Improved quality of life following constraint-induced movement therapy is associated with gains in arm use, but not motor improvement

Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of upper extremity outcome measures in chronic stroke patients with moderate to severe impairment: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Approximately 70% of chronic stroke patients experience upper extremity (UE) functional impairments, and UE outcome measures are often used as quality-of-life indicators.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to estimate minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values for UE outcome measures in chronic stroke patients with moderate to severe UE hemiplegia.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional study, conducted as a secondary analysis of data from the ReoGo-J study, a multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel-group trial of robot-assisted self-training for UE hemiplegia in chronic stroke. The patients were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups. Treatment was provided 3 times a week for 10 weeks, and UE outcome measures were evaluated before and after treatment. The anchor-based method was used to estimate MCID values for UE outcome measures, with Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) subscales as anchors. MCID values were estimated by identifying cutoff values in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

Between-group comparisons of UE outcome measures, based on the clinically important difference (CID) values of SIS subscales, revealed significant differences in both the Amount of Use (AOU) and Quality of Movement (QOM) components of the Motor Activity Log (MAL)-14. The estimated MCID values were 0.89 for the AOU component and 0.77 for the QOM component.

CONCLUSIONS

The estimated MCID values for the MAL-14 not only add information regarding the clinical characteristics of the MAL-14 but also facilitate interpretations of changing scores in chronic stroke patients with moderate to severe UE hemiplegia undergoing rehabilitation therapy.

STUDY REGISTRATION

https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm (UMIN000022509; 1 July 2016).

Indirect causal path from motor function to quality of life through daily use of the affected arm poststroke after task-specific training: a longitudinal mediation analysis

PURPOSE

Task-specific training generally targets motor function, with the ultimate goal of improving quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to determine whether motor function indirectly affects QoL through daily use of the affected arm and activities of daily living (ADL) in patients with chronic stroke.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 155 patients who received training for 90-120 min/session, 3-5 sessions/week, for 4-6 weeks. The training involved specific mirror or robot-assisted therapy, followed by functional task practice for 15-30 min in each session. Patients were assessed before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

At both pre-test and post-test, significant indirect effects of motor function on QoL through daily use of the affect arm and ADL were observed (β = 0.087-0.124). When the change scores of the measures between the pre-test and post-test were used, significant mediating effects of daily arm use on the relationship between motor function and QoL were identified (β = 0.094-0.103).

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced motor function after intervention may lead to an increase in arm use for daily activities and subsequently result in an improvement in QoL. These results highlight the critical role of daily arm use in task-specific training aimed at improving QoL.

Engaging in a home-based exercise program: a mixed-methods approach to identify motivators and barriers for individuals with stroke

Community-dwelling individuals with chronic stroke used a novel, portable rehabilitation system, mRehab, that uses a smartphone app coupled with 3D printed objects resembling daily use items. The objectives of this study include evaluating participant's approach and nature of engagement with mRehab and identifying factors that influenced the users' engagement with mRehab. An explanatory mixed-method approach was used. In the first phase, 16 participants used mRehab at home for six weeks; six participants were recruited from the first phase for in-depth interviews. Participants were categorized into High, Moderate, and Low Frequency groups based on their frequency of mRehab use. High frequency of use was not related to improved performance on clinical assessments; instead, High Frequency users more commonly initiated performance of new activities after the mRehab program compared to participants with lower frequency of use. Useful activities that are challenging and meaningful to the participants, and availability of objective feedback for self-monitoring were some of the motivators for mRehab use. Difficulty with time management, lack of caregiver availability, and difficulties with the design of the system posed as barriers to mRehab use. Tailoring home programs to the recipients' needs including perceived meaningfulness of the activities is key for long-term rehabilitation.

