The impact of cell-of-origin, MYC/Bcl-2 dual expression and MYC rearrangement on disease relapse among early stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with combined modality therapy

Advances in biology, diagnosis and treatment of DLBCL

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with approximately 150,000 new cases worldwide each year, represent nearly 30% of all cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and are phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous. A gene-expression profile (GEP) has identified at least three major subtypes of DLBCL, each of which has distinct clinical, biological, and genetic features: activated B-cell (ABC)-like DLBCL, germinal-center B-cell (GCB)-like DLBCL, and unclassified. Different origins are associated with different responses to chemotherapy and targeted agents. Despite DLBCL being a highly heterogeneous disease, more than 60% of patients with DLBCL can be cured after using rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) to inhibit the growth of cancer cells while targeting the CD20 receptor. In recent decades, the improvement of diagnostic levels has led to a refinement classification of DLBCL and the development of new therapeutic approaches. The objective of this review was to summarize the latest studies examining genetic lesions and therapies for DLBCL.

Enhanced prognostic evaluation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A comprehensive surveillance study incorporating Epstein-Barr virus infection status and immunohistochemical markers

Emerging biologic subsets and new prognostic markers are significantly important for aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Nevertheless, the high cost of testing limits the availability of these tests in most hospitals, thus making prognostic judgment based on basic immunohistochemical testing, whole blood Epstein-Barr virus DNA (WBEBV) surveillance and clinical features advantageous for hospitals and patients with poor medical conditions. We included 647 DLBCL patients treated in our hospital from January 2009 to March 2023. Non-germinal center B-cell like, Ki-67, and International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores were related to cMYC/B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2)-double expression. Age, Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNA (EBER) positivity, and IPI scores were associated with mortality. The cutoffs for differential overall survival (OS) of age, WBEBV, Bcl-2, and cMYC were 57 years, 1514 copies/mL (baseline), 5.89 × 104 copies/mL (treatment), 40%, and 55%, respectively. EBER positivity was significantly associated with a worse OS. Patients with newly defined DE (Bcl-2 ≥ 40 and cMYC > 55) had a worse prognosis than controls (p = 0.04). We found that cMYC with an optimal cutoff of 47.5 could effectively predict high-grade DLBCL with an area under the curve of 0.912, and the specificity and sensitivity were 70.7% and 100%, respectively. Our study provides valuable insights into the prognostic factors and biomarker cutoffs that influence OS in DLBCL patients, which may guide clinicians in tailoring treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes.

Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT tumor metabolic parameters and Ki-67 in pre-treatment diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Background

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a highly aggressive lymphoma. Rituximab-based conventional chemotherapy still leads to drug resistance or relapse in 30-40% of patients. Therefore, early identification of high-risk patients and accurate assessment of prognosis are very important for clinical decision-making. The aim of this study is to investigate the value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) of tumor metabolic, clinical and biological parameters in the prognostic risk stratification of DLBCL before treatment.

Methods

We retrospectively collected clinical data on 63 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL admitted to Shanxi Bethune Hospital during the period from November 2016 to April 2020 who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT prior to treatment in a cohort study. Metabolic, clinical, and biological parameters were analyzed by Cox regression. Kaplan-Meier curves of patient survival were compared by the log-rank test.

Results

The median follow-up was 21 months. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 47.62%, and the overall survival (OS) was 53.97%. The subtype, double expression, Ann Abor stage, NCCN-IPI score, Ki-67, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), bulk volume glycolysis (BVG), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) were the influencing factors for PFS and OS (P<0.050) in univariate analysis. BVG (PFS: HR =6.62, P<0.001; OS: HR =3.53, P=0.029), TLG (PFS: HR =8.56, P<0.001; OS: HR =5.20, P=0.004), TMTV (PFS: HR =12.02, P=0.001; OS: HR =5.05, P=0.033) and Ki-67 were found to be independent prognostic risk stratification parameters affecting PFS and OS by multivariate regression analysis. The 2-year PFS and OS rates for patients with high BVG (≥288.00 cm3), TLG (≥1,854.00 cm3), TMTV (≥103.00 cm3), and Ki-67 (≥85%) were 20% and 28.57%, 9.68% and 22.58%, 20.51%, and 30.77%, and 25% and 33.33%, respectively; and the 2-year PFS and OS rates for patients with low BVG (<288.00 cm3), TLG (<1,854.00 cm3), TMTV (<103.00 cm3), and Ki-67 (<85%) patients were 82.14% and 85.71%, 84.37% and 84.37%, 91.67% and 91.67%, and 61.54% and 66.67%, respectively. Patients with high BVG, TLG, TMTV, and Ki-67 had a worse 2-year PFS as well as OS rate (Ki-67: P=0.0018/P=0.0025; P<0.0001 for the rest of the groups).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that BVG, TLG, TMTV, and Ki-67 are independent prognostic indicators for survival in patients with pre-treatment DLBCL, especially BVG, which is a novel prognostic indicator that has to be validated in future research.

