1
|
A multicenter cohort study on the association between prehospital immobilization and functional outcome of patients following spinal injury in Asia. Sci Rep 2022; 12:3492. [PMID: 35241763 PMCID: PMC8894344 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07481-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Prehospital spinal immobilization is a widely used procedure in the emergency medical service (EMS) system worldwide, while the incidence of patients with spinal injury (SI) is relatively low, and unnecessary prehospital spinal immobilization is associated with patient complications. This study aimed to determine the association between prehospital spine immobilization and favorable functional outcomes at hospital discharge among trauma patients with SI. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Pan-Asia Trauma Outcomes Study (PATOS) registry data from January 1, 2016, to November 30, 2018. A total of 759 patients with SI were enrolled from 43,752 trauma patients in the PATOS registry during the study period. The subjects had a median age of 58 years (Q1–Q3, 41–72), and 438 (57.7%) patients had prehospital spine immobilization. Overall, prehospital spinal immobilization was not associated with favorable functional outcomes at discharge in multivariable logistic regression (aOR 1.06; 95% CI 0.62–1.81, p = 0.826). However, in the subgroup of cervical SI, prehospital spinal immobilization was associated with favorable functional outcomes at discharge (aOR 3.14; 95% CI 1.04–9.50; p = 0.043). Therefore, we suggest that paramedics should be more careful when determining the presence of a cervical SI and should apply full spine immobilization if possible.
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Since the early 1970s, initial management of patients with suspected spinal injuries has involved the use of a cervical collar and long spine board for full immobilization, which was thought to prevent additional injury to the cervical spine. Despite a growing body of literature demonstrating the detrimental effects and questionable efficacy of spinal immobilization, the practice continued until 2013, when the National Association of EMS Physicians issued a position statement calling for a reduction in the use of spinal immobilization and a shift to spinal-motion restriction. This article examines the literature that prompted the change in spinal-injury management and the virtual elimination of the long spine board as a tool for transport.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis X Feld
- Anesthesia Department, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Passavant Hospital, PA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yue JK, Winkler EA, Rick JW, Deng H, Partow CP, Upadhyayula PS, Birk HS, Chan AK, Dhall SS. Update on critical care for acute spinal cord injury in the setting of polytrauma. Neurosurg Focus 2018; 43:E19. [PMID: 29088951 DOI: 10.3171/2017.7.focus17396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) often occurs in patients with concurrent traumatic injuries in other body systems. These patients with polytrauma pose unique challenges to clinicians. The current review evaluates existing guidelines and updates the evidence for prehospital transport, immobilization, initial resuscitation, critical care, hemodynamic stability, diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, and timing appropriate for the patient with SCI who has multisystem trauma. Initial management should be systematic, with focus on spinal immobilization, timely transport, and optimizing perfusion to the spinal cord. There is general evidence for the maintenance of mean arterial pressure of > 85 mm Hg during immediate and acute care to optimize neurological outcome; however, the selection of vasopressor type and duration should be judicious, with considerations for level of injury and risks of increased cardiogenic complications in the elderly. Level II recommendations exist for early decompression, and additional time points of neurological assessment within the first 24 hours and during acute care are warranted to determine the temporality of benefits attributable to early surgery. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis using low-molecular-weight heparin is recommended by current guidelines for SCI. For these patients, titration of tidal volumes is important to balance the association of earlier weaning off the ventilator, with its risk of atelectasis, against the risk for lung damage from mechanical overinflation that can occur with prolonged ventilation. Careful evaluation of infection risk is a priority following multisystem trauma for patients with relative immunosuppression or compromise. Although patients with polytrauma may experience longer rehabilitation courses, long-term neurological recovery is generally comparable to that in patients with isolated SCI after controlling for demographics. Bowel and bladder disorders are common following SCI, significantly reduce quality of life, and constitute a focus of targeted therapies. Emerging biomarkers including glial fibrillary acidic protein, S100β, and microRNAs for traumatic SCIs are presented. Systematic management approaches to minimize sources of secondary injury are discussed, and areas requiring further research, implementation, and validation are identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John K Yue
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.,Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco; and
| | - Ethan A Winkler
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.,Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco; and
| | - Jonathan W Rick
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.,Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco; and
| | - Hansen Deng
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.,Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco; and
| | - Carlene P Partow
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.,Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco; and
| | - Pavan S Upadhyayula
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Harjus S Birk
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Andrew K Chan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.,Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco; and
| | - Sanjay S Dhall
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.,Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco; and
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Diduch BK, Hudson K, Resch JE, Shen F, Broshek DK, Brady W, Cole SL, Courson R, Castens T, Shimer A, Miller MD. Treatment of Head and Neck Injuries in the Helmeted Athlete. JBJS Rev 2016; 4:01874474-201603000-00002. [PMID: 27500432 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.15.00077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Sport-related concussion treatment includes three major phases: initial evaluation at the time of the injury, treatment while the patient is symptomatic, and evaluation of the readiness for a gradual return to participation. Each concussion evaluation should include similar elements: assessment of symptoms, assessment of cognitive ability, assessment of coordination (of the eyes, upper extremities, and lower extremities), and assessment for additional injuries. The spine-boarding recommendations from the American College of Emergency Physicians, National Association of EMS Physicians, and National Athletic Trainers' Association have changed. These recommendations include both decreased use of spinal immobilization and removal of the helmet and shoulder pads prior to securing the athlete to the board when sufficient numbers of trained providers are present. Preseason training and pregame meetings or "medical time outs" should become standard practice for the sidelines medical team (including the athletic trainer, team physician, emergency response personnel, and possibly others).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Kent Diduch
