CPR Induced Consciousness During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Case Report on an Emerging Phenomenon

CPR-Induced Consciousness during Ventricular Fibrillation: Case Report and Literature Review

Introduction

Over the years, numerous studies have suggested the occurrence of a peculiar phenomenon known as "CPRIC" during the revival process. The revelation of this phenomenon has ignited widespread discussion and investigation, yet many enigmas remain unsolved. This study describes the case of a 52-year-old man diagnosed with acute anterior myocardial infarction, who experienced ventricular fibrillation while awaiting further treatment. Despite ultimately not regaining spontaneous circulation, he remained conscious for a period during chest compressions and showed signs of resistance.

Methods

PubMed and Web of Science were searched until July 11, 2024. We included original studies and case reports relevant to CPRIC. For case reports, we extracted information on the author (year), country, patients, location, compression, signs of CPRIC, treatment of CPRIC, and patient outcomes. For other studies, we included the author (year), country, participants, and results. The extracted data were synthesized using a narrative approach.

Results

Of 3038 articles, 32 were included, i.e., 18 case reports (24 cases), 9 cross-sectional surveys, and 5 cohort studies. In CPRIC cases, patients exhibited various manifestations including opening their eyes, speaking, and moving. Other included studies explored healthcare workers' awareness and experiences of CPRIC, the incidence and manifestations of CPRIC, the impact of CPRIC on patient outcomes, memories and perceptions of cardiac arrest indicating consciousness, the effects of CPRIC on rescuers, and the management of CPRIC.

Conclusions

There is an urgent need to establish a globally recognized definition of CPRIC. It is crucial to develop clear algorithms that focus not only on identifying this phenomenon but also on determining the best approaches to manage it. Furthermore, CPRIC can cause multiple interruptions during CPR, making it essential to differentiate whether these interruptions are due to CPRIC or indicative of a return of spontaneous circulation.

Expert opinion on evidence after the 2020 Korean Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Guidelines: a secondary publication

Considerable evidence has been published since the 2020 Korean Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Guidelines were reported. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) also publishes the Consensus on CPR and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) summary annually. This review provides expert opinions by reviewing the recent evidence on CPR and ILCOR treatment recommendations. The authors reviewed the CoSTR summary published by ILCOR in 2021 and 2022. PICO (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome) questions for each topic were reviewed using a systemic or scoping review methodology. Two experts were appointed for each question and reviewed the topic independently. Topics suggested by the reviewers for revision or additional description of the guidelines were discussed at a consensus conference. Forty-three questions were reviewed, including 15 on basic life support, seven on advanced life support, two on pediatric life support, 11 on neonatal life support, six on education and teams, one on first aid, and one related to COVID-19. Finally, the current Korean CPR Guideline was maintained for 28 questions, and expert opinions were suggested for 15 questions.

Analgesic Use in Patients during Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation

INTRODUCTION

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation-induced consciousness is a newly recognized phenomenon with an increasing incidence. A return of consciousness during cardiopulmonary resuscitation affects up to 0.9% of cases. Patients may also experience physical pain associated with chest compressions, as most victims of cardiac arrest who are subjected to resuscitative efforts sustain ribs or sternum fractures.

METHODS

A rapid review was carried out from August 2021 to December 2022.

RESULTS

Thirty-two articles were included in the rapid review. Of these, eleven studies focused on the return of consciousness during CPR, and twenty-one on CPR-induced chest injuries.

CONCLUSION

A small number of studies that have dealt with the return of consciousness associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation made it hard to clearly determine how often this occurs. There were more studies that dealt with chest trauma during resuscitation, but no study considered the use of analgesics. Of note, there was no standardized therapeutic approach as far as the use of analgesics and/or sedatives was considered. This is probably due to the lack of guidelines for analgesic management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and peri-resuscitative period.

Looking back to inform the future: a review of published paramedicine research

OBJECTIVE

Paramedicine has evolved in ways that may outpace the science informing these changes. Examining the scholarly pursuits of paramedicine may provide insights into the historical academic focus, which may inform future endeavors and evolution of paramedicine. The objective of this study was to explore the existing discourse in paramedicine research to reflect on the academic pursuits of this community.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Google Scholar and Web of Science from January, 2006 to April, 2019. We further refined the yield using a ranking formula that prioritized journals most relevant to paramedicine, then sampled randomly in two-year clusters for full text review. We extracted literature type, study topic and context, then used elements of qualitative content, thematic, and discourse analysis to further describe the sample.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 99,124 citations, leaving 54,638 after removing duplicates and 7084 relevant articles from nine journals after ranking. Subsequently, 2058 articles were included for topic categorization, and 241 papers were included for full text analysis after random sampling. Overall, this literature reveals: 1) a relatively narrow topic focus, given the majority of research has concentrated on general operational activities and specific clinical conditions and interventions (e.g., resuscitation, airway management, etc.); 2) a limited methodological (and possibly philosophical) focus, given that most were observational studies (e.g., cohort, case control, and case series) or editorial/commentary; 3) a variety of observed trajectories of academic attention, indicating where the evolution of paramedicine is evident, areas where scope of practice is uncertain, and areas that aim to improve skills historically considered core to paramedic clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Included articles suggest a relatively narrow topic focus, a limited methodological focus, and observed trajectories of academic attention indicating where research pursuits and priorities are shifting. We have highlighted that the academic focus may require an alignment with aspirational and direction setting documents aimed at developing paramedicine. This review may be a snapshot of scholarly activity that reflects a young medically directed profession and systems focusing on a few high acuity conditions, with aspirations of professional autonomy contributing to the health and social well-being of communities.