Improved outcomes of localized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at the Waldeyer ring in comparison to the sinonasal area in the rituximab era

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the head-and-neck area primarily involves the Waldeyer ring (WR) and sinonasal area (SN). However, the differential clinical outcomes between patients with WR-DLBCL and those with SN-DLBCL in the rituximab era remain unclear.

METHODS

To avoid confounding factors contributed by advanced DLBCL with WR and SN involvement, we assessed the clinical outcomes of patients with stage I/II WR-DLBCL and SN-DLBCL and compared them with those having corresponding stages of DLBCL in the lymph nodes but without other extranodal involvement (LN-DLBCL) in the same period. We compared the patients' clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) among the three subgroups.

RESULTS

We analyzed 67, 15, and 106 patients with WR-DLBCL, SN-DLBCL, and LN-DLBCL, respectively, between January 2000 and December 2019. All patients received front-line rituximab-based regimens, and > 80% received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone-based regimens. More patients with SN-DLBCL had revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) score 3 (27%) when compared with those with WR-DLBCL (7%) and those with LN-DLBCL (10%, p = 0.181). Patients with WR-DLBCL, LN-DLBCL, and SN-DLBCL had 5-year EFS and OS rates of 80.7%, 59.5%, and 41.9% (p = 0.021) and 83.7%, 70.8%, and 55.8% (p = 0.032), respectively. Compared to patients with LN-DLBCL, those with WR-DLBCL also had a significantly favorable 5-year EFS rate (p = 0.021) and 5-year OS rate (p = 0.023). Three of the 15 patients with SN-DLBCL experienced lymphoma recurrence in the brain after front-line treatment. In multivariate analyses, R-IPI scores of 1-2 and 3 served as significantly poor prognostic factors for patients with poor EFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to patients with LN-DLBCL, patients with WR-DLBCL receiving front-line rituximab-based treatments had favorable clinical outcomes; however, patients with SN-DLBCL had worse clinical outcomes. Further studies on molecular prognostic factors and treatment strategies for SN-DLBCL are warranted.

Navigating the Evolving Treatment Landscape of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, comprises a heterogenous group of morphologically, genetically, and clinically distinct diseases. Several recent advances have affected the treatment landscape, which had been mostly stagnant for the past few decades. We will review the practice-changing studies in frontline (POLARIX), early relapse (ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM), and multiple recurrent (ZUMA-1, JULIET, TRANSCEND, L-MIND, and LOTIS-2) stages and discuss how the treatment landscape may evolve with the emergence of bispecific antibodies.

Limited-stage Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

DLBCL, the most common lymphoma subtype, is localized in 25-30% of patients. Prognosis in patients with limited-stage DLBCL (LS-DLBCL) is excellent with 10-year overall survival of at least 70-80%. Improved insights into the disease biology, the availability of positron-emission tomography (PET) scans and recent dedicated clinical trials within this unique population, have led to evolving treatment paradigms. However, no standard definition of LS-DLBCL exists, and while generally defined as Ann Arbor stages I-II disease with largest mass size <10cm in diameter, variations across studies cause challenges in interpretation. Similar to advanced-stage disease, R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone) immunochemotherapy forms the basis of treatment, with combined modality therapy including 3 cycles of systemic treatment and involved-site radiation therapy being a predominant historical standard. Yet the well-described continuous risk of relapse beyond 5 years and established late complications of radiotherapy have challenged previous strategies. More rigorous baseline staging and response assessment with PET may improve decision making. Recent clinical studies have focused on minimizing toxicities while maximizing disease outcomes using strategies such as abbreviated immunochemotherapy alone and PET-adapted radiotherapy delivery. This comprehensive review provides an update of recent literature with recommendations for integration into clinical practice for LS-DLBCL patients.

Prognostication of Primary Tumor Location in Early-Stage Nodal Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: An Analysis of the SEER Database

The prognostic role of primary tumor location for clinical outcomes of patients with early-stage nodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains uncertain. We evaluated the relationship between primary tumor site and overall survival (OS) in 9738 early-stage nodal DLBCL patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary site of the tumors was characterized as supradiaphragm and subdiaphragm according to the definition of lymph node distribution in the Ann Arbor staging. The OS was significantly better for patients of the supradiaphragm group (n = 6038) compared to the ones from the subdiaphragm group (n = 3655) (hazard ratio (HR) 1.24; 95%CI: 1.16-1.33; P < 0.001), and it was preserved after propensity score matching (PSM) (HR 1.15; 95% CI: 1.07-1.24; P < 0.001). Gene enrichment analyses demonstrated that the subdiaphragm group has an upregulated extracellular matrix (ECM)-related signaling, which reportedly can promote growth, invasion, and metastasis of the cancer, and downregulated interferon response, which is considered to have anti-tumor function. Our results indicate the two tumor locations (supradiaphragm and subdiaphragm) presented different prognostic implications for the overall survival, suggesting that the tumor's location could serve as a prognostic biomarker for early-stage nodal DLBCL patients.