The relationship between Rating of Everyday Arm-use in the Community and Home (REACH) scale affected arm-use assessment, activity and participation after stroke

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

While arm function has been traditionally used as a primary goal for upper extremity rehabilitation post-stroke, we propose a simple measure of arm use, which may translate into better activities and participation. The aim was to determine the relationship between arm use and measures of activity and participation.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study with evaluative components involving community-dwelling individuals with chronic stroke. The Rating of Everyday Arm-Use in the Community and Home (REACH) Scale was used to assess affected arm use, Barthel Index and activity domain of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) for activities, and participation domain of the SIS for participation. The participants were also asked if they resumed driving after the stroke.

RESULTS

Forty-nine individuals (mean age = 70.3 ± 11.5 years, male sex = 51%) living with the effects of a stroke for at least 3 months participated in this study. There was a positive relationship between affected arm use and activities (Barthel Index score - rs  = 0.464; SIS activities - rs  = 0.686), participation (rs  = 0.479), and driving (rs  = 0.581). The Barthel Index scores were higher for individuals with dominant arm hemiparesis (p = 0.003) or left hemisphere lesions (p = 0.005). There was also greater arm use in left hemisphere lesions (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Affected arm use in individuals with chronic stroke is related to activities and participation. Given the importance of arm use in activities and participation after stroke, rehabilitation therapists may consider utilizing the REACH Scale, a simple and quick outcome measure, as a means to assess arm use and implement effective interventions for improving arm use.

Quantitative measurement of finger usage in stroke hemiplegia using ring-shaped wearable devices

BACKGROUND

In post-stroke rehabilitation, positive use of affected limbs in daily life is important to improve affected upper-limb function. Several studies have quantitatively evaluated the amount of upper-limb activity, but few have measured finger usage. In this study, we used a ring-shaped wearable device to measure upper-limb and finger usage simultaneously in hospitalized patients with hemiplegic stroke and investigated the association between finger usage and general clinical evaluation.

METHODS

Twenty patients with hemiplegic stroke in an inpatient hospital participated in this study. All patients wore a ring-shaped wearable device on both hands for 9 h on the day of the intervention, and their finger and upper-limb usage were recorded. For the rehabilitation outcome assessments, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function (STEF), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Motor Activity Log-14 (MAL), and Functional Independence Measure Motor (FIM-m) were performed and evaluated on the same day as the intervention.

RESULTS

Finger usage of the affected hand was moderately correlated with STEF ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and STEF ratio ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). The finger-usage ratio was moderately correlated with FMA-UE ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and ARAT ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), and strongly correlated with STEF ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and STEF ratio ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). The upper-limb usage of the affected side was moderately correlated with FMA-UE ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), STEF ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and STEF ratio ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), and strongly correlated with ARAT ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). The upper-limb usage ratio was moderately correlated with ARAT ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and STEF ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), and strongly correlated with the STEF ratio ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). By contrast, there was no correlation between MAL and any of the measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

This measurement technique provided useful information that was not biased by the subjectivity of the patients and therapists.

Progress in the clinical application of constraint-induced therapy following stroke since 2014

Stroke is a group of cerebrovascular diseases with high prevalence and mortality rate. Stroke can induce many impairments, including motor and cognitive dysfunction, aphasia/dysarthria, dysphagia, and mood disorders, which may reduce the quality of life among the patients. Constraint-induced therapy has been proven to be an effective treatment method for stroke rehabilitation. It has been widely used in the recovery of limb motor dysfunction, aphasia, and other impairment like unilateral neglect after stroke. In recent years, constraint-induced therapy can also combine with telehealth and home rehabilitation. In addition, constraint-induced therapy produces significant neuroplastic changes in the central nervous system. Functional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and other imaging/electrophysiology methods have been used to clarify the mechanism and neuroplasticity. However, constraint-induced therapy has some limitations. It can only be used under certain conditions, and the treatment time and effectiveness are controversial. Further research is needed to clarify the mechanism and effectiveness of CI therapy.