Pre-hospital guidelines for CPR-Induced Consciousness (CPRIC): A scoping review

Background

CPR-Induced Consciousness is an emerging phenomenon with a paucity of consensus guidelines from peak resuscitative bodies. Local prehospital services have had to implement their own CPR-Induced Consciousness guidelines. This scoping review aims to identify prehospital CPR-Induced Consciousness guidelines and compare or contrast their management options.

Objective

The purpose of this scoping review is to identify and compare as many prehospital CPR-Induced Consciousness guidelines as feasible, highlight common management trends, and discuss the factors that might impact CPR-Induced Consciousness guidelines and the management trends identified.

Design

To search for prehospital CPR-Induced Consciousness guidelines, a bibliographical search of five databases was undertaken (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Scopus, and CINAHL plus). Also included was a grey literature search arm, comprised of four search strategies: 1. Customised Google search, 2. Hand searching of targeted websites, 3. Grey literature databases, 4. Consultation with subject experts.

Results

Our search extracted 23 prehospital CPR-Induced Consciousness guidelines and one good practise statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Of the 23 prehospital guidelines available, we identified 20 different ways of treating CPR-Induced Consciousness. Midazolam was the most frequently used drug to treat CPR-Induced Consciousness (14/23, 61%), followed by Ketamine (11/23, 48%) and Fentanyl (9/23, 39%).

Conclusion

Prehospital CPR-Induced Consciousness guidelines are both exceptionally uncommon and vary substantially from each other. This has a flow-on effect towards data collection and only serves to continue CPR-Induced Consciousness's relatively unknown status surrounding both knowledge of, and the effect CPR-Induced Consciousness treatment has on cardiac arrest outcomes.

2021 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; First Aid Task Forces; and the COVID-19 Working Group

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the fifth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews in this summary include resuscitation topics of video-based dispatch systems; head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation; early coronary angiography after return of spontaneous circulation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone patient; cord management at birth for preterm and term infants; devices for administering positive-pressure ventilation at birth; family presence during neonatal resuscitation; self-directed, digitally based basic life support education and training in adults and children; coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk to rescuers from patients in cardiac arrest; and first aid topics, including cooling with water for thermal burns, oral rehydration for exertional dehydration, pediatric tourniquet use, and methods of tick removal. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations or good practice statements. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

2021 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; First Aid Task Forces; and the COVID-19 Working Group

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the fifth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews in this summary include resuscitation topics of video-based dispatch systems; head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation; early coronary angiography after return of spontaneous circulation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone patient; cord management at birth for preterm and term infants; devices for administering positive-pressure ventilation at birth; family presence during neonatal resuscitation; self-directed, digitally based basic life support education and training in adults and children; coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk to rescuers from patients in cardiac arrest; and first aid topics, including cooling with water for thermal burns, oral rehydration for exertional dehydration, pediatric tourniquet use, and methods of tick removal. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations or good practice statements. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

An exploration of UK paramedics' experiences of cardiopulmonary resuscitation-induced consciousness

Introduction:

Consciousness may occur during cardiopulmonary resuscitation despite the absence of a palpable pulse. This phenomenon, known as CPR-Induced Consciousness (CPR-IC), was first described over three decades ago and there has been an increase in case reports describing it. However, there remains limited evidence in relation to the incidence of CPR-IC and to practitioners’ experiences of it.

Methods:

A mixed-methods, cross-sectional survey of paramedics who were registered with the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) and working in the United Kingdom (UK) at the time of the survey. Participants who had experienced CPR-IC were asked to provide details about the number of episodes, a description of how consciousness was manifested and whether or not it interfered with resuscitation.

Results:

293 eligible participants completed the study and 167 (57%) said that they had witnessed CPR-IC. Of those, over 56% reported that they had experienced it on at least two occasions. CPR-IC was deemed to interfere with resuscitation in nearly 50% of first experiences but this fell to around 31% by the third experience. The most common reasons for CPR-IC to interfere with resuscitation were: patient resisting clinical interventions, increased rhythm and pulse checks, distress, confusion and reluctance to perform CPR.

