Cerebral EBV-positive PTLD controlled by PD-1 checkpoint blockade in a liver transplant patient

PD-L1 and PD-1 expression in pediatric post-transplant Burkitt lymphoma and other monomorphic post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) develop as a consequence of immune suppression. Programmed death protein 1 (PD-1), a regulator of host immune activation, binds to programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) to suppress the T-cell immune response. PD-1/PD-L1 pathway may play a role in PTLD. The objective was to describe intratumoral expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 in pediatric monomorphic PTLD, and assess if density of these cells is associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

PROCEDURE

Clinical variables and outcome data were collected on B-cell monomorphic PTLD treated in Toronto, Canada between 2000 and 2017. Diagnostic area from tumor tissue was identified to count CD3-positive or PD-1-positive cells and CD3-negative lymphoma B cells or PD-L1-positive cells. CD3+ , PD-1+ , and PD-L1+ cell densities were compared between cases of PTLD. OS and PFS were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 25 cases of B-cell monomorphic PTLD; majority Burkitt lymphoma (32%) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (56%). All cases had CD3+ cells infiltrating the tumor, and median percentage of CD3+ cells was 14% (interquartile range: 6.2%-25%). Twelve cases (48%) had PD-1+ cell infiltrating (range: 1%-83%) and 13 cases (52%) had no PD-1+ cells infiltrating. Sixteen cases (64%) had PD-L1+ cells present; however, there was no PD-L1 expression on any Burkitt lymphoma tissue. When comparing PD-1 and PD-L1 expression, there was no difference in OS or PFS.

CONCLUSION

Intratumoral presence of PD-1+ and PD-L1+ cells varied in pediatric patients with monomorphic PTLD; however, no relationship to OS and PFS was identified.

Immunotherapy and Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review of Basic and Clinical Data

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the management of patients with intermediate- and advanced-stage HCC, even making some of them potential candidates for liver transplantation. However, acute rejection has been observed after ICI therapy, challenging its safety in transplant settings. We summarize the key basic impact of immune checkpoints on HCC and liver transplantation. We analyze the available case reports and case series on the use of ICI therapy prior to and after liver transplantation. A three-month washout period is desirable between ICI therapy and liver transplantation to reduce the risk of acute rejection. Whenever possible, ICIs should be avoided after liver transplantation, and especially so early after a transplant. Globally, more robust prospective data in the field are required.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in malignancies after liver transplantation: A systematic review and pooled analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Treatment of de novo malignancies and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in liver transplant recipients (LT) is an attractive strategy that is infrequently pursued because of the lack of strong evidence regarding their safety and efficacy. In this systematic review with pooled analysis, we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of ICI therapy following LT.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of case reports and series published until January 2022. We included 31 publications reporting a total of 52 patients treated with ICIs after LT and assessed in a pooled analysis the risk of graft rejection and the outcome of ICI therapy.

RESULTS

Acute graft rejection occurred in 15 patients (28.8%) and 7 patients (13.4% of the total cohort) died because of graft loss. Rejection was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (17.2 months, confidence interval [CI] 12.1-22.2 vs. 3.5 months, CI 1.6-5.4, p < 0.001). Disease control rate was 44.2% (n = 23), and in these patients, OS was longer than in non-responders (26.4 months, CI 20.8-32.0 vs. 3.4 months, CI 2.1-4.7, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Observational, off-label experience suggests that treatment with ICI for advanced malignancies in LT recipients might not be discarded a priori. This notwithstanding, ICI treatment in these patients is associated with a substantial risk of graft rejection and mortality. Prospective studies are needed to provide adequate safety and efficacy figures of ICI treatment in this fragile population.

Epstein-Barr virus-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders: new insights in pathogenesis, classification and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a serious complication following transplantation from an allogeneic donor. Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) is involved in a substantial number of cases. In this review, we aim to summarize recent knowledge on pathogenesis, classification and treatment of EBV + PTLD.

RECENT FINDINGS

New insights in the complex oncogenic properties of EBV antigens noncoding Ribonucleic acids (RNAs), especially EBV MicroRNA (miRNAs), have increased our knowledge of the pathogenesis of EBV + PTLD. In addition the potential influence of EBV on the tumor microenvironment is becoming clearer, paving the way for new types of immunotherapy. Currently PTLD is classified according to the World Health Organization classification together with other lymphoproliferative disorders, based on the specific immunosuppression. However, a new framework integrating all types of lymphoproliferative disorders in all different settings of immune deficiency and dysregulation is needed. Although treatment of EBV + and EBV - PTLD was largely similar in the past, EBV-directed therapies are currently increasingly used.

SUMMARY

The use of EBV-directed therapies and new agents, based on better understanding of pathogenesis and classification of PTLD, will change the treatment landscape of EBV + PTLD in the next era.