Anawati A, Cameron E, Harvey J. Exploring the development of a framework of social accountability standards for healthcare service delivery: a qualitative multipart, multimethods process.
BMJ Open 2023;
13:e073064. [PMID:
37709334 PMCID:
PMC10503373 DOI:
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073064]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Social accountability is an equity-oriented health policy strategy that requires institutions to focus on local population needs. This strategy is well established in health professional education, but there is limited understanding of its application in healthcare service delivery. Building on what is known in the education setting, this study aimed to explore the development of a framework of comprehensive, evidence-based social accountability standards for healthcare service delivery institutions.
DESIGN
This qualitative, multipart, multimethods study consisted of a modified Delphi process guided by an evidence-based social accountability tool for health professional education and complementary methods including developmental evaluation and a review of select literature to capture emerging evidence and contextual relevance.
SETTING
The study took place in Northern Ontario, Canada at a medical school and a tertiary, regional academic health sciences centre that are both grounded in social accountability.
PARTICIPANTS
Eight expert participants from diverse, multidisciplinary backgrounds, including a patient advocate, were purposefully recruited from both institutions, enrolled and seven completed the study.
MAIN OUTCOME
The resulting framework of social accountability standards is organised into 4 major sections that capture broad and critical concepts; 17 key component reflective questions that address key themes; 39 aspirations that describe objective standards and 197 indicators linked to specific expectations.
RESULTS
Three modified Delphi rounds were completed producing a framework of consensus derived standards. Developmental evaluation helped identify facilitators, barriers and provided real-time feedback to the study's processes and content. The literature reviewed identified 10 new concepts and 43 amendments.
CONCLUSION
This study highlights the development of a comprehensive, evidence-based framework of social accountability standards for healthcare service delivery institutions. Future studies will aim to evaluate the application of these standards to guide equity-oriented social accountability health policy strategies in healthcare service delivery.
Collapse