Pembrolizumab for myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of hypomethylating agents in the phase 1b KEYNOTE-013 study

Cellular and immunotherapies for myelodysplastic syndromes

In this review article, we outline the current landscape of immune and cell therapy-based approaches for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Given the well characterized graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect observed with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, and the known immune escape mechanisms observed in MDS cells, significant interest exists in developing immune-based approaches to treat MDS. These attempts have included antibody-based drugs that block immune escape molecules, such as inhibitors of the PD-1/PD-L1 and TIM-3/galectin-9 axes that mediate interactions between MDS cells and T-lymphocytes, as well as antibodies that block the CD47/SIRPα interaction, which mediates macrophage phagocytosis. Unfortunately, these approaches have been largely unsuccessful. There is significant potential for T-cell engaging therapies and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, but there are also several limitations to these approaches that are unique to MDS. However, many of these limitations may be overcome by the next generation of cellular therapies, including those with engineered T-cell receptors or natural killer (NK)-cell based platforms. Regardless of the approach, all these immune cells are subject to the complex bone marrow microenvironment in MDS, which harbours a variable and heterogeneous mix of pro-inflammatory cytokines and immunosuppressive elements. Understanding this interaction will be paramount to ensuring the success of immune and cellular therapies in MDS.

T-cell dysfunctions in myelodysplastic syndromes

ABSTRACT

Escape from immune surveillance is a hallmark of cancer. Immune deregulation caused by intrinsic and extrinsic cellular factors, such as altered T-cell functions, leads to immune exhaustion, loss of immune surveillance, and clonal proliferation of tumoral cells. The T-cell immune system contributes to the pathogenesis, maintenance, and progression of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Here, we comprehensively reviewed our current biological knowledge of the T-cell compartment in MDS and recent advances in the development of immunotherapeutic strategies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and T-cell- and antibody-based adoptive therapies that hold promise to improve the outcome of patients with MDS.

Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS): The Current and Future Treatment Landscape

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogenous clonal disorder of hemopoietic stem cells characterized by cytomorphologic dysplasia, ineffective hematopoiesis, peripheral cytopenias and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Our understanding of this disease has continued to evolve over the last century. More recently, prognostication and treatment have been determined by cytogenetic and molecular data. Specific genetic abnormalities, such as deletion of the long arm of chromosome 5 (del(5q)), TP53 inactivation and SF3B1 mutation, are increasingly associated with disease phenotype and outcome, as reflected in the recently updated fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors (WHO5) and the International Consensus Classification 2022 (ICC 2022) classification systems. Treatment of lower-risk MDS is primarily symptom directed to ameliorate cytopenias. Higher-risk disease warrants disease-directed therapy at diagnosis; however, the only possible cure is an allogenic bone marrow transplant. Novel treatments aimed at rational molecular and cellular pathway targets have yielded a number of candidate drugs over recent years; however few new approvals have been granted. With ongoing research, we hope to increasingly offer our MDS patients tailored therapeutic approaches, ultimately decreasing morbidity and mortality.

Immune checkpoint blockade in hematological malignancies: current state and future potential

Malignant cells are known to evade immune surveillance by engaging immune checkpoints which are negative regulators of the immune system. By restoring the T-lymphocyte mediated anti-tumor effect, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of solid tumors but have met rather modest success in hematological malignancies. Currently, the only FDA approved indications for ICI therapy are in classic hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma. Multiple clinical trials have assessed ICI therapy alone and in combination with standard of care treatments in other lymphomas, plasma cell neoplasms and myeloid neoplasms but were noted to have limited efficacy. These trials mostly focused on PD-1/PDL-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors. Recently, there has been an effort to target other T-lymphocyte checkpoints like LAG-3, TIM-3, TIGIT along with improving strategies of PD-1/PDL-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition. Drugs targeting the macrophage checkpoint, CD47, are also being tested. Long term safety and efficacy data from these ongoing studies are eagerly awaited. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the mechanism of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the key takeaways from the reported results of completed and ongoing studies of these therapies in the context of hematological malignancies.

Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hematologic Malignancies

The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to a dramatic paradigm shift within the landscape of cancer treatment, igniting significant interest in their potential application in treating hematologic malignancies. This comprehensive review critically has examined the existing body of literature to shed light on the evolving understanding of the efficacy and safety of ICIs, both as a single agent and in combination regimens in hematologic malignancies. Across distinct lymphoma subtypes, the observed treatment responses exhibit diversity, and conflicts. Notably, Hodgkin lymphoma and certain non-Hodgkin lymphomas such as primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, emerge as remarkable cases, showing encouraging response rates and outcomes. However, the efficacy of ICIs reveals variations among subtypes such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia and multiple myeloma. Combination therapies consistently demonstrated superior outcomes compared to monotherapy in several malignancies. While the potential benefits of ICIs in hematologic malignancies are evident, the safety profile warrants careful consideration. Immune-related and other adverse events, though generally tolerable and manageable, highlight the necessity of meticulous monitoring and appropriate intervention. The discussions prompted by these findings underscore the need for tailored treatment approaches, driven by disease subtype, patient characteristics, and potential biomarkers. Moreover, the emerging realm of combination therapies involving immune checkpoint inhibitors holds promise for enhanced treatment outcomes, and ongoing research endeavors aim to unravel the optimal strategies.

Immunotherapy with Monoclonal Antibodies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Work in Progress

In the last few years, molecularly targeted agents and immune-based treatments (ITs) have significantly changed the landscape of anti-cancer therapy. Indeed, ITs have been proven to be very effective when used against metastatic solid tumors, for which outcomes are extremely poor when using standard approaches. Such a scenario has only been partially reproduced in hematologic malignancies. In the context of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as innovative drugs are eagerly awaited in the relapsed/refractory setting, different ITs have been explored, but the results are still unsatisfactory. In this work, we will discuss the most important clinical studies to date that adopt ITs in AML, providing the basis to understand how this approach, although still in its infancy, may represent a promising therapeutic tool for the future treatment of AML patients.

Immunotherapy for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia: where do we stand?

INTRODUCTION

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are generally characterized by a poor prognosis with currently available therapies. Immunotherapies have already seen success in treating a variety of malignant disorders, and their role in managing myeloid cancers is evolving rapidly.

AREAS COVERED

This is a review of the immunotherapies tested in MDS and AML, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and cell therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, T cell receptor (TCR) engineered T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells, with a focus on clinical trials conducted to date and future directions.

EXPERT OPINION

Initial clinical trials exploring checkpoint inhibitors in MDS and AML have demonstrated high toxicity and disappointing efficacy. However, ongoing trials adding novel checkpoint inhibitors to standard therapy are more promising. Technological advances are improving the outlook for bispecific antibodies, and cellular therapies like adoptive NK cell infusion have favorable efficacy and tolerability in early trials. As our understanding of the immune microenvironment in MDS and AML improves, the role for immunotherapy in the treatment of these diseases will become clearer.

Therapeutic approaches for the management of higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes

The heterogeneous nature of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) demands a risk-adapted therapeutic approach, and higher risk MDS, characterized by an increased risk of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia and inferior survival, is typically defined based on an integrated assessment of cytopenias, bone marrow blast percentage, and cytogenetic findings using the revised International Prognostic Scoring System. Incorporating mutational data could further refine the risk assessment and identify those with higher-than-expected disease risk. The principal therapeutic goal in this disease subset is to modify the natural history and prolong survival. Allogeneic stem cell transplant, the only potentially curative treatment, should be offered to eligible patients. Hypomethylating agents are the only approved treatment with unsatisfactory response rates and duration, and patients who failed prior hypomethylating agents unfortunately have dismal outcomes with urgent need of novel therapeutic agents. In this review, we provide the therapeutic landscape in higher risk MDS based on the current evidence and discuss the investigational treatment options under development.

Emerging treatments for myelodysplastic syndromes: Biological rationales and clinical translation

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by myeloid dysplasia, peripheral blood cytopenias, and increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The standard of care for patients with MDS is hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based therapy; however, nearly 50% of patients have no response to the treatment. Patients with MDS in whom HMA therapy has failed have a dismal prognosis and no approved second-line therapy options, so enrollment in clinical trials of experimental agents represents these patients' only chance for improved outcomes. A better understanding of the molecular and biological mechanisms underpinning MDS pathogenesis has enabled the development of new agents that target molecular alterations, cell death regulators, signaling pathways, and immune regulatory proteins in MDS. Here, we review novel therapies for patients with MDS in whom HMA therapy has failed, with an emphasis on the biological rationale for these therapies' development.

