First steps in the formulation of praziquantel nanosuspensions for pharmaceutical applications

Major difference in particle size, minor difference in release profile: a case study of solid lipid nanoparticles

Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) have been widely used in a variety of drug delivery routes, which have the outstanding advantage of controlled drug release. The release of SLN is dominated by many factors, among which the particle size of SLN is a critical one. The aim of this project was to explore the relationship between drug release profile and particle size of SLN. SLN were synthesized via the hot high-pressure homogenization (HPH) method, budesonide (BUD) was used as the model drug, and BUD-SLN1-BUD-SLN4 with increasing particle size was obtained, i.e. 120, 240, 360, and 480 nm. The prepared SLN has good encapsulation efficiency, drug loading capacity, and stability. In vitro release behavior studies showed that the cumulative release of BUD-SLN in Tris-Maleate (Tris-M) media was negligible, while that in Tris-M plus pancreatin media or Tris-M-ethanol media obeyed Ritger-Peppas model or first-order kinetic model, respectively. Noticeably, the release behavior of SLN was to some extent related to the average particle size of SLN, but the correlation was insignificant when the intersection degree of particle size distribution was great. This study provides a new idea for the understanding of in vitro release of SLN and has a certain referencing value for the research and development of novel nanomedicines.

Progress in the development of stabilization strategies for nanocrystal preparations

In recent years, nanocrystal technology has been extensively investigated. Due to the submicron particle size and unique physicochemical properties of nanocrystals, they overcome the problems of low drug solubility and poor bioavailability. Although the structures of nanocrystals are simple, the further development of these materials is hindered by their stability. Drug nanocrystals with particle sizes of 1∼1000 nm usually require the addition of stabilizers such as polymers or surfactants to enhance their stability. The stability of nanocrystal suspensions and the redispersibility of solid nanocrystal drugs are the key factors for the large-scale production of nanocrystal preparations. In this paper, the factors that affect the stability of drug nanocrystal preparations are discussed, and related methods for solving the stability problem are put forward.

Gemcitabine-Loaded Magnetically Responsive Poly(ε-caprolactone) Nanoparticles against Breast Cancer

A reproducible and efficient interfacial polymer disposition method has been used to formulate magnetite/poly(ε-caprolactone) (core/shell) nanoparticles (average size ≈ 125 nm, production performance ≈ 90%). To demonstrate that the iron oxide nuclei were satisfactorily embedded within the polymeric solid matrix, a complete analysis of these nanocomposites by, e.g., electron microscopy visualizations, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, electrophoresis, and contact angle goniometry was conducted. The magnetic responsive behaviour of these nanoparticles was quantitatively characterized by the hysteresis cycle and qualitatively investigated by visualization of the colloid under exposure to a 0.4 T magnet. Gemcitabine entrapment into the polymeric shell reported adequate drug loading values (≈11%), and a biphasic and pH-responsive drug release profile (≈ four-fold faster Gemcitabine release at pH 5.0 compared to pH 7.4). Cytotoxicity studies in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells proved that the half maximal inhibitory concentration of Gem-loaded nanocomposites was ≈ two-fold less than that of the free drug. Therefore, these core/shell nanoparticles could have great possibilities as a magnetically targeted Gemcitabine delivery system for breast cancer treatment.