Maintenance azacitidine after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myeloid malignancies

Refractory patients with favorable/intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia benefit from azacytidine maintenance therapy following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Recurrence following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the major cause of treatment failure in patients with myeloid malignancy. Azacytidine (AZA) maintenance is a promising therapy to prevent relapse and improve survival. We conducted a prospective, one-arm study involving 78 patients with myeloid malignancy at a high risk of recurrence who were enrolled between September 2019 and April 2022. Furthermore, 102 matched historical controls were selected using propensity score matching. With a median follow-up time of 19.6 (3.5-91.7) months, AZA maintenance therapy significantly improved relapse-free survival (RFS; log-rank test, p = 0.01). The AZA and control groups had a 1-year RFS of 87.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.96) and 72.2% (95% CI, 0.64-0.82), respectively, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.09-0. 47; p < 0.01). There were no grade 4 adverse effects or deaths related to AZA. Refractory patients with favorable/intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) benefited more from AZA maintenance therapy than those with adverse-risk AML according to the European Leukemia Net guidelines (RFS in favorable/intermediate-risk AML, HR = 0.29, 95% CI, 0.11-0.79; RFS in adverse-risk AML, HR = 0.57, 95% CI, 0.21-1.6; p for interaction = 0.03). Our findings suggest that AZA maintenance therapy following allo-HSCT was safe and could reduce the incidence of relapse, particularly for refractory patients with favorable/intermediate-risk AML.

Real-world outcomes and prognostic factors among patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant lymphohematopoietic tumor that ranks among the most frequent indications for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the application of allo-HSCT for AML and identify prognostic factors to enhance future treatment effect. This retrospective study collected data from 323 patients diagnosed with AML at Peking University First Hospital who underwent allo-HSCT between September 2003 and July 2022. The annual number of transplantations has steadily increased. Our center has observed a rise in the proportion of cytogenetic high-risk and measurable residual disease (MRD) positive patients since 2013, as well as an increase in the number of haploidentical transplantations. The overall leukocyte engraftment time has decreased over the past 20 years. Furthermore, both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) have significantly improved, while non-relapse mortality (NRM) has significantly decreased since 2013. Multivariate analysis identified transplantation before 2013, patients in complete remission (CR) 2 or non-CR, and recipients older than 50 years as risk factors for NRM, while patients in non-CR and patients with positive MRD are risk factors for recurrence. These findings offer insights into AML treatment outcomes in China, highlighting changes in transplantation practices and the need to reduce post-transplant relapse. Effective interventions, such as MRD monitoring and risk stratification schemes, are crucial for further enhancing transplant outcomes.

Azacitidine and lenalidomide combination: a novel relapse prophylaxis regimen after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Introduction

While allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) can be a curative regimen for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), relapse of AML remains a serious risk post-transplantation. Once relapsed, salvage options are limited and management of AML is difficult. Here we designed a prospective study to examine the efficacy and tolerability of maintenance therapy with azacytidine (AZA) plus low-dose lenalidomide (LEN) to prevent relapse after allo-HSCT for AML patients (ChiCTR2200061803).

Methods

AML patients post-allo-HSCT were treated with AZA (75 mg/m² for 7 days), followed by LEN (5 mg/m², day 10-28), and a 4-week resting interval, which was defined as one treatment cycle. A total of 8 cycles was recommended.

Results

37 patients were enrolled, 25 patients received at least 5 cycles, and 16 patients finished all 8 cycles. With a median follow-up time of 608 (43-1440) days, the estimated 1-year disease free survival (DFS) was 82%, cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 18%, and overall survival (OS) was 100%. Three patients (8%) had grade 1-2 neutropenia without fever; one patient developed grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and minor subdural hematoma; 4/37 patients (11%) developed chronic GVHD with a score of 1-2, without requiring systemic treatment; No patient developed acute GVHD. After AZA/LEN prophylaxis, increasing numbers of CD56⁺NK and CD8⁺ T, and decreasing of CD19⁺ B cells were observed.

Discussion

Azacitidine combined with low-dose lenalidomide was observed to be an effective relapse prophylaxis option after allo-HSCT in AML patients, and can be administered safely without significantly increasing the risk of GVHD, infection and other AEs.

Clinical Trial Registration

www.chictr.org, identifier ChiCTR2200061803.

