relapse/progression after ASCT in the rituximab era (2002-2007) was significantly lower than that in the pre-rituximab era (1990-2001; P < 0.001). Older age, male gender, poor performance status at ASCT, non-CR1 at ASCT, ASCT performed in 1990-2001, and LEED or MCEC regimen were adverse predictors of OS. Because ASCT for newly diagnosed high-risk DLBCL has not been performed recently, a registry database study to assess the impact of ASCT for relapsed or refractory DLBCL in the rituximab era is warranted.