Therapeutic collaboration and the assimilation of problematic experiences in emotion-focused therapy for depression: Comparison of two cases

A Distress-Processing Model for Clients in Suicidal Crisis

Background: While crisis intervention frameworks have indicated the importance of clients in suicidal crisis better understanding their distress to decrease suicidality, it is unclear how clients in suicidal crisis process their distress. Aims: To develop (Study 1) and validate (Study 2) a sequential distress-processing model for clients in suicidal crisis. Methods: Applying task analysis, Study 1 consisted of three phases, which resulted in a theoretically and empirically informed model. In Study 2, we examined the distress-processing model's validity using a longitudinal design. In both studies, data were online crisis chats with adults in suicidal crisis. Results: In Study 1, we developed a sequential five-stage distress-processing model: (Stage 1) unengaged with distress, (Stage 2) distress awareness, (Stage 3) distress clarity, (Stage 4) distress insight, and (Stage 5) applying distress insight. In Study 2, the model's validity was supported via evidence that (H1) progression through the processing stages was sequential and (H2) clients with good outcomes had greater progression in their processing than clients with poor outcomes. Limitation: Clients who were suicidal but did not disclose their suicidality were not included. Conclusion: Our findings provide a framework for conceptualizing and operationalizing how clients move through suicidal crises, which can facilitate intervention and research developments.

Is the quality of therapeutic collaboration associated with the assimilation of problematic experiences progress? A comparison of two cases

OBJECTIVE

How are collaborative interactions associated with clients' progress in therapy? This study addressed this question, by assessing the quality of therapeutic collaboration and comparing it passage by passage with the clients' assimilation of problematic experiences in two cases of major depression treated with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, one recovered and one improved-but-not-recovered.

METHOD

We used the Therapeutic Collaboration Coding System to code collaborative work and the Assimilation of Problematic Experiences Scale (APES) to rate clients' progress. In both cases, for the distribution of specific collaborative therapeutic exchanges, we tested for the difference of empirical means between lower and higher APES levels.

RESULTS

Both cases progress in APES, but in contrast with Annie (Improved-but-not-recovered), Kate (Recovered) achieved higher levels of change in last sessions. In addition, we found significant differences in the types of collaborative therapeutic exchanges associated with lower and higher APES levels.

CONCLUSION

Ambivalent therapeutic exchanges distinguished the recovered case from the not recovered case highlighting a source of difficulties in facilitating therapeutic change in CBT. In addition, observations in these cases supported the theoretical suggestion that supporting interventions would be better accepted at lower APES levels, whereas challenging interventions would be better accepted at higher APES levels.

Therapist's interventions immediately after exceeding the client's therapeutic zone of proximal development: A comparative case study

OBJECTIVE

When therapists' proposals are too demanding exceeding clients' readiness to move into change, clients may resist advancing. We aimed to understand how a therapist behaved immediately after the client resisted advancing into change within Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy.

METHODS

We analyzed a recovered and an unrecovered case, both with Major Depression, and followed by the same therapist. Through the Therapeutic Collaboration Coding System, we analyzed 407 exchanges of interest.

RESULTS

In both cases, clients resisted more in advancing at intermediate sessions, mainly by the therapist's challenges to raise insight and debate cognitive beliefs in the recovered case, and to seek experiential meanings in the unrecovered case. Immediately after clients resisted advancing, the therapist tended to insist on challenging them in the same direction. In the recovered case, the therapist did so continually throughout the therapy, sometimes balancing between insisting or stepping back. In the unrecovered case, the therapist insisted on challenging, but mostly at the final session. Occasionally, the therapist insisted on challenging, and clients resisted over consecutive exchanges.

CONCLUSION

Our results reinforce that to enact progress and change clients need to be pushed into change, however it requires therapists' skillful assessment of clients' tolerance to move in time.

Therapeutic Collaboration in Career Construction Counseling: Case Studies of an Integrative Model

The mapping of therapeutic collaboration throughout counseling deepens our understanding of how the helping relationship fosters client change. To better understand the process of career construction counseling (CCC), we analyzed the therapeutic collaboration on six successful face-to-face cases. The participants were six Portuguese adults, five women and one man, real clients of a career counseling service, and four psychologists, three female and one male trained in the career intervention model. The participants completed demographic questions and measures of career certainty, vocational identity, career indecision, and psychological functioning. The Therapeutic Collaboration Coding System was used to track collaboration throughout all interactive episodes. The clinical significance of the intervention was calculated by analyzing pre-post-test statistical differences for each case, with the Reliable Change Index and Z score. The findings evidenced a pattern of therapeutic collaboration evolution for good outcome cases. Based on this pattern, we propose a model of process-outcome evolution for the three phases of CCC.