- Department of Health Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia
| | - Korin Hudson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital & Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| | - Jacob E Resch
- Department of Kinesiology (J.E.R.), Spine Division, Spine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (F.S.), Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences (D.K.B.), Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine (W.B.), Orthopedic Inpatient Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (A.S.), Division of Sports Medicine (M.D.M.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Francis Shen
- Department of Kinesiology (J.E.R.), Spine Division, Spine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (F.S.), Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences (D.K.B.), Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine (W.B.), Orthopedic Inpatient Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (A.S.), Division of Sports Medicine (M.D.M.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Donna K Broshek
- Department of Kinesiology (J.E.R.), Spine Division, Spine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (F.S.), Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences (D.K.B.), Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine (W.B.), Orthopedic Inpatient Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (A.S.), Division of Sports Medicine (M.D.M.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - William Brady
- Department of Kinesiology (J.E.R.), Spine Division, Spine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (F.S.), Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences (D.K.B.), Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine (W.B.), Orthopedic Inpatient Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (A.S.), Division of Sports Medicine (M.D.M.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | | | - Titus Castens
- Albemarle County Fire Rescue, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Adam Shimer
- Department of Kinesiology (J.E.R.), Spine Division, Spine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (F.S.), Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences (D.K.B.), Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine (W.B.), Orthopedic Inpatient Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (A.S.), Division of Sports Medicine (M.D.M.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Mark D Miller
- Department of Kinesiology (J.E.R.), Spine Division, Spine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (F.S.), Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences (D.K.B.), Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine (W.B.), Orthopedic Inpatient Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (A.S.), Division of Sports Medicine (M.D.M.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
White CC, Domeier RM, Millin MG. EMS spinal precautions and the use of the long backboard - resource document to the position statement of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2014; 18:306-14. [PMID: 24559236 DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2014.884197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Field spinal immobilization using a backboard and cervical collar has been standard practice for patients with suspected spine injury since the 1960s. The backboard has been a component of field spinal immobilization despite lack of efficacy evidence. While the backboard is a useful spinal protection tool during extrication, use of backboards is not without risk, as they have been shown to cause respiratory compromise, pain, and pressure sores. Backboards also alter a patient's physical exam, resulting in unnecessary radiographs. Because backboards present known risks, and their value in protecting the spinal cord of an injured patient remains unsubstantiated, they should only be used judiciously. The following provides a discussion of the elements of the National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) and American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) position statement on EMS spinal precautions and the use of the long backboard. This discussion includes items where there is supporting literature and items where additional science is needed.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ala A, Shams Vahdati S, Seyyedghiasi G. Evaluation of Trauma Patient Transport via Emergency Medical Services in Tabriz. Trauma Mon 2012; 17:262-3. [PMID: 24829896 PMCID: PMC4004994 DOI: 10.5812/traumamon.4634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2012] [Revised: 03/01/2012] [Accepted: 03/10/2012] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Ala
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran
| | - Samad Shams Vahdati
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran
- Corresponding author: Samad Shams Vahdati, Department of Emergency Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran, Tel: +98-4116581401, Fax: +98-4116552876,
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ahn H, Singh J, Nathens A, MacDonald RD, Travers A, Tallon J, Fehlings MG, Yee A. Pre-hospital care management of a potential spinal cord injured patient: a systematic review of the literature and evidence-based guidelines. J Neurotrauma 2010; 28:1341-61. [PMID: 20175667 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2009.1168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
An interdisciplinary expert panel of medical and surgical specialists involved in the management of patients with potential spinal cord injuries (SCI) was assembled. Four key questions were created that were of significant interest. These were: (1) what is the optimal type and duration of pre-hospital spinal immobilization in patients with acute SCI?; (2) during airway manipulation in the pre-hospital setting, what is the ideal method of spinal immobilization?; (3) what is the impact of pre-hospital transport time to definitive care on the outcomes of patients with acute spinal cord injury?; and (4) what is the role of pre-hospital care providers in cervical spine clearance and immobilization? A systematic review utilizing multiple databases was performed to determine the current evidence about the specific questions, and each article was independently reviewed and assessed by two reviewers based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Guidelines were then created related to the questions by a national Canadian expert panel using the Delphi method for reviewing the evidence-based guidelines about each question. Recommendations about the key questions included: the pre-hospital immobilization of patients using a cervical collar, head immobilization, and a spinal board; utilization of padded boards or inflatable bean bag boards to reduce pressure; transfer of patients off of spine boards as soon as feasible, including transfer of patients off spinal boards while awaiting transfer from one hospital institution to another hospital center for definitive care; inclusion of manual in-line cervical spine traction for airway management in patients requiring intubation in the pre-hospital setting; transport of patients with acute traumatic SCI to the definitive hospital center for care within 24 h of injury; and training of emergency medical personnel in the pre-hospital setting to apply criteria to clear patients of cervical spinal injuries, and immobilize patients suspected of having cervical spinal injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Ahn
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|