Development of Care Pathways to Standardize and Optimally Integrate Multidisciplinary Care for Head and Neck Cancer

Malnutrition risk and oropharyngeal dysphagia in the chronic post-stroke phase

Background

Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) and malnutrition are associated with poor clinical outcomes after stroke. The present study evaluated (1) malnutrition risk and OD-related characteristics in patients with chronic post-stroke OD, and (2) the relationship between on the one hand OD severity and on the other hand functional oral intake and dysphagia-specific quality of life.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in a Dutch interdisciplinary outpatient clinic for OD. The standardized examination protocol comprised: clinical ear, nose, and throat examination, body mass index, the short nutritional assessment questionnaire (SNAQ), a standardized fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), the functional oral intake scale (FOIS), and the MD Anderson dysphagia inventory (MDADI).

Results

Forty-two consecutive patients with chronic post-stroke OD were included. Mean (±SD) age and BMI of the population were 69.1 (±8.7) years and 26.8 (±4.1) kg/m2 respectively. Seventeen (40.4%) patients presented a moderate to high risk of malnutrition (SNAQ score≥2). The FEES examination showed moderate to severe OD in 28 (66.7%) patients. The severity of OD was significantly related to the FOIS score but not to the MDADI scores.

Conclusion

In this specific sample of referred stroke patients, moderate to severe OD and moderate to high risk of malnutrition were common. Despite the use of clinical practice guidelines on stroke and a normal nutritional status at first sight, repeated screening for malnutrition and monitoring the severity and management of OD remain important elements in the care of patients with chronic post-stroke OD.

Head and neck cancer survivorship consensus statement from the American Head and Neck Society

OBJECTIVES

To provide a consensus statement describing best practices and evidence regarding head and neck cancer survivorship.

METHODS

Key topics regarding head and neck cancer survivorship were identified by the multidisciplinary membership of the American Head and Neck Society Survivorship, Supportive Care & Rehabilitation Service. Guidelines were generated by combining expert opinion and a review of the literature and categorized by level of evidence.

RESULTS

Several areas regarding survivorship including dysphonia, dysphagia, fatigue, chronic pain, intimacy, the ability to return to work, financial toxicity, lymphedema, psycho-oncology, physical activity, and substance abuse were identified and discussed. Additionally, the group identified and described the role of key clinicians in survivorship including surgical, medical and radiation oncologists; dentists; primary care physicians; psychotherapists; as well as physical, occupational, speech, and respiratory therapists.

CONCLUSION

Head and neck cancer survivorship is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach centered around patients and their caregivers. As survival related to head and neck cancer treatment improves, addressing post-treatment concerns appropriately is critically important to our patient's quality of life. There continues to be a need to define effective and efficient programs that can coordinate this multidisciplinary effort toward survivorship.

Quality improvement intervention to reduce time to postoperative radiation in head and neck free flap patients

BACKGROUND

Best-practice guidelines for head and neck cancer patients advise postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) initiation within 6 weeks of surgery. We report our institutional experience improving timeliness of adjuvant radiation in free-flap patients.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria in the 2017-2019 study period. We divided into "Early" (n = 19) and "Late" (n = 20) time-period groups to compare performance over time. The primary endpoint was time to PORT initiation, with success defined as <6 weeks.

RESULTS

The number of patients achieving timely PORT improved from 10.5% in the Early group to 50.0% in the Late group (p = 0.014). Patients undergoing concurrent adjuvant chemoradiation were more likely to meet the PORT target in the Late group (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

We ascribe this quality improvement in free-flap patients to increased communication among multidisciplinary care teams, proactive consultation referrals, and a targeted patient-navigator intervention. Though work is needed to further improve performance, insight gained from our experience may benefit other teams.

Interprofessional clinical pathway program effects on patient outcomes in the setting of neutropenic fever: An integrative review

PURPOSE

Neutropenic fever (NF) is an oncologic emergency linked to substantial healthcare costs, treatment delays, and increased patient mortality. Clinical pathways have emerged as a coordinated, interprofessional approach to NF management. The aim of this review was to examine the research question: What is the effect of an interprofessional clinical pathway program on outcomes (time-to-antibiotic, mortality, cost, readmissions and length of stay) in patients presenting with NF?

METHODS

Using the integrative review method of Whittemore and Knafl, the databases PubMed, CINAHL and Scopus were searched for articles published in English between 1997 to present that met the following criteria: (1) reported clinical pathway implementation, and (2) reported outcome data on patients 18 years or older who were diagnosed with NF.

RESULTS

Of the 17 included articles, 13 demonstrated improvement in reducing time-to-antibiotic following clinical pathway implementation. Three studies reported a reduction in mortality and two studies reported no change in patient mortality after NF clinical pathway integration. One study demonstrated a reduction in hospital readmissions, while three studies showed improvement in length of stay. None of the included studies reported data on cost reduction. Half of the articles articulated the different members of the interprofessional teams.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of interprofessional clinical pathway programs for NF had positive effects on patient outcomes in this review. Measuring patient and institutional outcomes is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of interprofessional clinical pathways in NF care. Future research should incorporate these measurements to improve the development and implementation of NF clinical pathways.

Neuro-Oncology Practice resources for optimizing care and practice in spinal oncology

As the diagnosis and treatment of systemic cancers continues to improve, increased patient survival has resulted in a rise in the number of patients who develop spinal metastases (SM). Within many areas of oncology, utilization of multidisciplinary care models in the management and decision making of SM patients has proven effective for optimizing care and improving patient safety. Three main goals of an effective clinical pathway include improving outcomes and quality, improving the patient experience, and lowering cost. This paper outlines the strategies employed to optimally establish such a collaborative program for the management of patients with SM, as well as direct providers in and out of the field, patients and caregivers, and practice managers to the appropriate resources.