Capturing the sublimity of a free radical gas

A critical assessment of the neurodestructive and neuroprotective effects of nitric oxide

Whether nitric oxide is cytodestructive or cytoprotective is of obvious clinical importance. The debate on this subject in the past decade has generated much "heat and light". This paper focuses on the actions of NO on the nervous system and reexamines the controversial issue and the contribution of the authors and their colleagues in the light of recent findings. We also report new findings, critically assesses previous experimental data, and share perspectives on this important subject.

Hypothesis: proteasomal dysfunction: a primary event in neurogeneration that leads to nitrative and oxidative stress and subsequent cell death

It is proposed that a primary mechanism leading to neuronal cell death in common neurodegenerative diseases is interference with proteasome function. This can involve genetic defects, direct inactivation of the proteasome (e.g., by reactive oxygen species), or overloading with proteins. The latter can be caused by excessive production of normal proteins or by the formation of poorly degradable proteins as a result of genetic mutations, faulty posttranslational modification, or protein modification by reactive oxygen or nitrogen species. Blockage of the proteasome leads to increased oxidative and nitrative stress, the latter apparently due to upregulation of nitric oxide synthase. Thus, agents that increase proteasome function may be generally neuroprotective, as may be NOS inhibitors. Proteasome inhibitors should be used with caution as therapeutic agents.