Additional therapy promotes a continued pattern of improvement in upper-limb function and independence post-stroke

BACKGROUND

Upper-limb motor impairment after stroke is common and disabling. Growing evidence suggests that rehabilitation is effective in the chronic period. However, there is limited knowledge on the effects of ongoing targeted rehabilitation programs on patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the effects of delivering two programs of dose-matched evidence-based upper-limb rehabilitation to community-dwelling post-acute stroke patients with low, moderate and high motor-function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

12 patients (2 female) aged 50.5±18.2 years and 13.8±10.8 months post-stroke completed 2-weeks of modified-Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy followed by 2-weeks of Wii-based Movement Therapy after a mean interval of 9.6±1.1 months (range 6-19months). Function was assessed at 6 time points (i.e. before and after each therapy program and 6-month follow-up after each program). Primary outcome measures were the Wolf Motor Function Test timed-tasks (WMFT-tt), upper-limb Fugl-Meyer Assessment (F-M) and the Motor Activity Log Quality of Movement Scale (MALQOM). Improvement and maintenance was analyzed using Paired T-Tests and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests.

RESULTS

Upper-limb function significantly improved on all primary outcome measures with the first therapy program (WMFT-tt p=0.008, F-M p=0.007 and MALQOM p<0.0001). All scores continued to improve with the second therapy program with significant improvements in the F-M (p=0.048) and the MALQOM (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

All patients showed a pattern of continued improvement in upper-limb motor-function and independence in activities of daily living. These improvements demonstrate the benefit of ongoing post-stroke rehabilitation for community-dwelling stroke survivors for individuals of varying baseline functional status.

Psychometric Properties of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Scale in Post-Stroke Patients-Spanish Population

The validation of measuring instruments in the field of health is a requirement before they can be used safely and reliably. The action research arm test (ARAT) tool is an instrument validated in numerous countries and languages and for different populations, and its use is widespread. The objective of this research was to determine the psychometric properties of ARAT for a sample composed of post-stroke patients. To achieve this, a psychometric analysis was performed, where internal consistency tests were carried out using Cronbach's alpha, correlations between items and item-total and half-level tests to verify their reliability. Regarding validity, criteria validity tests were performed, taking the motor function dimension of the Fugl-Meyer scale as gold standard, and convergent validity tests were performed by correlation with the FIM-FAM, ECVI-38 and Lawton and Brody scales. The results showed very good internal consistency as well as good criterion and convergent validity. In conclusion, the ARAT can be considered a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of upper limb function in post-stroke patients.

Proprioceptive based training or modified constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity motor functions in chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: The Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) method is a unilateral training that respectively avoids and activates less affected and affected sides of upper extremities; however, the selected options are not typically ideal. Proprioceptive based training (PT) includes bilateral training methods and influencing proprioceptive receptors. OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose was to determine if conventional therapy and PT or conventional therapy and mCIMT therapy show similar improvement in patients with chronic stroke. The secondary purpose was to investigate the effectiveness of conventional therapy and PT or mCIMT therapy in patients with chronic stroke and to compare which of the two interventions is more effective. METHODS: Forty patients with chronic stroke were randomly allocated to only conventional therapy (PTR, n = 14), conventional therapy plus proprioception training (PTR-PT, n = 13), and mCIMT (PTR-mCIMT, n = 13) groups. Evaluations were assessed before and 6 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Intragroup evaluations revealeda significant improvement in the all scores in the PTR-PT and PTR-mCMIT groups (p = 0.006 < 0.001). Intergroup comparisons demonstrated that the PTR-mCIMT group had a significant improvement in spasticity and motor function scores compared to the PTR (p < 0.001) and the PTR-PT groups (p = 0.006–0.015). CONCLUSIONS: PT and mCMIT applied in addition to conventional therapy in patients with chronic stroke were more effective than only conventional therapy. Additionally, mCMIT showed greater improvement in spasticity and motor function scales than PT.

Suitability of accelerometry as an objective measure for upper extremity use in stroke patients

Background

Upper limb (UL) paresis is one of the most common stroke consequences and significantly restricts patients in everyday life. Instruments objectively measuring direct arm use in stroke patients are lacking, but might be helpful to understand patients’ impairment. Aiming to examine whether accelerometry is a suitable objective measure for everyday UL use in stroke patients, we conducted a systematic review on the association between accelerometer-derived measurements and clinical scales.

