A randomized phase II/III study of 'novel therapeutics' versus azacitidine in newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), age 60 or older: a report of the comparison of azacitidine and nivolumab to azacitidine: SWOG S1612

Higher tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 expression correlate with shorter survival in hematologic malignancies

Background

The prognostic implications of tumor mutational burden (TMB) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression are poorly studied in hematologic malignancies.

Objectives

This study aimed to better understand the characteristics and prognostic value of TMB and PD-1/PD-L1 in hematologic malignancies.

Design

This real-world study was conducted among patients with hematologic malignancies who had next-generation sequencing (NGS) (Foundation Medicine) at the University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center (2014-2018).

Methods

TMB was measured by NGS. PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score, TPS) was measured by immunohistochemistry (classified as high (⩾50%), low (1-49%), and negative (<1%)). Data was curated from the electronic medical records.

Results

In 388 evaluable patients, the most common diagnoses were B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (35%) and Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative disorders (16%). Median TMB was 1.6 mutations/Mb (range, 0-46.83). Forty-eight patients (12%) had TMB ⩾10 mutations/Mb, 90% of which were B-cell or T-cell NHL. In 85 samples with available PD-L1 scores, 11 were high; 26, low; and 48, no tumor cell expression. PD-L1 TPS positive (⩾1%) was most common in T-cell NHL (7/9 (77%) cases) followed by B-cell NHL (21/51 (41%) cases). TMB ⩾4 mutations/Mb and PD-L1 score ⩾1% were significantly associated with shorter overall survival (OS) from diagnosis, with hazard ratio (HR) = 1.46 (p = 0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-2.03) and HR = 2.11 (p = 0.04, 95% CI 1.04-4.30), respectively; the relationship was more pronounced when PD-L1 ⩾50% versus <50% was used (HR = 2.80, p = 0.02, 95% CI 1.19-6.59). Higher TMB and higher PD-L1 positivity correlation were significant but weak (Pearson correlation coefficient R 2 = 0.04, p = 0.04).

Conclusion

TMB ⩾4 mutations/Mb and positive PD-L1 TPS are poor prognostic factors, correlating with shorter OS across hematologic malignancies.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02478931.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Cardiotoxicity: A Comparative Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have uncommon associations with cardiotoxicity, yet these cardiotoxic effects are associated with high mortality. An accurate assessment of risk for cardiotoxicity is essential for clinical decision-making, but data from randomized controlled trials often differ from real-world observational studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus was performed, including phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OSs) reporting myocarditis or pericardial disease, myocardial infarction, or stroke with an immunotherapy. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to pool results between ICIs and other cancer therapy in RCTs and OSs. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was followed. In total, 54 RCTs (N=38 264) and 24 OSs (N=12 561 455) were included. In RCTs, ICI use resulted in higher risk of myocarditis (OR, 3.55 [95% CI, 2.10-5.98]), pericardial disease (OR, 2.73 [95% CI, 1.57-4.77]), and myocardial infarction (OR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.03-3.25]), compared with non-ICI (placebo or chemotherapy). In OSs, ICI use was not associated with myocarditis, pericardial disease, or myocardial infarction compared with controls; however, combination ICIs demonstrated higher risk of myocarditis compared with single ICI use (OR, 3.07 [95% CI, 1.28-7.39]). Stroke risk was not increased with use of ICIs in RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated increased risk of ICI myocarditis, pericardial disease, and myocardial infarction in RCTs but not OSs. Results of this study suggest there are differences between ICI cardiotoxicity risk, possibly suggesting differences in diagnoses and management, in clinical trials versus the OSs.

Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS): The Current and Future Treatment Landscape

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogenous clonal disorder of hemopoietic stem cells characterized by cytomorphologic dysplasia, ineffective hematopoiesis, peripheral cytopenias and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Our understanding of this disease has continued to evolve over the last century. More recently, prognostication and treatment have been determined by cytogenetic and molecular data. Specific genetic abnormalities, such as deletion of the long arm of chromosome 5 (del(5q)), TP53 inactivation and SF3B1 mutation, are increasingly associated with disease phenotype and outcome, as reflected in the recently updated fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors (WHO5) and the International Consensus Classification 2022 (ICC 2022) classification systems. Treatment of lower-risk MDS is primarily symptom directed to ameliorate cytopenias. Higher-risk disease warrants disease-directed therapy at diagnosis; however, the only possible cure is an allogenic bone marrow transplant. Novel treatments aimed at rational molecular and cellular pathway targets have yielded a number of candidate drugs over recent years; however few new approvals have been granted. With ongoing research, we hope to increasingly offer our MDS patients tailored therapeutic approaches, ultimately decreasing morbidity and mortality.

Coordinated Immune Cell Networks in the Bone Marrow Microenvironment Define the Graft versus Leukemia Response with Adoptive Cellular Therapy

Understanding how intra-tumoral immune populations coordinate to generate anti-tumor responses following therapy can guide precise treatment prioritization. We performed systematic dissection of an established adoptive cellular therapy, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), by analyzing 348,905 single-cell transcriptomes from 74 longitudinal bone-marrow samples of 25 patients with relapsed myeloid leukemia; a subset was evaluated by protein-based spatial analysis. In acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) responders, diverse immune cell types within the bone-marrow microenvironment (BME) were predicted to interact with a clonally expanded population of ZNF683 + GZMB + CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) which demonstrated in vitro specificity for autologous leukemia. This population, originating predominantly from the DLI product, expanded concurrently with NK and B cells. AML nonresponder BME revealed a paucity of crosstalk and elevated TIGIT expression in CD8+ CTLs. Our study highlights recipient BME differences as a key determinant of effective anti-leukemia response and opens new opportunities to modulate cell-based leukemia-directed therapy.

Checkpoint inhibition in hematologic malignancies

Checkpoint inhibitor therapy has emerged as an effective therapeutic strategy for many types of malignancies, especially in solid tumors. Within the last two decades, numerous monoclonal antibody drugs targeting the CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint pathways have seen FDA approval. Within hematologic malignancies, Hodgkin Lymphoma has seen the greatest clinical benefits thus far with more recent data showing efficacy in the front-line setting. As our understanding of checkpoint inhibition expands, using these pathways as a therapeutic target has shown some utility in the treatment of other hematologic malignancies as well, primarily in the relapsed/refractory settings. Checkpoint inhibition also appears to have a role as a synergistic agent to augment clinical responses to other forms of therapy such as hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Moreover, alternative checkpoint molecules that bypass the well-studied CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 pathways have emerged as exciting new therapeutic targets. Most excitingly is the use of anti-CD47 blockade in the treatment of high risk MDS and TP-53 mutated AML. Overall, there has been tremendous progress in understanding the benefits of checkpoint inhibition in hematologic malignancies, but further studies are needed in all areas to best utilize these agents. This is a review of the most recent developments and progress in Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Hematologic Malignancies in the last decade.