1
|
Djodikromo MF, Hermens RP, Bemt BJVD, Smit Y, Govers TM, Bekker CL, Blijlevens NM. Patient-guided dose reduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukaemia (RODEO study): study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, single-arm trial. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:231. [PMID: 36899295 PMCID: PMC10007754 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10697-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dose reduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) with an optimal response to TKIs may support cost-effective medication use by maintaining therapeutic effectiveness while reducing adverse events and medication costs. As the choice for dose reduction depends on patients' individual needs and preferences, a patient-centred approach is warranted. Therefore, a study to evaluate the effectiveness of patient-guided dose reduction in patients with CML who are in a major or deep molecular response is designed. METHODS This study is a prospective, multicentre, single-arm study. 147 patients with CML (aged ≥ 18 years) in chronic phase, who are treated with imatinib, bosutinib, dasatinib, nilotinib or ponatinib, and have reached at least major molecular response (defined as having BCR-ABL levels < 0.1% for an uninterrupted period of 6 months) are eligible. Patients will use an online patient decision aid and a shared decision making consultation will be held, after which patients who choose to will receive a personalised, lower TKI dose. Primary outcome is the proportion of patients with intervention failure at 12 months after dose reduction, defined as patients who have restarted their initial dose due to (expected) loss of major molecular response. For this, BCR-ABL1 levels will be analysed from blood samples drawn at baseline, 6 weeks after dose reduction and 3-monthly thereafter. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients with intervention failure at 6 and 18 months after dose reduction. Other outcomes include differences before and after dose reduction regarding the number and severity of patient-reported side effects; quality of life; beliefs about medicines; and medication adherence. Patients' level of decisional conflict and regret after choosing dose reduction will be assessed, as will the decisional process experienced by patients and healthcare providers. DISCUSSION Outcomes of this trial using a personalised approach will provide clinical and patient-reported data to guide future dose reduction of TKIs in CML. If the strategy appears to be effective, it may be implemented as another valid option to offer next to standard of care to prevent potential unnecessary exposure to higher TKI doses in this selected group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT number 2021-006581-20.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa F Djodikromo
- Department of Haematology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rosella Pmg Hermens
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud university medical center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Yolba Smit
- Department of Haematology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tim M Govers
- Department of medical imaging, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L Bekker
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Nicole Ma Blijlevens
- Department of Haematology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Narlı Özdemir Z, Kılıçaslan NA, Yılmaz M, Eşkazan AE. Guidelines for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia from the NCCN and ELN: differences and similarities. Int J Hematol 2023; 117:3-15. [PMID: 36064839 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-022-03446-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Patients diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase can now have a life expectancy comparable to that of the general population thanks to the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies. Although most patients with CML require lifelong TKI therapy, it is possible for some patients to achieve treatment-free remission. These spectacular results have been made possible by the development of superior treatment modalities as well as clinicians' efforts in strictly adhering to clinical guidelines such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Leukemia Network (ELN). CML treatment recommendations reported in these guidelines are the result of years of selecting and incorporating the most reliable evidence. In this review, we provide a synopsis of the differences and similarities that exist between the NCCN and ELN guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zehra Narlı Özdemir
- Department of Hematology, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | - Musa Yılmaz
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ahmet Emre Eşkazan
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yohanan B, George B. Current Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Myeloid Blast Phase. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2022; 16:11795549221139357. [PMID: 36507316 PMCID: PMC9726842 DOI: 10.1177/11795549221139357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the major advancements in the management of chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), blast crisis (BC) remains a major therapeutic challenge. BC can be myeloid, lymphoid, or mixed lineage with myeloid BC being the most common type. BC in CML is mediated by aberrant tyrosine kinase activity of the BCR::ABL fusion protein. The introduction of BCR::ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has been a gamechanger in the treatment of CML and there has been a significant reduction in the incidence of BC. The main treatment goal in BC is to achieve a second CP and consolidate that with an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in eligible patients. The outcomes in BC remain dismal even in the current era. In this review, we provide an overview of the biology and current therapeutic approach in myeloid BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binoy Yohanan
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Binsah George
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA,Binsah George, Department of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 5.216, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen Y, Zou J, Cheng F, Li W. Treatment-Free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and New Approaches by Targeting Leukemia Stem Cells. Front Oncol 2021; 11:769730. [PMID: 34778088 PMCID: PMC8581243 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.769730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The therapeutic landscape for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has improved significantly with the approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for therapeutic use. Most patients with optimal responses to TKIs can have a normal life expectancy. Treatment-free remission (TFR) after discontinuing TKI has increasingly become a new goal for CML treatment. However, TKI only "control" CML, and relapse after discontinuation has become a key factor hindering patient access to attempt TFR. In this study, we reviewed studies on TKI discontinuation, including both first and second-generation TKI. We also reviewed predictors of relapse, new monitoring methods, and strategies targeting leukemic stem cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Weiming Li
