Hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndromes and population-level outcomes: a changing landscape or a small dent?

A new therapeutic perspective: Erastin inhibits tumor progression by driving ferroptosis in myelodysplastic syndromes

Ferroptosis is a recently identified and evolutionarily conserved form of programmed cell death. This process is initiated by an imbalance in iron metabolism, leading to an overload of ferrous ions. These ions promote lipid peroxidation in the cell membrane through the Fenton reaction. As the cell's antioxidant defenses become overwhelmed, a fatal buildup of reactive oxygen species (ROS) occurs, resulting in the rupture of the plasma membrane. Ferroptosis is implicated in conditions such as ischemia-reperfusion injuries and a range of cancers. In our research, we explored ferroptosis in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) by measuring iron levels, transferrin receptor expression, and glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) mRNA. Our findings revealed that MDS patients had significantly higher Fe2+ levels in CD33+ cells and increased transferrin receptor mRNA compared to healthy individuals. GPX4 expression was also higher in MDS but not statistically significant. To investigate potential treatments for myeloid hematological diseases through ferroptosis induction, we treated the myelodysplastic syndrome cell line (SKM-1) and two myeloid leukemia cell lines (KG-1 and K562) with erastin, an iron transfer inducer. We observed that erastin treatment led to glutathione depletion, reduced GPX4 activity, and increased ROS, culminating in cell death by ferroptosis. Furthermore, combining erastin with azacitidine demonstrated a synergistic effect on MDS and leukemia cell lines, suggesting a promising approach for treating these hematological conditions with this drug combination. Our experiments confirm erastin's ability to induce ferroptosis in MDS and highlight its potential synergistic use with azacitidine for treatment.

Comorbidities and malignancies negatively affect survival in myelodysplastic syndromes: a population-based study

Population-based studies that contain detailed clinical data on patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are scarce. This study focused on the real-world overall survival (OS) of MDS patients in association with comorbidities, specifically malignancies. An observational population-based study using the HemoBase registry was performed, including all patients with MDS diagnosed between 2005 and 2017 in Friesland, a Dutch province. Detailed information about diagnosis, patient characteristics, previous treatment of malignancies, and comorbidities according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was collected from electronic health records. Patients were followed up until June 2019. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression analyses were used to study survival differences. In the 291 patients diagnosed with MDS, the median OS was 25.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.3-30.2). OS was significantly better for patients with CCI score <4, age <65 years, female sex, and low-risk MDS. Fifty-seven patients (20%) had encountered a prior malignancy (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer), and a majority (38 patients; 67%) were therapy related. Both therapy-related and secondary MDSs were associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.02-2.23 and 1.58; 95% CI, 0.95-2.65, respectively), as compared with de novo MDS patients (P = .04). Patients in remission at time of MDS diagnosis had a similar median OS compared with patients with de novo MDS (25.5 vs 28.3 months). This population-based study involving all newly diagnosed MDS patients over a 13-year period in Friesland showed that multiple comorbidities, including previous malignancies, are associated with shorter OS. OS was not related to the use of radiotherapy or chemotherapy.

Immunosuppressive therapy in myelodysplastic syndromes: a borrowed therapy in search of the right place

INTRODUCTION

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) encompass a heterogenous collection of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders defined by dysregulated hematopoiesis, peripheral cytopenias, and a risk of leukemic progression. Increasing data support the role of innate and adaptive immune pathways in the pathogenesis and disease course of MDS. The role of immunosuppressive therapy has an established role in the treatment of other hematologic diseases, such as aplastic anemia whose pathogenesis is postulated to reflect that of MDS with regards to many aspects of immune activation. Areas covered: This paper discusses the current understanding of immune dysregulation as it pertains to MDS, the clinical experience with immunosuppressive therapy in the management of MDS, as well as future prospects which will likely improve therapeutic options and outcomes for patients with MDS. Expert commentary: Though limited by paucity of high quality data, immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive therapies for the treatment of MDS have shown meaningful clinical activity in selected patients. Continued clarification of the immune pathways that are dysregulated in MDS and establishing predictors for clinical benefit of immunosuppressive therapy are vital to improve the use and outcomes with these therapies.

More is less, less is more, or does it really matter? The curious case of impact of azacitidine administration schedules on outcomes in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) encompass a diverse group of hematologic disorders characterized by ineffective and malignant hematopoiesis, peripheral cytopenias and significantly increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The hypomethylating agents (HMA) azacitidine and decitabine induce meaningful clinical responses in a significant subset of patients with MDS. Though never compared directly with decitabine, only azacitidine has improved overall survival (OS) compared to conventional care in a randomized trial in patients with higher-risk MDS. The azacitidine regimen used in this pivotal trial AZA-001 included administration at 75 mg/m2/day for 7 consecutive days in 28-day cycles (7-0 regimen). Given the logistical difficulties of weekend administration in the 7-0 regimen, as well as in efforts to improve response rates, alternative dosing schedules have been used. In a typical 28-day cycle, administration schedules of 3, 5, 10, and (with the oral version of azacitidine) 14 and 21 days have been used in clinical trials. Most trials that evaluated alternative administration schedules of azacitidine did so in lower-risk MDS and did not directly compare to the 7-0 schedule. Given the lack of randomized prospective studies comparing the 7-0 schedule to the other regimens of azacitidine in MDS, Shapiro et al. conducted a systematic review in an attempt to answer this question. Here we place the findings of this important work in clinical context and review the current knowledge and unresolved issues regarding the impact of administration schedules of azacitidine on outcomes of patients with both lower-risk and higher-risk MDS.