Ibrutinib and idelalisib block immunophenotypic changes associated with the adhesion and activation of CLL cells in the tumor microenvironment

Comparison of the blood immune repertoire with clinical features in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy or ibrutinib

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by the accumulation of CD19+ CD5+ clonal B lymphocytes in the blood, bone marrow, and peripheral lymphoid organs. Treatment options for patients range from historical chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) to small molecule inhibitors targeting pro-survival pathways in leukemic B cells, such as the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib (IBR). Using biobanked blood samples obtained pre-therapy and at standard response evaluation timepoints, we performed an in-depth evaluation of the blood innate and adaptive immune compartments between pentostatin-based CIT and IBR and looked for correlations with clinical sequelae. CD4+ conventional T cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells responded similarly to CIT and IBR, although exhaustion status differed. Both treatments dramatically increased the prevalence and functional status of monocyte, dendritic cell, and natural killer cell subsets. As expected, both regimens reduced clonal B cell levels however, we observed no substantial recovery of normal B cells. Although improvements in most immune subsets were observed with CIT and IBR at response evaluation, both patient groups remained susceptible to infections and secondary malignancies during the study.

Revealing a Phenotypical Appearance of Ibrutinib Resistance in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia by Flow Cytometry

Background: Ibrutinib is widely known as an effective and well-tolerated therapeutical choice of the chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). However, acquired resistance may occur during the treatment, causing relapse. Early detection of ibrutinib resistance is an important issue, therefore we aimed to find phenotypic markers on CLL cells the expression of which may correlate with the appearance of ibrutinib resistance.

Methods: We examined 28 patients’ peripheral blood (PB) samples (treatment naïve, ibrutinib sensitive, clinically ibrutinib resistant). The surface markers’ expression (CD27, CD69, CD86, CD184, CD185) were measured by flow cytometry. Furthermore, the BTK^C481S resistance mutation was assessed by digital droplet PCR. Moreover, the CLL cells’ phenotype of a patient with acquired ibrutinib resistance was observed during the ibrutinib treatment.

Results: The expression of CD27 (p = 0.030) and CD86 (p = 0.031) became higher in the clinically resistant cohort than in the ibrutinib sensitive cohort. Besides, we found that high CD86 and CD27 expressions were accompanied by BTK^C481S mutation. Our prospective study showed that the increase of the expression of CD27, CD69 and CD86 was noticed ahead of the clinical resistance with 3 months.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that the changes of the expression of these markers could indicate ibrutinib resistance and the examination of these phenotypic changes may become a part of the patients’ follow-up in the future.

In Vitro and In Vivo Models of CLL–T Cell Interactions: Implications for Drug Testing

Simple Summary

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells in the peripheral blood and lymphoid microenvironment display substantially different gene expression profiles and proliferative capaci-ty. It has been suggested that CLL–T-cell interactions are key pro-proliferative stimuli in immune niches. We review in vitro and in vivo model systems that mimic CLL-T-cell interactions to trigger CLL proliferation and study therapy resistance. We focus on studies describing the co-culture of leukemic cells with T cells, or supportive cell lines expressing T-cell factors, and simplified models of CLL cells’ stimulation with recombinant factors. In the second part, we summarize mouse models revealing the role of T cells in CLL biology and implications for generating patient-derived xenografts by co-transplanting leukemic cells with T cells.

Abstract

T cells are key components in environments that support chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), activating CLL-cell proliferation and survival. Here, we review in vitro and in vivo model systems that mimic CLL–T-cell interactions, since these are critical for CLL-cell division and resistance to some types of therapy (such as DNA-damaging drugs or BH3-mimetic venetoclax). We discuss approaches for direct CLL-cell co-culture with autologous T cells, models utilizing supportive cell lines engineered to express T-cell factors (such as CD40L) or stimulating CLL cells with combinations of recombinant factors (CD40L, interleukins IL4 or IL21, INFγ) and additional B-cell receptor (BCR) activation with anti-IgM antibody. We also summarize strategies for CLL co-transplantation with autologous T cells into immunodeficient mice (NOD/SCID, NSG, NOG) to generate patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and the role of T cells in transgenic CLL mouse models based on TCL1 overexpression (Eµ-TCL1). We further discuss how these in vitro and in vivo models could be used to test drugs to uncover the effects of targeted therapies (such as inhibitors of BTK, PI3K, SYK, AKT, MEK, CDKs, BCL2, and proteasome) or chemotherapy (fludarabine and bendamustine) on CLL–T-cell interactions and CLL proliferation.

