"The left hand does not know what the right hand is doing": rural and urban cultures of care for persons with traumatic brain injuries

Social and community participation following traumatic lower limb amputation: an exploratory qualitative study

PURPOSE

To explore barriers and facilitators to social and community participation experienced by people following traumatic lower limb amputation (LLA).

METHODS

An exploratory qualitative study was conducted with nine adults with traumatic LLA in Victoria, Australia. Participants were a minimum of 18 months post amputation. Interview data was analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Participants referenced the inaccessibility of the built environment and physical challenges associated with prosthetic mobility as barriers to participation. Chronic and complex health concerns due to their injuries resulted in physical and emotional distress for some, further limiting their social and community engagement. Participants highlighted the benefit of peer-support networks and the value of supportive community groups in assisting the transition to their pre-amputation family, work and social roles. Participants also felt that a strong, positive attitude and being self-motivated were important to aid in their return to social and community participation.

CONCLUSION

People following traumatic LLA experience a number of physical, psychological and environmental challenges to participation. The role of peer-support networks, community groups and personal attitudes are important facilitators to assist a return to family, work and life roles. The findings of this study have informed the development of recommendations to guide clinical practice.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPeer-support groups for people following traumatic lower limb amputation (LLA) may assist to improve their long-term adjustment to disability and community participationRetraining skills in an individual's own community should be considered when planning community-based therapy services for people following traumatic LLA.Ongoing psychosocial support including strategies to develop self-efficacy and positive mindset may improve social and community participationRegular medical and allied health reviews can be beneficial to promote early intervention for any complications that arise to minimise time off prosthesis.

Internet-Administered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Common Mental Health Difficulties in Parents of Children Treated for Cancer: Intervention Development and Description Study

BACKGROUND

Following the end of a child's treatment for cancer, parents may report psychological distress. However, there is a lack of evidence-based interventions that are tailored to the population, and psychological support needs are commonly unmet. An internet-administered low-intensity cognitive behavioral therapy (LICBT)-based intervention (EJDeR [internetbaserad självhjälp för föräldrar till barn som avslutat en behandling mot cancer]) may provide a solution.

OBJECTIVE

The first objective is to provide an overview of a multimethod approach that was used to inform the development of the EJDeR intervention. The second objective is to provide a detailed description of the EJDeR intervention in accordance with the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist.

METHODS

EJDeR was developed through a multimethod approach, which included the use of existing evidence, the conceptualization of distress, participatory action research, a cross-sectional survey, and professional and public involvement. Depending on the main presenting difficulty identified during assessment, LICBT behavioral activation or worry management treatment protocols are adopted for the treatment of depression or generalized anxiety disorder when experienced individually or when comorbid. EJDeR is delivered via the Uppsala University Psychosocial Care Programme (U-CARE) portal, a web-based platform that is designed to deliver internet-administered LICBT interventions and includes secure videoconferencing. To guide parents in the use of EJDeR, weekly written messages via the portal are provided by e-therapists comprising final year psychology program students with training in cognitive behavioral therapy.

RESULTS

An overview of the development process and a description of EJDeR, which was informed by the TIDieR checklist, are presented. Adaptations that were made in response to public involvement are highlighted.

CONCLUSIONS

EJDeR represents a novel, guided, internet-administered LICBT intervention for supporting parents of children treated for cancer. Adopting the TIDieR checklist offers the potential to enhance fidelity to the intervention protocol and facilitate later implementation. The intervention is currently being tested in a feasibility study (the ENGAGE study).

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023708.

Caring for people with serious injuries in urban and regional communities: a qualitative investigation of healthcare providers' perceptions

Purpose: To understand the factors that affect the management of people after serious injury in urban and regional settings, beyond hospital discharge from the perspectives of allied health professionals (AHPs).Materials and methods: An exploratory qualitative study of AHPs caring for people with serious injuries post-hospital discharge in urban and regional areas of Victoria, Australia was completed. Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were undertaken with AHPs and thematically analysed.Results: Allied health professionals in urban and regional settings reported the benefits of a multi-disciplinary team to deliver high-quality care. However, a number of barriers to service delivery were identified that impacted on their ability to meet the needs of patients. These included insufficient psychological services, a shortage of available carers and an unmet need for external clinical support in regional areas. Communication between AHPs and other services, and care co-ordination of post-discharge services, was also highlighted as key areas to improve for optimal patient care.Conclusions: Factors that influenced optimal patient management included the availability of psychological and carer services, communication between health professionals and coordination of post-discharge care. The experiences of AHPs can offer practical suggestions to optimise service delivery and post-discharge care for people with serious injuries.Implications for RehabilitationAllied health professionals (AHPs) face a number of challenges in the provision of optimal care to people with serious injuries.Improving the availability of psychological support and attendant carers is needed in regional areas.A designated care coordinator role may assist people with serious injuries transitioning between hospital and home to engage with necessary services and reduce administrative burden for AHPs.Telehealth may provide facilitate improved communication between health professionals and support regional clinicians caring for people with complex injuries.

We Finally Learnt to Demand: Consumers’ Access to Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical care guidelines exist internationally recommending the appropriate standards of care for adults following brain injury. These guidelines recommend a care pathway including acute, inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation and community-based care. However, if and how these guidelines are implemented is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the recollected continuum of care experienced by 202 adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in Victoria, Australia. The experiences of participants in this study were investigated using a mixed methods research approach (surveys and in-depth interviews). The results indicated that only 20% of participants in this study recollected receiving care in line with recommendations made in clinical care guidelines. Reasons they identified for their problematic access to services included: a lack of information about the services available, the absence of an advocate and services being restricted by limited funding. The findings of this study indicate that while guidelines provide recommendations regarding standards of care and can serve as a benchmark to improve the quality of services, they do not ensure the equitable delivery of services. Clinicians using these guidelines need to be aware of the factors that restrict clients’ access to services and take these into account when planning the delivery of services.