The yin-yang of immunity: Immune dysregulation in myelodysplastic syndrome with different risk stratification

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a heterogeneous group of myeloid clonal diseases with diverse clinical courses, and immune dysregulation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of MDS. However, immune dysregulation is complex and heterogeneous in the development of MDS. Lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) is mainly characterized by immune hyperfunction and increased apoptosis, and the immunosuppressive therapy shows a good response. Instead, higher-risk MDS (HR-MDS) is characterized by immune suppression and immune escape, and the immune activation therapy may improve the survival of HR-MDS. Furthermore, the immune dysregulation of some MDS changes dynamically which is characterized by the coexistence and mutual transformation of immune hyperfunction and immune suppression. Taken together, the authors think that the immune dysregulation in MDS with different risk stratification can be summarized by an advanced philosophical thought “Yin-Yang theory” in ancient China, meaning that the opposing forces may actually be interdependent and interconvertible. Clarifying the mechanism of immune dysregulation in MDS with different risk stratification can provide the new basis for diagnosis and clinical treatment. This review focuses on the manifestations and roles of immune dysregulation in the different risk MDS, and summarizes the latest progress of immunotherapy in MDS.

Dynamics of PD-1 expression are associated with treatment efficacy and prognosis in patients with intermediate/high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes under hypomethylating treatment

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are widely used in patients with higher-risk MDS not eligible for stem cell transplantation. However, the general response rate by HMAs is lesser than 50% in MDS patients, while the relapse rate is high. Emerging evidence indicates that demethylating effects committed by HMAs may facilitate the up-regulation of a range of immune checkpoints or cancer suppressor genes in patients with MDS, among which the programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligands are demonstrated to be prominent and may contribute to treatment failure and early relapse. Although results from preliminary studies with a limited number of enrolled patients indicate that combined administration of PD-1 inhibitor may yield extra therapeutic benefit in some MDS patients, identifications of this subgroup of patients and optimal timing for the anti-PD-1 intervention remain significant challenges. Dynamics of immune checkpoints and associated predictive values during HMA-treatment cycles remained poorly investigated. In this present study, expression levels of immune checkpoints PD-1 and its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 were retrospectively analyzed by quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) in a total of 135 myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) cohort with higher-risk stratification. The prognostic value of dynamics of these immune checkpoints during HMA cycles was validated in two independent prospective cohorts in our center (NCT01599325 and NCT01751867). Our data revealed that PD-1 expression was significantly higher than that in younger MDS patients (age ≤ 60) and MDS with lower IPSS risk stratification (intermediate risk-1). A significantly up-regulated expression of PD-1 was seen during the first four HMA treatment cycles in MDS patients, while similar observation was not seen concerning the expression of PD-L1 or PD-L2. By utilizing binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) models, we further identified that higher or equal to 75.9 PD-1 expressions after 2 cycles of HMA treatment is an independent negative prognostic factor in predicting acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transformation and survival. Collectively, our data provide rationales for monitoring the expression of PD-1 during HMA treatment cycles, a higher than 75.9 PD-1 expression may identify patients who will potentially benefit from the combined therapy of HMA and PD-1 inhibitors.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of many solid tumors, with limited progress made in the area of myeloid malignancies. The low mutational burden of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is one potential reason behind the lack of activity of T-cell harnessing ICIs, particularly CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors. Innate immune checkpoints play a critical role in the immune escape of AML and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The CD47 targeting agent, magrolimab, has shown promising activity when combined with azacitidine in early phase trials conducted in AML and higher-risk MDS, especially among patients harboring a TP53 mutation. Similarly, sabatolimab (an anti-TIM-3 monoclonal antibody) plus hypomethylating agents have shown durable responses in higher-risk MDS and AML in early clinical trials. Randomized trials are currently ongoing to confirm the efficacy of these agents. In this review, we will present the current progress and future directions of immune checkpoint inhibition in AML and MDS.