Indirect treatment comparison of brexucabtagene autoleucel (ZUMA-2) versus standard of care (SCHOLAR-2) in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma

[T-cell recruiting immunotherapies in B-cell lymphoma - the future backbone for all therapy lines?]

The introduction of immunologically targeted therapies has represented a significant advancement in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas, particularly aggressive B-cell lymphoma. CD19 CAR-T cells such as Axicabtagen-Ciloleucel (Axi-cel) and Lisocabtagen Maraleucel (Liso-cel) have been approved since 2022 and 2023, respectively, for second-line therapy of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas (DLBCL), when there is primary refractory disease or relapse within 12 months after the end of first-line therapy. These therapies result in a significant improvement in progression-free survival compared to the previous standard therapy (salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation). Especially in elderly patients or patients with underlying medical conditions, CAR-T cell therapies like Axi-cel and Liso-cel demonstrate acceptable tolerability and high efficacy.Furthermore, bispecific T-cell-engaging antibodies ("bispecifics") such as Glofitamab, Epcoritamab, and Mosunetuzumab also represent promising treatment options for patients with relapsed disease after failure of second- or later line therapy and show efficacy even in a subset of patients relapsing after CD19 CAR-T cells. However, randomized study results for these substances are not yet available. They are expected to be used in earlier lines of therapy in the future, especially in combination with standard chemotherapy regimens. Common side effects of bispecific antibody therapies are cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune-mediated cytopenias, whereas immune-cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is relatively rare compared to CD19 CAR T cells. In summary, bispecifics represent a novel, highly effective immunotherapy for the treatment of lymphomas with a very favourable toxicity profile.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel (ZUMA-2) and Pirtobrutinib (BRUIN) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Previously Treated with a Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

INTRODUCTION

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) often require multiple lines of treatment and have a poor prognosis, particularly after failing covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (cBTKi) therapy. Newer treatments such as brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy) and pirtobrutinib (non-covalent BTKi) show promise in improving outcomes.

METHODS

Without direct comparative evidence, an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted to estimate the relative treatment effects of brexu-cel and pirtobrutinib for post-cBTKi R/R MCL. Using logistic propensity score models, individual patient-level data from ZUMA-2 brexu-cel-infused population (N = 68) were weighted to match pre-specified clinically relevant prognostic factors based on study-level data from the BRUIN cBTKi pre-treated cohort (N = 90). The base-case model incorporated the five most pertinent factors reported in ≥ 50% of both trial populations: morphology, MCL International Prognostic Index, number of prior lines of therapy, disease stage, and prior autologous stem cell transplant. A sensitivity analysis additionally incorporated TP53 mutation and Ki-67 proliferation. Relative treatment effects were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

In the base-case model, brexu-cel was associated with higher rates of objective response (OR 10.39 [95% CI 2.81-38.46]) and complete response (OR 10.11 [95% CI 4.26-24.00]), and improved progression-free survival (HR 0.44 [95% CI 0.25-0.75]), compared to pirtobrutinib. Overall survival and duration of response favored brexu-cel over pirtobrutinib but the differences crossed the bounds for statistical significance. Findings were consistent across the adjusted and unadjusted analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that brexu-cel may offer clinically and statistically significant benefits regarding objective response, complete response, and progression-free survival compared to pirtobrutinib among patients with R/R MCL after prior cBTKi therapy. Given the short follow-up and high degree of censoring in BRUIN, an analysis incorporating updated BRUIN data may provide more definitive overall survival results.

Basic notions about gene therapy from the nucleic acid perspective and applications in a pediatric disease: Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Gene therapy involves the introduction of genetic material into cells as a therapeutic molecule to cure a disease. Through the transfer of specific nucleic acid to the target tissue, gene expression can be downregulated, augmented, or corrected thanks to the nucleic acid sequence as a support of gene expression. This is achieved through molecular interactions according to the sequence arrangement or the secondary structure of the molecules or through their catalytic properties. Over the past two decades, the rapid advances of knowledge and technologies in gene therapy have led to the development of different strategies and to the extension of its use to numerous indications, including certain cancers. Major success has been achieved in clinical trials and the field of gene therapy is booming. Several gene therapy products are now on the market in Europe, the United States, and China. In this review, we cover the basic principles of gene therapy and the characteristics of the main vectors used to transfer genetic material into the cell. As an example of applications, we address the various strategies applied to a rare pediatric muscle disease: Duchenne muscular dystrophy. © 2023 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of French Society of Pediatrics.