1
|
Gaut D, Oliai C, Boiarsky J, Zhang S, Salhotra A, Azenkot T, Kennedy VE, Khanna V, Olmedo Gutierrez K, Shukla N, Moskoff B, Park G, Afkhami M, Patel A, Jeyakumar D, Mannis G, Logan AC, Jonas BA, Schiller G. Measurable residual disease conversion rate with consolidation chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2024; 65:69-77. [PMID: 37801340 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2023.2264426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
The rate of MRD clearance in AML with standard consolidation chemotherapy is not well defined. A multi-institution retrospective analysis was performed on 107 consecutively treated AML patients in morphologic complete remission with detectable MRD post-induction therapy who received standard chemotherapy consolidation. In response to standard intermediate/high-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy, 26 of 60 patients (43.3%) with MRD threshold of detection of at least 0.1% converted to MRD-negative status (undetectable with assay used), and 6 of 47 patients (12.8%) with MRD threshold of detection > 0.1% converted to MRD-negative status. Multivariable logistic regression for patients with MRD threshold of detection of at least 0.1% showed that, when controlling for age, ELN risk category, dose of cytarabine, and use of a combination agent, treatment with 1 cycle of consolidation cytarabine versus ≥2 cycles decreased the odds of conversion of AML to MRD-negative (OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.85, p = 0.03).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daria Gaut
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Caspian Oliai
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Boiarsky
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Shiliang Zhang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Amandeep Salhotra
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Tali Azenkot
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Vanessa E Kennedy
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Vishesh Khanna
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Karla Olmedo Gutierrez
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Navika Shukla
- Divison of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Benjamin Moskoff
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Gabriel Park
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Michelle Afkhami
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Anand Patel
- Divison of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Deepa Jeyakumar
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Gabriel Mannis
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Aaron C Logan
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Brian A Jonas
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Gary Schiller
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tiong IS, Loo S. Targeting Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Moving beyond Prognostication. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:4790. [PMID: 36902217 PMCID: PMC10003715 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has an established role in disease prognostication, particularly in guiding decisions for hematopoietic cell transplantation in first remission. Serial MRD assessment is now routinely recommended in the evaluation of treatment response and monitoring in AML by the European LeukemiaNet. The key question remains, however, if MRD in AML is clinically actionable or "does MRD merely portend fate"? With a series of new drug approvals since 2017, we now have more targeted and less toxic therapeutic options for the potential application of MRD-directed therapy. Recent approval of NPM1 MRD as a regulatory endpoint is also foreseen to drastically transform the clinical trial landscape such as biomarker-driven adaptive design. In this article, we will review (1) the emerging molecular MRD markers (such as non-DTA mutations, IDH1/2, and FLT3-ITD); (2) the impact of novel therapeutics on MRD endpoints; and (3) how MRD might be used as a predictive biomarker to guide therapy in AML beyond its prognostic role, which is the focus of two large collaborative trials: AMLM26 INTERCEPT (ACTRN12621000439842) and MyeloMATCH (NCT05564390).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ing S. Tiong
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Sun Loo
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- The Northern Hospital, Epping, VIC 3076, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Azenkot T, Jonas BA. Clinical Impact of Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153634. [PMID: 35892893 PMCID: PMC9330895 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Advances in immunophenotyping and molecular techniques have allowed for the development of more sensitive diagnostic tests in acute leukemia. These techniques can identify low levels of leukemic cells (quantified as 10−4 to 10−6 ratio to white blood cells) in patient samples. The presence of such low levels of leukemic cells, termed “measurable/minimal residual disease” (MRD), has been shown to be a marker of disease burden and patient outcomes. In acute lymphoblastic leukemia, new agents are highly effective at eliminating MRD for patients whose leukemia progressed despite first line therapies. By comparison, the role of MRD in acute myeloid leukemia is less clear. This commentary reviews select data and remaining questions about the clinical application of MRD to the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Abstract Measurable residual disease (MRD) has emerged as a primary marker of risk severity and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). There is, however, ongoing debate about MRD-based surveillance and treatment. A literature review was performed using the PubMed database with the keywords MRD or residual disease in recently published journals. Identified articles describe the prognostic value of pre-transplant MRD and suggest optimal timing and techniques to quantify MRD. Several studies address the implications of MRD on treatment selection and hematopoietic stem cell transplant, including patient candidacy, conditioning regimen, and transplant type. More prospective, randomized studies are needed to guide the application of MRD in the treatment of AML, particularly in transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tali Azenkot
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA;
| | - Brian A. Jonas
- Division of Cellular Therapy, Bone Marrow Transplant, and Malignant Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-916-734-3772
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prognostic value of measurable residual disease at allogeneic transplantation for adults with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission. Bone Marrow Transplant 2021; 56:2779-2787. [PMID: 34272486 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-021-01409-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Pretransplant measurable residual disease (MRD) has been shown to be associated with relapse incidence following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, it remains less clear whether pretransplant MRD status affects transplant outcomes in core binding factor AML (CBF-AML). We retrospectively evaluated the effect of pretransplant MRD, which was measured by a polymerase chain reaction of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcripts, on transplant outcomes for a cohort of 959 adult patients with t(8;21) or inv(16) AML treated by allogeneic HCT during complete remission (CR), between 2000 and 2018. Multivariate analysis showed the absence of pretransplant MRD was significantly associated with lower relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; P < 0.001), treatment failure (HR, 0.66; P = 0.004), and overall mortality (HR, 0.72; P = 0.037) among patients with t(8;21). However, pretransplant MRD negativity was not associated with relapse (HR, 0.73; P = 0.420), treatment failure (HR, 0.64; P = 0.063), or overall mortality (HR, 0.69; P = 0.149) among patients with inv(16). In subgroup analysis, pretransplant MRD status significantly affected relapse and LFS only in patients with t(8;21) undergoing allogeneic HCT during CR2. In conclusion, our data demonstrate the different prognostic values of pretransplant MRD for CBF-AML, highlighting the need to develop effective therapeutic strategies for such MRD-positive patients.
Collapse
|