Patients' perspective on aspirin during pregnancy: a survey

Implementation of aspirin use during pregnancy in community midwifery-led care in the Netherlands: A pilot survey

INTRODUCTION

Aspirin nowadays is widely used in pregnancy, but implementation among gynecologists took nearly four decades. For a complete insight in the implementation of aspirin, community midwives are to be involved. Community midwives do not have authority to prescribe aspirin and have to refer to a general practitioner or consultant obstetrician for a prescription.

METHODS

The study was an online, national pilot survey about the implementation of aspirin use during pregnancy among independently practicing community midwives consisting of 29 items with five categories: background, advising, prescribing, possible indications, and clinical practice.

RESULTS

Forty-seven community midwives completed the survey between April and May 2021. All respondents had experience on advising aspirin use in pregnancy. History of preterm pre-eclampsia or HELLP syndrome was identified as a risk factor for developing utero-placental complications by 97.9% of the community midwives. Moderate risk factors in women with otherwise low-risk pregnancy were identified by >75% of the participants. Practical issues in prescribing aspirin were experienced by one-third of the respondents. Suggestions were made to obtain authority for community midwives to prescribe aspirin and improve collaboration with consultant obstetricians and general practitioners.

CONCLUSIONS

Community midwives seem to be adequate in identifying risk factors for developing utero-placental complications in women with otherwise low-risk pregnancy. Practical issues for prescribing aspirin occur often. Obtaining authority for community midwives to prescribe aspirin after education should be considered and consulting a consultant obstetrician should become more accessible to overcome the practical issues. Further educating community midwives and general practitioners might improve implementation rates and perinatal outcomes.

Improved implementation of aspirin in pregnancy among Dutch gynecologists: Surveys in 2016 and 2021

Objective

To evaluate the implementation of low-dose aspirin in pregnancy for the prevention of utero-placental complications among gynecologists in the Netherlands between 2016 and 2021. In this timeframe, a national guideline about aspirin in pregnancy was introduced by the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Materials and methods

A national online survey among Dutch gynecologists and residents was performed. An online questionnaire was distributed among the members of the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology in April 2016 and April 2021. Main outcome measure was the proportion of gynecologists indicating prescription of aspirin in pregnancy for high and moderate risk indications.

Results

In 2016, 133 respondents completed the survey, and in 2021 231. For all indications mentioned in the guideline there was an increase in prescribing aspirin in 2021 in comparison to 2016. More specifically, the percentage of gynecologists prescribing aspirin for a history of preeclampsia before 34 weeks, between 34 and 37 weeks and at term increased from respectively 94% to 100%, 39% to 98%, and 15% to 97%. Consultant obstetricians and respondents working in an university hospital did not more often indicate the prescription of aspirin for tertiary care indications in 2021. Future use of a prediction model was suggested in the narrative comments.

Conclusion

Implementation of aspirin in pregnancy among Dutch gynecologists substantially improved after a five year timeframe in which the national guideline on aspirin during pregnancy was introduced and trials confirming the effect of aspirin were published.

Assessment of adherence to aspirin for preeclampsia prophylaxis and reasons for nonadherence

BACKGROUND

Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disease unique to pregnancy and has a significant impact on maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Daily aspirin has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of preeclampsia. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends daily low-dose aspirin, ideally before 16 weeks' gestation, in at-risk patients for preeclampsia risk reduction. This study examined whether patients at-risk for preeclampsia by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria recalled aspirin recommendation and factors associated with treatment adherence.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined whether patients at-risk for preeclampsia by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria recalled aspirin recommendation and factors associated with treatment adherence.

STUDY DESIGN

This study used an anonymous written survey. Pregnant patients were asked to record self-reported risk factors and to recall recommendation to take aspirin for preeclampsia prophylaxis. Participants were then determined to be high-, moderate-, or low-risk on the basis of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines. Self-reported adherence to recommendations and factors contributing to the patients' decisions to take or decline aspirin were assessed. Secondary outcomes included demographic characteristics of adherent patients and patients who did not recall aspirin recommendation.

RESULTS

A total of 544 surveys were distributed and 500 were returned (91.9% response rate). Of the 104 high-risk pregnancies identified, aspirin was recommended in 60 (57.7%; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.67). Of the 269 patients with 2 or more moderate-risk factors, aspirin was recommended for 13 (4.8%; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.08). Among the participants who recalled aspirin recommendation, adherence was similar between high-risk (81.7%) and moderate-risk (76.9%) groups (P=.69). Patients with chronic hypertension, a history of preeclampsia or gestational hypertension in a previous pregnancy, and pregestational diabetes mellitus were most likely to report receiving aspirin recommendation (78.8%, 76.5%, 63.8%, and 53.3%, respectively). No high-risk factor was associated with a decreased likelihood of adherence. Nonadherent patients rarely discussed their decision with their medical provider (5.9%). In the 42.3% of high-risk participants who did not recall aspirin recommendation, autoimmune disease, multiple gestation, and kidney disease were the most prevalent risk factors (42.9%, 35.7%, and 25.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In the population studied, many at-risk patients, as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria, did not recall recommendations to take aspirin for preeclampsia prophylaxis. This raises concerns for absent or ineffective counseling. Of the patients who recalled aspirin recommendation, most reported adherence, and a history of hypertensive disorders or preeclampsia, autoimmune disease, and pregestational diabetes mellitus were most often associated with adherence. There was no single factor most strongly associated with intentional nonadherence.

Informational needs related to aspirin prophylactic therapy amongst pregnant women at risk of preeclampsia - A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

Despite being key to reducing the occurrence of pre-eclampsia in high-risk women, adherence to aspirin prophylaxis is low, reflecting multifactorial challenges faced by pregnant women. It is therefore important to understand the barriers and facilitators of aspirin adherence in pregnancy. This sub-analysis of a qualitative study conducted to better understand barriers and facilitators of aspirin adherence was set to describe informational needs related to aspirin use in pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

A qualitative study was conducted with 14 postnatal women from North-East of England, who declared various levels of non-adherence to aspirin (0-5/7 prescribed). A thematic framework analysis of semi-structured interviews was used.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Emerging themes associated with informational needs about aspirin use in pregnancy.

RESULTS

Main themes identified a) Informational needs, b) Nature of the information seeking behaviour (active vs passive), c) Sources of information, d) Preferred format of information, e) Partners seeking knowledge. Not all women actively seek information; some choose not to pursue it as they find thinking of hypothetical risks disturbing. When information is accessed, women use a wide range of informational resources from scientific articles and National Health Services website to social media sources and word-of-mouth. Women admit that reading leaflets can be difficult, preferring to receive information in interactive ways. Although partners seek information about risks and risk reduction strategies, they are often not included in conversations with health care professionals.

CONCLUSION

New interactive and accessible informational resources are needed to engage pregnant women and their partners in aspirin prophylactic therapy.