Soldier, civilian, criminal: identifying pathways to offending of ex-armed forces personnel in prison

Psychosocial factors associated with psychological distress and functional difficulties in recently transitioned and current serving regular Australian Defence Force members

The transition period from military-to-civilian life can be one of the most significant and stressful periods in the military life cycle. We explore the psychosocial factors associated with psychological distress and functional impairment among those who recently transitioned from the Australian Defence Force (ADF) and those currently serving in 2015. Using data from the Transition and Wellbeing Research Programme, multinomial logistic regression models were used to analyze the associations between a combined measure of psychological distress and functional impairment (K10/SDS) with various psychosocial, lifestyle, and physical health factors. There were 10,210 in the final analytic cohort (Transitioned=3,254; Regular 2015 ADF=6,956). Overall, the odds of belonging to the highly distressed/impaired group were greatest among those with insomnia (Odds Ratio 18.53), low resilience (OR 7.67), physical health symptoms (OR 7.16), and alcohol risk (OR 4.67). Other factors included pain (OR 3.36), financial issues (OR 2.38), and social strain (OR 1.98). The associations with insomnia and physical health symptoms were stronger among the Transitioned compared to the Regular 2015 ADF. Results of this research highlights the importance of taking a multi-dimensional perspective of symptoms in military populations, particularly in those recently transitioned from permanent service, as predictors of future risk of disorder.

Demystifying the "Victimized State": A Civil-Military Crisis in Waiting?

The purpose of this article is to illustrate prescient issues relating to current and ex-military communities in the United Kingdom who have featured heavily within the policy arena over the past decade in relation to several key areas of importance. It will be illustrated how this population becomes visible within the public imagination (via military losses), how discourses relating to the harms they experience are structured and articulated within political and policy domains (particularly in relation to mental health) via “state talk” (qua Sim), and what the potential social consequences are for politically rendering an unproblematized populist view of current and ex-military communities (i.e., pending crises). This argument is made with the express intention of reengaging critical recognition of the distancing of the military institution from the physical and psychological vulnerability of those who have participated in war and military environments. This is an argument returned to pertinence from the recent publication of the Chilcot Inquiry into British involvement in the Iraq war.