Post-transplant maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation harmonizing multiple therapeutic modalities including targeted therapy, immunotherapy and cellular therapy

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) has improved survival for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially for those at high risk of relapse. However, relapse remains the leading cause of treatment failure post-HCT, occurring in around 35-45% of patients, and leading to dismal outcomes. Strategies to reduce relapse risk are urgently needed, especially in the early post-transplant period before activation of the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Maintenance therapy is a course of treatment given post-HCT with the expectation of reducing relapse risk. While there are currently no therapies approved for maintenance therapy for AML after HCT, there are a number of studies and ongoing investigations examining the role of maintenance therapies that include targeted agents against FLT3-ITD, BCL2, or IDH mutations, hypomethylating agents, immunomodulatory therapies and cellular therapies. In this review, we discuss the mechanistic and clinical data for post-transplant maintenance therapies in AML and strategies for maintenance therapy for AML after HCT.

Overcoming relapse: prophylactic or pre-emptive use of azacitidine or FLT3 inhibitors after allogeneic transplantation for AML or MDS

Relapse remains the most critical obstacle in treatment by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Non-relapse mortality has improved annually, but relapse mortality remains high. Post-transplant maintenance treatment, such as hypomethylating agents and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors, has been investigated for decades as a means of preventing disease relapse after HSCT. Other factors besides the relapse tendency of the primary disease that can affect the transition of estimated disease burden in patients undergoing HSCT are disease status at HSCT (non-remission, remission with minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD), and remission without MRD) and conditioning regimen intensity. Optimal selection of patients at high risk for relapse who can tolerate a long duration of therapy is pivotal for successful post-transplant maintenance therapy. In this review, we provide an overview of current progress in research on post-transplant maintenance treatment using azacitidine or FLT3 inhibitors for preventing disease relapse after HSCT for AML or MDS, and discuss the future outlook in this area.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions |The Role of Maintenance Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive disease predominantly affecting the elderly population. Although, up to 65% of patients with AML achieve a complete remission with standard induction chemotherapy, the majority of patients will relapse and succumb to the disease. Although maintenance therapy is a component of standard management for various hematological malignancies, such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) or multiple myeloma, past studies investigating the role of maintenance therapy in AML were unable to demonstrate an advantage in overall survival, and therefore, it has not been an established practice in the treatment of AML. For patients, who are not candidates for stem cell transplant, effective AML maintenance therapies are needed in order to reduce the risk of relapse. Over the past decades, many investigators have examined the role of various maintenance strategies in AML; with the intention to prolong remission and overall survival. This review will provide an overview of prior and ongoing approaches and strategies to maintenance therapy for AML.

Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: an overview of prevention and treatment

Despite therapeutic progress in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), relapse post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains a major challenge. Here, we aim to provide an overview of prevention and treatment of relapse in this population, including cell-based and pharmacologic options. Post-transplant maintenance therapy is used in patients who have undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD), while pre-emptive treatment is administered upon detection of MRD. Prompt transfusion of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) was found to be effective in preventing relapse and overcoming the negative impact of detectable MRD. In addition, patients with persistent targetable mutations can benefit from targeted post-transplant pharmacological interventions. IDH inhibitors have shown promising results in relapsed/refractory AML. Hypomethylating agents, such as decitabine and azacitidine, have been studied in the post-allo-HSCT setting, both as pre-emptive and prophylactic. Venetoclax has been shown effective in combination with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine in patients with newly diagnosed AML, especially those unfit for intensive chemotherapy. FLT3 inhibitors, the topic of another section in this review series, have significantly improved survival in FLT-3-ITD mutant AML. The role of other cell-based therapies, including CAR-T cells, in AML is currently being investigated.

Efficacy of azacitidine in preventing relapse after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for advanced myeloid malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Relapse is the leading cause of death from myeloid malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Azacitidine has gained attention in recent years in the prophylaxis of relapsed refractory hematologic malignancies. This study evaluated the efficacy of AZA in preventing relapse after HSCT in patients with myeloid malignancies.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of all available cohort studies were performed regarding the application of AZA for prophylaxis of relapse after HSCT for advanced MDS and AML. Databases were searched for relevant studies. Endpoints included 2-year relapse rate, survival, relapse-related mortality, as well as the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

RESULTS

A total of 444 patients from 13 studies were included in this analysis. The pooled estimate of the cumulative incidence of relapse after two years in enrolled patients was 25% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18%-33%). The pooled estimates of 2-year survival probabilities were 65% (95% CI, 50%-79%). The pooled cumulative incidence of relapse-related mortality was 28% (95% CI, 22%-34%). The pooled estimated incidence of acute and chronic GVHD, respectively, were 28% (95% CI, 22%-34%) and 38% (95% CI, 27%-49%).