Conclusions:

The prevalence of CPR-IC in our study was similar to that in earlier studies; however, unlike the other studies, we did not define what constituted interfering CPR-IC. Our findings suggest that interference may be related as much to the exposure of the clinician to CPR-IC as to any specific characteristic of the phenomenon itself.

Prognostic value of signs of life throughout cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

PURPOSE

Prognostication of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is essential for selecting the population that may benefit from extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). We aimed to examine the prognostic value of signs of life before or throughout conventional CPR for individuals undergoing ECPR for refractory OHCA.

METHODS

Pooling the original data from three cohort studies, we estimated the prevalence of signs of life, for individuals with refractory OHCA resuscitated with ECPR. We performed multivariable logistic regression to examine the independent associations between the occurrence of signs of life and 30-day survival with a CPC score ≤ 2.

RESULTS

The analytical sample consisted of 434 ECPR recipients. The prevalence of any sign of life was 61%, including pupillary light reaction (48%), gasping (32%), or increased level of consciousness (13%). Thirty-day survival with favorable neurological outcome was 15% (63/434). In multivariable analysis, the adjusted odds ratios of 30-day survival with favorable neurological outcome were 7.35 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.71-19.97), 5.86 (95% CI, 2.28-15.06), 4.79 (95% CI, 2.16-10.63), and 1.75 (95% CI, 0.95-3.21) for any sign of life, pupillary light reaction, increased level of consciousness, and gasping, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of signs of life before or throughout CPR substantially improves the accuracy of a multivariable prognostic model in predicting 30-day survival with favorable neurological outcome. The lack of any sign of life might obviate the provision of ECPR for patients without shockable cardiac rhythm.

A review of pre-hospital case series among those with time to double external defibrillation and neurologic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Double external defibrillation (DED) has been used as a final effort to terminate refractory ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardiac (rVF/pVT). Data surrounding time to DED and patient-centered outcomes remains limited.

OBJECTIVES

This study summarizes patient-level data from case-series of observed survival and neurologic outcomes following the use of DED for rVF/pVT among those with data regarding time to DED.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE (OVID interface), and Scopus from January 1, 2000, through January 5, 2020. The literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two investigators independently conducted the literature search, study selection, and data extraction.

RESULTS

Our database search identified 3139 records. Of these, 1660 studies were eliminated following inspection of the titles and 22 studies underwent full-text screening, three included in the final analysis, describing a total of 29 cases. All studies were considered to have critical risk of bias. For the critical outcomes of survival to discharge and neurologically intact survival we identified that patients who received DED before 30 min from collapse compared to those who received DED after 30 min had better survival to discharge (33.3% [5/15] vs. 7.1% [1/14]) and neurologically intact survival (20.0% [3/15] vs. 7.1% [1/14]). Overall, 20.6% of patients survived to discharge, 13.8% with neurologically intact survival. It is noteworthy that the patients who were discharged with a CPC of 1 received two, four, five, and three standard shocks before receiving DED, and the time between their onset of cardiac arrest to their first DED attempt was recorded to be 15, 26, 26, and 32 min, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We would like to indicate that there is not enough evidence to suggest that early use of pre-hospital DED is associated with improved outcomes. Further research should strive to address these issues before conclusions can be drawn.

Prehospital Double Defibrillation for Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation: A Scoping Review Protocol

Double defibrillation (DD) has been proposed as an alternative treatment for patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/pVT) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) nonresponsive to the best current standard of care. Treatment results are promising, but the efficacy and safety of the procedure remain unclear. Currently, there is a paucity of evidence in the literature on DD suggesting the optimal strategy for treating this challenging patient population. Thus, we aim to perform a scoping review to explore the current literature addressing resuscitative parameters, survival rates, and neurological outcomes in refractory VF/pVT OHCA patients treated with DD as well as to identify gaps in the literature that may require further research. Here, we discuss the anticipated study protocol.

Double sequential defibrillation for out-of-hospital refractory ventricular fibrillation: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Double sequential defibrillation (DSD) has been proposed as a viable treatment option for patients in refractory ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/pVT) out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). However, currently there is insufficient evidence to support a widespread implementation of this therapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The aim of this scoping review was to summarize the current available evidence of DSD for patients with refractory VF/pVT OHCA as well as to identify gaps in the literature that may require further research.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase via Ovid, and Scopus on August 19, 2019. We also checked reference lists of relevant papers to identify additional studies. Any controlled clinical study design (randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials), and observational studies (cohort studies and case-control studies) providing information on resuscitative parameters, survival rates and neurological outcomes in adults (≥ 18 years old) treated with DSD for refractory VF/pVT OHCA were included. Two investigators independently conducted the literature search, study selection, and data extraction.