Effect of Ibrutinib on the IFN Response of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cells

The Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib has profound activity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but limited curative potential by itself. Residual signaling pathways that maintain survival of CLL cells might be targeted to improve ibrutinib's therapeutic activity, but the nature of these pathways is unclear. Ongoing activation of IFN receptors in patients on ibrutinib was suggested by the presence of type I and II IFN in blood together with the cycling behavior of IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) products when IFN signaling was blocked intermittently with the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib. IFN signaling in CLL cells from human patients was not prevented by ibrutinib in vitro or in vivo, but ISG expression was significantly attenuated in vitro. ISGs such as CXCL10 that require concomitant activation of NF-κB were decreased when this pathway was inhibited by ibrutinib. Other ISGs, exemplified by LAG3, were decreased as a result of inhibited protein translation. Effects of IFN on survival remained intact as type I and II IFN-protected CLL cells from ibrutinib in vitro, which could be prevented by ruxolitinib and IFNR blocking Abs. These observations suggest that IFNs may help CLL cells persist and specific targeting of IFN signaling might deepen clinical responses of patients on ibrutinib.

Ibrutinib Resistance Mechanisms and Treatment Strategies for B-Cell lymphomas

Chronic activation of B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling via Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) is largely considered to be one of the primary mechanisms driving disease progression in B-Cell lymphomas. Although the BTK-targeting agent ibrutinib has shown promising clinical responses, the presence of primary or acquired resistance is common and often leads to dismal clinical outcomes. Resistance to ibrutinib therapy can be mediated through genetic mutations, up-regulation of alternative survival pathways, or other unknown factors that are not targeted by ibrutinib therapy. Understanding the key determinants, including tumor heterogeneity and rewiring of the molecular networks during disease progression and therapy, will assist exploration of alternative therapeutic strategies. Towards the goal of overcoming ibrutinib resistance, multiple alternative therapeutic agents, including second- and third-generation BTK inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs, have been discovered and tested in both pre-clinical and clinical settings. Although these agents have shown high response rates alone or in combination with ibrutinib in ibrutinib-treated relapsed/refractory(R/R) lymphoma patients, overall clinical outcomes have not been satisfactory due to drug-associated toxicities and incomplete remission. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of ibrutinib resistance development in B-cell lymphoma including complexities associated with genomic alterations, non-genetic acquired resistance, cancer stem cells, and the tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, we focus our discussion on more comprehensive views of recent developments in therapeutic strategies to overcome ibrutinib resistance, including novel BTK inhibitors, clinical therapeutic agents, proteolysis-targeting chimeras and immunotherapy regimens.

Dual inhibition of MEK1/2 and AKT by binimetinib and MK2206 induces apoptosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells under conditions that mimic the tumor microenvironment

Several key pathways mediate signaling via the B-cell receptor, including the mitogen-activated protein kinase-ERK1/2 pathway. However, inhibition of MEK1/2, a key component of the MAPK-ERK1/2 signaling cascade, results in paradoxical activation of AKT in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells. In the current study we demonstrate synergy between the MEK1/2 inhibitor binimetinib and the AKT inhibitor MK2206, which combined induce apoptosis of primary CLL cells and restrict the cell cycle progression and proliferation of the OSU-CLL cell line. The mechanisms of action of the drug combination involve dual inhibition of MAPK-ERK1/2 and AKT signaling and down-regulation of Mcl-1 expression. Collectively, these data suggest that dual inhibition of MEK1/2 and AKT may represent a therapeutic option for CLL, capable of overcoming the pro-survival effects of the lymph node and bone marrow microenvironments.