Methods

Articles were systematically searched in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, PeDro and LIVIVO through December 12^th, 2021, screened for inclusion by AH, and subsequently independently screened by CK and MK. Disagreements were discussed until consensus. We included English and German peer-reviewed articles dealing with the validity of accelerometers as a measurement of UL use in stroke patients and eligible systematic reviews. Studies exclusively using accelerometry as an outcome parameter, book contributions, conference abstracts and case studies were excluded. Data extraction was conducted by AH and confirmed by CK focussing on study type, objective, accelerometer device, sample size, stroke status, assessments conducted, measurement method, wearing time and key results. We analysed all eligible articles regarding the correlation between accelerometry and other clinical assessments and the validity in accordance with the type of accelerometer.

Results

Excluding duplicates, the initial search yielded 477 records. In the 34 eligible studies accelerometers was used with a predominance of tri-axial accelerometery (n = 12) and only few with two-axial application (n = 4). Regarding measures to examine association to accelerometer data different clinical scales were applied depending on the setting, the degree of impairment and/or the status of stroke. Cut-off values to determine correlations varied largely; most significant correlations are reported for the MAL [Range 0.31- 0.84] and the ARAT [Range 0.15–0.79].

Conclusions

Accelerometers can provide reliable data about daily arm use frequency but do not supply information about the movements´ quality and restrictions on everyday activities of stroke patients. Depending on the context, it is advisable to use both, accelerometry and other clinical measures. According to the literature there is currently no accelerometer device most suitable to measure UL activity. High correlations indicate that multi-dimensional accelerometers should be preferred.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02743-w.

Robot-Assisted Training as Self-Training for Upper-Limb Hemiplegia in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine whether robotic self-training improved upper-extremity function versus conventional self-training in mild-to-moderate hemiplegic chronic stroke patients.

METHODS

Study design was a multi-center, prospective, randomized, parallel-group study comparing three therapist-guided interventions (1-hour sessions, 3×/wk, 10 weeks). We identified 161 prospective patients with chronic, poststroke, upper-limb hemiplegia treated at participating rehabilitation centers. Patients were enrolled between November 29, 2016, and November 12, 2018 in Japan. A blinded web-based allocation system was used to randomly assign 129 qualifying patients into 3 groups: (1) conventional self-training plus conventional therapy (control, N=42); (2) robotic self-training (ReoGo-J) plus conventional therapy (robotic therapy [RT], N=44); or (3) robotic self-training plus constraint-induced movement therapy (N=43).

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper-extremity.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Motor Activity Log-14 amount of use and quality of movement; Fugl-Meyer Assessment shoulder/elbow/forearm, wrist, finger, and coordination scores; Action Research Arm Test Score; Motricity Index; Modified Ashworth Scale; shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and finger range of motion; and Stroke Impact Scale (the assessors were blinded). Safety outcomes were adverse events.

RESULTS

Safety was assessed in 127 patients. An intention-to-treat full analysis set (N=121), and a per-protocol set (N=115) of patients who attended 80% of sessions were assessed. One severe adverse event was recorded, unrelated to the robotic device. No significant differences in Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper-extremity scores were observed between groups (RT versus control: -1.04 [95% CI, -2.79 to 0.71], P=0.40; RT versus movement therapy: -0.33 [95% CI, -2.02 to 1.36], P=0.90). The RT in the per-protocol set improved significantly in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper-extremity shoulder/elbow/forearm score (RT versus control: -1.46 [95% CI, -2.63 to -0.29]; P=0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic self-training did not improve upper-limb function versus usual self-training, but may be effective combined with conventional therapy in some populations (per-protocol set).

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr; Unique identifier: UMIN000022509.

