Biologic, clinical, and sociodemographic predictors of multi-agent systemic therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in people living with HIV: a population-based investigation in the state of Georgia

Impact of multi-agent systemic therapy on all-cause and disease-specific survival for people living with HIV who are diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: population-based analyses from the state of Georgia

For people living with HIV (PLWH) who are subsequently diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), we investigate the impact of standard-of-care (SoC) cancer treatment on all-cause, NHL-specific, and HIV-specific survival outcomes. The focus is on a registry-derived, population-based sample of HIV + adults diagnosed with NHL within 2004-2012 in the state of Georgia. SoC treatment is defined as receipt of multi-agent systemic therapy (MAST). In multivariable survival analyses, SoC cancer treatment is significantly associated with better all-cause and NHL-specific survival, but not better HIV-specific survival across 2004-2017. Having a CD4 count <200 near the time of cancer diagnosis and Ann Arbor stage III/IV disease are associated with worse all-cause and HIV-specific survival; the effects on NHL survival trend negative but are not significant. Future work should expand the geographic base and cancers examined, deepen the level of clinical detail brought to bear, and incorporate the perspectives and recommendations of patients and providers.

Outcomes of Treatment for HIV-Infected Lymphoma Patients: A National Cancer Database (NCDB) Analysis

BACKGROUND

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection may be a predictor of undertreatment of patients with lymphoma. We hypothesized treatment with systemic therapy (SysT) or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) in the first-line setting leads to improved outcomes and sought to compare the predictors for treatment and outcomes with non-HIV (HIV-) patients.

METHODS

Patients with lymphoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were extracted from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Patients were categorized as HIV+ and HIV-. First-line treatment was categorized as no systemic therapy reported (noSyst), SysT, or HCT. Multivariate analysis to predict treatment and survival was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 552,513 lymphoma patients, of whom 11,160 HIV+ versus 349,607 HIV- patients were eligible for analysis. Among HIV+, the positive predictors for SysT were insurance and higher income, whereas female sex and minority racial status predicted lower likelihood for SysT. Forty HIV+ patients underwent HCT. Treatment of HIV+ lymphoma patients resulted in improved outcomes: 3-year overall survival 43.6% in noSyst versus 58.1% SysT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.61; P < .005) versus 62.2% HCT (HR 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14-1.3; P = .08). The outcomes were lower compared to non-HIV patients (3-yr overall survival 67.3% with SysT and 62.2% HCT).

CONCLUSION

Patients with lymphoma with HIV benefit from SysT when feasible but outcomes are worse than non-HIV patients. HCT should be offered to HIV+ patients with lymphoma in the appropriate clinic setting. Individual characteristics of the patients and complications could not be evaluated in the present study but should be a focus for future research.