Increased mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies treated with proton pump inhibitors: a nationwide cohort study

Intake of Proton Pump Inhibitors Is Associated with a Shorter Time to First Treatment in Early-Stage Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most widely used drugs worldwide [Gut Liver. 2017;11(1):27-37]. The use of PPI has become a common practice and is overprescribed for all patients with cancer including patients with hematological malignancies. In the current study, we aimed to explore retrospectively the effect of PPI, on time to first treatment (TTFT) in a large cohort of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who were under watch-and-wait approach.

METHODS

The cohort is based on anonymized data obtained from electronic medical records of Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS) members, who is the second-largest healthcare organization in Israel, with 2.5 million insured patients, and received a diagnosis of CLL during this period.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 3,474 patients with CLL who are treatment-naïve, and the median follow-up was 1,745 days (602-3,700). A total of 1,061 patients (30.5%) received a PPI agent, for a minimum of 3 months during the watch-and-wait period. The intake of PPI was found to be associated with a shorter TTFT: among PPI users, the 10-year treatment-free ratio is 79.2%, while among non-PPI users it is 90.6%.

CONCLUSION

Routine use of PPI in CLL patients may negatively impact their clinical course. Biology of this primary observation requires further investigation.

Proton pump inhibitors and cancer treatments: Emerging evidence against coadministration

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used in cancer patients despite accumulating data showing that they can impact the efficacy of major anticancer drugs. This is particularly important with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs).

RESULTS

Most TKIs require gastric acidity for their absorption and some retrospective series demonstrated that coprescription decreases the survival benefit of some TKI use (erlotinib, gefitinib and pazopanib). Relations between microbiota, the immune system, and the efficacy of immunotherapy are now obvious, just as modifications to gut flora after PPIs use are well-known. Many retrospective articles, including articles based on individual-participant data from randomized studies, demonstrated that patients treated with CPIs have a poorer outcome (overall survival, progression-free survival and response rate) when they received PPIs concomitantly, while there was no impact of such coprescription among patients in control arms, not treated with immunotherapies. Similar data were also observed in patients treated with palbociclib.

CONCLUSION

For these interactions, it is very important to use the precautionary principle and warn patients and physicians about this. In patients who require acid suppression because of severe symptoms, using antacids or H2 blockers could be recommended.

Association of proton pump inhibitor use with survival and adverse effects outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma: pooled analysis of three clinical trials

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used in cancer patients, but their impact on treatment outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM) patients remains unclear. This study investigated the association of PPI use with survival and adverse effects in MM patients across three randomized-control trials initiating daratumumab, lenalidomide, or bortezomib combination treatments. Cox proportional hazard analysis and logistic regression were employed to assess the associations with treatment outcomes, while adjusting for age, sex, weight, MM international staging system stage, ECOG-performance status, comorbidity count, and presence of gastrointestinal disorders. Pooled data involving 1804 patients revealed that 557 (32%) used PPIs at baseline. PPI use was independently associated with worse overall survival (adjusted HR [95% CI] 1.32 [1.08-1.62], P = 0.007) and grade ≥ 3 adverse events (adjusted OR [95% CI] 1.39 [1.03-1.88], P = 0.030). However, the association with progression-free survival did not reach statistical significance (adjusted HR [95% CI] 1.14 [0.97-1.33], P = 0.112). Findings were consistent across trials and treatment arms. PPI use was identified as a negative prognostic factor in MM patients, potentially enhancing clinical decisions regarding its use. Further research is needed to fully comprehend the impacts and safety of PPI use in MM patients.