RESULTS

The search yielded 1612 unique records, of which 4 peer-reviewed articles were found relating to the research purpose, totaling 1061 patients of who 20.5% (n = 217) received DSD. Most studies evaluated if pre-hospital DSD was associated with improved survival to discharge after refractory VF/pVT. No randomized controlled trials were identified.

CONCLUSION

To date, it is difficult to conclude the real benefit of DSD for patients in refractory VF based on the available evidence. The findings of this scoping review suggest there is limited evidence to support at large-scale the use of DSD for refractory VF/pVT OHCA. Further research is needed to better characterize and understand the use of DSD for refractory VF/pVT, in order to implement best practices to maximize the effectiveness and efficiency of care.

The evolving role of novel treatment techniques in the management of patients with refractory VF/pVT out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this review is to provide a brief overview of new life-saving interventions and novel techniques that have been proposed as viable treatment options for patients presenting with refractory ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/pVT) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed recent, Medline and Embase databases via the Ovid interface and Google Scholar from inception to July 2019. Eligible studies were observational in nature reporting outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), esmolol, double sequential defibrillation (DSD), and stellate ganglion block (SGB). Two investigators conducted the literature search, study selection, and data extraction. Any disagreements were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

Our database search identified 5331 records. We included in our review 23 articles that met our inclusion criteria. The selected studies included 16 observational studies on ECMO, 2 observational studies on esmolol, and 5 observational studies on DSD.

CONCLUSION

We would like to suggest that there is not enough evidence in the existing literature to support at large-scale the effects of these techniques in the treatment of refractory VF/pVT OHCA. Randomized studies are warranted to evaluate the significant effects of these approaches against the best current standard of care.

BET 2: Pain management in patients who show awareness during CPR

A shortcut review was carried out to establish whether pin management or sedation is indicated to improve outcome in patients who show signs of awareness during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Seven papers presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of these papers are tabulated. It is concluded that awareness during CPR or CPR-induced consciousness is rare but increasingly reported. Further research is needed before definite guidance can be given. Local advice should be followed.

Approach to cardiopulmonary resuscitation induced consciousness, an emergency medicine perspective

BACKGROUND

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains the key intervention following cardiac arrest because of its ability to continue circulation. Recent focus on high quality compressions during CPR has coincided with more frequent encounters of CPR Induced Consciousness (CPRIC). CPRIC represents a poorly understood patient experience during CPR and defined as signs of consciousness and pain perception during CPR.

METHODS

Articles were selected using PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus search for the keywords "cardiopulmonary resuscitation", "consciousness", "awareness", "resuscitation", "cardio-cerebral resuscitation", "agitation" and "patient experience" yielding 336 articles. Results and their references were assessed for relevance. Articles were filtered by English language and the keyword. Case reports and case series were included. All remaining articles were reviewed and findings were discussed.

RESULTS

A total of ten articles were selected, which included data on 123 cases. Sample size varied per study from 1 to 112. Studies included cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and in hospital cardiac arrest. Compressions were manually provided in most cases. Patient total recall was reported in 40% of cases. Use of sedation was reported in 40% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

There is need for continued research to better describe, explain and manage the phenomena of CPRIC. From the articles reviewed here, it is clear that further investigation has the potential to properly elucidate the patient experience including lasting psychological effects of CPRIC. Importantly, there is need for more than recognition of CPRIC from national authorities. Future research efforts should focus on establishing guidelines for the use of sedation and physical restraints, as well as the potential impact of treating CPRIC on survival.

Cardiac arrest teams perspectives on communication and ethical conflicts related to awareness during CPR, a focus group study protocol

Background

Awareness during Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) also called CPR induced consciousness (CPRIC) is a rare, but increasingly reported condition with significant clinical implications. Health professionals lack guidelines about patients with CPRIC, and to this date, no studies have addressed the complexity of communication and ethical aspects when continuing CPR while the patient is conscious.

Methods

We aim to explore Cardiac arrest team members perspectives regarding communication and ethical conflicts related to awareness during CPR. We have designed a qualitative, descriptive study using focus groups to discuss and reflect on patients with awareness during CPR. Focus groups consist of cardiac arrest team members (senior and training medical doctors, nurses and hospital porters). We will be presenting already published case reports about patients with CPRIC to focus groups to facilitate discussion and debate regarding the team members perceptions. Data analysis is inductive and based on systematic text condensation.

Discussion

Previous studies have suggested that external stressors affect the performance of a Cardiac arrest team. As a result of our analysis, we will aim to describe communicative and ethical challenges and concerns regarding awareness during CPR. Recent studies in the area point to a desire for guidelines and we hope to contribute with knowledge, that can inform the further process when developing guidelines and training team members to handle these stressful and important cases.

Trial registration

The study involves no healthcare intervention on human participants.