Relationship Between Body-Specific Attention to a Paretic Limb and Real-World Arm Use in Stroke Patients: A Longitudinal Study

Learned nonuse is a major problem in upper limb (UL) rehabilitation after stroke. Among the various factors that contribute to learned nonuse, recent studies have focused on body representation of the paretic limb in the brain. We previously developed a method to measure body-specific attention, as a marker of body representation of the paretic limb and revealed a decline in body-specific attention to the paretic limb in chronic stroke patients by a cross-sectional study. However, longitudinal changes in body-specific attention and paretic arm use in daily life (real-world arm use) from the onset to the chronic phase, and their relationship, remain unknown. Here, in a longitudinal, prospective, observational study, we sought to elucidate the longitudinal changes in body-specific attention to the paretic limb and real-world arm use, and their relationship, by using accelerometers and psychophysical methods, respectively, in 25 patients with subacute stroke. Measurements were taken at baseline (TBL), 2 weeks (T2w), 1 month (T1M), 2 months (T2M), and 6 months (T6M) after enrollment. UL function was measured using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Real-world arm use was measured using accelerometers on both wrists. Body-specific attention was measured using a visual detection task. The UL function and real-world arm use improved up to T6M. Longitudinal changes in body-specific attention were most remarkable at T1M. Changes in body-specific attention up to T1M correlated positively with changes in real-world arm use up to T6M, and from T1M to T6M, and the latter more strongly correlated with changes in real-world arm use. Changes in real-world arm use up to T2M correlated positively with changes in FMA up to T2M and T6M. No correlation was found between body-specific attention and FMA scores. Thus, these results suggest that improved body-specific attention to the paretic limb during the early phase contributes to increasing long-term real-world arm use and that increased real-world use is associated with the recovery of UL function. Our results may contribute to the development of rehabilitation strategies to enhance adaptive changes in body representation in the brain and increase real-world arm use after stroke.

Predictors of Clinically Important Improvements in Motor Function and Daily Use of Affected Arm after a Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Patients with Chronic Stroke

Identifying patients who can gain minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in active motor function in the affected upper extremity (UE) after a botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injection for post-stroke spasticity is important. Eighty-eight participants received a BoNT-A injection in the affected UE. Two outcome measures, Fugl–Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Motor Activity Log (MAL), were assessed at pre-injection and after 24 rehabilitation sessions. We defined favorable response as an FMA-UE change score ≥5 or MAL change score ≥0.5.Statistical analysis revealed that the time since stroke less than 36 months (odds ratio (OR) = 4.902 (1.219–13.732); p = 0.023) was a significant predictor of gaining MCID in the FMA-UE. Medical Research Council scale -proximal UE (OR = 1.930 (1.004–3.710); p = 0.049) and post-injection duration (OR = 1.039 (1.006–1.074); p =0.021) were two significant predictors of MAL amount of use. The time since stroke less than 36 months (OR = 3.759 (1.149–12.292); p = 0.028), naivety to BoNT-A (OR = 3.322 (1.091–10.118); p = 0.035), and education years (OR = 1.282 (1.050–1.565); p = 0.015) were significant predictors of MAL quality of movement. The findings of our study can help optimize BoNT-A treatment planning.

Self-Directed Exergaming for Stroke Upper Limb Impairment Increases Exercise Dose Compared to Standard Care

Background. One of the strongest modifiable determinants of rehabilitation outcome is exercise dose. Technologies enabling self-directed exercise offer a pragmatic means to increase dose, but the extent to which they achieve this in unselected cohorts, under real-world constraints, is poorly understood. Objective. Here we quantify the exercise dose achieved by inpatient stroke survivors using an adapted upper limb (UL) exercise gaming (exergaming) device and compare this with conventional (supervised) therapy. Methods. Over 4 months, patients presenting with acute stroke and associated UL impairment were screened at a single stroke centre. Participants were trained in a single session and provided with the device for unsupervised use during their inpatient admission. Results. From 75 patients referred for inpatient UL therapy, we recruited 30 (40%), of whom 26 (35%) were able to use the device meaningfully with their affected UL. Over a median enrolment time of 8 days (IQR: 5–14), self-directed UL exercise duration using the device was 26 minutes per day (median; IQR: 16–31), in addition to 25 minutes daily conventional UL therapy (IQR: 12–34; same cohort plus standard care audit; joint n = 50); thereby doubling total exercise duration (51 minutes; IQR: 32–64) relative to standard care (Z = 4.0, P <.001). The device enabled 104 UL repetitions per day (IQR: 38–393), whereas conventional therapy achieved 15 UL repetitions per day (IQR: 11–23; Z = 4.3, P <.001). Conclusion. Self-directed adapted exergaming enabled participants in our stroke inpatient cohort to increase exercise duration 2-fold, and repetitions 8-fold, compared to standard care, without requiring additional professional supervision.

