Sacral examination in spinal cord injury: Is it really needed?

Identification of a reliable sacral-sparing examination to assess the ASIA impairment scale in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the time course of the American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale (AIS) for up to three months in participants within 72 h after traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) with complete paralysis. We aimed to determine the most useful sacral-sparing examination (deep anal pressure [DAP], voluntary anal contraction [VAC], S4-5 light touch [LT], or pin prick [PP] sensation) in determining AIS grades.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Spinal Injuries Center, Fukuoka, Japan.

PARTICIPANTS

Among 668 TSCI participants registered in the Japan Single Center study for Spinal Cord Injury Database (JSSCI-DB) between January 2012 and May 2020, we extracted the data of 80 patients with AIS grade A within 72 h after injury and neurological level of injury (NLI) at T12 or higher.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The sacral-sparing examination at the time of the change to incomplete paralysis was compared to the AIS determination using a standard algorithm and with each assessment including the VAC, DAP, S4-5LT, and S4-5PP examinations at the time of AIS functional change. Agreement among assessments was evaluated using weighted kappa coefficients. The relationship was evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Fifteen participants (18.8%) improved to incomplete paralysis (AIS B to D) within three months after injury. The single assessment among the sacral-sparing examinations with the highest agreement and strongest correlation with AIS determination was the S4-5LT examination (k = 0.89, P < 0.01, r = 0.84, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The S4-5LT examination is key in determining complete or incomplete paralysis due to its high discriminatory power.

Accuracy of self-reported severity and level of spinal cord injury

Study design

Observational.

Objectives

To assess accuracy of self-reported level of injury (LOI) and severity in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) as compared with clinical examination.

Setting

An SCI Model System Hospital.

Methods

A 20-item survey evaluated demographics, physical abilities, and self-reported injury level and severity. A decision tree algorithm used responses to categorize participants into injury severity groups. Following the survey, participants underwent clinical examination to determine current injury level and severity. Participants were later asked three questions regarding S1 sparing. Chart abstraction was utilized to obtain initial injury level and severity. Injury level and severity from self-report, decision tree, clinical exam, and chart abstraction were compared.

Results

Twenty-eight individuals participated. Ninety-three percent correctly self-reported anatomical region of injury (ROI). Self-report of specific LOI matched current clinical LOI for 25% of participants, but matched initial LOI for 61%. Self-report of ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) matched clinical AIS for 36%, but matched initial AIS for 46%. The injury severity decision tree was 75% accurate without, but 79% accurate with additional S1 questions. Self-report of deep anal pressure (DAP) was correct for 86% of participants, while self-report of voluntary anal contraction (VAC) was correct for 82%.

Conclusion

Individuals with SCI are more accurate reporting ROI than specific LOI. Self-reported injury level and severity align more closely with initial clinical examination results than current exam results. Using aggregate data from multiple questions can categorize injury severity more reliably than self-report. Using this type of decision tree may improve injury severity classification in large survey studies.

Adaptação transcultural para o Português do questionário de autorrelato da função sensorial e motora de S4-5 (S4-5Q) em pessoas com lesão medular espinhal

Objective  The “Self-report S4-5 sensory and motor function questionnaire (S4-5Q)” is a short questionnaire that aims to assess the function of the sacral segments, S4 and S5, after a spinal cord injury (SCI), with the purpose of replacing the rectal exam test. The aim of the present study was to carry out a cross-cultural adaptation of the S4-5Q to the Brazilian Portuguese language and to investigate the test-retest reliability of this version.

Method  The translation and cross-cultural adaptation was performed using the methodology of translation and backtranslation. Initially, translations were done by three independent translators. Their synthesis was then submitted to an expert committee for analysis (SCI health professionals); then, the backtranslation to the original language was sent to the original author and, after all the adjustments, the final version was completed. For test-retest reliability, 24 individuals with chronic SCI were recruited (2 evaluations with an interval of 7 to 14 days between them). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM-SPSS (Version 20, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) with data pretabulated in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Reliability was tested with Cohen Kappa, and internal consistency with Cronbach α, both adopting p  < 0.05 as significant.

Results  In the reliability analysis, the results of all questions showed almost perfect agreement (Kappa > 0.81) and good internal consistency (Cronbach α: 0.65–0.77) between the questions and final classification.

Conclusion  The cross-culturally adapted S4-5Q is reliable to be applied to the Brazilian population with chronic SCI to determine their S4-5 sensory and motor function.

The impact of surgical timing on motor level lowering in motor complete traumatic spinal cord injury patients

Patients with motor complete traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) have a low potential to recover ambulation. Motor level recovery, adjacent to the level of injury, could influence functional independency. This study addresses whether surgical timing influences motor level recovery in patients with sensorimotor complete (AIS A) and motor complete sensory incomplete (AIS B) tSCI. A retrospective cohort study was performed in the Netherlands in patients with motor complete tSCI (C2-L2), who consecutively underwent surgery between January 2010 and April 2020. Neurological examination was performed directly at presentation to the ER and at discharge from the rehabilitation facility. Motor level lowering, AIS grade and Upper and Lower Extremity Motor Score (UEMS and LEMS) recovery were calculated for patients who underwent early (<24h) and late (24h+) surgery. A total of 96 patients met the inclusion criteria. In the multivariate analysis late surgical decompression (24h+) was negatively associated with ≥1 motor level lowering and ≥2 AIS grade improvement (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.11 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.67) p=0.046, OR 0.06 (95% CI: 0.00, 047) p=0.030). The presence of sacral sparing (AIS B) at initial examination, and cervical level of the tSCI were associated with ≥1 motor level lowering. In addition, AOSpine C-type injuries were negatively associated with any type of neurological recovery, except motor level lowering. Although sensorimotor complete injuries as well as thoracolumbar injuries negatively influence neurological recovery, early surgical decompression (<24h) appears independently associated with enhanced neurological recovery in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury despite level and severity of injury.

An interview based approach to the anorectal portion of the International Standards of Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Exam (I-A-ISNCSCI): a pilot study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, single-blinded study.

OBJECTIVE

To design and evaluate the use of an interview based version of the anorectal portion of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) exam in the acute inpatient rehabilitation (AIR) setting.

SETTING

AIR unit.

METHODS

Participants admitted to AIR underwent standard ISNCSCI exams (S-ISNCSCI) as part of routine inpatient care within 3 days of being administered an interview version of the anorectal portion of the ISNCSCI (I-A-ISNCSCI). Agreement between the anorectal portion of the S-ISNCSCI (S-A-ISNCSCI) and the I-A-ISNCSCI was evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty of forty-five enrolled participants completed the assessments. Agreement between the I-A-ISNCSCI and S-A-ISNCSCI was substantial for anorectal sensation to light touch (k = 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.90, N = 36), pin prick (k = 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.87, N = 38), deep anal pressure (k = 0.77, 95% CI 0.53-1.00, N = 37), and completeness of injury based on combined sacral sensory criteria (k = 0.72, 95% CI 0.47-0.97, N = 40); and fair for voluntary anal contraction (k = 0.29, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.59, N = 36). Responses of "I don't know" were excluded from agreement analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study was a first step in developing interview based tools such as the I-A-ISNCSCI in an AIR setting providing convenient access to individuals with SCI and their direct feedback. The study design introduces potential recall bias and may not match true clinical situations such as remote follow-up of neurological changes for chronic patients. The use of interview based tools for assessing individuals with SCI remains worthy of further study.