Functional coupling of the Galpha(olf) variant XLGalpha(olf) with the human adenosine A2A receptor

Blood Platelet Adenosine Receptors as Potential Targets for Anti-Platelet Therapy

Adenosine receptors are a subfamily of highly-conserved G-protein coupled receptors. They are found in the membranes of various human cells and play many physiological functions. Blood platelets express two (A_2A and A_2B) of the four known adenosine receptor subtypes (A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃). Agonization of these receptors results in an enhanced intracellular cAMP and the inhibition of platelet activation and aggregation. Therefore, adenosine receptors A_2A and A_2B could be targets for anti-platelet therapy, especially under circumstances when classic therapy based on antagonizing the purinergic receptor P2Y₁₂ is insufficient or problematic. Apart from adenosine, there is a group of synthetic, selective, longer-lasting agonists of A_2A and A_2B receptors reported in the literature. This group includes agonists with good selectivity for A_2A or A_2B receptors, as well as non-selective compounds that activate more than one type of adenosine receptor. Chemically, most A_2A and A_2B adenosine receptor agonists are adenosine analogues, with either adenine or ribose substituted by single or multiple foreign substituents. However, a group of non-adenosine derivative agonists has also been described. This review aims to systematically describe known agonists of A_2A and A_2B receptors and review the available literature data on their effects on platelet function.

Adenosine A2A receptor in the monkey basal ganglia: ultrastructural localization and colocalization with the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in the striatum

The adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A) R) is a potential drug target for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and other neurological disorders. In rodents, the therapeutic efficacy of A(2A) R modulation is improved by concomitant modulation of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5). To elucidate the anatomical substrate(s) through which these therapeutic benefits could be mediated, pre-embedding electron microscopy immunohistochemistry was used to conduct a detailed, quantitative ultrastructural analysis of A(2A) R localization in the primate basal ganglia and to assess the degree of A(2A) R/mGluR5 colocalization in the striatum. A(2A) R immunoreactivity was found at the highest levels in the striatum and external globus pallidus (GPe). However, the monkey, but not the rat, substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) also harbored a significant level of neuropil A(2A) R immunoreactivity. At the electron microscopic level, striatal A(2A) R labeling was most commonly localized in postsynaptic elements (58% ± 3% of labeled elements), whereas, in the GPe and SNr, the labeling was mainly presynaptic (71% ± 5%) or glial (27% ± 6%). In both striatal and pallidal structures, putative inhibitory and excitatory terminals displayed A(2A) R immunoreactivity. Striatal A(2A) R/mGluR5 colocalization was commonly found; 60-70% of A(2A) R-immunoreactive dendrites or spines in the monkey striatum coexpress mGluR5. These findings provide the first detailed account of the ultrastructural localization of A(2A) R in the primate basal ganglia and demonstrate that A(2A) R and mGluR5 are located to interact functionally in dendrites and spines of striatal neurons. Together, these data foster a deeper understanding of the substrates through which A(2A) R could regulate primate basal ganglia function and potentially mediate its therapeutic effects in parkinsonism.

Subcellular localization of a novel G protein XLGalpha(olf)

XLGalpha(olf) was identified as a transcriptional variant of the heterotrimeric G protein, Galpha(olf). Previous work showed that XLGalpha(olf) couples with adenosine A2a receptor and dopamine D1 receptor in vitro. However, physiological functions of XLGalpha(olf) remain to be elucidated. In this study, we performed indirect immunofluorescence confocal analyses to examine the subcellular localization of XLGalpha(olf). With overexpression, surprisingly, many large endosomes resulted. We also observed that XLGalpha(olf) localizes at the Golgi apparatus. The N-terminal region of XLGalpha(olf) appears necessary for both endosome formation and the Golgi localization. The results indicate that XLGalpha(olf) and Galpha(olf) play distinctly separate roles. Moreover, XLGalpha(olf) colocalized with Rab3A and Rab8A, as well as partially with Rab11A, but not with other endocytotic endosomes. We could confirm the interaction between XLGalpha(olf) and Rab3A/Rab8A by co-immunoprecipitation experiments. Our study provides important clues toward understanding physiological functions of XLGalpha(olf).

Genomic imprinting in the development and evolution of psychotic spectrum conditions

I review and evaluate genetic and genomic evidence salient to the hypothesis that the development and evolution of psychotic spectrum conditions have been mediated in part by alterations of imprinted genes expressed in the brain. Evidence from the genetics and genomics of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, Prader-Willi syndrome, Klinefelter syndrome, and other neurogenetic conditions support the hypothesis that the etiologies of psychotic spectrum conditions commonly involve genetic and epigenetic imbalances in the effects of imprinted genes, with a bias towards increased relative effects from imprinted genes with maternal expression or other genes favouring maternal interests. By contrast, autistic spectrum conditions, including Kanner autism, Asperger syndrome, Rett syndrome, Turner syndrome, Angelman syndrome, and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, commonly engender increased relative effects from paternally expressed imprinted genes, or reduced effects from genes favouring maternal interests. Imprinted-gene effects on the etiologies of autistic and psychotic spectrum conditions parallel the diametric effects of imprinted genes in placental and foetal development, in that psychotic spectrum conditions tend to be associated with undergrowth and relatively-slow brain development, whereas some autistic spectrum conditions involve brain and body overgrowth, especially in foetal development and early childhood. An important role for imprinted genes in the etiologies of psychotic and autistic spectrum conditions is consistent with neurodevelopmental models of these disorders, and with predictions from the conflict theory of genomic imprinting.