Complementary alternative medicine practices and beliefs in spinal cord injury and non-spinal cord injured individuals

Integrated Yoga and Naturopathy Interventions to Modify Functional Disability in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the use of integrated yoga and naturopathy intervention to modify functional disability and improve independence in patients with spinal cord injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, 48 spinal cord injury patients receiving residential rehabilitation, aged between 23 and 57 years (37.9±11.8) of both genders, were randomly allocated to two groups: (i) experimental group (naturopathy and yoga) and (ii) control group (waitlist with routine care). Subjects were assessed on day 1 (baseline), day 30 (intense phase), and day 90 (follow-up). Assessments were done using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), handheld myometry (HHM), time up and go (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and 10-meter walk test (10MWT).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences at baseline between groups for all the variables (p>0.05) through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Repeated measures ANOVAs (RM-ANOVAs) were performed to compare between assessments and the groups (p<0.05). Post hoc shows that there is significant SCIM (p<0.001), HHM (p<0.001), TUG (p<0.001), BBS (p<0.001), and 10MWT (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that there is significant improvement in the functions of both yoga and naturopathy and the control group. So, yoga and naturopathy can be considered as adjuvant along with routine care of physical therapy in spinal cord injury rehabilitation programs.

Alternative and complementary medicine in neurological disorders and neurological disability patients: Prevalence, factors, opinions and reasons

OBJECTIVES

This cross-sectional study is aimed to investigate the prevalence of the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), types of CAMs used, as well as reasons and factors found in patients with neurological diseases or neurological disability.

METHODS

An anonymous, self-administered survey was designed to collect information about demographics, personal medical history, CAM usage habits, and different opinions about CAM vs. conventional medicine (CM). The survey was applied by non-medical personnel in a rehabilitation hospital to patients older than 18 years, with a confirmed diagnosis of neurological disorder or neurological disability.

RESULTS

453 patients were included, 59.7 % were female. Mean age: 49 years (SD: 18.2). 200 patients (44.2 %) had a history of chronic diseases. Depression was found in 139 patients (30.7 %). Neurological disorders were: peripheral neuropathy: 97 (21.4 %), headache or migraine: 78 (17.2 %), neurodegenerative diseases: 69 (15.2 %) and stroke: 58 (12.8 %). 60.2 % (n = 273) had some degree of disability. Prevalence of CAM use was 36 % (n = 163). Most common CAMs were: Biological therapies: 133 (71.1 %), energy-based therapies: 63 (33.7 %) and body manipulation therapies: 51 (27.3 %). Reasons to use CAM were: "to complement the pharmacological treatment" (45 = 27.6 %), and "treatment failure with CM" (43 = 26.4 %). Finally, older age (p = 0.0280) and having a chronic disease (p = 0.0229) or depression (p < 0.001) were the factors associated with the current use of CAM.

CONCLUSION

One third of patients with neurological pathologies use CAM, the most popular type of CAM is biologic therapies. As in other pathologies, CAM use was associated with older age, history of depression, and chronic diseases. Therefore, it is suggested that physicians routinely ask patients about the use of CAM, if they need more information about CAM, and even verify the possibility of drug interactions or adverse effects.

Alternative medicine therapies in neurological disorders: Prevalence, reasons and associated factors. A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to identify the prevalence of CAM use in patients with neurological disorders, and also to know most frequent types of CAM used.

METHODS

Five databases: PubMed, Science Direct, EBSCO, Latindex and Scielo (in English and Spanish) were searched from January 2010 to May 2021. Only original cross-sectional, retrospective and cohort studies were included, whose primary objective was to describe the frequency of CAM use in neurological disorders and/or the related factors to its use in adults. Based on the data, a descriptive analysis was performed, covering the characteristics of studies, measuring methods, prevalence, types and related factors. To control the risk of bias, a quality assessment of each study was performed using STROBE checklist.

RESULTS

For the final analysis, 40 studies were included. Most common pathologies observed in the studies were multiple sclerosis, headache, stroke, Parkinson and epilepsy. The STROBE score of studies ranged from 13 to 22 points, with an average of 18.2. Prevalence of CAM use was highly variable from one study to another (16% in stroke patients, to 100% in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or spinal cord injury patients). Biological therapies (dietary supplements and herbal medicine) were the most commonly CAM types used. The associated factors identified were female sex, an age between 40 and 50 years, and higher socioeconomic level. Not all studies investigated about the results of CAMs but these ranged from 35% to more than 80% of reporting positive effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of CAM use in neurological diseases is highly variable (16%-100%); the most used type of CAM was biological therapies and the associated factors were female sex, age between 40 and 50 years old and high socioeconomic level.

Management of spinal cord injury-related pain using complementary alternative medicine: a scoping review protocol

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review will identify complementary alternative medicine methods used to manage spinal cord injury-related pain.

INTRODUCTION

Spinal cord injury-related pain is common, with a third of individuals experiencing severe pain. Conventional interventions are well documented, however, pain relief remains elusive for people with spinal cord injuries. Although complementary alternative medicine is available to alleviate various health problems, little is known about the complementary alternative medicine methods used to manage pain in people with spinal cord injuries.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will consider all studies on complementary alternative medicine treatment methods used by adults with spinal cord injury to treat their associated pain. The concept of interest in this study is complementary alternative medicine. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies, text and opinion papers as well as systematic reviews will be included in this review.

METHODS

A three-step search strategy, consisting of an initial limited search, a full search, and a screening of the reference lists of all included articles will be undertaken. Key information sources to be searched include CINAHL, Cochrane Library, JBI Evidence Synthesis, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, DynaMed, Natural Medicines, HerbMed, Open Dissertations, and OpenGrey. All titles and abstracts of identified citations will be screened and then uploaded to a reference management program. The full text of studies potentially meeting the inclusion criteria will be assessed in detail, and relevant data will be extracted and reported in tabular format, in line with the objectives and scope of the review.

Applications of complementary therapies during rehabilitation for individuals with traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Findings from the SCIRehab Project

Objective: Evaluate the use of complementary therapies during rehabilitation for patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Secondary analyses were conducted to identify the use and associated outcomes of complementary therapies provided by occupational therapists (OTs) and physical therapists (PTs) during rehabilitation from a public dataset. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation. Participants: A public dataset composed of 1376 patients with SCI that were enrolled in a five-year, multi-center investigation, the SCIRehab Project. Secondary analyses focused on a subset of 93 patients (47 who received complementary therapy during treatment and 46 case-matched controls who received no complementary therapy). Interventions: OTs and PTs recorded use of complementary therapies during sessions, including yoga, Pilates, tai chi, aromatherapy, relaxation techniques, imagery and other. Outcome Measures: Pain interference, pain severity, mobility, and social integration. Results: Three percent of participants received any complementary therapies. Patients who received complementary therapies showed greater reductions in pain severity from 6 months to 12 months relative to matched controls. Furthermore, the amount of time that patients received complementary therapies during physical therapy sessions was associated with reduced pain interference at 6 months and with reduced pain severity at the 6-month and 12-month follow-ups. Complementary therapy use was not associated with mobility or social integration. Conclusion: The current study provides preliminary evidence documenting the limited use of complementary therapies in rehabilitation settings and highlights the opportunity for further research, particularly regarding pain-related outcomes.