- Department of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bulla A, Markovic U, Bellofiore C, Stella S, Conticello C, DI Raimondo F, Stagno F. A Treatment-free Interval Allowed by Ponatinib as Fourth-line Therapy. CANCER DIAGNOSIS & PROGNOSIS 2021; 1:19-22. [PMID: 35399694 PMCID: PMC8962775 DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib has demonstrated high clinical efficacy in the setting of patients with resistant chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), also inducing deep molecular responses. However, ponatinib-related cardiovascular toxicities make management challenging, especially of those patients with CML with previous cardiovascular comorbidities. CASE REPORT We report on the efficacy of ponatinib treatment used as fourth-line therapy in a 55-year-old woman affected by significant comorbidities (mainly cardiovascular) present before the diagnosis of CML. Ponatinib therapy induced a rapid and excellent clinical response, with the achievement of a durable deep molecular response that allowed us to propose a strategy of treatment discontinuation in order to reduce drug-related toxicities. CONCLUSION A strategy of a treatment-free interval might represent a useful clinical tool in those patients with CML who achieve a durable deep molecular response but are also affected by significant comorbidities in order to minimize the risk of ponatinib-related toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Bulla
- Hematology Section and BMT Unit, Rodolico Hospital, AOU Policlinico "Rodolico - San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Uros Markovic
- Hematology Section and BMT Unit, Rodolico Hospital, AOU Policlinico "Rodolico - San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Claudia Bellofiore
- Hematology Section and BMT Unit, Rodolico Hospital, AOU Policlinico "Rodolico - San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Stefania Stella
- Center of Experimental Oncology and Hematology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine,AOU Policlinico "Rodolico - San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Concetta Conticello
- Hematology Section and BMT Unit, Rodolico Hospital, AOU Policlinico "Rodolico - San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Francesco DI Raimondo
- Hematology Section and BMT Unit, Rodolico Hospital, AOU Policlinico "Rodolico - San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Fabio Stagno
- Hematology Section and BMT Unit, Rodolico Hospital, AOU Policlinico "Rodolico - San Marco", Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yilmaz U, Eskazan AE. Moving on from 2013 to 2020 European LeukemiaNet recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia: what has changed over the 7 years? Expert Rev Hematol 2020; 13:1035-1038. [PMID: 32814447 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1813564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Umut Yilmaz
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa , Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Emre Eskazan
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa , Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Silver RT, Schiffer C, Apperley JF, Cervantes F, Clark RE, Cortes JE, Deininger MW, Guilhot F, Hjorth-Hansen H, Hughes TP, Janssen JJWM, Kantarjian HM, Kim DW, Larson RA, Lipton JH, Mahon FX, Mayer J, Nicolini F, Niederwieser D, Pane F, Radich JP, Rea D, Richter J, Rosti G, Rousselot P, Saglio G, Saußele S, Soverini S, Steegmann JL, Turkina A, Zaritskey A, Hehlmann R. European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2020; 34:966-984. [PMID: 32127639 PMCID: PMC7214240 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-0776-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 793] [Impact Index Per Article: 198.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The therapeutic landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has profoundly changed over the past 7 years. Most patients with chronic phase (CP) now have a normal life expectancy. Another goal is achieving a stable deep molecular response (DMR) and discontinuing medication for treatment-free remission (TFR). The European LeukemiaNet convened an expert panel to critically evaluate and update the evidence to achieve these goals since its previous recommendations. First-line treatment is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI; imatinib brand or generic, dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib are available first-line). Generic imatinib is the cost-effective initial treatment in CP. Various contraindications and side-effects of all TKIs should be considered. Patient risk status at diagnosis should be assessed with the new EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS)-score. Monitoring of response should be done by quantitative polymerase chain reaction whenever possible. A change of treatment is recommended when intolerance cannot be ameliorated or when molecular milestones are not reached. Greater than 10% BCR-ABL1 at 3 months indicates treatment failure when confirmed. Allogeneic transplantation continues to be a therapeutic option particularly for advanced phase CML. TKI treatment should be withheld during pregnancy. Treatment discontinuation may be considered in patients with durable DMR with the goal of achieving TFR.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aniline Compounds/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
- Clinical Decision-Making
- Consensus Development Conferences as Topic
- Dasatinib/therapeutic use
- Disease Management
- Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/antagonists & inhibitors
- Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/genetics
- Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/metabolism
- Gene Expression
- Humans
- Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use
- Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/diagnosis
- Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy
- Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/genetics
- Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/mortality
- Life Expectancy/trends
- Monitoring, Physiologic
- Nitriles/therapeutic use
- Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
- Pyrimidines/therapeutic use
- Quality of Life
- Quinolines/therapeutic use
- Survival Analysis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Hochhaus
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum, Jena, Germany.
| | - M Baccarani
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - R T Silver
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - C Schiffer
- Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - J F Apperley
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | | | - R E Clark
- Department of Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - J E Cortes
- Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - M W Deininger
- Huntsman Cancer Center Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - F Guilhot
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - H Hjorth-Hansen
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - T P Hughes
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - J J W M Janssen
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - D W Kim
- St. Mary´s Hematology Hospital, The Catholic University, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | - F X Mahon
- Institut Bergonie, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - J Mayer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - F Pane
- Department Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico Secondo, Naples, Italy
| | - J P Radich
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - D Rea
- Hôpital St. Louis, Paris, France
| | | | - G Rosti
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - P Rousselot
- Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France
| | - G Saglio
- University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - S Saußele
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - S Soverini
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - A Turkina
- National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - A Zaritskey
- Almazov National Research Centre, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - R Hehlmann
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
- ELN Foundation, Weinheim, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|