Why setbacks are compatible with progress in assimilating problematic themes: Illustrations from the case of Alicia

Objective: This theory-building case study investigated setbacks in assimilation, seeking to replicate and elaborate previous work, in which most setbacks were one of two types, balance strategy (BS) or exceeding the therapeutic zone of proximal development (TZPD). Method: We studied the case of Alicia, a 26 year-old woman, treated successfully for depression. Her main problematic experiences were rated with the Assimilation of Problematic Experiences Scale (APES), and 267 setbacks were identified. We classified the setbacks and examined them quantitatively and qualitatively. Results: Alicia showed the usual irregular progress of assimilation, with generally increasing APES ratings, consistent with the improvements in outcome measures. Almost all setbacks could be distinguished as BS or TZPD. Replicating a previously observed pattern, BS setback passages tended to be at or above APES stage 3, whereas TZPD setback passages tended to be below APES stage 3. BS and TZPD setbacks also drew qualitatively different characterizations. Conclusion: Results represented a conceptual replication of previous work, explainable using the same theoretical tenets. As an integral part of therapeutic work, setbacks do not impede progress in therapy. BS and TZPD setbacks reflect different processes and have different implications for how therapist and client are working together.

Therapist's actions after therapeutic collaboration breaks: a single case study

Aim: This study analyzes how a therapist contributed to therapeutic collaboration reestablishment by describing his actions after therapeutic collaboration breaks in a recovered completer clinical case. Method: Data was collected from a narrative therapy case with the diagnosis of depression spanning 19 sessions. We identified sequences in which therapeutic collaboration breaks were re-established (or not) through the Therapeutic Collaboration Coding System. We analyzed the therapist's actions after the therapeutic collaboration breaks through Conversation Analysis. Results: Typically, the therapist maintained the action that preceded the therapeutic collaboration break. When he did so by proposing a new meaning to the client's experience or by highlighting the client's agency, the therapeutic collaboration was usually re-established; however, when he did so by guiding or making exploratory questions to deepen the client's experience, the therapeutic collaboration was usually not re-established. When the therapist retreated from his previous action, the therapeutic collaboration tended to be re-established, mainly when he reflected the client's previous turn. Conclusion: This study suggests that more important than maintaining or retreating from the previous action is how the therapist does so. The therapist's actions of acknowledging the client's experience and agency contributed to therapeutic collaboration reestablishment.

Does assimilation of problematic experiences predict a decrease in symptom intensity?

The assimilation model describes therapeutic change as an integration of experiences that had previously been problematic, distressing, avoided, or warded off. This study assessed whether assimilation was associated with treatment outcome in a sample of psychotherapeutic treatments for depression. Further, it assessed the direction of the association—whether increasing assimilation predicted decreases in symptom intensity or decreasing symptom intensity predicted increases in assimilation.

Method

Participants were 22 clients with mild to moderate depression drawn from a clinical trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy with emotion‐focused therapy. The direction of prediction between assimilation progress and changes in self‐reported symptom intensity was assessed.

Results

The assimilation progress was shown to be a better predictor of decreases in symptom intensity than the reverse.

Conclusion

The results supported the assimilation model's suggestion that assimilation progress promotes decreases in symptom intensity in the treatment of clients with major depressive disorder.

Elaborating the assimilation model: Introduction to a special section on case studies of setbacks within sessions and therapeutic collaboration

This article introduces a Special Section of case studies that focus on therapeutic collaboration and setbacks in the process of assimilation with the aim of contributing to the evolution of the assimilation model of therapeutic change. The first study examined setbacks in two depression cases (a good vs. a poor outcome) treated with emotion-focused therapy. The second article traced how therapist activities and positions toward internal voices were associated with setbacks in a case treated with linguistic therapy of evaluation. The third article studied contributions of therapeutic collaboration for both advances and setbacks in assimilation in two contrasting cases treated with emotion-focused therapy. The fourth and final article analyzed the therapeutic collaboration in episodes of ambivalence in two cases of narrative therapy (one good outcome, one poor outcome) reflecting on the implications for the assimilation model's perspective on the therapeutic relationship. This Introduction concludes by offering some suggestions for theory-building within the assimilation model.

Setbacks in the process of assimilation of problematic experiences in two cases of emotion-focused therapy for depression

OBJECTIVE

Research on the assimilation model has suggested that psychological change takes place in a sequence of stages punctuated by setbacks, that is, by transient reversals in the developmental course. This study analyzed such setbacks in one good outcome case and one poor outcome case of Emotion-focused therapy (EFT) for depression.

METHOD

Intensive analyses of five transcribed sessions from each case identified 26 setbacks in the good outcome case and 27 in the poor outcome case. The reason for each setback was classified into one of four categories: balance strategy, exceeding the therapeutic zone of proximal development either induced by the therapist (ZPD-T) or induced by the client (ZPD-C), or spontaneous switches.

RESULTS

In the good outcome case the most frequent reasons for setbacks were balance strategy and spontaneous switches, whereas in the poor outcome case the most frequent reason for setbacks was ZPD-T.

CONCLUSIONS

As in previously studied therapies, setbacks in EFT, usually represent productive work on relatively less advanced strands of the client's major problems. Results point to the importance of the therapist attending to the limits of the client's therapeutic ZPD.