The influence of shoulder pain and fear of falling on level and non-level transfer technique

Low-frequency electrically induced exercise after spinal cord injury: Physiologic challenge to skeletal muscle and feasibility for long-term use

CONTEXT

Skeletal muscle has traditionally been considered a "force generator": necessary for purposes of locomotion, but expendable for non-ambulators who use wheelchairs, such as people with a spinal cord injury (SCI). Active skeletal muscle plays an indispensable role in regulating systemic metabolic functions, even in people with paralysis, but because of severe osteoporosis, high tetanic muscle forces induced with high frequency electrical stimulation may be risky for some individuals. The purpose of this study was to compare the physiologic muscle properties incurred by two low force/low frequency repetitive stimulation protocols (1 and 3 Hz); and, to assess the acceptability of each protocol among people with SCI.

METHODS

Ten individuals with chronic SCI (12.9 years) and 11 individuals without SCI (NonSCI) participated in the study. Participants received either 1 or 3 Hz stimulation to the quadriceps muscle on Day 1, then the converse on Day 2. Each session consisted of 1000 stimulus pulses.

RESULTS

The initial and maximum forces were similar for the 1 and 3 Hz frequencies. The fatigue index (FI) for SCI and NonSCI groups were lower (P < 0.007) for 3 Hz than for 1 Hz (0.34 ± 0.17 versus 0.65 ± 0.16 and 0.72 ± 0.14 versus 0.87 ± 0.07, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The 3 Hz stimulation offered the greatest physiological challenge and was perceived as more acceptable for long term use among people with SCI.

Association Between Pain and Fall Worry Among Community-Dwelling Older People With Cognitive Impairment in the United States

Background and Objectives

Previous studies have found that pain is associated with fall worry among community-dwelling older people. However, both pain and fall worry are poorly understood and underaddressed among community-dwelling older people with cognitive impairment (CI). It is essential to examine the association between pain and fall worry, and how sociodemographic and health characteristics may shape fall worry among this subgroup.

Research Design and Methods

We used data from the 2015 National Health and Aging Trends Study (analytic sample: n = 1150 community-dwelling older people with CI; were self-interviewed; mean age: 81; age range: 65-107). The number of pain sites in the prior month was assessed by presenting a card listing common pain sites (eg, back, knees). Two questions assessed past-month fall worry, "did you worry about falling down" and "did this worry ever limit your activities." Following descriptive statistics, we fit multinomial logistic regression models to examine the associations between different pain characteristics (number of sites, severity, location) and non-activity-limiting and activity-limiting fall worry.

Results

Non-activity-limiting fall worry was endorsed by 21.1% and activity-limiting fall worry by 13.6% of community-dwelling older people with CI. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and fall-worry-related covariates, multinomial logistic regression analysis found that a greater number of pain sites (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 1.22, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI] = 1.12-1.33, p <.001) and severe pain (RRR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.12-3.75, p = .020) was associated with activity-limiting fall worry. Both lower body (knee, foot, and leg) and upper body (hand, wrist, shoulder, neck, and stomach) pain were found to be associated with a high risk of activity-limiting fall worry.

Discussion and Implications

These findings suggest pain and fall worry are common among community-dwelling older people with CI and can be elicited directly from those who are communicative. Fall prevention for this population should prioritize pain management to mitigate activity-limiting fall worry because activity limitation increases the risk of falls.

The influence of gender on shoulder kinematics and head-hip technique during non-level transfers in full-time wheelchair users

BACKGROUND

Non-level transfers are some of the most demanding tasks for manual wheelchair users. Safely performing these transfer tasks may be needed for maintaining long-term upper limb health. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the influence of gender on the head-hip technique and lead arm kinematics during multi-height transfers in manual wheelchair users.

METHODS

Motion analysis was used to obtain lead-arm shoulder kinematics (flexion/extension and abduction/adduction) and trunk flexion during level, uphill, and floor-to-table transfers in full-time manual wheelchair users.

FINDINGS

Twelve male (N = 12) and fifteen female (N = 15) manual wheelchair users with a mean age of 23 ± 5 years and no signs of shoulder pain participated in the study. Lead-arm shoulder flexion and abduction increased as vertical displacement requirements increased during the various transfer tasks (p < 0.01). Women displaced greater trunk flexion during level transfers at approaching significant levels (p = 0.07). During uphill transfers, women displayed significantly greater trunk flexion than men (p < 0.05).

INTERPRETATION

Manual wheelchair users use unique kinematic requirements when using the head-hip during level and non-level transfers. Women may be at decreased risk of chronic shoulder pain due to a greater use of the head-hip technique during non-level transfers. Nonetheless, more research that integrates kinetics and strength assessments during non-level transfer biomechanical analyses is needed to better understand technical requirements of non-level transfers in manual wheelchair users.