CONCLUSION

AZA administration is efficacious for relapse prevention after HSCT in myeloid malignancies.

Single-agent 5-azacytidine as post-transplant maintenance in high-risk myeloid malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Relapse is a major cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in myeloid malignancies. Additional strategies have been devised to further maximize the immunologic effect of allo-HCT, notably through maintenance therapy with hypomethylating agents such as 5-azacytidine (AZA). We conducted a single-center retrospective study to investigate the efficacy of AZA after allo-HCT for high-risk myeloid malignancies. All patients transplanted between Jan 2014 and Sept 2019 for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (n = 123), myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 51), or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (n = 11) were included. Patients who died, relapsed, or developed grade ≥ 2 acute graft-versus-host disease before day + 60 were excluded, as well as those who were eligible for anti-FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 maintenance. Of the 185 included patients, 65 received AZA while 120 did not. Median age at transplant was 59 years; 51.9% of patients were males. The median follow-up was 24 months for both groups. Regarding main patient characteristics and transplantation modalities, the two groups were comparable. In multivariate analyses, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (HR = 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-2.12; p = 0.55), overall survival (HR = 0.62; 95%CI 0.35-1.12; p = 0.12) and event-free survival (HR = 0.97; 95%CI 0.60-1.58; p = 0.91) rates. In conclusion, single-agent AZA does not appear to be an optimal drug for preventing post-transplant relapse in patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies. This study highlights the need for prospective studies of alternative therapies or combination approaches in the post-transplant setting.

Maintenance With Hypomethylating Agents After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) seem to have a range of properties favorable to post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) maintenance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients.

Materials and Methods

The Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were independently searched by two investigators to identify relevant studies published inception to 18 November 2021. These trials compared HMA maintenance to observation following allo-SCT for AML or myelodysplastic syndrome.

Results

The meta-analysis eligibility criteria were fulfilled by 14 studies. The overall survival and relapse-free survival of the HMA maintenance group were superior to the observation group, with a pooled risk ratio (RR) of 1.38 and 1.46, respectively. Moreover, the cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly lower in those who received HMAs. The HMA group also had lower non-relapse mortality compared with the observation group. Overall, the incidences of grades III–IV acute graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD did not differ in both groups. However, when looking specifically at those receiving decitabine maintenance, the rate of chronic GVHD seemed to be lower compared with observation alone.

Conclusions

The current systematic review and meta-analysis illustrated that AML and MDS patients receiving HMA maintenance after allo-SCT had better outcomes in regards to OS, RFS, NRM, CIR as well as a reduced incidence of chronic GVHD.

Feasibility and efficacy of salvage allogeneic stem cell transplantation in AML patients relapsing after autologous stem cell transplantation

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is suitable for consolidation of favorable-/intermediate-risk AML patients in CR1. However, ~50% of AML patients relapse after autologous HCT, and efficacy of subsequent salvage strategies including allogeneic HCT remains unclear. We studied 123 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AML undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT)/autologous HCT in CR1. In relapsing patients afterwards, we analyzed salvage treatments and outcomes focusing particularly on salvage allogeneic HCT. Of 123 patients, 64 (52%) relapsed after autologous HCT. Subsequently, 13 (21%) received palliative therapy, whereas 51 (79%) proceeded to salvage therapy with a curative intent. Of the 47 patients with a curative intent and who did not proceed directly to allogeneic HCT, 23 (49%) achieved CR2 or had ongoing hematologic CR1 despite molecular relapse. Finally, 30 patients (47%) received allogeneic HCT with estimated 3-year leukemia-free and overall survival rates of 33% and 43%. Hematologic remission at allogeneic HCT and lack of acute GvHD had a positive impact on OS and LFS (p < 0.05). Our study suggests that almost 80% of AML patients can undergo salvage therapy following relapse after front-line HDCT/autologous HCT. Allogeneic HCT can provide cure in one third of patients relapsing after front-line HDCT/autologous HCT.