Acceptability of constraint induced movement therapy: influence of perceived difficulty and expected treatment outcome

BACKGROUND

Constraint-Induced Movement (CI) Therapy has evidence of efficaciously rehabilitating upper-extremity hemiparesis after stroke. Yet, it is not widely used in the United States. One barrier appears to be the perception of its difficulty among stroke care consumers, as reported by two published studies in which the participants had little or no apparent direct exposure to CI Therapy.

OBJECTIVES

Assess the perception of difficulty of CI Therapy by individuals with chronic stroke who have actually undergone CI Therapy.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was conducted of data from two randomized controlled trials of CI Therapy. Participants had chronic, mild-to-moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis after stroke. The Motor Activity Log and Wolf Motor Function Test were used to measure motor function of the more-affected arm. A Patient Opinion Survey assessed participants' perception of difficulty and satisfaction with treatment.

RESULTS

The participants (N = 40) showed large improvements in motor function of their more-affected arm after treatment, p's <001. CI Therapy was perceived to be of only moderate difficulty by participants before treatment (mean = 4.4 out of 7). Perception of its difficulty decreased afterward (mean = 3.7, p = .002). Moreover, participants were highly satisfied with their outcomes (mean = 6.3 out of 7). Satisfaction was positively related to the improvements in more-affected arm use in everyday life, ΔR² = .3, p < .001.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic stroke survivors who have actually had CI Therapy perceive it to be of only moderate difficulty and are highly satisfied. Negative views about its acceptability warrant reconsideration.

Constraint-induced movement therapy protocols using the number of repetitions of task practice: a systematic review of feasibility and effects

BACKGROUND

High repetitions of task practice is required for the recovery of the motor function during constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). This can be achieved into ways: when the task practice is measured in hours of practice or when the number of repetitions is counted. However, it has been argued that using hours of task practice as a measure of practice does not provide a clear instruction on the dose of practice.

AIM

The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility and effects of the CIMT protocol that uses the number of repetitions of task practice.

MATERIALS/METHOD

The study was a systematic review registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020142140). Five databases, PubMED, CENTRAL, PEDro, OTSeeker and Web of Science, were searched. Studies of any designs in adults with stroke were included if they used the number of repetitions of task practice as a measure of dose. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using Modified McMaster critical review form. The results were analysed using qualitative synthesis.

RESULTS

Eight studies (n = 205) were included in the study. The number of task repetitions in the studies ranges between 45 and 1280 per day. The results showed that CIMT protocol using the number of repetitions of task practice was feasible and improved outcomes such as motor function, quality of life, functional mobility and spasticity.

CONCLUSION

The number of repetitions of task practice as a measure of CIMT dose can be used in place of the existing protocol that uses the number of hours of task practice.

Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on persons-reported outcomes of health status after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is used for the rehabilitation of motor function after stroke. The aim of this review was to investigate its effect on persons-reported outcomes of health status (PROsHS) compared with conventional therapy. The study was a systematic review and meta-analysis registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019142279). Five databases PubMED, PEDro, OTSeeker, CENTRAL and Web of Science were searched. Randomized controlled trials were included if they assessed PROsHS. Mean scores of PROsHS, sample size and dose of CIMT and control groups interventions were extracted. The result was analyzed using qualitative and quantitative syntheses. Nine studies (n = 558) were included in the review. From the result, CIMT significantly improved PROsHS postintervention. However, postintervention, there was no statistically significant difference between groups for the upper limb [Mean difference (MD) = 6.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -2.09 to 15.44, P = 0.14] and the lower limb (MD = -1.86, 95% CI = -16.29 to 12.57, P = 0.80). Similarly, there was no statistically significant percentage of variation across studies, upper limb (I2 = 0%, P = 0.92) and lower limb (I2 = 0%, P = 0.86). For the lower limb at follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference between groups (MD = 0.97, 95% CI = -13.59 to 15.53, P = 0.90). When upper and lower limbs studies were pooled, there was no statistically significant difference between groups postintervention (MD = 0.22, 95% CI = -0.15 to 0.58, P = 0.24) and at follow-up (MD = 0.03, 95% CI = -0.43 to 0.49, P = 0.90). CIMT improves PROsHS after stroke. However, it is not superior to conventional therapy based on the current literature.

Effectiveness of a Functional Rehabilitation Program for Upper Limb Apraxia in Poststroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effectiveness of a home-based restorative and compensatory upper limb apraxia (ULA) rehabilitation program.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Neurology Unit of San Cecilio Hospital and 2 private and specialized health care centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Community dwelling participants (N=38) between the ages of 25 and 95 years old (sex ratio, 1:1) with unilateral mild-to-moderate poststroke lesions (time of evolution since stroke, 12.03±8.98mo) and secondary ULA.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly assigned to an 8-week combined ULA functional rehabilitation group (n=19) 3 days per week for 30 minutes or to a traditional health care education protocol group (n=19) once a month for 8 weeks. Both interventions were conducted at home.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sociodemographic and clinical data, Barthel Index (primary outcome), Lawton and Brody Scale, observation and scoring activities of daily living, the De Renzi tests for ideational and ideomotor apraxia and imitating gestures test, recognition of gestures, test for upper limb apraxia , and stroke-specific quality of life scale were assessed at 3 time points: baseline, posttreatment (8wk), and follow-up (8wk).

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences among the groups regarding ideomotor apraxia, imitating gestures, global recognition of gestures, intransitive gestures, and comprehension of gesture production (P<.05) in favor of the experimental group. However, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups regarding functionality or quality of life (P>.05). Regarding the within-group effect, statistically significant differences were found in all neuropsychological outcomes at posttreatment and follow-up (P<.05).

CONCLUSION

A functional rehabilitation program was found to be superior to a traditional health care education program and resulted in improvements in neuropsychological functioning in ULA poststroke. Conventional education showed an insufficient effect on apraxia recovery. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to determine the effect of rehabilitation strategies on functionality and quality of life of poststroke ULA patients.

Predicting Improved Daily Use of the More Affected Arm Poststroke Following Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

BACKGROUND

Constraint-induced movement therapy (CI therapy) produces, on average, large and clinically meaningful improvements in the daily use of a more affected upper extremity in individuals with hemiparesis. However, individual responses vary widely.

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to investigate the extent to which individual characteristics before treatment predict improved use of the more affected arm following CI therapy.

DESIGN

This study was a retrospective analysis of 47 people who had chronic (> 6 months) mild to moderate upper extremity hemiparesis and were consecutively enrolled in 2 CI therapy randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

An enhanced probabilistic neural network model predicted whether individuals showed a low, medium, or high response to CI therapy, as measured with the Motor Activity Log, on the basis of the following baseline assessments: Wolf Motor Function Test, Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test of touch threshold, Motor Activity Log, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Then, a neural dynamic classification algorithm was applied to improve prognostic accuracy using the most accurate combination obtained in the previous step.

RESULTS

Motor ability and tactile sense predicted improvement in arm use for daily activities following intensive upper extremity rehabilitation with an accuracy of nearly 100%. Complex patterns of interaction among these predictors were observed.

LIMITATIONS

The fact that this study was a retrospective analysis with a moderate sample size was a limitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced machine learning/classification algorithms produce more accurate personalized predictions of rehabilitation outcomes than commonly used general linear models.