Treatment of AML Relapse After Allo-HCT

With advances in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT), disease relapse has replaced transplant-related mortality as the primary cause of treatment failure for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The efficacy of allo-HCT in AML is a consequence of a graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect that is mediated by T lymphocytes, and unique mechanisms of immune evasion underlying post-allo-HCT AML relapses have recently been characterized. Relapsed AML following allo-HCT presents a particularly vexing clinical challenge because transplant-related toxicities, such as graft-versus-host (GVHD) and infections, increase the risk of treatment-related morbidity and mortality. In general, the prognosis of relapsed AML following allo-HCT is poor with most patients failing to achieve a subsequent remission and 2-year survival consistently <15%. The two factors that have been found to predict a better prognosis are a longer duration of post-transplant remission prior to relapse and a lower disease burden at the time of relapse. When considered in combination with a patient's age; co-morbidities; and performance status, these factors can help to inform the appropriate therapy for the treatment of post-transplant relapse. This review discusses the options for the treatment of post-transplant AML relapse with a focus on the options to achieve a subsequent remission and consolidation with cellular immunotherapy, such as a second transplant or donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). While intensive reinduction therapy and less intensive approaches with hypomethylating agents have long represented the two primary options for the initial treatment of post-transplant relapse, molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapy are emerging as potential alternative options to achieve remission. Herein, we highlight response and survival outcomes achieved specifically in the post-transplant setting using each of these approaches and discuss how some therapies may overcome the immunologic mechanisms that have been implicated in post-transplant relapse. As long-term survival in post-transplant relapse necessarily involves consolidation with cellular immunotherapy, we present data on the efficacy and toxicity of both DLI and second allo-HCT including when such therapies are integrated with reinduction. Finally, we provide our general approach to the treatment of post-transplant relapse, integrating both novel therapies and our improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying post-transplant relapse.

A phase II study of azacitidine in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as maintenance treatment, after allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation in patients with poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)

Relapse is the most common cause of treatment failure following allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) for AML or MDS. Post-transplant maintenance therapies may prevent relapse. We conducted a phase II trial combining azacitidine (AZA) with GM-CSF in non-relapsed, post-transplant patients with AML or MDS. Patients received escalating doses of AZA to a maximum of 75 mg/m2 for 5 days per cycle for up to 12 cycles. GM-CSF was given on days 1-10 of each cycle. Eighteen patients were treated following non-myeloablative (17) and myeloablative (1) alloBMT for AML (61.1%), MDS (27.7%), or therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (11.1%). The majority of patients (72%) received their graft from an HLA-haploidentical donor. The treatment was well-tolerated with rare grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities. One patient suffered an exacerbation of GVHD. The 24-month relapse-free and overall survivals were 47 and 57%, respectively, with a median of 18.6 and 29 months.

5-Azacytidine depletes HSCs and synergizes with an anti-CD117 antibody to augment donor engraftment in immunocompetent mice

Depletion of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is used therapeutically in many malignant and nonmalignant blood disorders in the setting of a hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) to eradicate diseased HSCs, thus allowing donor HSCs to engraft. Current treatments to eliminate HSCs rely on modalities that cause DNA strand breakage (ie, alkylators, radiation) resulting in multiple short-term and long-term toxicities and sometimes even death. These risks have severely limited the use of HCT to patients with few to no comorbidities and excluded many others with diseases that could be cured with an HCT. 5-Azacytidine (AZA) is a widely used hypomethylating agent that is thought to preferentially target leukemic cells in myeloid malignancies. Here, we reveal a previously unknown effect of AZA on HSCs. We show that AZA induces early HSC proliferation in vivo and exerts a direct cytotoxic effect on proliferating HSCs in vitro. When used to pretreat recipient mice for transplantation, AZA permitted low-level donor HSC engraftment. Moreover, by combining AZA with a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting CD117 (c-Kit) (a molecule expressed on HSCs), more robust HSC depletion and substantially higher levels of multilineage donor cell engraftment were achieved in immunocompetent mice. The enhanced effectiveness of this combined regimen correlated with increased apoptotic cell death in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Together, these findings highlight a previously unknown therapeutic mechanism for AZA which may broaden its use in clinical practice. Moreover, the synergy we show between AZA and anti-CD117 mAb is a novel strategy to eradicate abnormal HSCs that can be rapidly tested in the clinical setting.

Maintenance therapies in acute myeloid leukemia: the renaissance of an old therapeutic concept

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Disease relapse remains the major cause of death in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is driven by the persistence of leukemic cells following induction chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT). Maintenance therapies to extend the duration of remission and to improve survival have been proposed for several years with mixed results but have experienced a renaissance recently.

RECENT FINDINGS

The oral hypomethylating agent CC-486 has been the first agent to show an overall survival (OS) benefit compared with observation in AML patients in remission following intensive chemotherapy who are not proceeding to allo-HCT. In the realm of postallo-HCT maintenance therapy, the FLT3 inhibitor sorafenib has yielded superior results in terms of OS and relapse-free survival in randomized trials compared with observation. Several open questions remain regarding patient selection, timing, duration and safety of maintenance therapies. Various targeted agents are currently tested in clinical trials and could potentially enable an even more individualized therapeutic approach.

SUMMARY

Maintenance therapies following intensive chemotherapy or allo-HCT offer a new therapeutic paradigm for an increasing number of AML patients and have been shown to result in an OS benefit in selected patients.

Glasdegib as maintenance therapy for patients with AML and MDS patients at high risk for postallogeneic stem cell transplant relapse

Posttransplantation, glasdegib maintenance therapy in patients at high risk for relapse did not meaningfully reduce relapse incidence. Use of glasdegib in the posttransplantation setting was complicated by adverse events requiring drug holds and occasional discontinuation.

Azacitidine maintenance therapy post-allogeneic stem cell transplantation in poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is the potential curative modality for poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), relapse remains the main reason for transplant failure. Early-phase studies showed azacitidine is safe for post-transplant maintenance therapy in AML.

METHODS

We performed a single institutional prospective cohort study to evaluate the benefit of azacitidine maintenance therapy following allogeneic HSCT in poor-risk AML. The main objective of this study is to generate a hypothesis aiming to optimize post-transplantation outcomes in poor-risk AML. Forty-nine adults with poor-risk AML who underwent allogeneic HSCT were evaluated in a nonrandomized prospective cohort fashion. Thirty-one participants received post-transplant azacitidine (32 mg/m²) on Days 1-5 for a 28-day treatment cycle beginning approximately 40 days after transplantation. The study was controlled using 18 matched individuals who were on a noninterventional surveillance protocol.

RESULTS

The relapse rate was significantly higher in the control cohort (66.67%) versus (25.81%) in the azacitidine maintenance cohort (p < .005). Time to relapse was significantly prolonged by azacitidine maintenance, not reached versus 4.1 months in the control arm (p < .0001). In addition, median overall survival was lower in the control cohort at 7.6 versus 27.4 months in the interventional cohort (p < .0001). At a median follow-up of 24 months, incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) did not differ between study groups (p = .325). In both cohorts, minimal residual disease was correlated with higher hazard of relapse (95% confidence interval, 2.31-13.74; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that low dose azacitidine maintenance following allogeneic HSCT in poor-risk AML, decreased relapse rate, and increased both the time to relapse and overall survival without increased risk of GVHD.

Maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Relapse remains the main cause of treatment failure in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Emerging evidence has demonstrated that AML patients might benefit from maintenance therapy post-transplantation, especially for high-risk AML patients. In this mini-review, we will summarize targeted drugs, such as hypomethylating agents, FLT3 inhibitors and isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors, as maintenance therapy post-transplantation in AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An Evidence-Based Review from the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

The role of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in the management of newly diagnosed adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is reviewed and critically evaluated in this evidence-based review. An AML expert panel, consisting of both transplant and nontransplant experts, was invited to develop clinically relevant frequently asked questions covering disease- and HCT-related topics. A systematic literature review was conducted to generate core recommendations that were graded based on the quality and strength of underlying evidence based on the standardized criteria established by the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Steering Committee for evidence-based reviews. Allogeneic HCT offers a survival benefit in patients with intermediate- and high-risk AML and is currently a part of standard clinical care. We recommend the preferential use of myeloablative conditioning in eligible patients. A haploidentical related donor marrow graft is preferred over a cord blood unit in the absence of a fully HLA-matched donor. The evolving role of allogeneic HCT in the context of measurable residual disease monitoring and recent therapeutic advances in AML with regards to maintenance therapy after HCT are also discussed.

Maintenance Strategies After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an essential component of potentially curative therapy for patients with hematologic malignancies. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous (auto) stem cell rescue is used to overcome chemoresistance in multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma. Alternatively, poor-risk acute leukemias rely on the graft versus leukemia effect of allogeneic (allo) products. Long-term remissions are feasible with both auto- and allo-HCT; however, disease relapse is the leading cause of death after HCT for many patients. In recognition of this, novel therapies are being investigated in the upfront, relapsed/refractory, and post-HCT maintenance settings to deepen response and maintain disease control. To date, the most robust data to support this approach are in multiple myeloma, where post-transplant maintenance therapy has improved clinical outcomes. In Hodgkin lymphoma, patients with high-risk features may benefit from post-auto-HCT vedotin (BV) regardless of pre-HCT BV exposure. Apart from mantle cell lymphoma, where rituximab maintenance is generally accepted, post-auto-HCT maintenance in other forms of NHL is less established. In patients who undergo allo-HCT, the utilization of maintenance therapy is an important component of improving post-HCT outcomes, however, an individualized approach that considers patient factors such as residual toxicity from HCT, an immature graft with poor graft function, infection, and graft-versus-host disease create a complex environment for aggressive interventions. Initiation of directed agents in patients with identified mutations prior to allo-HCT, including FLT3 in acute myeloid leukemia and Philadelphia chromosome in acute lymphoid leukemia have generally improved post-HCT outcomes. Ongoing studies are exploring the safety and efficacy of additional maintenance strategies post-allo-HCT in an effort to further improve post-HCT outcomes.

Maintenance therapy in AML: The past, the present and the future

Curative treatment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) depends on successful induction therapy to achieve a complete remission (CR), and subsequent post-remission therapy to prevent relapse. High relapse rates after consolidation therapy and after allogeneic stem cell transplant contribute to suboptimal outcomes in AML patients, and continue to represent a difficult challenge. Effective maintenance therapy could play an important role in prolonging the remission interval in the post-consolidation setting, especially in high risk AML patients. Maintenance treatment approaches based on conventional chemotherapy, immunotherapy, hypomethylating agents, and targeted small molecules have been explored in this setting, but no data so far have been convincing enough to establish this approach as the standard of care. However, ongoing and future studies including novel targeted therapies may demonstrate promising efficacy that could facilitate incorporation of maintenance therapy into clinical practice. In this review we summarize previous and ongoing approaches of maintenance therapy in AML and discuss the most promising strategies.

A Phase II Multicenter Study of the Addition of Azacitidine to Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Transplant for High-Risk Myelodysplasia (and Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia): Results of CALGB 100801 (Alliance)

Relapse remains the major cause of death in older patients transplanted for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission or for patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) at any age. Conventional myeloablative conditioning followed by allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation is associated with significantly less relapse compared with reduced-intensity conditioning when performed in younger patients with AML or MDS, but the toxicity of this approach in older patients is prohibitive. We hypothesized that pharmacokinetic targeting to optimize busulfan (BU) exposure, combined with the administration of azacitidine (AZA) post-transplant would mitigate the risk of relapse while reducing nonrelapse mortality and ultimately improve progression-free survival (PFS). On this phase II multicenter study, 63 patients (40 unrelated donors and 23 matched related donors) received a uniform conditioning regimen consisting of fludarabine i.v. (days -7 to -3), BU targeted to a daily area under the curve (AUC) of 4000 μM/min (days -6 to -3) after the administration of a 25-mg/m² i.v. test dose on 1 day between days -14 to -9, and antithymocyte globulin (days -6, -5, and -4 (2 doses for matched related donors and 3 for matched unrelated donors only). Beginning on days +42 to +90, all patients were planned to receive up to 6 monthly cycles of AZA at 32 mg/m² subcutaneously for 5 days. The median age was 62 years (range, 44 to 74); 13 had AML and 50 had MDS; 87% of patients were within 20% of the target AUC based on a validation sample. Forty-one patients (65%) started AZA at a median of 61 days (range, 43 to 91) post-transplant, and 17 patients (41%) completed all 6 cycles of AZA. The cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality at 2 years was 33.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22%-45%). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 25% (95% CI, 15%-37%) at 2 years. With a median follow-up of 58.9 months, the estimated PFS probability at 2 years and 5 years after transplantation was 41.2% (80% CI, 33.9%-49.9%) and 26.9% (80% CI, 20.4%-35.5%), respectively, for the entire group with a median PFS of 15.8 months (95% CI, 6.7 to 28.3). The probability of overall survival at 2 and 5 years was 45.7% (95% CI, 34.9%-59.9%) and 31.2% (95% CI, 21.3% to 45.8%), respectively, for the entire group with a median overall survival of 19.2 months (95% CI, 8.7 to 37.5). In summary, we demonstrated the feasibility of a novel reduced-intensity conditioning regimen with test dose BU targeted to an AUC of 4000 μM/min. The feasibility of AZA in this setting appears to be limited if applied to an unselected population of older hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01168219.).